[Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS workaround question

2003-06-19 Thread Nick Hayer
Is there a way to use this test on domains that receive forwarded email? Ex someone from AOL sends an email to a server that automatically forwards the email to the server that is running DJM. Since the sending server DJM sees is not aol.com/netscape.net in this example the email incorrectly

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.75 (release version) released

2003-07-22 Thread Nick Hayer
Great! Question though regarding previous beta tests, will they be added to the manual or are they abandonded? Thanks -Nick Hayer Date sent: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:46:54 -0400 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A good SD.TXT File?

2003-07-22 Thread Nick Hayer
I give it a much lower rate because it will fail legitimate forwarded email. This is the only issue I have discovered - -Nick Hayer Giving it a weight of 20 but be careful that this is not the only test it will fail as it can be dangerous to block from the large domains

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OSRELAY question.

2003-08-27 Thread Nick Hayer
accurate results and are not duplicates of each other? Would it be possible for you to make a new recommended list? -Nick Hayer --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test based on results of other tests

2003-09-03 Thread Nick Hayer
Folks, Is there a test that can be based on the results of 2 or more other specific tests? ex: an email that fails both HELOBOGUS and BADHEADERS would fail HELOHEAD and have x number of points added/deducted to it? Thanks Nick --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Junkmail Tests and Configs

2003-11-12 Thread Nick Hayer
Jonathan, Here is my setup - hopefully it will help. Anyone feel free to tell me what I have messed up... -Nick #GLOBAL.CFG edited # #SETTINGS CONSOLE ON HOP 0

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Junkmail Tests and Configs

2003-11-12 Thread Nick Hayer
subjectspaces15x10 SUBSPACE-25subjectspaces25x20 SUBSPACE-40subjectspaces40x30 Matt Nick Hayer wrote: Jonathan, Here is my setup - hopefully it will help. Anyone feel free to tell me what I have messed up

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] dns blacklist

2003-11-12 Thread Nick Hayer
-Nick Hayer --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamAssassin SPAMC/SPAMD and Declude working for me...I think!

2003-11-18 Thread Nick Hayer
Sandy, I am definitely interested! -Nick Hayer All, I believe I've gotten one of our sites up and running with SPAMD under Cygwin (server implementation of SpamAssassin that's much, much faster than native Win32/ActivePerl SA, even running under Cygwin shell

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT DNS question unable to receive mail

2003-11-20 Thread Nick Hayer
[I post to this list from my day job address] Have a new host called jrny.tv At http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/lookup.ch?name=jrny.tvtype=MX all looks kool - it points to my servers vtbass.com But the servers never get the mail... At http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/mail.ch?domain=jrny.tv I

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT DNS question unable to receive mail

2003-11-20 Thread Nick Hayer
I just saw that. No question my fault. Date sent: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 17:29:21 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT DNS question unable to receive mail Send reply

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] This one eBay fraud.. came right through..

2003-11-20 Thread Nick Hayer
Kami, Would you care to share your FILTER-BODYURL filter? I'm interested in seeing what you filter on - Thanks! -Nick Hayer From: Kami Razvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:[Declude.JunkMail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BODY STARTSWITH

2003-11-25 Thread Nick Hayer
Wow! Very kool. Thanks Scott! -Nick Date sent: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 15:11:33 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BODY STARTSWITH Send reply to:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BODY STARTSWITH

2003-11-25 Thread Nick Hayer
Scott, Is there an order to which tests are executed in the global config? Are filterfiles read/executed last? Is there any way to determine the order that each filterfile is run ? Thanks -Nick Hayer Date sent: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 15:11:33 -0500

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BODY STARTSWITH

2003-11-25 Thread Nick Hayer
Thanks Scott! Another question: Very kool addition but I'm having trouble with MAXWEIGHT Gotta be simple but I just don't get it: DJMPro v1.76i27 I created a filter called testfilter.txt it contains SKIPIFWEIGHT 40 MAXWEIGHT 20 HEADERS 1 CONTAINSfrom I sent myself an

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Clarification..needed

2003-11-26 Thread Nick Hayer
Scott, Sure seems to work like a charm. Again - very kool! -Nick There is a new interim release (1.76i28) at http://www.declude.com/release/176i/declude.exe that changes the way that the weight is calculated (in i27 it would count negative weights, but no longer will), and

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] improved performance using ramdrive?

2003-11-26 Thread Nick Hayer
Frederick - I suggest you try the new feature in the latest intrim release that has these commands avail: SKIPIFWEIGHT and MAXWEIGHT Place your compensatory filters [ones that reduce scoring] in the global config ahead of the other filter files. For me frankly most of my filters do not even

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamchk fine tuning?

2003-12-02 Thread Nick Hayer
Matt - What I did was in the beta version set a max weight and a min weight to be returned. [I have it set now at 8 and -2 respectivly.] Then let it run and check the log file to see what is failing - adjust accordingly. I ended up reducing the scores for failures in the ini by ~50+%

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] F-prot updates

2003-12-03 Thread Nick Hayer
with scheduling the updates but this alias is kinda neat and it hopefully gets me the updates right off. -Nick Hayer Markus --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MAILFROM vs FROMFILE

2003-12-12 Thread Nick Hayer
Is MAILFROM in a filterfile equivalent to an entry in a FROMFILE? Is there an advantage to use one over the other? Thanks! -Nick Hayer --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF BIND OT question

2003-12-18 Thread Nick Hayer
for each mailserver? Thanks! -Nick Hayer Date sent: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:33:38 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta Send

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] PREWHITELIST ON Question

2003-12-18 Thread Nick Hayer
Scott - I have PREWHITELIST ON however all tests seem to be run on an email regardless - then when tests are completed the email is whitelisted. Is this broke or am I misunderstanding PREWHITELIST eg: if switched ON then testing will be done? - Thanks! -Nick Hayer snip 12

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow

2003-12-22 Thread Nick Hayer
control list. Currently that list contains nearly 10,000 ip's... -Nick Hayer Matt Fritz Squib wrote: Hey guys, this sounds like same problem that I have been experiencing, however it has been a bunch of spam with c.c. 's to non-existant mail addresses on my

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Additional IP4R RHSBL tests

2003-12-23 Thread Nick Hayer
-Nick Hayer From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:[Declude.JunkMail] Additional IP4R RHSBL tests Date sent: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 11:21:45 -0800 Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have been

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Comments test

2003-12-24 Thread Nick Hayer
- -Nick Hayer From: Omar K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:[Declude.JunkMail] Comments test Date sent: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 21:21:17 +0200 Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maybe im not quite

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Comments test **Answered

2003-12-24 Thread Nick Hayer
Kami, The filters do work with the embeded html. I just sent myself a test email with the Medicat/ and it was snagged. Go home. Merry xmas! -Nick Hayer From: Kami Razvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Adult phrase filter

2003-12-26 Thread Nick Hayer
caught in other words, like document and analog Try IS rather than CONTAINS? -Nick Hayer I'm using 2 filters, one filter adds weight based on keywords the other removes weight based on keywords. Thanks Gene Head ACCRAM Inc. MCP,Net+,A+,CCNA,CCDA [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Adult phrase filter

2003-12-26 Thread Nick Hayer
in regular email but are often in spam eg: ANYWHERE IS semen semen =basement -Nick Hayer -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers. Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Sorting log another question

2003-12-30 Thread Nick Hayer
Scott - Do you have a handy dandy way of finding all the messages that were delivered Message OK *and* failed a certain test? Like all the messages that were successfully delivered that failed SPAMDOMAINS. Even a count would be nice - Thanks -Nick Hayer If you are just

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamD/SpamC for Declude

2004-01-12 Thread Nick Hayer
Hi Russ, I have it set for 8. I hold on 10 delete on 30. It runs on my mailserver. In local.cf I have required_hits 3.00 -Nick Hayer Date sent: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:55:47 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Russ Uhte

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamD/SpamC for Declude

2004-01-12 Thread Nick Hayer
of its results? -Nick Hayer -Russ --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMC32 (SpamAssassin SPAMC for Declude) 0.5.55 released

2004-01-13 Thread Nick Hayer
I tried this without success. Sandy's port for me is *much* slicker - -Nick Hayer From: Rick Klinge [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMC32 (SpamAssassin SPAMC for Declude) 0.5.55

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] *OT* Web dns management console

2004-01-13 Thread Nick Hayer
Can anyone recommend a web interfaced dns management console for end users? Want end users to be able to manage their own domains eg: adding, deleting, edits. Thanks much! -Nick Hayer --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] *OT* Web dns management console

2004-01-13 Thread Nick Hayer
2004 11:56:12 -0800 Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] You did not mention the DNS server being used. like BIND, Simple DNS, MS DNS??? Kevin Bilbee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nick Hayer Sent: Tuesday, January

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting concept..

2004-01-20 Thread Nick Hayer
Marc, Would you share your filter? Save me some efforts! Thanks -Nick From: Marc Hilliker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting concept.. Date sent: Tue, 20 Jan 2004

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist filter

2004-01-22 Thread Nick Hayer
Scott - Performance wise would one be better off maxing out the global config [200 entries] with WHITELISTS and then use WHITELIST in a filter file? OR the filter file exclusively? Thanks -Nick Hayer Date sent: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:59:49 -0500

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2004-01-23 Thread Nick Hayer
daily like me to also ask for a spiffy manual. I feel it has to be one or the other and for that reason no complaints at all on my end. Great job! -Nick Hayer Subject:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Test for SPAM from AOL, Yahoo

2004-01-28 Thread Nick Hayer
Would you mind posting your global.cfg? Redact whatever you want private. With that maybe some good suggestions can be made -Nick Hayer From: TC Online Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Test for SPAM from AOL, Yahoo

2004-01-28 Thread Nick Hayer
. -Nick Hayer From: TC Online Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Test for SPAM from AOL, Yahoo Date sent: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:55:08 -0600 Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [IMail Forum] Continuous statistical filter updates?

2004-02-04 Thread Nick Hayer
. If not, per-domain can sometimes be acceptable. Server-wide statistical databases fare worse. I have baynesian filtering enabled on Sandy's implimentation of SpamAssassin server wide. Am I just wasting cpu cycles/decreasing SA effectiveness by including this? Thanks -Nick Hayer --- [This E-mail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [IMail Forum] Continuous statistical filte r updates?

2004-02-04 Thread Nick Hayer
is not worth using, but that the filters in SpamAssassin are worth keeping. Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: Nick Hayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 8:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [IMail Forum] Continuous statistical

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Not really a white list..

2004-02-11 Thread Nick Hayer
believe is in the current beta] Not sure I should bring up features that are not in the manual. Do not want to start a documentation thread - however these tools are handy and info to config is 100% in the archives. -Nick Hayer That's what we do and it works well. I believe

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HOP HIGH / Spam Tests

2004-02-26 Thread Nick Hayer
! -Nick Hayer --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude version

2004-03-03 Thread Nick Hayer
type declude at the \imail prompt more info is declude -diag -Nick Hayer Date sent: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 16:45:20 -0500 From: Bud Durland [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] declude virus - additional info

2004-03-03 Thread Nick Hayer
is not a problem, I'm just not sure of the command line needed. I do - email me off list and I will send you my batch file. I run it every 4 hrs. [There are others on the Declude website as well.] -Nick Hayer We're at a point were I've convinced Mgmnt that if they want zips

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] e-commerce counter weights

2004-03-29 Thread Nick Hayer
'Order shipped' , etc. I make compensatory.txt the first filter in global.cfg also; to be sure SKIPIFWEIGHT feature is used in the other filter files. -Nick Hayer Thank you for making YourNET Connection your connection to the world Jim O'Keefe Technical Support @YourNET

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Internet Usage Monitoring

2004-03-30 Thread Nick Hayer
On 30 Mar 2004 at 12:43, Kevin Bilbee wrote: Here we *used* a product called LittleBrother. It would produce complete tracking reports for every user. Very complete. Simple to use. Not sure if it is still avail. We stopped using it because of privacy/union concerns. -Nick

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Passing weight to Externalplus test

2004-04-08 Thread Nick Hayer
to your products. You listen to your customers.. -Nick Hayer -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers since 2000. Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver vulnerability detection

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Notification to customers of change of ownership

2004-04-12 Thread Nick Hayer
On 12 Apr 2004 at 14:44, R. Scott Perry wrote: Don't worry, I will continue answering questions here (and on the IMail Forum). :) If Chucky Barry don't work you promise you won't leave us correct? -Nick Hayer -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Log analysis and test check scripts

2004-04-21 Thread Nick Hayer
On 21 Apr 2004 at 21:24, Roger Eriksson wrote: *very* nice job Roger - Thanks! -Nick Hayer Hi, My log analysis and test check scripts are available for download at: http://www.botany.gu.se/download/decludescript/LOG_analysis.zip http://www.botany.gu.se/download/decludescript

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Using RHSBL's for reverse DNS entries

2004-05-13 Thread Nick Hayer
On 13 May 2004 at 16:57, R. Scott Perry wrote: Scott, For the test type below you have dnsbl ; I have only been using rhsbl and ip4r - are these just names to flag the type of test in global.cfg or are different actions taken on each? [Hope I am somewhat clear on this..] -Nick Hayer

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Using RHSBL's for reverse DNS entries

2004-05-13 Thread Nick Hayer
On 13 May 2004 at 17:16, R. Scott Perry wrote: kool - thanks! -Nick For the test type below you have dnsbl ; I have only been using rhsbl and ip4r - are these just names to flag the type of test in global.cfg or are different actions taken on each? [Hope I am somewhat clear on

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Latest interim

2004-05-11 Thread Nick Hayer
On 11 May 2004 at 14:38, Darin Cox wrote: Boys, Scott is very knowledgeable, helpful, and quick to assist. He is also as stuborn as an old dog. He is not going to change the way he tags his releases, or writes his manual. No biggie. I suggest the good outweighs the bad... -Nick Hayer

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] f-prot

2004-05-17 Thread Nick Hayer
out with protection for a new outbreak before another. The downside is cost and cpu overhead. For the latter there is an outstanding request to Scott to kill additional scanning once a scanner detects a virus.. -Nick Hayer I realize that the cost of F-Prot (which I am using) is quite low

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] f-prot

2004-05-18 Thread Nick Hayer
Insight. -Nick Hayer Thanks, Aaron Caviglia On May 17, 2004, at 8:23 PM, Goran Jovanovic wrote: For the latter there is an outstanding request to Scott to kill additional scanning once a scanner detects a virus.. So right now if you use multiple scanners when you scan

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] f-prot

2004-05-18 Thread Nick Hayer
On 17 May 2004 at 23:23, Goran Jovanovic wrote: So right now if you use multiple scanners when you scan with ScannerA and it finds a virus Declude will still call ScannerB and have it scan as well? Correct. Scott has said this is on his todo list.. -Nick Hayer Scott pointed out that his

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Tips for handling dictionary attacks

2004-05-18 Thread Nick Hayer
On 18 May 2004 at 12:45, Matt wrote: Very slick Matt great idea! -Nick Hayer One other thing. Unless you have a ton of traffic (~100,000/day) or have people doing BCC blasts from your server to hundreds of addresses, there is a setting in IMail 8.x that can slow down the dictionary

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] f-prot

2004-05-18 Thread Nick Hayer
a freebe..] -Nick Hayer Thanks, Ben - Original Message - From: John Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 12:56 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] f-prot Do you have a CDW product number on this? Called and they took forever to come

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted- getting thru

2004-05-19 Thread Nick Hayer
On 19 May 2004 at 9:04, Richard Farris wrote: Kinda - there is a test called BYPASSWHITELIST http://www.mail- archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg17561.html Hope this helps! -Nick Hayer I have noticed that some of the spam getting thru is because a I have several in my whitelist and even

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Feature request: COMBO tests

2004-05-19 Thread Nick Hayer
for the multiple DUL issue by using custom filters [In the archives you will find exactly this example provided by Matt] This works well - a feature request for NOTCONTAINS has been made and will improve the method -Nick Hayer --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Feature request: COMBO tests

2004-05-19 Thread Nick Hayer
- Original Message - From: Nick Hayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Darin Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 4:48 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Feature request: COMBO tests Hi Darin - On 19 May 2004 at 15:10, Darin Cox wrote: I would like to be able

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNSstuff Website

2004-05-20 Thread Nick Hayer
My best guess is - Chuck Berry - whoever now own Declude can't fix it. Scott is on a cruise. No internet. No phone. When Scott returns he will reboot the box - for now we just have to make do.. -Nick Hayer On 20 May 2004 at 11:45, Matt Robertson wrote: I have been using

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Are tests executed?

2004-05-20 Thread Nick Hayer
the action to take. Cheers - -Nick Hayer Thanx Goran Jovanovic The LAN Shoppe --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Are tests executed?

2004-05-20 Thread Nick Hayer
On 20 May 2004 at 13:34, John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote: Incorrect. While it is true of the action, the weight will still be added. Yup - I was thinking about 0 [zero] scoring and taking an action in the applicable junkmail file. Sorry about the misinformation.. -Nick Hayer . --- [This E

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] trip

2004-05-24 Thread Nick Hayer
Welcome back Scott - how was your trip? Any details? Were you looking for property in the islands now that you are flush with cash? -Nick Hayer --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack OT Windows IP question

2004-05-26 Thread Nick Hayer
? I also have DJMPro. OT Question: SVList does not have a setting to work off a particular IP. Is there a way to make an IP on a windows box 'primary' or 'default' in the sense programs such as SVList will *always* use it? If so this would solve my problem Thanks as always -Nick Hayer

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2004-06-17 Thread Nick Hayer
Scott - Is it possible to get Hijack to run after DJMP? This would help me to better manage my backup mailserver - Thanks -Nick Hayer --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack question

2004-06-17 Thread Nick Hayer
On 17 Jun 2004 at 17:47, R. Scott Perry wrote: Perfect. Thanks! -Nick Is it possible to get Hijack to run after DJMP? This would help me to better manage my backup mailserver - The only way to do that would be if you are also running Declude Virus, you could use the AVAFTERJM ON

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not working on internal customers

2004-06-22 Thread Nick Hayer
; if that doesn't help review your hijack logs and email Scott... -Nick Hayer I have had a continuing problem with Hijack. I have several business customers with 25 plus work stations, these customers are getting caught in hijack on outgoing mails. I have added ALLOWIP entries for all the customers

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is this unique?

2004-08-25 Thread Nick Hayer
Scott - We are getting a lot of spam with this text in the email: x-mac-type=4A504547; x-mac-creator=4A565752 Question - can I filter on this or is this a common MAC string? Thanks -Nick Hayer --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is this unique?

2004-08-25 Thread Nick Hayer
On 25 Aug 2004 at 15:18, E. Ballerini wrote: Hi Erminio - I saw this explanation on a google search - my question is are the id's unique to this mac client eg ok to filter on? Thanks -Nick Hayer These are file attachments that have come from a Mac email client, probably Outlook Express

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Question

2004-10-15 Thread Nick Hayer
On 15 Oct 2004 at 12:49, Alejandro Valenzuela wrote: Alex - I would like to have a test that checks if a message has been found on 3 or more black lists Then if that is the case, assign more points to it... Is this posible ?? Well I do not know how to count the number of failed tests but

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] E-Mail to download v1.8

2004-09-28 Thread Nick Hayer
On 28 Sep 2004 at 10:33, Jeff Maze wrote: Hi Jeff, Hello, Just wanted to know if there's a place to download the latest .cfg files to handle the v1.8 additions. Or even an updated declude manual? http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=116 -Nick Thanks.. --- [This E-mail was

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack

2004-09-28 Thread Nick Hayer
On 28 Sep 2004 at 11:44, Richard Farris wrote: Hi Richard, You need to whitelist your ip, regretfully there is no way to config by domain - -Nick Now that I have HiJack, I found out yesterday when sending a mass email to all my customers that they were held...how do I take myself out of

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack

2004-09-28 Thread Nick Hayer
Scott - wow. Now when did that occur? I see no reference of this anywhere. Are there any other switches? Thanks -Nick Hayer On 28 Sep 2004 at 14:37, Glenn \ WCNet wrote: The current version of HiJack supports 'whitelisting' by sending address in hijack.cfg. ALLOWADDR [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack

2004-09-28 Thread Nick Hayer
On 28 Sep 2004 at 16:15, R. Scott Perry wrote: That was added to v1.69, per http://www.declude.com/relnotes.htm . Thanks. It may make a nice addition to the manual as well. :) -Nick -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 1.80 and e-mail notifications

2004-09-29 Thread Nick Hayer
On 28 Sep 2004 at 16:58, R. Scott Perry wrote: Scott - Thanks for pointing that out -- it should be fixed now. Does this mean we need to do something on our end or retreive an interim? Thanks -Nick The format used for the forging virus lookups was changed, and we had to also make a

Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter file maintenance suggestion

2004-10-07 Thread Nick Hayer
On 6 Oct 2004 at 18:52, Sanford Whiteman wrote: [ Don't worry, I'll cool off the cheerleading the moment a lot of SPAMC32 support posts come in. :) ] Cheers and more cheers from me. Simply Excellent! -Nick Hayer --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HIDETESTS

2004-10-20 Thread Nick Hayer
Scott - Is there a limit to how many tests that can be hidden? Do all the tests that are listed have to be on a single line? Thanks! -Nick Hayer --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] *very* much off topic

2004-10-21 Thread Nick Hayer
For those that follow baseball... the RedSox gave the Yankees an 'ATOMIC' WEDGIE' :) -Nick --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IPSwitch ICS

2004-10-25 Thread Nick Hayer
for sure looking elsewhere - -Nick Hayer --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] External Test for Obfuscated Subjects / update for Subject Case External Test

2004-10-26 Thread Nick Hayer
On 26 Oct 2004 at 10:43, Scott Fisher wrote: Nice job! Business as usual - back to spam busting.. -Nick I have created an external test that checks the subject for obfuscated subjects based on a filter file. It is available at: http://it.farmprogress.com/declude/declude.htm I have also

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SPAMC32 (SpamAssassin SPAMC for Declude) 0.5.56 released

2004-11-02 Thread Nick Hayer
On 1 Nov 2004 at 19:08, Sanford Whiteman wrote: Sandy, Dunno what I did but in moving to SA 3x from 2.61 I cannot get spamd to run. Any ideas? The error is can't execute /user/bin/spamd.. THanks! -Nick Hayer All, SPAMC32 has been updated to more easily function as a weight test

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SPAMC32 (SpamAssassin SPAMC for Declude) 0.5.56 released

2004-11-03 Thread Nick Hayer
On 1 Nov 2004 at 19:08, Sanford Whiteman wrote: Sandy, I have this working with SA 3.01 very nice..! Question - with your new 'e' switch - can the weight returned be capped eg a max return value? -Nick All, SPAMC32 has been updated to more easily function as a weight test in addition

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] anyone know how to stop this? topic change

2004-11-09 Thread Nick Hayer
On 9 Nov 2004 at 11:27, Bill Landry wrote: Thanks!! Bill [I do have 3.0.1] -Nick I should have clarified, the example I give below is for SA 3.0.1, since they changed the action from header to the more appropriate body setting between SA 3.0.0 3.0.1. So, you have it correct if you are

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SA help -

2004-11-10 Thread Nick Hayer
On 9 Nov 2004 at 22:54, Bill Landry wrote: Nick, I cannot think of any RHSBLs that would be candidates for urirhssub, other than the SURBLs that currently use bitmasked responses. I did not have any in mind but I was looking over the setups and this scenerio came to mind.. Thanks for you

[Declude.JunkMail] AOL header tags

2005-02-28 Thread Nick Hayer
Hello - I am seeing these tags in AOL bounces - X-AOL-IP: 213.226.82.229 X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:169167590:15837691 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 Does anyone know what they represent? The first I believe is the original sender ip; since these are coming to me mainly as a result of joejobs I'm

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2 and DELETE continued

2005-03-02 Thread Nick Hayer
to tech support cc'd to the list? -Nick Hayer I had mentioned it on the list twice right after I was finally able to upgrade to 2.04 (after the crashes were fixed). I thought I was dreaming and have not yet found the time to debug it. Thanks for the pointer. If letting through high-weight

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2.0 Issues

2005-03-03 Thread Nick Hayer
On 2 Mar 2005 at 18:07, Darin Cox wrote: Hi Darin, 2.05 will pass email that should have been deleted. The total weight may be 3 times your delete weight and the email will still be delivered. Declude tech support is aware of the problem - and as far as I know it is unresolved. I am back to

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2.x

2005-03-03 Thread Nick Hayer
On 3 Mar 2005 at 15:06, David Franco-Rocha wrote: Hi David, I am having problem with the DELETE action as well; have sent 2 support requests - would this issue be related to what you describe below as well? Thanks -Nick Hayer We wish to let everyone know that through our own testing

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2.x

2005-03-03 Thread Nick Hayer
On 3 Mar 2005 at 16:18, David Franco-Rocha wrote: Prior to 2.0, the DELETE action had the highest priority and affected all recipients of a message. Even with per-user settings, if one user triggered the DELETE action, the email was deleted for everyone. Oh. I do not use ROUTETO anywhere so at

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2.x

2005-03-03 Thread Nick Hayer
- Original Message - From: Nick Hayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 3:51 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2.x On 3 Mar 2005 at 15:06, David Franco-Rocha wrote: Hi David, I am having problem with the DELETE

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2.x

2005-03-04 Thread Nick Hayer
On 4 Mar 2005 at 12:51, Andy Schmidt wrote: Hi Nick, John, Eric, Fritz, Kevin, Dan, NCL Admin, et al: I recommendyou sit tight just a little longer. Done!. I'm chilled. No problem. Really. Honest! :) The only thing that slightly ticked me off was lack of communication about this bug. Now

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Filter

2005-05-24 Thread NIck Hayer
I do not think this will work. The imail headers are added after declude sees the email -Nick Spaminator wrote: Hi all, I have a need to use Declude to filter mail to a user's spambox based on X-IMAIL-SPAM in the headers (we're still using an imail filter that we don't want to give up).

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Filter

2005-05-24 Thread NIck Hayer
Bill Landry wrote: Actually, some IMail spam tests run before being passed to Declude and some after. The JunkMail archives will contain the gory details. Bill correct William - but the headers are after. I already tried to do this awhile ago without success.. Key here is though - awhile

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IMail Server Vulnerabilities...

2005-05-24 Thread NIck Hayer
8.1x has the patch out - I would suggest posting to the Imail list for info on earlier versions? Regards, -Nick Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: It looks like it will be 4 IMAP Vulnerabilties and 1 Web Calendering vulnerability. Darrell ---

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Update

2005-05-25 Thread NIck Hayer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Barry - A new incremental release (2.0.6.16) is now available for customers with a current service agreement. This release includes: . Virus scanner rules change option (EXITSCANONVIRUS) Excellent! Scott will be mad! He liked all those scanners running for

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] legit newsletter services

2005-06-01 Thread NIck Hayer
Does anyone have a list of newsletter [revdns?] senders that are trusting to not send spam that they would be willing to share? I send quite a bit of time trying to figure out if some emails are actuall valid - for example stuff from roving.com, etc. Thanks! -Nick --- This E-mail came from

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] legit newsletter services

2005-06-01 Thread NIck Hayer
to my lists all the time, but it has paid off for me. Matt NIck Hayer wrote: Does anyone have a list of newsletter [revdns?] senders that are trusting to not send spam that they would be willing to share? I send quite a bit of time trying to figure out if some emails are actuall valid

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Message not scanned

2005-06-02 Thread NIck Hayer
Hi Dan, Here are some thoughts - I still don't know why Hijack decided to flag my gateway and hold its messages (ALL messages in HOLD2 were verified to be destined for local users). Hijack cares about the senders - not the recipients I do believe I still don't know why it only

  1   2   3   4   >