Is there a way to use this test on domains that receive forwarded
email? Ex someone from AOL sends an email to a server that
automatically forwards the email to the server that is running DJM.
Since the sending server DJM sees is not aol.com/netscape.net in this
example the email incorrectly
Great! Question though regarding previous beta tests, will they be
added to the manual or are they abandonded?
Thanks
-Nick Hayer
Date sent: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:46:54 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED
I give it a much lower rate because it will fail legitimate forwarded
email. This is the only issue I have discovered -
-Nick Hayer
Giving it a weight of 20 but be careful that this is not the only test
it will fail as it can be dangerous to block from the large domains
accurate
results and are not duplicates of each other? Would it be possible
for you to make a new recommended list?
-Nick Hayer
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list
Folks,
Is there a test that can be based on the results of 2 or more other
specific tests? ex: an email that fails both HELOBOGUS and
BADHEADERS would fail HELOHEAD and have x number of points
added/deducted to it?
Thanks
Nick
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by
Jonathan,
Here is my setup - hopefully it will help. Anyone feel free to tell
me what I have messed up...
-Nick
#GLOBAL.CFG edited
#
#SETTINGS
CONSOLE ON
HOP 0
subjectspaces15x10
SUBSPACE-25subjectspaces25x20
SUBSPACE-40subjectspaces40x30
Matt
Nick Hayer wrote:
Jonathan,
Here is my setup - hopefully it will help. Anyone feel free to tell
me what I have messed up
-Nick Hayer
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
Sandy,
I am definitely interested!
-Nick Hayer
All,
I believe I've gotten one of our sites up and running with SPAMD
under Cygwin (server implementation of SpamAssassin that's much,
much faster than native Win32/ActivePerl SA, even running under
Cygwin shell
[I post to this list from my day job address]
Have a new host called
jrny.tv
At http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/lookup.ch?name=jrny.tvtype=MX
all looks kool - it points to my servers vtbass.com
But the servers never get the mail...
At http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/mail.ch?domain=jrny.tv
I
I just saw that. No question my fault.
Date sent: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 17:29:21 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT DNS question unable to receive mail
Send reply
Kami,
Would you care to share your FILTER-BODYURL filter? I'm
interested in seeing what you filter on -
Thanks!
-Nick Hayer
From: Kami Razvan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[Declude.JunkMail
Wow! Very kool. Thanks Scott!
-Nick
Date sent: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 15:11:33 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BODY STARTSWITH
Send reply to:
Scott,
Is there an order to which tests are executed in the global config?
Are filterfiles read/executed last? Is there any way to determine the
order that each filterfile is run ?
Thanks
-Nick Hayer
Date sent: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 15:11:33 -0500
Thanks Scott!
Another question:
Very kool addition but I'm having trouble with MAXWEIGHT
Gotta be simple but I just don't get it:
DJMPro v1.76i27
I created a filter called testfilter.txt
it contains
SKIPIFWEIGHT 40
MAXWEIGHT 20
HEADERS 1 CONTAINSfrom
I sent myself an
Scott,
Sure seems to work like a charm. Again - very kool!
-Nick
There is a new interim release (1.76i28) at
http://www.declude.com/release/176i/declude.exe that changes the way
that the weight is calculated (in i27 it would count negative weights,
but no longer will), and
Frederick -
I suggest you try the new feature in the latest intrim release
that has these commands avail:
SKIPIFWEIGHT and MAXWEIGHT
Place your compensatory filters [ones that reduce scoring] in the
global config ahead of the other filter files.
For me frankly most of my filters do not even
Matt -
What I did was in the beta version set a max weight and a min weight
to be returned. [I have it set now at 8 and -2 respectivly.]
Then let it run and check the log file to see what is failing -
adjust accordingly.
I ended up reducing the scores for failures in the ini by ~50+%
with scheduling the updates but this alias is kinda
neat and it hopefully gets me the updates right off.
-Nick Hayer
Markus
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list
Is MAILFROM in a filterfile equivalent to an entry in a FROMFILE? Is
there an advantage to use one over the other?
Thanks!
-Nick Hayer
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list
for each
mailserver?
Thanks!
-Nick Hayer
Date sent: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:33:38 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF support to be added to next beta
Send
Scott -
I have PREWHITELIST ON however all tests seem to be run on an email
regardless - then when tests are completed the email is whitelisted.
Is this broke or am I misunderstanding PREWHITELIST eg: if switched
ON then testing will be done? -
Thanks!
-Nick Hayer
snip
12
control list. Currently that list contains nearly 10,000
ip's...
-Nick Hayer
Matt
Fritz Squib wrote:
Hey guys, this sounds like same problem that I have been
experiencing, however it has been a bunch of spam with c.c. 's to
non-existant mail addresses on my
-Nick Hayer
From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[Declude.JunkMail] Additional IP4R RHSBL tests
Date sent: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 11:21:45 -0800
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have been
-
-Nick Hayer
From: Omar K. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[Declude.JunkMail] Comments test
Date sent: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 21:21:17 +0200
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maybe im not quite
Kami,
The filters do work with the embeded html. I just sent myself a test
email with the
Medicat/
and it was snagged.
Go home. Merry xmas!
-Nick Hayer
From: Kami Razvan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
caught
in other words, like document and analog
Try IS rather than CONTAINS?
-Nick Hayer
I'm using 2 filters, one
filter adds weight based on keywords the other removes weight based on
keywords.
Thanks
Gene Head
ACCRAM Inc.
MCP,Net+,A+,CCNA,CCDA
[EMAIL PROTECTED
in
regular email but are often in spam eg:
ANYWHERE IS semen
semen =basement
-Nick Hayer
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail
mailservers. Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader
Scott -
Do you have a handy dandy way of finding all the messages that were
delivered Message OK *and* failed a certain test?
Like all the messages that were successfully delivered that failed
SPAMDOMAINS. Even a count would be nice -
Thanks
-Nick Hayer
If you are just
Hi Russ,
I have it set for 8. I hold on 10 delete on 30. It runs on my
mailserver.
In local.cf I have
required_hits 3.00
-Nick Hayer
Date sent: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:55:47 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Russ Uhte
of its results?
-Nick Hayer
-Russ
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just
I tried this without success. Sandy's port for me is *much* slicker -
-Nick Hayer
From: Rick Klinge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMC32 (SpamAssassin SPAMC for
Declude) 0.5.55
Can anyone recommend a web interfaced dns management console for end
users? Want end users to be able to manage their own domains eg:
adding, deleting, edits. Thanks much!
-Nick Hayer
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com
2004 11:56:12 -0800
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You did not mention the DNS server being used. like BIND, Simple DNS,
MS DNS???
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nick Hayer
Sent: Tuesday, January
Marc,
Would you share your filter? Save me some efforts!
Thanks
-Nick
From: Marc Hilliker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting concept..
Date sent: Tue, 20 Jan 2004
Scott -
Performance wise would one be better off maxing out the global config
[200 entries] with WHITELISTS and then use WHITELIST in a filter
file? OR the filter file exclusively?
Thanks
-Nick Hayer
Date sent: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:59:49 -0500
daily
like me to also ask for a spiffy manual. I feel it has to be one or
the other and for that reason no complaints at all on my end. Great
job!
-Nick Hayer
Subject:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Would you mind posting your global.cfg? Redact whatever you want
private. With that maybe some good suggestions can be made
-Nick Hayer
From: TC Online Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
.
-Nick Hayer
From: TC Online Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Test for SPAM from AOL, Yahoo
Date sent: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:55:08 -0600
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED
. If not,
per-domain can sometimes be acceptable. Server-wide statistical
databases fare worse.
I have baynesian filtering enabled on Sandy's implimentation of
SpamAssassin server wide. Am I just wasting cpu cycles/decreasing SA
effectiveness by including this?
Thanks
-Nick Hayer
---
[This E-mail
is not worth using, but that the filters in
SpamAssassin are worth keeping.
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: Nick Hayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 8:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [IMail Forum] Continuous statistical
believe is in the
current beta]
Not sure I should bring up features that are not in the manual. Do
not want to start a documentation thread - however these tools are
handy and info to config is 100% in the archives.
-Nick Hayer
That's what we do and it works well. I believe
!
-Nick Hayer
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail
type declude at the \imail prompt
more info is declude -diag
-Nick Hayer
Date sent: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 16:45:20 -0500
From: Bud Durland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
is not a problem, I'm just not sure of
the command line needed.
I do - email me off list and I will send you my batch file. I run it
every 4 hrs. [There are others on the Declude website as well.]
-Nick Hayer
We're at a point were I've convinced Mgmnt that if they want zips
'Order shipped' , etc.
I make compensatory.txt the first filter in global.cfg also; to be
sure SKIPIFWEIGHT feature is used in the other filter files.
-Nick Hayer
Thank you for making YourNET Connection your connection to the world
Jim O'Keefe
Technical Support
@YourNET
On 30 Mar 2004 at 12:43, Kevin Bilbee wrote:
Here we *used* a product called LittleBrother. It would produce
complete tracking reports for every user. Very complete. Simple to
use.
Not sure if it is still avail. We stopped using it because of
privacy/union concerns.
-Nick
to your products. You listen to
your customers..
-Nick Hayer
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail
mailservers since 2000. Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection
and the leader in mailserver vulnerability detection
On 12 Apr 2004 at 14:44, R. Scott Perry wrote:
Don't worry, I will continue answering questions here (and on the
IMail Forum). :)
If Chucky Barry don't work you promise you won't leave us correct?
-Nick Hayer
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced
On 21 Apr 2004 at 21:24, Roger Eriksson wrote:
*very* nice job Roger -
Thanks!
-Nick Hayer
Hi,
My log analysis and test check scripts are available for download at:
http://www.botany.gu.se/download/decludescript/LOG_analysis.zip
http://www.botany.gu.se/download/decludescript
On 13 May 2004 at 16:57, R. Scott Perry wrote:
Scott,
For the test type below you have dnsbl ;
I have only been using rhsbl and ip4r - are these just names to
flag the type of test in global.cfg or are different actions taken on
each? [Hope I am somewhat clear on this..]
-Nick Hayer
On 13 May 2004 at 17:16, R. Scott Perry wrote:
kool - thanks!
-Nick
For the test type below you have dnsbl ;
I have only been using rhsbl and ip4r - are these just names to
flag the type of test in global.cfg or are different actions taken on
each? [Hope I am somewhat clear on
On 11 May 2004 at 14:38, Darin Cox wrote:
Boys,
Scott is very knowledgeable, helpful, and quick to assist. He is also
as stuborn as an old dog. He is not going to change the way he tags
his releases, or writes his manual. No biggie. I suggest the good
outweighs the bad...
-Nick Hayer
out with protection
for a new outbreak before another. The downside is cost and cpu
overhead. For the latter there is an outstanding request to Scott to
kill additional scanning once a scanner detects a virus..
-Nick Hayer
I realize that the cost of F-Prot (which I am using) is quite low
Insight.
-Nick Hayer
Thanks,
Aaron Caviglia
On May 17, 2004, at 8:23 PM, Goran Jovanovic wrote:
For the latter there is an outstanding request to Scott to
kill additional scanning once a scanner detects a virus..
So right now if you use multiple scanners when you scan
On 17 May 2004 at 23:23, Goran Jovanovic wrote:
So right now if you use multiple scanners when you scan with ScannerA
and it finds a virus Declude will still call ScannerB and have it scan
as well?
Correct. Scott has said this is on his todo list..
-Nick Hayer
Scott pointed out that his
On 18 May 2004 at 12:45, Matt wrote:
Very slick Matt great idea!
-Nick Hayer
One other thing. Unless you have a ton of traffic (~100,000/day) or
have people doing BCC blasts from your server to hundreds of
addresses, there is a setting in IMail 8.x that can slow down the
dictionary
a freebe..]
-Nick Hayer
Thanks,
Ben
- Original Message -
From: John Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 12:56 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] f-prot
Do you have a CDW product number on this? Called and they took
forever to come
On 19 May 2004 at 9:04, Richard Farris wrote:
Kinda - there is a test called
BYPASSWHITELIST
http://www.mail-
archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg17561.html
Hope this helps!
-Nick Hayer
I have noticed that some of the spam getting thru is because a I have
several in my whitelist and even
for the multiple DUL issue
by using custom filters
[In the archives you will find exactly this example provided by Matt]
This works well - a feature request for NOTCONTAINS has been made and
will improve the method
-Nick Hayer
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http
- Original Message -
From: Nick Hayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Darin Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 4:48 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
Feature request: COMBO tests
Hi Darin -
On 19 May 2004 at 15:10, Darin Cox wrote:
I would like to be able
My best guess is - Chuck Berry - whoever now own Declude can't
fix it. Scott is on a cruise. No internet. No phone. When Scott
returns he will reboot the box - for now we just have to make do..
-Nick Hayer
On 20 May 2004 at 11:45, Matt Robertson wrote:
I have been using
the action to take.
Cheers -
-Nick Hayer
Thanx
Goran Jovanovic
The LAN Shoppe
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail
On 20 May 2004 at 13:34, John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote:
Incorrect. While it is true of the action, the weight will still be
added.
Yup - I was thinking about 0 [zero] scoring and taking an action in
the applicable junkmail file.
Sorry about the misinformation..
-Nick Hayer
.
---
[This E
Welcome back Scott - how was your trip? Any details? Were you looking
for property in the islands now that you are flush with cash?
-Nick Hayer
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list
? I also
have DJMPro.
OT Question: SVList does not have a setting to work off a particular
IP. Is there a way to make an IP on a windows box 'primary' or
'default' in the sense programs such as SVList will *always* use it?
If so this would solve my problem
Thanks as always
-Nick Hayer
Scott -
Is it possible to get Hijack to run after DJMP? This would help me
to better manage my backup mailserver -
Thanks
-Nick Hayer
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list
On 17 Jun 2004 at 17:47, R. Scott Perry wrote:
Perfect. Thanks!
-Nick
Is it possible to get Hijack to run after DJMP? This would help me
to better manage my backup mailserver -
The only way to do that would be if you are also running Declude
Virus, you could use the AVAFTERJM ON
; if that doesn't help review your hijack logs and
email Scott...
-Nick Hayer
I have had a continuing problem with Hijack. I have several business
customers with 25 plus work stations, these customers are getting
caught in hijack on outgoing mails. I have added ALLOWIP entries for
all the customers
Scott -
We are getting a lot of spam with this text in the email:
x-mac-type=4A504547; x-mac-creator=4A565752
Question - can I filter on this or is this a common MAC string?
Thanks
-Nick Hayer
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E
On 25 Aug 2004 at 15:18, E. Ballerini wrote:
Hi Erminio -
I saw this explanation on a google search - my question is are the
id's unique to this mac client eg ok to filter on?
Thanks
-Nick Hayer
These are file attachments that have come from a Mac email client,
probably Outlook Express
On 15 Oct 2004 at 12:49, Alejandro Valenzuela wrote:
Alex -
I would like to have a test
that checks if a message has been found on 3 or more black lists
Then if that is the case, assign more points to it...
Is this posible ??
Well I do not know how to count the number of failed tests but
On 28 Sep 2004 at 10:33, Jeff Maze wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Hello,
Just wanted to know if there's a place to download the latest .cfg
files to handle the v1.8 additions. Or even an updated declude
manual?
http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=116
-Nick
Thanks..
---
[This E-mail was
On 28 Sep 2004 at 11:44, Richard Farris wrote:
Hi Richard,
You need to whitelist your ip, regretfully there is no way to config
by domain -
-Nick
Now that I have HiJack, I found out yesterday when sending a mass
email to all my customers that they were held...how do I take myself
out of
Scott -
wow.
Now when did that occur? I see no reference of this anywhere. Are
there any other switches?
Thanks
-Nick Hayer
On 28 Sep 2004 at 14:37, Glenn \ WCNet wrote:
The current version of HiJack supports 'whitelisting' by sending
address in hijack.cfg.
ALLOWADDR [EMAIL
On 28 Sep 2004 at 16:15, R. Scott Perry wrote:
That was added to v1.69, per http://www.declude.com/relnotes.htm .
Thanks. It may make a nice addition to the manual as well. :)
-Nick
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for
On 28 Sep 2004 at 16:58, R. Scott Perry wrote:
Scott -
Thanks for pointing that out -- it should be fixed now.
Does this mean we need to do something on our end or retreive an
interim?
Thanks
-Nick
The format
used for the forging virus lookups was changed, and we had to also
make a
On 6 Oct 2004 at 18:52, Sanford Whiteman wrote:
[ Don't worry, I'll cool off the cheerleading the moment a lot of
SPAMC32 support posts come in. :) ]
Cheers and more cheers from me. Simply Excellent!
-Nick Hayer
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http
Scott -
Is there a limit to how many tests that can be hidden? Do all the
tests that are listed have to be on a single line?
Thanks!
-Nick Hayer
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list
For those that follow baseball...
the RedSox gave the Yankees an 'ATOMIC' WEDGIE' :)
-Nick
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL
for sure looking elsewhere -
-Nick Hayer
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail
On 26 Oct 2004 at 10:43, Scott Fisher wrote:
Nice job!
Business as usual - back to spam busting..
-Nick
I have created an external test that checks the subject for
obfuscated subjects based on a filter file.
It is available at: http://it.farmprogress.com/declude/declude.htm
I have also
On 1 Nov 2004 at 19:08, Sanford Whiteman wrote:
Sandy,
Dunno what I did but in moving to SA 3x from 2.61 I cannot get spamd
to run. Any ideas? The error is
can't execute /user/bin/spamd..
THanks!
-Nick Hayer
All,
SPAMC32 has been updated to more easily function as a weight test
On 1 Nov 2004 at 19:08, Sanford Whiteman wrote:
Sandy,
I have this working with SA 3.01 very nice..!
Question - with your new 'e' switch - can the weight returned be
capped eg a max return value?
-Nick
All,
SPAMC32 has been updated to more easily function as a weight test in
addition
On 9 Nov 2004 at 11:27, Bill Landry wrote:
Thanks!! Bill [I do have 3.0.1]
-Nick
I should have clarified, the example I give below is for SA 3.0.1,
since they changed the action from header to the more appropriate
body setting between SA 3.0.0 3.0.1. So, you have it correct if
you are
On 9 Nov 2004 at 22:54, Bill Landry wrote:
Nick, I cannot think of any RHSBLs that would be candidates for
urirhssub, other than the SURBLs that currently use bitmasked
responses.
I did not have any in mind but I was looking over the setups and this
scenerio came to mind..
Thanks for you
Hello -
I am seeing these tags in AOL bounces -
X-AOL-IP: 213.226.82.229
X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:169167590:15837691
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0
Does anyone know what they represent? The first I believe is the
original sender ip; since these are coming to me mainly as a result
of joejobs I'm
to tech support cc'd to the list?
-Nick Hayer
I had mentioned it on the list twice right after I was finally able to
upgrade to 2.04 (after the crashes were fixed).
I thought I was dreaming and have not yet found the time to debug it.
Thanks for the pointer.
If letting through high-weight
On 2 Mar 2005 at 18:07, Darin Cox wrote:
Hi Darin,
2.05 will pass email that should have been deleted. The total weight
may be 3 times your delete weight and the email will still be
delivered.
Declude tech support is aware of the problem - and as far as I know
it is unresolved.
I am back to
On 3 Mar 2005 at 15:06, David Franco-Rocha wrote:
Hi David,
I am having problem with the DELETE action as well; have sent 2
support requests - would this issue be related to what you describe
below as well?
Thanks
-Nick Hayer
We wish to let everyone know that through our own testing
On 3 Mar 2005 at 16:18, David Franco-Rocha wrote:
Prior to 2.0, the DELETE action had the highest priority and affected
all recipients of a message. Even with per-user settings, if one user
triggered the DELETE action, the email was deleted for everyone.
Oh.
I do not use ROUTETO anywhere so at
- Original Message -
From: Nick Hayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2.x
On 3 Mar 2005 at 15:06, David Franco-Rocha wrote:
Hi David,
I am having problem with the DELETE
On 4 Mar 2005 at 12:51, Andy Schmidt wrote:
Hi Nick, John, Eric, Fritz, Kevin, Dan, NCL Admin, et al:
I recommendyou sit tight just a little longer.
Done!. I'm chilled. No problem. Really. Honest!
:)
The only thing that slightly ticked me off was lack of communication
about this bug. Now
I do not think this will work. The imail headers are added after declude
sees the email
-Nick
Spaminator wrote:
Hi all,
I have a need to use Declude to filter mail to a user's spambox based on
X-IMAIL-SPAM in the headers (we're still using an imail filter that we don't
want to give up).
Bill Landry wrote:
Actually, some IMail spam tests run before being passed to Declude and
some after. The JunkMail archives will contain the gory details.
Bill
correct William - but the headers are after. I already tried to do this
awhile ago without success.. Key here is though - awhile
8.1x has the patch out - I would suggest posting to the Imail list for
info on earlier versions?
Regards,
-Nick
Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
It looks like it will be 4 IMAP Vulnerabilties and 1 Web Calendering
vulnerability.
Darrell
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Barry -
A new incremental release (2.0.6.16) is now available for customers with a
current service agreement. This release includes:
. Virus scanner rules change option (EXITSCANONVIRUS)
Excellent! Scott will be mad! He liked all those scanners running for
Does anyone have a list of newsletter [revdns?] senders that are
trusting to not send spam that they would be willing to share? I send
quite a bit of time trying to figure out if some emails are actuall
valid - for example stuff from roving.com, etc.
Thanks!
-Nick
---
This E-mail came from
to my lists all the time, but it has paid off for me.
Matt
NIck Hayer wrote:
Does anyone have a list of newsletter [revdns?] senders that are
trusting to not send spam that they would be willing to share? I send
quite a bit of time trying to figure out if some emails are actuall
valid
Hi Dan,
Here are some thoughts -
I still don't know why Hijack decided to flag my gateway and hold its
messages (ALL messages in HOLD2 were verified to be destined for local
users).
Hijack cares about the senders - not the recipients I do believe
I still don't know why it only
1 - 100 of 329 matches
Mail list logo