On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 00:29 +0200, Reinout van Schouwen wrote:
Op dinsdag 07-07-2009 om 09:18 uur [tijdzone -0400], schreef Sam H:
I would like to implement support for tabbed windows in Mutter, and
was hoping for some helpful pointers. I envision tabbed windows
working essentially the
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 12:33 +0100, Calum Benson wrote:
On 7 Jul 2009, at 14:18, Sam H wrote:
Hey all,
I would like to implement support for tabbed windows in Mutter, and
was hoping for some helpful pointers. I envision tabbed windows
working essentially the same way that tabs work in
2. The much touted homogeneity and consistent quality of GNOME is
(imho) largely a thing of the past. There have been no organized UI
reviews of new modules in a long time, the HIG has not been updated to
match the UIs we see in current applications.
Something we should fix? I think
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 10:36 +0100, Johannes Schmid wrote:
Hi Christopher!
Besides... did modularity ever enslave a GNOME developer? Never. I expected
more than a statement like that.
This modularity prevents to create a solid user experience in various
ways because everything needs to
I don't see gnome-applets as part of GNOME 3. But it doesn't mean we
cannot ship gnome-applets 3.x.
GNOME 3 is about gnome-shell. Gnome-applets will always be a fallback. A
fallback which includes gnome-applets would be nice. But it is a
still fallback.
So the statement: gnome 3 is not
Assume this:
- Power-User
- using Compiz/Sawfish/Whatever
- wants to use Compiz/Sawfish/Whatever with GNOME-Shell as he likes both
What now? You said that you would like them to stay at GNOMEs, but how do you
want to achieve that? (that's a serious question!).
By making GNOME 3 the best
Well, now that people are throwing percents at each other, it is a
very interesting point as such - does anybody know anything about
userbase whose experience GNOME3 is going to improve? I am not
ranting/trolling here, I am really interested. Was there any research
made?
There is an
Given recent discussions regarding the use of this list, I'm unsure
whether I should be responding to this question here. That said, I do
want to ensure that people get answers to queries like this.
Andrew Cowie wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 12:33 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
* The default font
Hi Nick,
This probably isn't the best list for this discussion though, to be
fair, I don't know which one would be...
Nick wrote:
I haven't seen any mention of a new icon set for Gnome 3 (forgive me if
I'm mistaken) but could I bring attention to the Faenza Icon set[1]? Is
there an
Hi,
Maciej Piechotka wrote:
FLAMEThen show delyourdelinsdesign team/ins work! All I'm
hearing is that research have been done and the issue have been taken
into consideration during disussion but I DON'T have any references. I
cannot see logs of IRC (at least google is not showing them),
Gendre Sebastien wrote:
So, I update it to a version 3.
News:
- Use the switch GTK Widget.
- Remove Apply and Cancel buttons.
- Add Bluetooth sharing option.
- Some changes on tabulation to be OK with the present Printer panel of
Control
Center.
- Add mochup for options window.
Hey Andy,
Andy Wingo wrote:
Hi Alan,
FWIW I mostly like GNOME 3, so I don't want to pile on the flamefest.
But this bothered me:
On Sun 06 Feb 2011 15:27, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com writes:
Even if you had records of every discussion, you wouldn't get the
information you're
I'm going to start writing a first draft of the release notes very soon.
There are still a bunch of apps that are missing from the preparatory
notes [1], however. I know for certain that there have been improvements
to gedit... What about Empathy? What about games? What about Rhythmbox?
What about
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 11:15 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
The story I've heard is that we haven't supported themes because we
make no guarantees about CSS class stability: CSS support was a nifty
thing that was added so that we could put up a couple actors and
Guillaume Desmottes wrote:
Le mardi 22 mars 2011 à 10:02 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
- Sadly, empathy is not a great chat application; with chat being such
a prominent feature in 3.0, we really should be doing much better
here.
I'm sorry to hear that.
Empathy is great. I definitely
Matthias Clasen wrote:
With GNOME 3.0 going into code freeze any day now, it is high time
that we start looking beyond 3.0 and start collecting ideas and making
plans for what comes next. To that end, I have collected a list of
things that have fallen off the 3.0 train at one point or
Richard Hughes wrote:
On 23 March 2011 11:08, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
Software aside, we really need that new version of the HIG that we've
been talking about (Calum has been taking this forward recently)!
In related news, I have no idea what the HIG is supposed to be for
3.0
snip
Frederic Peters wrote:
Allan Day wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
With GNOME 3.0 going into code freeze any day now, it is high time
that we start looking beyond 3.0 and start collecting ideas and making
plans for what comes next. To that end, I have collected a list of
things
Guillaume Desmottes wrote:
Le mercredi 23 mars 2011 à 11:08 +, Allan Day a écrit :
I'd also like to see us concentrate on the design quality of our core
applications.
I'm starting planning goals for Empathy 3.2 and would like some input
from the design team on some point. So I went
Hey Alex!
This is great. I've been doing some work on this recently, and we seem
to be thinking about the same problems (good thing!)
Alexander Larsson wrote:
I've been looking at the contact feature for Gnome 3.2 [1], trying to
understand what we want from this and how it would look. The
Hi Michael,
Michael Terry wrote:
Hello! You may remember me as the bloke that proposed the Déjà Dup
backup tool as a GNOME module a little back, right as modules were
being reorganized.
I've been encouraged to try again as a Feature. I don't fully
understand the process, but I gather an
Michael Terry wrote:
Hi, Allan. Thanks for your past and continuing help with design! :)
Answers below.
On 11 May 2011 11:33, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
This looks like an improvement on the UI that you presented the last
time you proposed Deja Dup. It could still be much
Sam Thursfield wrote:
... snip ...
* Branding - a part of the core should be branded as a part of GNOME 3,
and I don't think we'd want GNOME's new backup facility to visibly exist
outside of GNOME.
Could you clarify this one a little? On first read it sounds like if
Deja Dup becomes
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 16:44 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 09:37 +0200, Ted Gould wrote:
Could someone please articulate the GNOME position for downstream
distributors of GNOME technologies? It seems to me the previous
position was to use the
Michael Terry wrote:
On 11 May 2011 19:18, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
Looking at your proposal it seems that you are proposing Deja Dup for
inclusion in the GNOME core. You also seem to want it to be developed on
LP and for it to simultaneously exist as a standalone app, though
Cosimo Cecchi wrote:
Hi everyone,
It's too late for feature proposal, but I've been encouraged to post
this here anyway.
Sushi [1] is a quick previewer application, targeting integration with
file managers such as Nautilus - you can read more about it in a blog
post I wrote some time ago
Hi Michael,
Thanks for all of this. Let me reiterate that I *really* want to see
Deja Dup in 3.2. We just need to figure out how to make it work.
Michael Terry wrote:
On 12 May 2011 17:05, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
I presume you'd be happy for Deja Dup to become a GNOME Control
Michael Terry wrote:
On 13 May 2011 12:28, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
Would you be willing to use GNOME Bugzilla?
That specifically would be the hardest part of an infrastructure move.
Some important downstreams (Ubuntu and flavors) and my sister project
Duplicity are all in LP
Dave Neary wrote:
snip
Leaving aside because that's the way it is as a reason for a second,
what are the potential issues we'd have using Launchpad?
* Bug reporters would have to have an easy way to report bugs against
Deja Dup through gnome.org
* GNOME developers would need to reassign
Hi José,
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 09:52 -0400, José Aliste wrote:
Hi,
I have a simple question (hopefully ddl is the right mail list for
this): how are we supposed to interact with the design team? it seems
that the best way is contacting them through irc in #gnome-design, but
what about
Hi Dave,
Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Allan Day wrote:
#gnome-design is good; so is the usability list.
The ui-review Bugzilla keyword gets used in GNOME Shell and the control
center. We could try that here too.
Presumably you others are still not interested in drawing a few
developers
Dave Neary wrote:
By working real-time, you are preventing a relationship from being built
beyond a small group of people. Those people work closely together, but
have the appearance of a closed tight-knit clique from outside the
group. There is no transparency about what the design team is,
Johannes Schmid wrote:
Hi Allan!
Yes. *I* was annoyed by the recent Deja Dup discussion, and felt that
the developer got short-changed at the end of the day. I was very
annoyed at the systemd as external dependency discussion, and the
message that some people following along the GNOME
Frederic Crozat wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
can you please explain to me, in a short sentence, what do you want to
achieve? not how, but precisely what.
I have said that already: I want
Frederic Muller wrote:
On 06/07/2011 04:53 PM, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
Also, while I'm not a designer, yesterday I wanted to propose some new
stuff, and it was easy to get the design team to find a solution for
proposals (https://live.gnome.org/Design/Proposals ), so from my (short)
Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
To me, the criterion for success is that someone can start from scratch,
without knowing much about Linux development and have a working build
within an hour or so, without having to babysit it. Any sort of
babysitting makes things much longer for
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
zeesha...@gnome.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Nothing is ever perfect, but having at least some results is better
than
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
zeesha...@gnome.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:45 AM
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
I never found the time to do a proper write up of the user testing I
did on the shell. It was brief and ad hoc; I can tell you that the
five participants in my study were all
More selective answers... :)
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Giovanni Campagna
scampa.giova...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno sab, 20/08/2011 alle 12.04 +0100, Allan Day ha scritto:
This is the first time I see the amount of users tested, and the exact
tasks involved. I think it should go
Hey Denis!
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Denis Washington den...@online.de wrote:
Am 01.09.2011 11:34, schrieb Frederic Peters:
Hello all,
This is 3.1.90, and it's out! It's the first beta of what will be
GNOME 3.2, enjoy it while it's time, the next beta (3.1.91) will
arrive next week.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Jeremy Bicha jbi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
I had a bug this week where the power was screwy and GNOME briefly
thought my laptop was a desktop. I was awfully surprised to see that
the Power panel in System Settings 3.2 has only one item Suspend when
inactive for
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
...
time to start preparing the GNOME 3.4 release notes to tell users,
developers and press what's new and great in GNOME!
This means: We need YOUR help as you know best!
Please take two minutes:
* What new features does
Hi Giovanni,
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Giovanni Campagna
scampa.giova...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello desktop-devel,
3.4 is almost out, so it's time to start thinking about 3.5, and how
to make it even more wonderful.
As a quick afternoon hack, I built a Weather app, following the
designs
Seif Lotfy s...@lotfy.com wrote:
...
There are 3 issues in discussion or in development where Zeitgeist
integration is reaching a halt due to the uncertainty of where Zeitgeist
stands:
Epiphany (Web): There has long been discussions on how to deploy Zeitgeist
as a backend for Web. Web needed
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Seif Lotfy s...@lotfy.com wrote:
...
So a possible view for this feature can be done in Web: Links received can
then be automatically put in the queue of Web. And once visited can be taken
out of the queue.
Another possible view would be a dialog for
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 13:46 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 12:59 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
We have a design and a plan
Hi all,
Apologies in advance for the long mail - there was no other way.
There have been a few design-related threads on the list recently. I’m
going to try and reboot those discussions in a slightly different and,
I hope, more constructive mode.
Let’s start with the big picture - design is
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Sergey Udaltsov
sergey.udalt...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think you can infer that from the answers. I'm one of the
people who said they use Compose. I don't particularly care which
key it is, as long as I can reach it without taking my hands away
from home row.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:55 AM, John Stowers
john.stowers.li...@gmail.com wrote:
So there are lots of ways that we can do design better as a community,
and contributors on this list can all play a part in helping to make
us to be even more successful in this regard. It will take actions as
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Karen Sandler ka...@gnome.org wrote:
On Wed, April 25, 2012 9:27 am, Allan Day wrote:
Echoing what Brian said, I like these suggestions for improvement! Are
there any that we can turn into concrete initiatives that we can organize
soon and perhaps fundraise
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
...
* better testing facilities so people can test and give feedback on UX
changes before release time
What would this entail? This sounds like it could be incredibly helpful if
we could find the resources
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Federico Mena Quintero
feder...@gnome.org wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 15:31 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
no way to find the audience that would be unbiased? Are you just
implying that the current userbase of GNOME is so geekish that fair
survey among
Hi all,
Last release we introduced the ability for applications to define a
GMenu (or 'application menu'). This means that applications now have a
place to locate global application (as opposed to per window) menu
items. Some applications have already started to use a GMenu, and
while this is
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote:
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 13:55 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
Hi all,
Last release we introduced the ability for applications to define a
GMenu (or 'application menu'). This means that applications now have a
place to locate
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Jeremy Bicha jbi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
...
I believe we were talking about keeping File/Edit/View while adding a
GMenu. If so, the UI would be quite confusing if some things were
taken out of the normal File/Edit/View menus. If all we're talking
about is how
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Luca Ferretti lferr...@gnome.org wrote:
2012/4/25 Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com:
...
So, IMHO a design driven GNOME needs good desing documents. The
design document is a written contract[4] between designers and other
teams, more time you spend writing it, less
Hey Petris,
pec...@gmail.com pec...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone!
Since GNOME Shell 3.2 I love feature of overview accessing contacts
database and looking up their status. However, while I understand
reasoning to have default behaviour to just open entry in Contacts
app, I would like to
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Federico Mena Quintero
feder...@gnome.org wrote:
...
As a way to solve these issues, I'd like to follow up on an idea which I
sketched during last year's Desktop Summit - namely, about constructing
a pattern language for Gnome's design based on the good things
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Andrew Cowie
and...@operationaldynamics.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 13:55 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
It would be great if we could improve on the current situation and
ensure that all our applications present an appropriate set of items
in their GMenu
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Matteo Settenvini
matteo...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Il giorno lun, 07/05/2012 alle 16.15 +1000, Andrew Cowie ha scritto:
I ask this because Epiphany¹ has no menu, but does and a funky button
over on the right that, upon investigation, turns out to be a menu has
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Evandro Giovanini efgiovan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Xan Lopez x...@gnome.org wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Andrew Cowie
and...@operationaldynamics.com wrote:
Is there a reference application doing this right?
I ask this
Seif Lotfy s...@lotfy.com wrote:
I created a new wiki page for this. Hylke and Garrett have been helping out
on the idea and the design.
https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointFive/Features/FindingAndRediscoveringSharedLinks
I'm confused. Your original proposal for this feature was to add
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
Lionel proposes to consider merging the login screen and the lock screen
as both are about logging in.
In the end Allan wrote let's continue some place
Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote:
Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
We only have the development resources to ship one input method. It's
going to need special code to integrate with Clutter and the St
toolkit. If IBus is bad right now, we need to fix it.
Or use fcitx instead of IBus? I
Hey!
Feel free to use the playground space for your ideas. That's what it's
there for. :)
Allan
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Pigeon Lips pigeonl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All, a very friendly person on the gnome IRC put me on this mailing
list.
Long story short i wanted to add an article
Hey Ray,
Ray Strode halfl...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I put together a live image with a jhbuild built in it here:
http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/gnome/misc/testing/GNOME-3.5.1-LiveUSB.iso
...
It's a little hacked together, at the moment. I'd like to get the
process I used more refined and
Adam Dingle a...@yorba.org wrote:
I realized recently to my surprise and dismay that the compact view has been
removed from Nautilus:
Adam, if you wanted to discuss this change, you could have done so on
the bug or on the Nautilus mailing list, or by asking on
#gnome-design. I would have been
Federico Mena Quintero feder...@gnome.org wrote:
...
The anti-pattern for both removals is like, there's some peeling paint
in this house - let's bulldoze the neighborhood.
...
How do you know that was the reason for the decision, if the
background hasn't been explained? The anti-pattern for
Robert Ancell robert.anc...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder: are you looking for maintainers for any of these games, or
are you going to take charge of all of them? Also, are any of these
deemed to be core right now?
We're currently discussing the maintainership of them at the moment:
Hey Dulek,
We don't encourage minimize to tray or similar patterns for GNOME 3.
That was always a big usability problem in GNOME 2 and we're trying to
make things simpler and easier to use.
In general, applications should have a visible window while they are
running, although there are minor
Thomas H.P. Andersen pho...@gmail.com wrote:
When I looked at this last, I came up with the shortlist of aisleriot,
sudoku, iagno and tetravex. These seem to cover the categories you
describe above. They also have concepts that are clear and easy to
pick up. While people might like mines, I
Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
Thomas H.P. Andersen pho...@gmail.com wrote:
When I looked at this last, I came up with the shortlist of aisleriot,
sudoku, iagno and tetravex. These seem to cover the categories you
describe above. They also have concepts that are clear and easy to
pick
Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
to be fair, I'd envision this as a completely separate session that
you need to install and select, similar to what Ubuntu does —
especially if we want to call it GNOME Classic.
Agreed.
I don't think a separate session will work very well for
Florian Müllner fmuell...@gnome.org wrote:
...
The Tweak Tool shouldn't have anything to do with extensions. They are
something that you install and run as a part of the system, not
something to be tweaked via settings.
While I agree with you that gnome-tweak-tool (and package managers
(*))
Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me wrote:
...
What do people think about this? If there is agreement what would be a good
way to track? Worth having a GNOME Goal to track this?
Seems worthwhile to track this. How many bugs and affected modules are
we talking about here?
Allan
--
IRC: aday
Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me wrote:
Certainly, the first one I filed is this one:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693551
...
I found it a surprisingly smooth experience given its early stage.
I have however spotted one issue: Adjusting the master volume in-game
via the
Hi all,
It's that time again! GNOME 3.8 is due for release on 27 March: that
means we have about two weeks to get the release notes fully written -
that's not much time at all.
Enter a trance-like state. Cast your mind back over the last six
months. Ask yourself: is there anything I have done
Javier Jardón jjar...@gnome.org wrote:
On 28 February 2013 08:26, Dan Winship d...@gnome.org wrote:
But it seems like it would be a good idea to start explicitly noting
planned future ABI breaks in some way, somewhere, so nothing gets
forgotten when it does come, and so people can see the big
Some of you have been awesome and have given me nice notes on what you
did over the past 6 months. The rest of you are very bad people.
There is time to redeem yourselves, but the window of opportunity is closing.
Allan
--
IRC: aday on irc.gnome.org
Blog: http://afaikblog.wordpress.com/
This is your final call! The Release Notes are pretty much done and
I'm looking to get them nailed down at the beginning of next week.
If you have anything that should be included and isn't [1], please
fill in the wiki page [2] asap.
Allan
[1]
Hi Pierre-Yves,
Pierre-Yves Luyten p...@luyten.fr wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:31:21 +0100, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net
wrote:
(...) Still we *highly* encourage you to
communicate your plans for your projects early.
I'm requesting a new module inclusion : Bijiben
It's another note taking
Hi all,
Marina mentioned to me that we still need more ideas for this year's
GSoC [1]. If you would like to mentor someone, please get in touch:
it's really important that we have enough mentors and internship
ideas.
If you are willing to be a mentor but aren't sure about what you'd
work on, I
application. Here's Allan Day on the
subject, and a wiki page:
http://afaikblog.wordpress.com/2012/05/10/gnome-design-update-part-two/
https://live.gnome.org/GnomeOS/Design/Whiteboards/ContentSelection
Me and Jon were investigating this for a while, but it is dependent on
us having each
Hi Vishrut,
I came up with some wireframes for the Tweak Tool [1], which I'd be
happy to discuss. You should also make contact with John Stowers, who
is the Tweak Tool maintainer.
Best wishes,
Allan
[1]
Hi all,
This is something that me, Jon and Jakub have been thinking about for
some time, and is now at the stage where we can start to think about
implementation. I'm proposing it as a feature for 3.10 [1].
The main element of the design is to combine the sound, network,
bluetooth, power and
Hi Alberto,
Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote:
The main element of the design is to combine the sound, network,
bluetooth, power and user menus into a single menu. This will enable
us to resolve a number of UX issues we've encountered with the
existing design (badness on touch, difficulties
Part two of my reply. :)
Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote:
...
More details are outlined on the wiki [2]. If you do look at the
designs, please pay particular attention to the example scenarios -
these give a clearer idea of what the menu will actually look like.
The designs aren't
Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote:
Otherwise, the UX of the giant dialog looks good to me, and I'm
already starting to implement it. (But where's the avatar?)
Avatar?
Excellent. Is there a bug to track it?
Not yet. It's in a local branch on my system, as it's nowhere near
Federico Mena Quintero feder...@gnome.org wrote:
On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 14:36 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
The main element of the design is to combine the sound, network,
bluetooth, power and user menus into a single menu.
The update proposal [1] lists the following items as problems
Hey Giovanni!
Giovanni Campagna scampa.giova...@gmail.com wrote:
As one of the implementors of the current status icons, and current
developer of gnome-shell, I can tell it's a small can of worms, but that's
not what this is about.
Rather, what I'd like to point out is that, in my opinion,
Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me wrote:
Thanks, I must have missed it. I did peruse it and it's still an extra
click and misses the convenience of going to the network menu and hitting
vpn on. If you're doing a lot of it I can see it getting a little
irritating.
Yep, that's a downside
Lennart Poettering mzta...@0pointer.de wrote:
This all looks so ... crowded in the wireframes. So very very
crowded. That can't be good?
First of all, did you look at the example scenarios?
On my current machine, the user menu has 6 items, with the avatar,
user name and chat status on top.
Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
Rather, what I'd like to point out is that, in my opinion, this needs more
thinking through before going straight to shipping.
I mean, I trust the design team and I value your experience in the field,
but this is another radical change, and it's
Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote:
...
we have to question
ourselves if this is another trend like the netbook one that is
somewhat transient and misleading.
...
I'd make a distinction here between transformers (Docable tablet that
turns into a laptop+trackpad) that switches between touch
Tomas Frydrych tf+lists.gn...@r-finger.com wrote:
...
As a basic, but I think pertinent, example -- if one of the reasons for
the current design being touch unfriendly is that certain UI elements
are too small (which is the most rudimentary problem any UI moving from
pointer to touch faces),
Juanjo Marín juanjomari...@yahoo.es wrote:
...
But also some problems has arisen in the effort of being compatible with
touch devices.For example, I think that the UI of new applications like
Documents are very touch friendly, but it's weird for keyboard + mouse users.
It is weird because
Hey Marco,
Marco Scannadinari ma...@scannadinari.co.uk wrote:
The GTK+ throbber is a dotted animation, but the one used in clutter apps /
UIs use a different icon - instead of dots, it uses longer lines. Is this a
design decision? If it is please consider the points made below:
- It is
Marco Scannadinari ma...@scannadinari.co.uk wrote:
Cosimo or Benjamin can tell you more about the specifics.
Thanks. By Cosmio and Benjamin, do you mean Cosimo Cecchi and Benjamin
Otte?
I do indeed. :) (I was kinda hoping that they'd chime in.)
Allan
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Cosimo Cecchi cosi...@gnome.org wrote:
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Marco Scannadinari
ma...@scannadinari.co.uk wrote:
I think using the very nice throbber by the Tango people would look a
lot nicer and reduce the work (?) needed to standardise the throbber
1 - 100 of 299 matches
Mail list logo
