Randy Kobes wrote:
On 9 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+use Apache::TestConfig ();
I didn't put that in before, as I realized later
Apache::TestConfig is used by Apache::Test, which was already
use()d.
Sorry about that, Randy. I thought you have just committed an older patch.
Would it be g
On 9 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> stas2003/03/08 16:16:26
>
> Modified:ModPerl-Registry/t basic.t
> Log:
> add the missing use Apache::TestConfig
>
> Revision ChangesPath
> 1.13 +1 -0 modperl-2.0/ModPerl-Registry/t/basic.t
>
> Index: basic.t
>
Nick Tonkin wrote:
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stas2003/03/08 01:15:16
Modified:lib/Apache compat.pm
lib/ModPerl Code.pm
src/modules/perl mod_perl.c modperl_filter.c
xs/Apache/RequestRec Apache__RequestRe
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Randy Kobes wrote:
[ .. ]
> > There's also something with the closure.t test - in running
> > 'nmake test', test 4 of closure.t fails, but running closure.t
> > individually allows all tests to pass.
>
> You mean closure.t:4 fails only when some other test
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > stas2003/03/08 01:15:16
> >
> > Modified:lib/Apache compat.pm
> >lib/ModPerl Code.pm
> >src/modules/perl mod_perl.c modperl_filter.c
> >xs/Apache/RequestRec Apache__R
Kurt George Gjerde wrote:
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
test.pl:
my $r = shift;
$r->content_type('text/plain');
$r->print($r->args);
why? because what registry does is wrapping the code into a function handler,
passing $r as an argument. However it's also in the scope of the cod
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
> test.pl:
>
> my $r = shift;
> $r->content_type('text/plain');
> $r->print($r->args);
>
> why? because what registry does is wrapping the code into a function handler,
> passing $r as an argument. However it's also in the scope of the code that
> ca
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stas2003/03/08 01:15:16
Modified:lib/Apache compat.pm
lib/ModPerl Code.pm
src/modules/perl mod_perl.c modperl_filter.c
xs/Apache/RequestRec Apache__RequestRec.h
.Changes
Log:
When PerlOpt
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Randy Kobes wrote:
On Win32, there's a couple of minor things with the
ModPerl-Registry tests.
[ ... ]
- in the ModPerl-Registry/t/basic.t test, some tests are
made which rely on the setting of the executable bit, which
isn't available on Win32. The follo
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Win32, there's a couple of minor things with the
ModPerl-Registry tests.
- in ModPerl-Registry/t/TEST.PL, Win32 likes to have
the volume letter in a different place, as in the
following diff:
Index: ModPerl-Registry/t/TEST.PL
===
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Randy Kobes wrote:
> On Win32, there's a couple of minor things with the
> ModPerl-Registry tests.
[ ... ]
> - in the ModPerl-Registry/t/basic.t test, some tests are
> made which rely on the setting of the executable bit, which
> isn't available on Win32. The following diff:
On Win32, there's a couple of minor things with the
ModPerl-Registry tests.
- in ModPerl-Registry/t/TEST.PL, Win32 likes to have
the volume letter in a different place, as in the
following diff:
Index: ModPerl-Registry/t/TEST.PL
==
12 matches
Mail list logo
