Re: [CLOSED][VOTE] Apache Struts 7.1.1

The vote passed with result: GA +1 (binding) x4 GA +1 (non-binding) x1 Thanks a lot Łukasz niedz., 12 paź 2025 o 17:36 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > The Apache Struts 7.1.1 test build is available. This release contains > a few breaking changes plus some bug fixes. Also a lot of dep

Re: [VOTE] Apache Struts 7.1.1

niedz., 12 paź 2025 o 17:36 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [X] General Availability (GA) +1 (binding) Cheers Łukasz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For

Re: [VOTE] Apache Struts 7.1.1

+1 GA (binding) Sent from my mobile phone > Am 12.10.2025 um 18:36 schrieb Lukasz Lenart : > > The Apache Struts 7.1.1 test build is available. This release contains > a few breaking changes plus some bug fixes. Also a lot of dependencies > have been updated: > > Breaking

Re: [VOTE] Apache Struts 7.1.1

+1 GA On Mon, 13 Oct 2025 at 02:36, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > > The Apache Struts 7.1.1 test build is available. This release contains > a few breaking changes plus some bug fixes. Also a lot of dependencies > have been updated: > > Breaking changes > > - A new mechanis

Re: [VOTE] Apache Struts 7.1.1

[ ] Leave at test build [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] General Availability (GA) Thanks for all the work! Best regards Markus Am 12.10.25 um 17:36 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: The Apache Struts 7.1.1 test build is available. This release contains a few breaking changes plus some bug fixes. Also a lot of

[VOTE] Apache Struts 7.1.1

The Apache Struts 7.1.1 test build is available. This release contains a few breaking changes plus some bug fixes. Also a lot of dependencies have been updated: Breaking changes - A new mechanism has been introduced to configure CSP Nonce, see WW-5504. - Support for uploading empty files has

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 7.1.1 test build is ready

No issues to report On Thu, 2 Oct 2025 at 02:21, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > > Hello, > > This is a minor release of Struts 7.1.1 which contains only some small > breaking changes. > Please take your time and test the bits - any help is appreciated. > Please report any p

Re: [CLOSED] [VOTE] Apache Struts 6.8.0

Vote passed with result: GA +1 x 4 (binding) Thanks a lot Łukasz niedz., 28 wrz 2025 o 12:23 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > The Apache Struts 6.8.0 test build is available. With this release the > following issues were addressed: > > Bug > [WW-5494] - Using struts2.Action

Re: [VOTE] Apache Struts 6.8.0

niedz., 28 wrz 2025 o 12:23 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [X] General Availability (GA) +1 (binding) Regards Łukasz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 7.1.1 test build is ready

Thanks Łukasz tested and looks good! Best regards Markus Am 01.10.25 um 18:12 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: Hello, This is a minor release of Struts 7.1.1 which contains only some small breaking changes. Please take your time and test the bits - any help is appreciated. Please report any problems

Re: [VOTE] Apache Struts 6.8.0

+1 GA On Sun, 28 Sept 2025 at 20:24, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > > The Apache Struts 6.8.0 test build is available. With this release the > following issues were addressed: > > Bug > [WW-5494] - Using struts2.ActionSupport instead of > xwork2.ActionSupport cause interceptors

[TEST] Apache Struts 7.1.1 test build is ready

Hello, This is a minor release of Struts 7.1.1 which contains only some small breaking changes. Please take your time and test the bits - any help is appreciated. Please report any problems you will spot. Here are the changes from the previous version: https://github.com/apache/struts/releases

Re: [VOTE] Apache Struts 6.8.0

+1 [ ] Leave at test build [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [x] General Availability (GA) Thank you Johannes # web: https://www.jgeppert.com Lukasz Lenart schrieb am So., 28. Sept. 2025, 12:24: > The Apache Struts 6.8.0 test build is available. With t

Re: [VOTE] Apache Struts 6.8.0

+1 GA (binding) Sent from my mobile phone > Am 28.09.2025 um 12:24 schrieb Lukasz Lenart : > > The Apache Struts 6.8.0 test build is available. With this release the > following issues were addressed: > > Bug > [WW-5494] - Using struts2.ActionSupport instead of > xw

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 7.1.0 test build is ready

Sure: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-5576 Best regards Markus Am 28.09.25 um 11:22 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: sob., 27 wrz 2025 o 13:[email protected] napisał(a): Hello not so sure about this one, but in Java 25 I see a ton of warnings like: WARNING: Use of the three-l

[VOTE] Apache Struts 6.8.0

The Apache Struts 6.8.0 test build is available. With this release the following issues were addressed: Bug [WW-5494] - Using struts2.ActionSupport instead of xwork2.ActionSupport cause interceptors stack corrupted [WW-5504] - CSP Nonce changes within a page [WW-5523

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.8.0 test build is ready

Great, thanks a lot for testing the build, I will call for Vote then :) śr., 24 wrz 2025 o 04:24 Kusal Kithul-Godage napisał(a): > > Just completed testing - no issues to report! > > > On Mon, 15 Sept 2025 at 16:43, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > &

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 7.1.0 test build is ready

PR addressing commons-logging https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/1366 PR addressing commons-io https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/1367 śr., 24 wrz 2025 o 13:59 [email protected] napisał(a): > > In Standalone artifacts > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/str

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 7.1.0 test build is ready [issue with FileUpload to /tmp]

PR is ready, I added check if file exists prior deleting it https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/1365 czw., 25 wrz 2025 o 10:33 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > śr., 24 wrz 2025 o 13:19 [email protected] > napisał(a): > > > > Am 24.09.25 um 12:36 schrie

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 7.1.0 test build is ready

sob., 27 wrz 2025 o 13:51 [email protected] napisał(a): > > Hello > > not so sure about this one, but in Java 25 I see a ton of warnings like: > > WARNING: Use of the three-letter time zone ID "ACT" is deprecated and it > will be removed in a future release > > This may be due to the u

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 7.1.0 test build is ready

eZone("GMT"); Maybe we should use the full IANA IDs like "Europe/London". Best regards Markus Am 24.09.25 um 10:14 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: Hello, This is a minor release of Struts 7.x which contains only some small breaking changes. Please take your time and test the

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 7.1.0 test build is ready

śr., 24 wrz 2025 o 13:59 [email protected] napisał(a): > > In Standalone artifacts > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/struts/7.1.0/ there are > > * commons-logging-1.3.4 > * commons-io-2.18.0 (CVE-2025-48924) > > > Maybe we should use &g

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 7.1.0 test build is ready [issue with FileUpload to /tmp]

śr., 24 wrz 2025 o 13:19 [email protected] napisał(a): > > Am 24.09.25 um 12:36 schrieb Kusal Kithul-Godage: > > I've the same logging issue. It's occurring within both > > #cleanUpDiskFileItems and #cleanUpTemporaryFiles. The method > > Files#deleteIfExists returns false if the file d

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 7.1.0 test build is ready

In Standalone artifacts https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/struts/7.1.0/ there are * commons-logging-1.3.4 * commons-io-2.18.0 (CVE-2025-48924) Maybe we should use * commons-logging-1.3.5 * commons-io-2.20.0 Best regards Markus Am 24.09.25 um 10:14 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: Hello

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 7.1.0 test build is ready [issue with FileUpload to /tmp]

Am 24.09.25 um 12:36 schrieb Kusal Kithul-Godage: I've the same logging issue. It's occurring within both #cleanUpDiskFileItems and #cleanUpTemporaryFiles. The method Files#deleteIfExists returns false if the file did not exist, so I don't believe there's any need to check the return value and lo

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 7.1.0 test build is ready [issue with FileUpload to /tmp]

I've the same logging issue. It's occurring within both #cleanUpDiskFileItems and #cleanUpTemporaryFiles. The method Files#deleteIfExists returns false if the file did not exist, so I don't believe there's any need to check the return value and log anything in these cases. On Wed, 24 Sept 2025 at

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 7.1.0 test build is ready [issue with FileUpload to /tmp]

śr., 24 wrz 2025 o 11:46 [email protected] napisał(a): > > With 7.1.0 I get a new Warning when uploading a file > > 24-09-2025 11:42:10.9 WARN > org.apache.struts2.dispatcher.multipart.JakartaMultiPartRequest - There > was a problem attempting to delete uploaded file: > /tmp/upload_3bf

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 7.1.0 test build is ready

Perfect! Thanks Łukasz Best regards Markus Am 24.09.25 um 10:39 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: śr., 24 wrz 2025 o 10:[email protected] napisał(a): Thanks! I tried to locate the "small breaking changes": There seems not to be any information about what will potentially break and what n

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 7.1.0 test build is ready [issue with FileUpload to /tmp]

struts.multipart.saveDir=/tmp The file gets uploaded correctly, but the message only appears since 7.1.0. Best regards Markus Am 24.09.25 um 10:14 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: Hello, This is a minor release of Struts 7.x which contains only some small breaking changes. Please take your time and test the bits - any

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 7.1.0 test build is ready

5 um 10:14 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: Hello, This is a minor release of Struts 7.x which contains only some small breaking changes. Please take your time and test the bits - any help is appreciated. Please report any problems you will spot. Here are the changes from the previous version: https://

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 7.1.0 test build is ready

śr., 24 wrz 2025 o 10:27 [email protected] napisał(a): > > Thanks! > > I tried to locate the "small breaking changes": There seems not to be > any information about what will potentially break and what needs to be > changed to avoid any problems. > > Thanks for providing more insight.

[TEST] Apache Struts 7.1.0 test build is ready

Hello, This is a minor release of Struts 7.x which contains only some small breaking changes. Please take your time and test the bits - any help is appreciated. Please report any problems you will spot. Here are the changes from the previous version: https://github.com/apache/struts/releases/tag

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.8.0 test build is ready

Just completed testing - no issues to report! On Mon, 15 Sept 2025 at 16:43, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > > Hello, > > This is a patch release of Struts 6.x which contains only non-breaking > changes. > Please take your time and test the bits - any help is appreciated. > Pleas

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.8.0 test build is ready

Thanks :) > On 23 Sep 2025, at 14:56, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > > czw., 18 wrz 2025 o 10:08 Ing. Andrea Vettori > napisał(a): >> >> Hello, Release notes lists bug WW-5537 >> but it is not present on the >> “changes” GitHub page. >> I tested it and

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.8.0 test build is ready

czw., 18 wrz 2025 o 10:08 Ing. Andrea Vettori napisał(a): > > Hello, Release notes lists bug WW-5537 > but it is not present on the > “changes” GitHub page. > I tested it and the problem is still present. Does this mean it has not been > fixed ?

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.8.0 test build is ready

gt; > Hello, > > This is a patch release of Struts 6.x which contains only non-breaking > changes. > Please take your time and test the bits - any help is appreciated. > Please report any problems you will spot. > > Here are the changes from the previous version: > ht

[TEST] Apache Struts 6.8.0 test build is ready

Hello, This is a patch release of Struts 6.x which contains only non-breaking changes. Please take your time and test the bits - any help is appreciated. Please report any problems you will spot. Here are the changes from the previous version: https://github.com/apache/struts/releases/tag

Re: Struts 6.8.0 & 7.1.0

Done https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/1328 śr., 10 wrz 2025 o 07:33 Łukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > pon., 8 wrz 2025 o 10:18 Greg Huber napisał(a): > > > > Would 6.8.0 include commons-fileupload 1.6.0 as I remember a cve in 1.5. > > As far I see this is a drop-in depe

Re: Struts 6.8.0 & 7.1.0

pon., 8 wrz 2025 o 10:18 Greg Huber napisał(a): > > Would 6.8.0 include commons-fileupload 1.6.0 as I remember a cve in 1.5. As far I see this is a drop-in dependency, so each user can do it independently. Cheers Łukasz - To un

Re: [VOTE] Struts IntelliJ plugin v242.18973.1

I would vote to close it. I would also question if a vote is really necessary for an IDE tool code base. Do you think this is really necessary - especially since it has no effect on the Struts code base itself? I would hate for you to be hindered on submitting updates based off the lack of

Re: Struts 6.8.0 & 7.1.0

Would 6.8.0 include commons-fileupload 1.6.0 as I remember a cve in 1.5. On 07/09/2025 08:50, Lukasz Lenart wrote: Hi, I'm almost ready to prepare these two new test builds, there is one PR waiting review related to 6.7.0 https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/1174 All the changes in

Re: [VOTE] Struts IntelliJ plugin v242.18973.1

I assume we can CLOSE this Vote and focus on another build which should support IntelliJ 2025.2 https://github.com/apache/struts-intellij-plugin/pull/28 niedz., 7 wrz 2025 o 09:56 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > czw., 4 wrz 2025 o 14:42 Burton Rhodes napisał(a): > > > > Wonderin

Struts 6.8.0 & 7.1.0

Hi, I'm almost ready to prepare these two new test builds, there is one PR waiting review related to 6.7.0 https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/1174 All the changes in 6.8.0 - the reset of TODO items I'm going to move to next 6.x version https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/W

Re: [VOTE] Struts IntelliJ plugin v242.18973.1

czw., 4 wrz 2025 o 14:42 Burton Rhodes napisał(a): > > Wondering if most are like me and can't test it out due to version > conflicts? Can't wait to vote once you get it working on 2025.X > (although I'm not binding) Maybe, but as I said, this is more about establishing a proper release process

Re: [VOTE] Struts IntelliJ plugin v242.18973.1

Wondering if most are like me and can't test it out due to version conflicts? Can't wait to vote once you get it working on 2025.X (although I'm not binding) -- Original Message -- From "Lukasz Lenart" To "Struts Developers List" Date 9/4/2025 6

Re: [VOTE] Struts IntelliJ plugin v242.18973.1

Can I assume Lazy Consensus in this case? wt., 2 wrz 2025 o 12:18 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > One more binding vote is needed to close this vote :) > > pon., 18 sie 2025 o 11:51 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > > > niedz., 17 sie 2025 o 10:54 Lukasz Lenart > > napisał(a): > > > [ ] Leave at tes

Re: [VOTE] Struts IntelliJ plugin v242.18973.1

One more binding vote is needed to close this vote :) pon., 18 sie 2025 o 11:51 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > niedz., 17 sie 2025 o 10:54 Lukasz Lenart > napisał(a): > > [ ] Leave at test build > > [ ] Alpha > > [ ] Beta > > [X] General Availability (GA) > > +1 (binding) > > > Cheers > Łukasz

Re: [VOTE] Struts IntelliJ plugin v242.18973.1

niedz., 17 sie 2025 o 10:54 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [X] General Availability (GA) +1 (binding) Cheers Łukasz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For

Re: [VOTE] Struts IntelliJ plugin v242.18973.1

+1 [ ] Leave at test build [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [x] General Availability (GA) Thank you Johannes # web: https://www.jgeppert.com Lukasz Lenart schrieb am Mo., 18. Aug. 2025, 07:49: > niedz., 17 sie 2025 o 17:41 Burton Rhodes > napisał(a):> >

Re: [VOTE] Struts IntelliJ plugin v242.18973.1

niedz., 17 sie 2025 o 17:41 Burton Rhodes napisał(a):> > Lukasz, > Thanks for all your hardwork on this. I would love to test it out, but > I am now on version 2025.2 of IntelliJ. Are you planning on upgrading > the plugin at some point to work with the 2025.X series? Yes, the next step is to r

Re: [VOTE] Struts IntelliJ plugin v242.18973.1

Lukasz, Thanks for all your hardwork on this. I would love to test it out, but I am now on version 2025.2 of IntelliJ. Are you planning on upgrading the plugin at some point to work with the 2025.X series? Thanks, Burton -- Original Message -- From "Lukasz Lenart"

[VOTE] Struts IntelliJ plugin v242.18973.1

The Struts IntelliJ plugin v242.18973.1 test build is now available. This version addresses basic compatibility with IntelliJ Platform 2024.2 plus defines a proper build & release pipelines. Please see the changelog: https://github.com/apache/struts-intellij-plugin/releases/tag/v242.189

Re: [CLOSED] [VOTE] Struts IntelliJ plugin v242.18969.1

): > > The Struts IntelliJ plugin v242.18969.1 test build is now available. > Please see the changelog: > https://github.com/apache/struts-intellij-plugin/releases/tag/untagged-148e962bc254f6c38d40 > > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] General Availabilit

[VOTE] Struts IntelliJ plugin v242.18969.1

The Struts IntelliJ plugin v242.18969.1 test build is now available. Please see the changelog: https://github.com/apache/struts-intellij-plugin/releases/tag/untagged-148e962bc254f6c38d40 [ ] Leave at test build [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] General Availability (GA) Everyone who has tested the build is

A new version of Struts IntelliJ IDEA plugin

x Apache Struts 241.18968.1 https://plugins.jetbrains.com/plugin/1698-apache-struts/edit/versions/stable/816489 Cheers Łukasz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-ma

Re: [CLOSED] [VOTE] Struts Annotations 2.0

Vote passed with result: +1 binding x3 Cheers Lukasz sob., 28 cze 2025 o 16:24 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > The Struts Annotations 2.0 test build is now available as a Maven artifact. > This version uses Java 17 as a minimal version of JDK. > All the changes: > https://github.co

Re: [VOTE] Struts Annotations 2.0

sob., 28 cze 2025 o 16:24 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > [X] General Availability (GA) +1 (binding) Cheers Łukasz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Re: [VOTE] Struts Annotations 2.0

+1 (binding) [ ] Leave at test build [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] General Availability (GA) # web: https://www.jgeppert.com Am Sa., 28. Juni 2025 um 16:24 Uhr schrieb Lukasz Lenart < [email protected]>: > The Struts Annotations 2.0 t

Re: [VOTE] Struts Annotations 2.0

+1 GA On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 at 00:24, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > > The Struts Annotations 2.0 test build is now available as a Maven artifact. > This version uses Java 17 as a minimal version of JDK. > All the changes: > https://github.com/apache/struts-annotations/releases/tag/STRUTS_

[VOTE] Struts Annotations 2.0

The Struts Annotations 2.0 test build is now available as a Maven artifact. This version uses Java 17 as a minimal version of JDK. All the changes: https://github.com/apache/struts-annotations/releases/tag/STRUTS_ANNOTATIONS_2_0 Staging artifacts are available here: https://repository.apache.org

[PR] Add support for JDK17 [struts-annotations]

jogep opened a new pull request, #3: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-annotations/pull/3 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe

Fwd: [struts-community-plugins/struts2-jquery] Update dependency org.hibernate:hibernate-core to v7 (release/5.0.x) (PR #708)

Would some pom rules stop these breaking upgrades? ^5.*$ Forwarded Message Subject: Re: [struts-community-plugins/struts2-jquery] Update dependency org.hibernate:hibernate-core to v7 (release/5.0.x) (PR #708) Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 22:44:02 -0700 From: renovate

Re: Explicitly archiving old struts versions

Thanks for pointing this out! Already requested INFRA to archive the repo https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-26793 and there is no Struts 1 related versions in https://downloads.apache.org/struts/ Cheers -- Łukasz wt., 6 maj 2025 o 10:42 Arnout Engelen napisał(a): > > Hello,

Explicitly archiving old struts versions

Hello, It might be good to mark https://github.com/apache/struts1 as 'archived' and remove unsupported versions from https://downloads.apache.org/struts/ - could someone have a look at that? Kind regards, -- Arnout Engelen ASF Security Response Apache Pekko PMC member, ASF Me

Re: [CLOSED] [VOTE] Struts 6.7.4

Vote passed with result: +1 GA (binding) x3 Thanks a lot! Łukasz czw., 27 lut 2025 o 07:13 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > The Apache Struts 6.7.4 test build is available. With this release the > following issues were addressed: > > Bug > [WW-5493] - Removing parameters broke

Build failed in Jenkins: Struts » Struts-site-javadocs #27

See <https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Struts/job/Struts-site-javadocs/27/display/redirect> Changes: -- [...truncated 1.86 MiB...] rewrite output/maven/struts2-plugins/struts2-velocity-plugin/apidocs/org/apache/struts2/views/velocity/comp

Re: [VOTE] Struts 6.7.4

czw., 27 lut 2025 o 07:13 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [X] General Availability (GA) +1 (binding) Cheers Łukasz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For ad

Re: [CLOSED] [VOTE] Apache Struts 7.0.3

Vote passed with result: GA +1 binding x3 GA +1 non-binding x2 Thanks! Łukasz czw., 27 lut 2025 o 07:09 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > pon., 24 lut 2025 o 13:14 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > > [ ] Leave at test build > > [ ] Alpha > > [ ] Beta > > [X] General Availability (GA) > > +1 (binding) > >

Re: WAR undeploy seems to leave some struts related classes in memory

:04, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > > pt., 28 lut 2025 o 11:55 Greg Huber napisał(a): >> >> Maybe comparing your test case with the showcase setup may give a hint >> on a config issue. >> >> @Lukasz do we need a tag for the last javax examples? > > h

Re: WAR undeploy seems to leave some struts related classes in memory

pt., 28 lut 2025 o 11:55 Greg Huber napisał(a): > > Maybe comparing your test case with the showcase setup may give a hint > on a config issue. > > @Lukasz do we need a tag for the last javax examples? https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/tree/STRUTS_EXAMPLES_1_1_0

Re: [VOTE] Struts 6.7.4

+1 GA On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 5:13 PM Lukasz Lenart wrote: > > The Apache Struts 6.7.4 test build is available. With this release the > following issues were addressed: > > Bug > [WW-5493] - Removing parameters broke custom components > [WW-5497] - Access to non-static mem

Re: [VOTE] Struts 6.7.4

Works well for me. Thanks. [x] General Availability (GA) On 27/02/2025 06:13, Lukasz Lenart wrote: The Apache Struts 6.7.4 test build is available. With this release the following issues were addressed: Bug [WW-5493] - Removing parameters broke custom components [WW-5497] - Access to non

[VOTE] Struts 6.7.4

The Apache Struts 6.7.4 test build is available. With this release the following issues were addressed: Bug [WW-5493] - Removing parameters broke custom components [WW-5497] - Access to non-static members of class objects fails with IllegalArgumentException [WW-5498] - with devMode enabled

Re: [VOTE] Apache Struts 7.0.3

pon., 24 lut 2025 o 13:14 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a): > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [X] General Availability (GA) +1 (binding) Cheers Łukasz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For ad

RE: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.4 test build is ready

I am planning to upgrade to Struts 7, but since the Java version will also be upgraded, I am still preparing. Has the EOL for Struts 6 been decided? -Original Message- From: Lukasz Lenart Sent: Friday, February 21, 2025 11:33 PM To: Struts Developers List Cc: sds-devs Subject: Re

Re: WAR undeploy seems to leave some struts related classes in memory

web context listener) and this may cause struts classes to stay in memory. So it may be a XNIO issue rather than a struts issue. If you have any hint on what to look into it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks > On 24 Feb 2025, at 15:15, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > > sob., 22 lut 2025 o

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.4 test build is ready

rtaEE. I do not plan to force users to migrate, yet this is inevitable. There can be some external factors which can change the optic (as it was with Struts 2.5.x) and then it's hard to backport some updates to the older version. Still, I don't see an immediate requirement to announce EOL

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.4 test build is ready

wt., 25 lut 2025 o 02:51 戸田 栞太（HARP） napisał(a): > > I am planning to upgrade to Struts 7, but since the Java version will also be > upgraded, I am still preparing. > Has the EOL for Struts 6 been decided? No decision yet and I don't see an immediate requirement to do it

Re: [VOTE] Apache Struts 7.0.3

+1 GA On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 11:15 PM Lukasz Lenart wrote: > > The Apache Struts 7.0.3 test build is available. This is the first > patch release of Struts 7.x series. With this release the following > issues were addressed: > > Bug > [WW-5495] - Tomcat 11 and ".act

Re: [VOTE] Apache Struts 7.0.3

[ x] General Availability (GA) Am 24. Februar 2025 13:14:25 MEZ schrieb Lukasz Lenart : >The Apache Struts 7.0.3 test build is available. This is the first >patch release of Struts 7.x series. With this release the following >issues were addressed: > >Bug >[WW-5495] - Tomc

Re: [VOTE] Apache Struts 7.0.3

+1 GA non-binding -- Original Message -- From "Lukasz Lenart" To "Struts Developers List" Date 2/24/2025 6:14:25 AM Subject [VOTE] Apache Struts 7.0.3 The Apache Struts 7.0.3 test build is available. This is the first patch release of Struts 7.x series. W

Re: WAR undeploy seems to leave some struts related classes in memory

sob., 22 lut 2025 o 13:16 Ing. Andrea Vettori napisał(a): > Hope someone can give me an hint on what to look into. I tried to navigate > the two objects with the memory analyzer but it’s too difficult to understand > what’s going on. Could you increase log level to DEBUG and check if you see "D

Re: [VOTE] Apache Struts 7.0.3

Thanks, works well for me. [x] General Availability (GA) On 24/02/2025 12:14, Lukasz Lenart wrote: The Apache Struts 7.0.3 test build is available. This is the first patch release of Struts 7.x series. With this release the following issues were addressed: Bug [WW-5495] - Tomcat 11 and

[VOTE] Apache Struts 7.0.3

The Apache Struts 7.0.3 test build is available. This is the first patch release of Struts 7.x series. With this release the following issues were addressed: Bug [WW-5495] - Tomcat 11 and ".action" send empty page [WW-5498] - with devMode enabled causes actionError [WW-5500] - Multipar

Re: WAR undeploy seems to leave some struts related classes in memory

can't fully understand myself. I’m using struts > since year 2000 (version 6.7 at the moment) in web apps with a mix of JSP and > Freemarker templates. I use Tomcat as servlet container. > Recently I found that when an app is hot deployed, I constantly find that > some non heap

Re: WAR undeploy seems to leave some struts related classes in memory

The image has been removed.  Text only here. On 22/02/2025 10:38, Ing. Andrea Vettori wrote: Hello, I’m facing an issue that can't fully understand myself. I’m using struts since year 2000 (version 6.7 at the moment) in web apps with a mix of JSP and Freemarker templates. I use Tomc

WAR undeploy seems to leave some struts related classes in memory

Hello, I’m facing an issue that can't fully understand myself. I’m using struts since year 2000 (version 6.7 at the moment) in web apps with a mix of JSP and Freemarker templates. I use Tomcat as servlet container. Recently I found that when an app is hot deployed, I constantly find that

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.4 test build is ready

rming! Any plans to migrate to Struts 7? pt., 21 lut 2025 o 12:06 戸田 栞太（HARP） napisał(a): I've confirmed that it works with Struts 6.7.4. Thank you for the fix! On 2025/02/20 14:01:53 Lukasz Lenart wrote: Hello, This is a patch release of Struts 6.x.x which contains only non-breaking chang

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.4 test build is ready

sob., 22 lut 2025 o 10:46 Greg Huber napisał(a): > > What is the plan on v6? Continue development or maintenance only? I would prefer to switch into maintenance mode only, yet it depends on users Cheers Łukasz - To unsubscrib

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.4 test build is ready

What is the plan on v6?  Continue development or maintenance only? More might jump to 7 if the latter. On 21/02/2025 14:33, Lukasz Lenart wrote: Thanks a lot for testing & confirming! Any plans to migrate to Struts 7? pt., 21 lut 2025 o 12:06 戸田 栞太（HARP） napisał(a): I've confirme

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.4 test build is ready

Thanks a lot for testing & confirming! Any plans to migrate to Struts 7? pt., 21 lut 2025 o 12:06 戸田 栞太（HARP） napisał(a): > > I've confirmed that it works with Struts 6.7.4. > > Thank you for the fix! > > On 2025/02/20 14:01:53 Lukasz Lenart wrote: > > Hello, &

RE: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.4 test build is ready

I've confirmed that it works with Struts 6.7.4. Thank you for the fix! On 2025/02/20 14:01:53 Lukasz Lenart wrote: > Hello, > > This is a patch release of Struts 6.x.x which contains only > non-breaking changes. Please take the time and test the bits - any > help is apprec

[TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.4 test build is ready

Hello, This is a patch release of Struts 6.x.x which contains only non-breaking changes. Please take the time and test the bits - any help is appreciated. Please report any problems you will spot. Here are the changes from the previous version: https://github.com/apache/struts/releases/tag

RE: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.3 is ready

Thank you for researching this issue and creating a pull request. -Original Message- From: Kusal Kithul-Godage Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2025 2:28 PM To: 戸田 栞太（HARP） Cc: Struts Developers List ; sds-devs Subject: Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.3 is ready Thanks for sharing the full

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.3 is ready

er; > > > > > > This is a bytecode error which occurs when a library targeting JRE8 is > > > compiled with a JDK greater than 8 but without the '--release 8' > > > option. > > > > > > I've created a PR with a fix: http

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.3 is ready

the relevant error here is: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: > > java.nio.ByteBuffer.flip()Ljava/nio/ByteBuffer; > > > > This is a bytecode error which occurs when a library targeting JRE8 is > > compiled with a JDK greater than 8 but without the '--release 8' > > option. > >

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.3 is ready

7;ve created a PR with a fix: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/1225 > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 11:44 AM 戸田 栞太（HARP） wrote: > > > > I used a simple hierarchical structure. > > Below is the JSP code: > > > > ``` sample.jsp > > <%@ page language="java

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.3 is ready

27; option. I've created a PR with a fix: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/1225 On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 11:44 AM 戸田 栞太（HARP） wrote: > > I used a simple hierarchical structure. > Below is the JSP code: > > ``` sample.jsp > <%@ page language="java" contentType=&qu

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.3 is ready

I used a simple hierarchical structure. Below is the JSP code: ``` sample.jsp <%@ page language="java" contentType="text/html; charset=UTF-8" pageEncoding="UTF-8"%><%-- --%><%@ taglib prefix="s" uri="/struts-tags" %><%-- -

Re: [TEST] Apache Struts 6.7.3 is ready

Could you share the full stacktrace, including the exception thrown and caused by hierarchy? On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 9:14 PM 戸田 栞太（HARP） wrote: > > Hello, > > When using the tag in a JSP with the Struts tags > library, > the included page does not appear. The following

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >