Re: AW: svn commit: r1707087 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/debugging/mod_bucketeer.c

On 02/15/2017 10:10 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote: How about creating it from c->pool and storing it in c->notes for the lifetime of c? Would that be unsafe for HTTP/2? Can multiple requests (that use ap_request_core_filter) be active on the same connection at once? --Jacob

Re: mod_brotli in 2.4.x is missing a few Makefile changes

Actually, I'll test here in a while and commit tomorrow. On 4/25/2017 6:20 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: I have one, command line makefiles and all. I just haven't had time to run a test build yet though lloking at it looks fine, but I like to test first. On 4/25/2017 2:07 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:

Re: svn commit: r1707087 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/debugging/mod_bucketeer.c

On 02/15/2017 05:08 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: [with the patch] On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: Does the attached patch work for you? I don't like it too much (if ever relevent), we could also possibly special case the EOR brigade (looks a bit hacky to

Re: svn commit: r1707087 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/debugging/mod_bucketeer.c

Hi Jacob, On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:58 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: > > Unfortunately the patch just moves the crash to another location. We can't > call APR_BRIGADE_EMPTY() on a brigade that's pointing at junk. I think a > bucket that cleans up the brigade it's a part of is

Re: listener buckets regressions

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:47:53PM +0200, Yann Ylavic wrote: >> Is the failure really expected w/o listener buckets? >> It happens on bind ("Address already in use: AH00072: make_sock"), >> which is indeed not an issue with

Re: mod_brotli in 2.4.x is missing a few Makefile changes

I have one, command line makefiles and all. I just haven't had time to run a test build yet though lloking at it looks fine, but I like to test first. On 4/25/2017 2:07 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: Hi Evgeny, On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Evgeny Kotkov wrote:

Re: HTTP Server Hackathon/BOFs in Miami?

Reiterating the question... from the absence of any answer - I'm presuming our project is not germane to the coming ApacheCon event? As much as I enjoy the IoT field, afraid this conference may fall out of scope for me. I know Jim registered as 'present' and presenting, Rich is registered as both

Re: svn commit: r1707087 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/debugging/mod_bucketeer.c

On 04/25/2017 04:02 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: Let me remind this a bit, it's been a long time :) Will have a look at it tomorrow hopefully.. No problem; sorry for springing it on you again after two months of silence. :D --Jacob

Re: svn commit: r1791807 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/conf/extra/httpd-manual.conf.in

On Apr 20, 2017 15:06, "André Malo" wrote: * William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Please re-validate your assumptions before we proceed with this > discussion. I'll be interested in your findings. I did. I've decided to drop out of that "discussion". I'm sorry if I offended you, or was

Request for eyes/test for 2.4

Could some people take a look at the hcheck backport proposal in STATUS for 2.4.26... tia

mod_brotli in 2.4.x is missing a few Makefile changes

Hi all, I noticed that the version of mod_brotli that has been backported to 2.4.x lacks a few Makefile changes from trunk. This results in a failing Unix build when mod_brotli is not being built. Another issue is that by default the CMakeLists.txt file refers to invalid library filenames.

Re: mod_brotli in 2.4.x is missing a few Makefile changes

Hi Evgeny, On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Evgeny Kotkov wrote: > > With the backport being in place in the 2.4.x branch, these changes no longer > merge cleanly from trunk. I can prepare a backport nomination for them that > resolves the conflicts and add it to