On Nov 30, 2011, at 9:16 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The XML interface for the balancer manager has, admittedly, lagged
behind...
Anyone have cycles and/or talent to bring it up to snuff? If not,
I'll try to muddle thru it ;)
As I mentioned to Jim at ApacheCon, I have a 2.2 patch for this
On Nov 30, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Jim Riggs wrote:
On Nov 30, 2011, at 9:16 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The XML interface for the balancer manager has, admittedly, lagged
behind...
Anyone have cycles and/or talent to bring it up to snuff? If not,
I'll try to muddle thru it ;)
As I mentioned
Here is what I am testing: I am using (currently one) mod_proxy_fcgi member in
a balancer to php-fpm. I have already run into some issues with fcgi:// as a
balancer member as described in
On Feb 9, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Thu Feb 9 15:07:22 2012
New Revision: 1242351
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1242351view=rev
Log:
Handle cases, esp when using mod_proxy_fcgi, when we do not
want SCRIPT_FILENAME to
On Jun 7, 2012, at 3:11 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
I share Williams concern that this makes mod_forensic potentially less
useful.
Maybe making the forensic log mode 600 by default would be a better
idea?
I have to agree with Jeff. I would rather have a more difficult or even
impossible
On Jun 8, 2012, at 11:51 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 08 Jun 2012, at 5:45 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Well not quite, we'd still have had a problem with storing and archiving
those logs even if we hadn't made them available to committers, because
they violate our password retention policies.
I am in the process of preparing a patch to add a new RewriteMap type and could
use some input from all of you on the best implementation. What I am creating
is basically a clone of the txt map type, except that each line is a regexp
followed by a replacement (with potential back-references).
On 20 Dec 2013, at 07:04, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
OK... this is weird, FreeBSD 9.2 make doesn't like
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1327907
gmake works fine. :/
(can't grab what the exact error is right now, but something
like needs an operator
For some (old 2007) context, see:
http://markmail.org/message/btwcnbl2i7ftwj4n
https://community.jivesoftware.com/message/201787
I am proxying an app via AJP to Tomcat 6/7. In certain circumstances, it
appears that the app (or possibly Tomcat) is erroneously sending a flush before
the
.
Regards
Rüdiger
-Original Message-
From: Jim Riggs
Sent: Dienstag, 2. August 2011 18:03
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: mod_proxy_ajp: ignoring flush before headers (again)
For some (old 2007) context, see:
http://markmail.org/message/btwcnbl2i7ftwj4n
https
tracker for 2.2.x.
Regards
Rüdiger
-Original Message-
From: Jim Riggs
Sent: Mittwoch, 3. August 2011 16:48
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: mod_proxy_ajp: ignoring flush before headers (again)
This does appear to work. Our automated tests are running
right now
I am having a couple of problems WRT using mod_proxy_fcgi inside a balancer
proxied to php-fpm. There are lots of variables in this scenario, but I think I
have narrowed the issues down. The setup looks like this:
httpd - balancer - fcgi balancer members - php-fpm
Issue 1: PHP-FPM does not
On Oct 27, 2011, at 3:35 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tuesday 25 October 2011, Noah Robin wrote:
I ran some tests on this and the following modified version will
work:
Header always set Cache-Control max-age=%{CACHE_LIFETIME}e
env=CACHE_LIFETIME
RewriteRule /example
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50317
While we are at ApacheCon, I would love to address this nasty bug with someone
familiar with 2.2's mod_cache. Our sites were brought down a few times last
year before we finally tracked it down to being this particular bug. I am using
a
On 9 Apr 2014, at 14:46, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
r1023398 for 2.2:
http://people.apache.org/~covener/patches/httpd-2.2.x-thunder.diff
The remove_url() prevents other threads from serving a stale cached
file during refresh of a slow response, but it's unnecessary to have a
On 27 Mar 2014, at 14:16, Mike Rumph mike.ru...@oracle.com wrote:
Hello all,
I have been doing some testing on the results of httpd restart with
configuration errors.
This gave me some interesting results.
For these tests I build httpd trunk with APR trunk on Linux using the
following
On 14 Apr 2014, at 10:38, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Mike Rumph mike.ru...@oracle.com wrote:
If there is an unknown directive in the config file, simply ignore it with a
warning.
You can't do that. What if it was Reqiure?
I agree with Eric. I
On 21 Apr 2014, at 06:38, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 19 Apr 2014, at 10:26 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
Graham -- related subject brought up either in Denver or in the bug.
It seems that when we serve a stale file while the cache is locked,
the age headers are
[Posting separately to both dev and users to see if anyone on either side sees
value in getting this committed.]
About a year ago, I had an idea for a new type of RewriteMap that would fill an
important need for a few particular use cases that we have [1]. While we were
at ApacheCon in Denver,
If so, I can RM.
PLEASE! We need those thundering herd fixes in mod_cache! :-)
On 16 Jul 2014, at 08:19, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Jim Riggs apache-li...@riggs.me wrote:
If so, I can RM.
PLEASE! We need those thundering herd fixes in mod_cache! :-)
This has already been backported by http://svn.apache.org/r1608302.
I
On 11/30/2014 11:08 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
* deploying Python web apps under uWSGI behind mod_proxy_fcgi/scgi
(some material
here: http://emptyhammock.com/projects/info/pyweb/index.html)
On 1 Dec 2014, at 19:15, Daniel Ruggeri drugg...@primary.net wrote:
Similarly, I'm always up for giving
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Jim Riggs apache-li...@riggs.me wrote:
P.S. mod_proxy_balancer - mod_proxy_fcgi - php-fpm is really fun and
interesting too! ;-)
mod_proxy_fcgi seems to need a bit of work from what I
On Wednesday, April 29, 2015, Jim Riggs apache-li...@riggs.me
mailto:apache-li...@riggs.me wrote:
Warn out from writing all of this and hopeful that someone other than me
actually cares, I wish you all well today/tonight!
*Worn* out, even! Boy, I was tired!
to not get slash-normalized URIs?
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:52 PM, Jim Riggs apache-li...@riggs.me wrote:
This came up at ApacheCon a couple of weeks ago. I just took this knowledge
for granted, as I have always accounted for it, but both Rich and Trawick
were surprised. As I thought about
This came up at ApacheCon a couple of weeks ago. I just took this knowledge for
granted, as I have always accounted for it, but both Rich and Trawick were
surprised. As I thought about it some more, it seems this may be a POLA
violation. Thoughts? If we agree it should be fixed, I can make the
On 1 May 2015, at 10:52, André Malo n...@perlig.de wrote:
* Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Jim Riggs apache-li...@riggs.me
wrote:
Thanks, Yann. I remember looking at this code before. The question
remains, though
[ Long message and proposal follows. Bear with me. There are a lot of words,
but that is because we need a lot of help/input! ;-) ]
So, this has come up in the past several times, and we discussed it again this
year at ApacheCon: How do we get the load balancer to make smarter, more
informed
On 28 Apr 2015, at 10:20, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 28 Apr 2015, at 5:17 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Anyone looked into having httpd be able to Listen on a UDS, as
well as scenarios where we may want that even?
I have always wanted it - one thing it allows
I just updated https://wiki.apache.org/httpd/Face2Face for Austin. If you are
getting into town on Sunday and are interested in grabbing some dinner, let me
know or update the page. Some of us got together last year on ApacheCon Eve and
had a nice time. Also update the page if there are other
On 28 May 2015, at 14:30, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 28.05.2015 um 21:22 schrieb Rich Bowen:
On 05/27/2015 05:38 PM, olli hauer wrote:
- for long time there was no working mod_php module for 2.4, and
changing to
php-fpm was not for everyone a solution.
In my
> On 2 Aug 2017, at 12:33, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> I'll be adding some code to allow for lbfactors to be
> single decimal numbers (like 1.1, 2.5, etc...)... People
> have asked "How do I change it so that machine B is like 10%
> preferred" and I mention that "Well, you could
> On 11 Jul 2017, at 11:46, James Cloos wrote:
>
>> "JJ" == Jim Jagielski writes:
>
> JJ> *) mod_http2: disable and give warning when mpm_prefork is encountered.
> The server will
> JJ> continue to work, but HTTP/2 will no longer be negotiated.
> On 3 Aug 2017, at 08:30, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> It's just GUI magic... Basically, it will internally take '1.1' and
> convert it to 11, 1.0 to 10, etc...
If that's the case, I would recommend going 2 decimal places (1.1 = 100, 1.25 =
125, etc.) to allow using percentages.
> On 18 May 2017, at 12:46, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Based on feedback from various sessions:
>
> o A new-kind of "hot standby" in mod_proxy which kicks
>in whenever a worker moves out of the pool (ie, doesn't
>wait until all workers are out)... ala a redundant
>
> On 22 May 2017, at 06:45, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>
> I'll let Jim Riggs answer that...it came up during his mod_cache
> talk.
>> On May 18, 2017, at 2:25 PM, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:2
> On 18 May 2017, at 13:22, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> Am 18.05.2017 um 19:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Based on feedback from various sessions:
>>
>> o A new-kind of "hot standby" in mod_proxy which kicks
>> in whenever a worker moves out of the pool (ie, doesn't
>>
This was mentioned in today's Bulletproof TLS newsletter
(https://www.feistyduck.com/bulletproof-tls-newsletter/issue_28_lets_encrypt_downtime.html):
https://blog.hboeck.de/archives/886-The-Problem-with-OCSP-Stapling-and-Must-Staple-and-why-Certificate-Revocation-is-still-broken.html
It
> On 1 Jun 2017, at 17:15, Yann Ylavic <ylavic@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Jim Riggs <apache-li...@riggs.me> wrote:
>>> On 1 Jun 2017, at 15:25, Yann Ylavic <ylavic@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun
> On 2 Jun 2017, at 07:20, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jun 1, 2017, at 1:29 PM, Jim Riggs <apache-li...@riggs.me> wrote:
>>
>> Regardless, even worst case, we are looking at what, iterating 6 pointers
>> instead of 3 or 10 instead
> On 23 May 2017, at 09:16, Jim Riggs <apache-li...@riggs.me> wrote:
>
>> On 18 May 2017, at 13:22, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> wrote:
>>
>> Am 18.05.2017 um 19:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> Based on feedback from various sessions:
>&g
y complexity.
Regardless, even worst case, we are looking at what, iterating 6 pointers
instead of 3 or 10 instead of 5? We probably have some lower hanging fruit
across the request lifecycle code to increase performance than saving some
arithmetic on a handful of structs, no? ;-)
>&g
> On 1 Jun 2017, at 15:25, Yann Ylavic <ylavic@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Yann Ylavic <ylavic@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Jim Riggs <apache-li...@riggs.me> wrote:
>>>> On 1 Jun 2017, at
I don't know that it really matters, but this guy is in there twice (in each
CHANGES doc), once with the PR # and once without:
> + *) mod_proxy: Allow the per-request environment variable "no-proxy" to
> + be used as an alternative to ProxyPass /path !. This is primarily
> + to set
So, who all will be in Miami? From what I've seen on Sched and messages here:
Yes : jimjag, rich, jfc, ruggeri, me
No : rowe, covener
There are several other ACNA regulars who have been quiet around here lately.
Anyone else coming in?
I'll be there Sunday evening through Friday morning. I
> On 11 Apr 2018, at 08:28, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 2:11 PM, wrote:
>> Author: jhriggs
>> Date: Wed Apr 11 12:11:05 2018
>> New Revision: 1828890
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1828890=rev
>> Log:
>>
On 11 Apr 2018, at 07:11, jhri...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Author: jhriggs
> Date: Wed Apr 11 12:11:05 2018
> New Revision: 1828890
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1828890=rev
> Log:
> mod_proxy_balancer: Add hot spare member type and corresponding flag (R). Hot
> spare members are
>
I didn't think of this before, but there is one edge case this would miss: if
someone (for whatever reason) wants a relative ErrorLog *file* named `syslog*',
for example `ErrorLog "syslog-httpd.log"' or `ErrorLog "syslog.log"'. It
appears that this is already broken in server/log.c, though.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 7:17 AM, Jim Riggs <jim...@riggs.me> wrote:
>> I didn't think of this before, but there is one edge case this would miss:
>> if someone (for whatever reason) wants a relative ErrorLog *file* named
>> `syslog*', for example `ErrorLog "syslog-
> On 20 Apr 2018, at 09:52, Luca Toscano <toscano.l...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2018-04-20 16:27 GMT+02:00 Jim Riggs <jim...@riggs.me>:
> > On 20 Apr 2018, at 08:53, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry for coming in late, but what is the exa
tag;
> On 18 Apr 2018, at 13:32, Luca Toscano <toscano.l...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot Jim! I like your code change and the extra checks, but I'd
> prefer to use strncmp if possible, also in log.c.
> Feel free to amend the patch, or I'll do it tomorrow (I forgot the
/
const char *tag;
> On 18 Apr 2018, at 13:32, Luca Toscano <toscano.l...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot Jim! I like your code change and the extra checks, but I'd
> prefer to use strncmp if possible, also in log.c.
> Feel free to amend the patch, or I'll d
> On 20 Apr 2018, at 01:42, Luca Toscano <toscano.l...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2018-04-19 17:49 GMT+02:00 Jim Riggs <j...@riggs.me>:
> Luca -
>
> Here's the same thing standardizing on strn?cmp(). Not that you couldn't have
> done it yourself, but since I had it u
> On 20 Apr 2018, at 08:53, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Sorry for coming in late, but what is the exact issue we are trying to solve
> again? My understanding was that if someone wanted something like
>
> ErrorLog "syslog-httpd.log"
>
> that the current implementation
54 matches
Mail list logo