Re: Ideas from ApacheCon

Will do! THX! > On Jun 2, 2017, at 9:46 AM, Jim Riggs wrote: > >> On 2 Jun 2017, at 07:20, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >>> On Jun 1, 2017, at 1:29 PM, Jim Riggs wrote: >>> >>> Regardless, even worst case, we are looking at what,

Re: Ideas from ApacheCon

> On 2 Jun 2017, at 07:20, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> On Jun 1, 2017, at 1:29 PM, Jim Riggs wrote: >> >> Regardless, even worst case, we are looking at what, iterating 6 pointers >> instead of 3 or 10 instead of 5? We probably have some lower hanging

Re: Ideas from ApacheCon

On Jun 1, 2017, at 1:29 PM, Jim Riggs wrote:Regardless, even worst case, we are looking at what, iterating 6 pointers instead of 3 or 10 instead of 5? We probably have some lower hanging fruit across the request lifecycle code to increase performance than saving some

Re: Ideas from ApacheCon

> On Jun 1, 2017, at 1:29 PM, Jim Riggs wrote: > > > Regardless, even worst case, we are looking at what, iterating 6 pointers > instead of 3 or 10 instead of 5? We probably have some lower hanging fruit > across the request lifecycle code to increase performance than

Re: Ideas from ApacheCon

> On Jun 1, 2017, at 1:29 PM, Jim Riggs wrote: > > > Regardless, even worst case, we are looking at what, iterating 6 pointers > instead of 3 or 10 instead of 5? We probably have some lower hanging fruit > across the request lifecycle code to increase performance than

Implement hot spares in mod_proxy_balancer [was Re: Ideas from ApacheCon]

> On 1 Jun 2017, at 17:15, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Jim Riggs wrote: >>> On 1 Jun 2017, at 15:25, Yann Ylavic wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Yann Ylavic

Re: Ideas from ApacheCon

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Jim Riggs wrote: >> On 1 Jun 2017, at 15:25, Yann Ylavic wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Yann Ylavic >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Jim Riggs

Re: Ideas from ApacheCon

> On 1 Jun 2017, at 15:25, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Jim Riggs wrote: On 1 Jun 2017, at 07:55, Jim Jagielski wrote:

Re: Ideas from ApacheCon

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Jim Riggs wrote: >>> On 1 Jun 2017, at 07:55, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> >>> I really like where this is going... I just have a few questions: >>>

Re: Ideas from ApacheCon

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Jim Riggs wrote: >> On 1 Jun 2017, at 07:55, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> I really like where this is going... I just have a few questions: >> >> 1. The style, esp with array usage is different; eg APR_ARRAY_PUSH >> and

Re: Ideas from ApacheCon

> On 1 Jun 2017, at 07:55, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I really like where this is going... I just have a few questions: > > 1. The style, esp with array usage is different; eg APR_ARRAY_PUSH > and APR_ARRAY_IDX... any particular reason why? Well, we don't seem to be

Re: Ideas from ApacheCon

I really like where this is going... I just have a few questions: 1. The style, esp with array usage is different; eg APR_ARRAY_PUSH and APR_ARRAY_IDX... any particular reason why? 2. I understand the logic behind creating the arrays, but doesn't this increase the overhead. We go

Re: Ideas from ApacheCon

> On 23 May 2017, at 09:16, Jim Riggs wrote: > >> On 18 May 2017, at 13:22, Rainer Jung wrote: >> >> Am 18.05.2017 um 19:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> Based on feedback from various sessions: >>> >>> o A new-kind of "hot standby" in mod_proxy

Re: Ideas from ApacheCon

On 23 May 2017, at 3:29 PM, Jim Riggs wrote: >>> Does that differ from "CacheQuickHandler OFF"? > > > This one is a bit quirky and requires some investigation to see the edge > cases. There appear to be some situations where Require directives with > `CacheQuickHandler

Re: Ideas from ApacheCon

> Am 23.05.2017 um 17:44 schrieb Jacob Champion : > > On 05/18/2017 10:46 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Based on feedback from various sessions: > > Thanks for the list, Jim! > >> o Warn if the trailing '/'s don't match in ProxyPass/Reverse >> directives (eg:

Re: Ideas from ApacheCon

On 05/18/2017 10:46 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Based on feedback from various sessions: Thanks for the list, Jim! o Warn if the trailing '/'s don't match in ProxyPass/Reverse directives (eg: ProxyPass /foo http://www.example.com/foo/ ) This one is easy enough to put into the

Re: Ideas from ApacheCon

> On 18 May 2017, at 12:46, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Based on feedback from various sessions: > > o A new-kind of "hot standby" in mod_proxy which kicks >in whenever a worker moves out of the pool (ie, doesn't >wait until all workers are out)... ala a redundant >

Re: Ideas from ApacheCon

> On 18 May 2017, at 13:22, Rainer Jung wrote: > > Am 18.05.2017 um 19:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Based on feedback from various sessions: >> >> o A new-kind of "hot standby" in mod_proxy which kicks >> in whenever a worker moves out of the pool (ie, doesn't >>

Re: Ideas from ApacheCon

> On 22 May 2017, at 06:45, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I'll let Jim Riggs answer that...it came up during his mod_cache > talk. >> On May 18, 2017, at 2:25 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Rainer Jung

Re: Ideas from ApacheCon

I'll let Jim Riggs answer that...it came up during his mod_cache talk. > On May 18, 2017, at 2:25 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: >>> o Look into AAA and mod_cache; eg: "bolt in at the end" > > Does

Re: Ideas from ApacheCon

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: >> o Look into AAA and mod_cache; eg: "bolt in at the end" Does that differ from "CacheQuickHandler OFF"? -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com

Re: Ideas from ApacheCon

Thanks for the list. One remark inline ... Am 18.05.2017 um 19:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski: Based on feedback from various sessions: o A new-kind of "hot standby" in mod_proxy which kicks in whenever a worker moves out of the pool (ie, doesn't wait until all workers are out)... ala a