Re: SSL Policy Definitions

2017-05-03 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
> On 3 May 2017, at 14:09, Graham Leggett wrote: > > On 03 May 2017, at 2:01 PM, Stefan Eissing > wrote: > >> We seem to all agree that a definition in code alone will not be good >> enough. People need to be able to see what is actually in

Re: SSL Policy Definitions

2017-05-03 Thread Stefan Eissing
> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:20 schrieb Luca Toscano : > > Hi Graham, > > 2017-05-03 14:09 GMT+02:00 Graham Leggett : > On 03 May 2017, at 2:01 PM, Stefan Eissing > wrote: > > > We seem to all agree that a definition in code

Re: SSL Policy Definitions

2017-05-03 Thread Luca Toscano
Hi Graham, 2017-05-03 14:09 GMT+02:00 Graham Leggett : > On 03 May 2017, at 2:01 PM, Stefan Eissing > wrote: > > > We seem to all agree that a definition in code alone will not be good > enough. People need to be able to see what is actually in

Re: SSL Policy Definitions

2017-05-03 Thread Graham Leggett
On 03 May 2017, at 2:01 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > We seem to all agree that a definition in code alone will not be good enough. > People need to be able to see what is actually in effect. I think we’re overthinking this. We only need to document the settings