> On 3 May 2017, at 14:09, Graham Leggett wrote:
>
> On 03 May 2017, at 2:01 PM, Stefan Eissing
> wrote:
>
>> We seem to all agree that a definition in code alone will not be good
>> enough. People need to be able to see what is actually in
> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:20 schrieb Luca Toscano :
>
> Hi Graham,
>
> 2017-05-03 14:09 GMT+02:00 Graham Leggett :
> On 03 May 2017, at 2:01 PM, Stefan Eissing
> wrote:
>
> > We seem to all agree that a definition in code
Hi Graham,
2017-05-03 14:09 GMT+02:00 Graham Leggett :
> On 03 May 2017, at 2:01 PM, Stefan Eissing
> wrote:
>
> > We seem to all agree that a definition in code alone will not be good
> enough. People need to be able to see what is actually in
On 03 May 2017, at 2:01 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> We seem to all agree that a definition in code alone will not be good enough.
> People need to be able to see what is actually in effect.
I think we’re overthinking this.
We only need to document the settings
Coming back how we would want to define SSL Security Policies:
> Am 03.05.2017 um 12:08 schrieb Stefan Eissing :
> 3. Place of Definition
> --
> Code vs. Config Files vs. Macros vs. "Owned Macros"
>
>> Am 03.05.2017 um 00:48 schrieb Jacob