Can there please be some priority given to the IP cleanup of the Symphony
section of the SVN so it is safe for others to begin working on it?
It is in an untouchable state in its present form, especially if folks want to
merge changes and fixes in preparation for integration of bits from it.
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]: next step towards graduation
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
I don't think deleting the files of the Symphony contribution is a
constructive step.
You overstate things. There is no IPR issue here. The IPR is set by
the SGA
It has nothing to do with whether anything from the Symphony donation is ever
released in AOO. The code has been donated and it should have its IP cleaned
up. Also, the history is not needed. It is simply the headers and notices on
the code as donated that is a problem. There are simple
All that is required to clean up the headers is to have some sort of official
permission from IBM to ASF that allows it to be done. That or an IBM-employed
committer needs to be identified as authorized to do it. The basic requirement
is under Source File Headers for Code Developed at the ASF
It seems valuable to have the CFP available here also:
https://staging.fosdem.org/2013/news/2012-11-01-cfp/
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2012 09:22
To: annou...@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Apache
Is this to be based on the Symphony code?
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Steve Yin [mailto:steve.yin@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 01:07
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: IAccessible2 integration for AOO 4.0
Thanks for both of your suggestions. The time
Just go to http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/ and browse around to
confirm that everything you are interested in is there.
(Are you thinking of the l10n under openoffice/branches ? It does appear that
all of openoffice/ooo-site and openoffice/site are there.)
- Dennis
[mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 14:25
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: IAccessible2 integration for AOO 4.0
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Remember, we wrote it.
Well, I suppose the notion of work for hire might
to happen?
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 14:57
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: IAccessible2 integration for AOO 4.0
I don't think the web site situation is an equivalent. I also don't think
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: IAccessible2 integration for AOO 4.0
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
I don't think the web site situation is an equivalent. I also don't think
the choice of base for integration of Symphony features
Please see https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121141 in addressing
security vs protection in the UX also.
1. CHOICE OF ENCRYPTION ALGORITHM
It is important to appreciate that there is no recommendation about AES for the
ODF 1.2 manifest:algorithm-name. The only mandated algorithm
used
is not itself protected in a secure way and a valuable password should not be
reused for this purpose.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 10:26
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE
I was running the Windows 8 Update advisor on my Windows XP SP3 Tablet PC to
see what was incompatible with Windows 8. (I learned that the machine itself
is incompatible - the processor chip does not have NX and Windows 8 will not
install on it.)
But the prize, scrolling down the
I agree with Rob's suggestion. Crowd-sourcing some tests would be great.
The test suites tend to require a version of the algorithm that can be run
standalone inside the test harness. The ScRandom() code could be transcribed
to a clean C implementation that would be usable. It could be
Concerning Microsoft Office interoperability, I suspect the absence of a way to
save documents in OOXML formats is a detractor from Apache OpenOffice 3.4.
There are the usual interchange fidelity issues as well, depending on which
interchangeable formats are used.
- Dennis
-Original
The scroll bars aren't that bad. They will work reasonably well working with a
touch screen/pad too.
One suggestion: It's helpful if news items are always be dated [;).
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 15:06
I am not so sure that jamendo covers of popular tunes are free to use, since
songwriter royalties are required to be paid in the US. I doubt that Bob Dylan
has granted royalty-free use of I Shall Be Released, for example.
In general, it works better if freely-licensed original compositions are
With a document open in Writer, type the text normally, including any inserted
symbols.
Then select any adjacent characters that you want to be positioned differently
(super- or sub-).
Use the Format | Character ... selection from the menu bar. On the Character
dialog, select the Position
I started looking through this. There probably needs to be a flag, because
there are inappropriate sources and this is an opinion piece in the ways Rob
has noticed.
While browsing,
In the prelude, the Apache License is described as among the weak copyleft
licenses. It is not, and weak
I agree, Gerard has impeached himself with regard to any interest in or grasp
of the facts, etc.
Maybe he'll declare that DOA AOO to be a zombie that has eaten 30 million
brains in 2012.
I don't think there is much that makes someone ineligible to edit, but it
certainly makes the result
...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 08:26
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Assigning Issues to the issues List?
Hi,
Am 18.01.2013 um 23:52 schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org:
I just noticed these changes on issues to clear out old bug assignees. I
recall
+1
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 09:17
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; q...@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Enabling QA Contact field in Bugzilla?
Any objections to enabling the useqacontact field in Bugzilla?
Per the BZ doc:
+1
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 04:09
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: An idea: Add option to delete profile when uninstalling
As I've been reviewing the backlog of defect reports submitted by
users I notice a lot of
+1 - covers the bases.
-Original Message-
From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 12:39
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: An idea: Add option to delete profile when uninstalling
Am 02/01/2013 01:19 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
On Fri, 1
For real input fields, (that is, form:text elements), direct entry works.
I assume that the case being discussed is for conventional field values that
someone wants to edit. (Like a page number or a date field in a footer.)
In those cases, I suppose direct entry might be useful. But there is
Thanks for adding this.
I have added a Calc and OpenFormat Support subsection there,
with description of the proposed change to have POWER(0,0) produce
an error value (#VALUE!) instead of 1, the current result. That
is explained on the Release Notes and at the Bugzilla Issue #114430
at
It is not clear that OpenOffice-lineage software has returned the same value
for POWER(0,0) over the years. It seems that a third-party library has been
relied upon for the implementation and there was apparently not much attention
to edge cases. If that library changes or is different on
, 2013 16:57
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; orc...@apache.org
Subject: Re: Calc behavior: result of 0 ^ 0
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
It is not clear that OpenOffice-lineage software has returned the same value
for POWER(0,0) over the years
...@apache.org
Subject: Re: Calc behavior: result of 0 ^ 0
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
It is not clear that OpenOffice-lineage software has returned the same value
for POWER(0,0) over the years. It seems that a third-party library has been
relied upon
I don't see how this discussion impacts the results of SERIESSUM. The nice
aspect of SERIESSUM is that it specifies precisely what the result should be.
So long as no exponents are negative, it requires that SERIESSUM(0;...) be
either c[0] or 0 depending on whether or not 0 is included in the
For some reason, I failed to consider this question until some restless sleep
this past weekend.
My understanding is that the improvements in OOXML handling are to be made
available under the ALv2 license. However, if those are in the form of
patches, their usefulness to AOO will depend on
This is not a vote. There is a statement about what is acceptable
mathematically that I cannot leave unchallenged. However, that is different
than what might or might not be acceptable computationally for a give case and
I continue to refrain from reiterating any argument about that.
-
is.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 14:24
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: Calc behavior: result of 0 ^ 0
This is not a vote. There is a statement about what is acceptable
mathematically
RESOLUTION OF THE PROPOSAL
The proposed change was made under CTR (Commit then Review). There has been
a subsequent review and, as Don points out, the discussion has been lengthy
and vocal.
The objective is to achieve consensus. I believe it is clear that there is
no consensus on the proposed
Hawking has explained how the change
would be incorrect and no example where someone has been affected
by this change has been provided.
Has the patch been vetoed, and if so on what basis?
Pedro.
Da: Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
A: dev
I did not test with your patch. I reported on behavior of available
releases.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Pedro Giffuni [mailto:p...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 19:42
To: rabas...@gmail.com; dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: :Re: Calc behavior: result of 0 ^ 0
in Writer
Hi,
On 15.02.2013 00:44, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
That's odd. I created a form:text-input field and it showed me an entry
window right in the document where I put it. I could then simply type
into
the box that was part of my document. That is, in fact, what I expected.
Hm...
I
, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
That's odd. I created a form:text-input field and it showed me an entry
window right in the document where I put it. I could then simply type
into
the box that was part of my document. That is, in fact, what I expected.
Hm...
I do not know form:text-input - I did
In case it is not clear where conventions arise in conjunction with prefixes on
XML qualified names, it is the namespace that is bound to the prefix that
establishes the convention. The prefix choice is relatively arbitrary (but one
must avoid unintentional collision with a prefix that is
I've been sitting on this in draft since Thursday because the two vetoes
from Kay and Rob seemed to have been sufficient and I didn't want to pile
onto Pedro. Pedro, it seems to me you are not paying attention. I agree
that the veto should have left the patch to be reverted yourself, and the
+1
This builds on an initial suggestion by Andrea Pescetti.
Introduction of spreadsheet settings for compatibility selections needs to be
done carefully. The usability needs to be handled in a way that doesn't confuse
anyone. I think it is a great way to deal with the interoperability cases
I don't want to get into this. I think enough has been said.
I do want to avoid anyone misunderstanding what the ANSI/ISO Standards for C
and C++ say about pow(0,0) however.
In general, C/C++ pow(0,0) is left implementation-defined. There may be a
domain error (this is an
I earlier quoted the applicable (and only) texts from the Standards themselves,
particularly C++ and also the latest C Standard (2011 and C99 with all
Technical Corrigenda through 2007).
No matter what is said about pow(0,0) in the C99 Rationale v5.10 Appendix F of
April 2003, there are no
, 2013 14:08
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; orc...@apache.org
Subject: Re: Solving this 0⁰ issue correctly (was Re: Calc behavior: result of
0 ^ 0)
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
I earlier quoted the applicable (and only) texts from the Standards
At the ASF, 72 hours is a *minimum* time. And it is polite to step past
known holidays and weekends as well.
There needs to be some clarification here on how Apache projects do not have
designated teams and voting is something that happens after extensive
discussion (both on the dev list). The
+1
I admire these introductions. They strike me as very inviting.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: RGB ES [mailto:rgb.m...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 13:56
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Draft blog post: Call for Documentation Volunteers
2013/2/25 Rob
On Microsoft Windows, the Input Methods are handled at the Operating System
level. I don't doubt that there are apps that use their own, but the
system-wide IMEs are very handy.
- Dennis
MORE DETAILS
For any chosen language one can specify what is the current OS display
language, the
I don't think entropy is the proper term.
The physicists version that I learned was in the following form:
1. You can't win.
2. You can't even break even.
3. And you can't get out of the game.
I think an appropriate concern, here, has to do with technical debt. The
longer the technical
Apachecon.
Pity the AOO contingent was small this time round.
On Mar 1, 2013, at 4:34 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
I don't think entropy is the proper term.
The physicists version that I learned was in the following form:
1. You can't win.
2. You can't even break even.
3
+1
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 14:53
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Strategic Planning: Website
[ ... ]
And let's not forget alternative ways of addressing this concern:
1) Work with Infra to make MWiki be
Are list threads and Community Wiki topics being confused?
-Original Message-
From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 15:44
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Strategic Planning: Website
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:15 PM, janI j...@apache.org
contributions
and such of those that survive in derivatives.
I represent that I am legally entitled to grant the above
licenses and make those contributions that I offer to
ASF projects.
March 8, 2013
Dennis E. Hamilton
4401 44th Ave SW
Seattle, WA 98116 USA
dennis.hamil...@acm.org
orc
It is not clear to me that the Apache OpenOffice statement answers the
question as it was asked at [tdf-discuss]. I read Jim's question as
being about multi-licensing (dual- or more). Not about a contributor
making a contribution of their original work in two places and under
different licenses
Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 19:48
To: LOffice Developers List (libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org)
Cc: 'disc...@documentfoundation.org'
Subject: Grant of License
This grant does not specify any particular open-source license.
My
@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: FW: GRANT OF LICENSE: Dennis Hamilton LibreOffice contributions
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
I have made this grant known to The Document Foundation and the
LibreOffice project. The TDF notification appears at
http
Reina,
I am going to attempt a fresh install of Symphony to see if I can
duplicate the problem. I will be installing on Windows Vista (x86)
in a Virtual Machine. It has no Java installed. I will remove
OpenOffice 3.4.0 and also perform a full security scan
before I install Symphony.
I think
it
successfully.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2013 11:03
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: 'Waldorf PC'
Subject: RE: Problems with Accessibility in Open Office
Reina,
I am going to attempt a fresh install of Symphony
From my perspective, Jörg's concern is very simple.
There are actions and arrangements that have been made that encourage certain
expectations in the mind of persons who participate and contribute in various
ways. And when those expectations are unsatisfied, that leads to assessments
and
+1
There's also the problem of synchronicity. Living in gmt-0800 (now gmt-0700
until the end of October), it is very difficult to find an useful window. And
if I am not present, I am not aware and have no available record. The Apach
lists and procedures recognize the need for asynchronous
: Thursday, March 21, 2013 02:10
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: A question about existing practices
On 3/18/2013 11:12, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
...
- Dennis
PS: My all-time favorite unreconcilable voted-for issue is the request for
Reveal Codes in the manner of WordPerfect.
Hi
The server is GPL and the JavaScripts that run in clients, Outlook, etc., are
Creative Commons attribution-share-alike-noncommercial. None of that is Apache
friendly.
More information:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-Xchange.
The licenses apply to different parts of the code base.
From
505-382-2641
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2013 13:09
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: 'Waldorf PC'
Subject: RE: Problems with Accessibility in Open Office
A. I was able to install Symphony 3.0.1 and the Fix Pack 2
There are two parts to the extensions for writing aids. I think there is some
serious low-hanging fruit for improving how this works.
MATERIAL INSTALLED IN THE PROGRAM SPACE.
The last time I checked, some writing aids and extensions that are bundled and
considered part of a distro are
-Original Message-
From: Ariel Constenla-Haile [mailto:arie...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 16:27
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [CODE][PROPOSAL]: AOO 4.0 getting rid of the 3 layer office, part 1
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 01:59:07PM -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote
I support the 1, 3, 2 prioritization.
With regard to the first item (1) below, Microsoft Office 2013 Access is now
provided with the Office 365 Home Premium subscription and all Office 365
Business subscriptions that include the current (now 2013) Microsoft Office
desktop applications.
With
I share Regina's concern for the use in teaching and for casual database
purposes. I'm not so sure how much SQL is a determining factor.
I also sympathize with not wanting a required Java dependency, especially for a
built-in component of the suite.
However, the cooperation offered by the
I'm not clear why a non-LDAP solution is required:
1. Being a committer is specific to a project. What it means to be a
committer on a project is very well-defined.
2. The SVN repositories of the public ASF projects are publicly read-only.
That's a no-brainer. They are only writable to
My sense of this is that there is a desire to reduce the threat surface of
the SVN by requiring committers to opt-in. (I assume there is some way to
decide which committers to grandfather.) Apparently, that is a one-time act
and it doesn't alter being relatively inactive. So I guess this
You're *still* understating the extent of the ceremony. They had to go through
everything a subsequently-invited committer had to do, even though Sam Ruby
provided the initial instructions. But thanks for mentioning the iCLA. That
is an useful object to have on file in tracking down a
-
compatibility with previous ODB files needs to be kept for a long long time.
Damjan
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 1:33 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.orgwrote:
The link to OpenOffice.org Base is interesting.
I wonder if the decision about SQLite (or a variant) should be
reconsidered for a re
I believe this is the only list to be concerned about:
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#openoffice
Those are the only Apache committers who have karma for the OpenOffice project.
Notice that there is a separate list for the PMC:
While looking around for some PDL-licensed content on www.openoffice.org, I
stumbled onto this page: http://www.openoffice.org/product/index.html.
I find this statement, at the bottom of the page, quite challenging:
• Certified by OSI(http://opensource.org/docs/definition.php)
Licensing issues have not been entirely removed,
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b.
Code with Category B MPL license is accepted in ASF projects under very
specific restrictions. Having to build the code from source, especially with
modifications, is problematic.
- Dennis
[mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2013 08:11
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; orc...@apache.org
Subject: Re: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.orgwrote:
Licensing issues have not been entirely removed,
http
: New license for libwpd, libwps, libwpg
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.orgwrote:
@Rob,
Thanks.
That is a great summary of what is involved.
I am curious, in the case of libwpd, how binaries would be obtained and
what the inclusion mechanism would be. E.g
I favor the idea of rethinking the Help system. I also think that it needs to
be decoupled as much as possible from the AOO 4 staging, doing the least that
works for AOO 4.0. The mechanism should allow incremental upgrading and
evolution that does not require synchronization with releases in
-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 10:02
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; orc...@apache.org
Subject: Re: INFO: OpenOffice help authoring
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox
Today, I did some digging around with respect to a different project and I
noticed a vulnerability that had not been discussed:
1. Assume that the credentials of an Apache OpenOffice Committer are
compromised (or the committer goes rogue).
2. This allows the compromised/rogue credentials to
: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:danie...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 15:58
To: Dennis E. Hamilton
Cc: dev@openoffice.apache.org; pesce...@apache.org
Subject: Re: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer access in SVN --
KEYS Compromise Exposure
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote on Mon, Apr 29
Your questions are great!
Kibitzing ...
BROAD CONSIDERATIONS
If the CMIS repository supplies MIME type as an attribute, it would be useful
to (tentatively) rely on that, especially for directory presentation. The
ultimate confirmation, for ODF documents, will be with the magic numbers at
Vanita,
That is a great question.
When I upgraded my Windows 7 system to Windows 8, I had to uninstall VC++ 2008
and 2010. I have installed the Visual Studio Express 2012 for Windows 8, but
have not attempted a build with that configuration and its VC++ command-line
compiler.
There are
Without concern for rationale, it is part of the ODF 1.2 OpenFormula syntax
that unary minus has precedence over all binary operators.
It is not uncommon for there to be such a rule in programming languages (C/C++,
Java, and JavaScript, for example).
Some languages that have an
Yes, NOT A BUG is definitely preferable to INVALID.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 02:56 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Dennis Hamilton
Subject: Re: Question about: OpenOffice Calc. =-1^2 like expressions
[ ... ]
[This was cross-posted, so I'm not clear what list was intended. Makes
tracking the discussion difficult.]
I'll bite:
I prefer Chris's latest. The weight of the lettering is more powerful. I think
the Apache should not be so thin. The form used by Samer works better. I
also think
@Kevin,
It never occurred to me that those were flying books. Taking another look, it
still doesn't work. If made more obviously as books, I'm not sure how that
will occur as indicative of an office productivity suite. (I have no idea how
birds in flight do that either, but it is probably
+1
The version-specific path on the site is also a fine way to locate the
check-for-update target, since the release has its release version. It can
also have human-readable (and localized) pages that provide update information
to someone who visits on-line.
The default page at those
++1
One-click access, Yay!!
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:rabas...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 1, 2013 06:44 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RELEASE][TRANSLATION]: changes to the README file for 4.0
On Jun 1, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Dennis E
@JanI,
Uh oh.
If you don't have explicit agreement from the contributor(s) to a page
concerning it being offered under a different license, either leave the
existing license or remove the content. Those are the only legally-sanitary
options for works still under copyright.
Declaring a work
+1
I prepared my response before I saw this one.
There is still need to be careful around this:
However, when we create new material, including enhancements
Of existing material, then we need to respect the ICLA which
says our contributions are made under ALv2. This might
(or not) localized wiki sites [was:
Fwd: [UserGuide]My roadmap]
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
+1
I prepared my response before I saw this one.
There is still need to be careful around this:
However, when we create new material, including
Sometimes it is simply necessary to do a cleanup of the working copy and then
start an update, assuming the check-out got anywhere. These are sometimes
simply synchronization glitches. If the check-out failed completely, I'd delete
that aoo-trunk folder and start over.
Another problem that
If you are talking about content items within an ODF Package, whether a path is
considered that of a folder is determined in the ODF Package manifest.xml file.
The manifest.xml file will specify the MIME TYPE of the collection of items
having the same path in the beginning of their file names
Is this of any assistance in terms of what you might need to be told to access
any given repository, and what is then discovered from the repository:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/cmis/CMIS/v1.0/os/cmis-spec-v1.0.html?
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rajath Shashidhara
There are some prospective problems with OpenOffice.org 3.3 that need to be
ruled-out/verified:
1. OpenOffice.org may not recognize 64-bit versions of the JVM, depending on
which JRE you have installed.
2. OpenOffice.org, in part of its detection of available JREs, may be looking
for Sun as
If you are on Windows, CTRL-END and CTRL-HOME do that. These are considered
common behaviors for all applications with scrollable windows. It is odd that
it is overlooked in Help and other documents.
-Original Message-
From: rosanne kosson [mailto:rkos...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday,
Another option would be to ditch the single gull and have a flat orb in the
upper left corner, in its original colors. The desktop icons might need to be
toned down a bit to not clash. Likewise for the document icons, which don't
scale well with those gradients. (Also, when did OpenOffice get
I don't quite understand what this means: mark something in Writer and then
copy it.
Is this about selecting something in Writer and copying it to the clip-board?
Or is there some other action that reproduces this situation.
I can test this in Windows 8 x64.
- Dennis
-Original
to replace it with the same version or not.)
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Max Merbald [mailto:max.merb...@gmx.de]
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 01:34 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Dennis E. Hamilton
Subject: Re: Installation on Windows 8, 64bit
Hello Dennis,
it's as you said, you
-
From: Steele, Raymond [mailto:raymond.ste...@lmco.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 12:29 PM
To: Andrea Pescetti; dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: Dennis E. Hamilton; 'Don'
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java 7
Who completed the OpenOffice 3.3 Solaris x86 build? It seems that we could
.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 1:08 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: Steele, Raymond
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java 7
No distribution of OpenOffice.org 3.3 was built at Apache OpenOffice
1 - 100 of 882 matches
Mail list logo
