Hi! I was reading the draft of the style guide in the file
[plt]/pkgs/racket-pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/style/textual.scrbl
(link:
http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/blob/b2ebb0a28bf8136e75cd98316c22fe54c30eacb2:/pkgs/racket-pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/style/textual.scrbl
)
In the lines 388 - 348,
I submitted a similar question a few months ago.
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/2013-January/056038.html
I was using a redefined current-load/use-compiled to delete the old
files, I'm not sure that the code handles all the cases properly, and
that it doesn't delete any source file.
Hi!
The file [plt] / racket / src / racket / src / optimize.c has a list
of movable primitives in lines 955-961. I think that scheme_mcons_proc
is missing. I read the definition and it’s very similar to
scheme_mcons_proc, so I guess that it should be included in the list.
Another possible
Hi!
The documentation about gen:dict
http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/dicts.html#%28def._%28%28lib._racket%2Fdict..rkt%29._gen~3adict%29%29
says that dict-count accepts one argument. But then it is defined with
a #:default argument:
(define (dict-count dict #:default [x #f])
(or x
If I understand correctly, 5.92 was going to be a “hidden” release.
But I just opened DrRacket 5.3.6 and got this message: “ Racket v5.92
is now available at http://download.racket-lang.org/ ”
Gustavo
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
Dear all:
I found another problem with the optimizer and the new undefined behavior.
(letrec ([x (if #t 8 x)]) x) ;==8
I also consider this correct in a strange sense :).
Gustavo
Welcome to Racket v6.0.1.4.
(letrec ([x x]) x)
x: undefined;
cannot use before initialization
context...:
C:\Program
, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
These seem correct to me. What were you expecting (and why?).
Robby
On Saturday, April 19, 2014, Gustavo Massaccesi gust...@oma.org.ar wrote:
I found another problem with the optimizer and the new undefined behavior.
(letrec ([x (if #t 8 x)]) x
I was reading the alternative implementation of reverse in
http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/blob/HEAD:/racket/collects/racket/private/reverse.rkt
and I thought that the “car” and “cdr” could be replaced by the
“unsafe” versions.
I tried a few changes:
* Use unsafe-car and unsafe-cdr
* Remove the
* openssl: recognize version 1.0.1j #8265c9 (3 days ago) -- latest
commit in git.racket-lang
* pretty-print: fix for a current inspector that sees through
internals #8d49a9 (3 days ago)
* fix reified-syntax-class-curry (missing role argument) #302986 (3
days ago) -- Latest commit in github
.
~Leif Andersen
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Gustavo Massaccesi gust...@oma.org.ar
wrote:
There is project to rewrite the Racket compiler in Racket. I'd like to
know if it has advanced. In particular, if it's still possible to make
big changes to the C code or it's better to wait and keep
10 matches
Mail list logo
