Oh, sorry I missed that.
Robby
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Alexis King lexi.lam...@gmail.com wrote:
I already used blame-add-context, but the message I used wasn’t very good, so
I’ve improved it. If everything else looks good, feel free to merge this
whenever you get the chance!
On
Yes, there are tests, and you can see them here
https://github.com/plt/racket/pull/860/files#diff-9383600c097f090324382317068c6187R1.
On Jan 19, 2015, at 13:29, Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
This seemed okay, but just a quick read of the code. But did I miss
the test
Any update on this? If there’s anything that still needs to be changed, let me
know—otherwise, I’ll patiently wait for the process to run its course. Just
checking in.
On Jan 16, 2015, at 10:15, Alexis King lexi.lam...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, that makes sense, fixed.
On Jan 16, 2015, at
This seemed okay, but just a quick read of the code. But did I miss
the test cases? (I just followed the link upthread -- sorry if I need
to look somewhere else too.)
Robby
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Alexis King lexi.lam...@gmail.com wrote:
Any update on this? If there’s anything that
Ah, that makes sense, fixed.
On Jan 16, 2015, at 05:37, Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
One comment. The contract combinators are curried so that you can do
work on the partial applications. So don't write this:
(define ho-val-first-projection
5 matches
Mail list logo
