-volunteer)
people resources needed to make a bug tracking system really work without
sapping development resources -- like IBM is doing with the Linux kernel.
If you're offering something like that, then I'm all ears.
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 01:05:45AM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
Like Reply-To:? Now the status of the list has changed, is the decision to
have a Reply-To: header added also up for reconsideration? :)
We have to draw a line somewhere :-)
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 09:14:41PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 07:23:37PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
Since you mention those $200 Walmart systems, has anyone actually
seen one? They don't have them in any Walmart I've been to -- only
the $600+ HP and eMachines systems
,
it'd be better if that auto-detection was done once and the cached data
used for the rest of the tree.
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL
if that makes a difference. If it does, we'll need to track
down why either the XKB map isn't working or it's not falling back
correctly to the built-in settings.
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
.
Could you try the attached patch, and let me know what happens. The
2nd hunk is the important one, and the problem there resulting on only
the first character of the PnP ID string being read.
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 02:47:26AM -0500, Kevin Brosius wrote:
David Dawes wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 03:21:10PM -0500, Kevin Brosius wrote:
For a previously working setup, mouse protocol auto no longer succeeds
in configuring the mouse, however it appears not to fail either, leaving
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 06:57:22PM -0500, Kevin Brosius wrote:
David Dawes wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 03:06:36AM -0500, Kevin Brosius wrote:
Does the server work correctly other than the key sequence not
working? If it is stuck somewhere, it might explain both why
SIGTERM
of avoiding lockups by using Xv
in modes where it will cause a lockup.
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman
missing them. I'm not sure if any more need them.
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
that is the
only X-platform with XKB I have access to. Since the null pointer is
dereferenced I can't see how this patch could break another platform.
Have you looked into why XkbGetKeyboard() is returning NULL?
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 07:18:15PM +0100, Tapani Utriainen wrote:
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, David Dawes wrote:
Have you looked into why XkbGetKeyboard() is returning NULL?
Only briefly, the trail of the error led to a so dark place that I
didn't dare to enter it :-)
XkbGetKeyboard() calls
21 February 2003
Taking some time to review and update the documentation is strongly
encouraged. If you have something to add to the release notes (it should
contain a summary of new features and known problems), please send it
in.
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 08:36:27AM -0700, Brian Paul wrote:
David Dawes wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:55:33AM +1000, Chris Ison wrote:
in XFree86 log
Symbol xf86strtof from module
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a is unresolved!
this function doesn't exist in XFree86 trunk
keycode' works.
I don't know why these keys don't repeat (and don't remember if they did
before).
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Allocated).
If that looks OK, then try the same thing you tried before but with a bare
X server and an idle system.
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
thanks,
-pat
On Friday 07 February 2003 02:47 pm, Sottek, Matthew J
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 11:37:20AM -0700, patrick charles wrote:
On Thursday 13 February 2003 09:03 pm, David Dawes wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 02:11:40PM -0700, patrick charles wrote:
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 10:20 pm, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 02:51:04PM -0700
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 11:27:16PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
To simplify my environment, I did a fresh install of Red Hat 8.0.
I then installed kernel 2.4.20-2.21 and XFree86-4.2.99.3-20030115,
taken as RPM's from the RH81 'phoebe' beta, required for the i845 support.
So, I now have
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 06:24:50PM -0500, Leif Delgass wrote:
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, David Dawes wrote:
[snip]
There are some more serious things holding up 4.3, including the issue
that Leif mentioned here a couple of days ago. I haven't seen anyone
comment on his proposed solution
/.
Thanks.
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 06:25:50PM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
David Dawes wrote (in a message from Sunday 16)
PS - when building and installing fontconfig as part of a 'make World
/ make install', is it really necessary to replace the user's existing
/etc/fonts/fonts.conf? I'm happy
definition to
the pc/es map (and all others where the default keyboard has this key),
or change rules/xfree86 so that all of the inetkbds definitions are
based on pc105 instead of pc104 (the LSGT key is the only difference
between the two).
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect
encouraged. If you have something to add to the release notes (it should
contain a summary of new features and known problems), please send it
in.
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
that the patch as sent
worked in that case? I also found that the operation of
xf86EnableVTSwitch() was broken after the XKB hot key changes, and that
should be fixed now too.
A natural extension of this would be to allow this setting to be changed
via the XFree86-Misc extension.
David
--
David
too much other
stuff included as a result of including setjmp.h directly).
I'd set the size of xf86jmp_buf to something large. Maybe 4K would
be sufficiently large without being excessive?
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:30:53PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
Around 23 o'clock on Feb 19, David Dawes wrote:
Yes, I think that should work (providing we don't get too much other
stuff included as a result of including setjmp.h directly).
Is there any interest in having this tested before
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 11:55:41AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 01:19:08PM +, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
The setjmp/longjmp fix in
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loader/xf86sym.c
and xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/xf86cfg/loadmod.c
doesn't compile in
RedHat
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 11:00:03AM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, David Dawes wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 01:19:08PM +, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
The setjmp/longjmp fix in
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loader/xf86sym.c
and xc/programs/Xserver/hw
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 03:35:35PM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, David Dawes wrote:
The setjmp/longjmp fix in
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loader/xf86sym.c
and xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/xf86cfg/loadmod.c
doesn't compile in
RedHat 6.2 egcs
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 07:18:37PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
Around 17 o'clock on Feb 21, David Dawes wrote:
The attached patch attempts to implement the second approach, and from
some limited testing it works OK for the two cases handled so far (where
setjmp is available directly
an exampe of an XVideo app that demonstrates this problem?
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
; with the argument that a new
driver is hardly going to break other stuff :)
I can see the appeal of that argument, but my experience with XFree86
releases tells me otherwise.
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 07:22:02PM +0100, Thomas Zander wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 01:00:23PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 10:15:59PM +0100, Thomas Zander wrote:
Hi,
I have been finetuning a driver for the paceblade touchscreen for a long
time now; and it has been
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 01:49:52AM +0100, Rob van Nieuwkerk wrote:
David Dawes wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 11:14:55AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
Here's a list of items for the RELNOTES for 4.3.0, if anyone has anything
to add to this, please send it in.
Thanks to all who sent in items
://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 02:56:11PM -0500, Matt Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 09:11:48PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
Please reports bugs here, and send bugfixes and documentation updates
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The updated 4.3 release schedule is:
Code freeze (critical fixes and doc
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 03:33:13PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Thanks to all who sent in items for the release notes. I've put
updated
versions of the docs for 4.3.0 at
http://www.xfree86.org/~dawes/4.3.0/.
Further updates for the release
updates.
Thanks, I've just removed the out of date duplicate.
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo
.
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
.
think you can handle the dual head/one accel engine this way.
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo
platforms that use glibc 2.0 and 2.1. (David Dawes, Keith Packard).
I tried to adjust xf86cfg to this change but failed for now. Maybe
David or Keith can have a look at this issue?
If you tried backing out that change and the problems still shows up,
then it's something else. Did you try
, and there
are many days when it would totally overwhelm the valid list traffic.
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
Mark.
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Paul Evans wrote:
Is there not a spam filter
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 12:33:32PM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote:
David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's for sure. I get to see what the filter blocks, and there
are many days when it would totally overwhelm the valid list traffic.
What software are you using for SPAM filtering? We
dual CRTC drivers to make use
of it.
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
4.3 installed.
Strange. It only happens if libfreetype.so render module exists. I
You can potentially run into all sorts of problems using .so modules.
If you see the problem with a .a version, then we have a real problem
to follow up.
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect
handles
everything, the mapping would be trivial. In the 4.x time frame, the
XF86Config file won't disappear (just not be required), and it (or some
equivalent) will always be needed to store configuration preference
information.
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 09:04:06PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 02:06:35PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 06:27:20PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 11:59:48AM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 10:11:34AM +0100, Sven
day or so
from our ftp site ftp://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/4.3.0/.
Some binary distributions will be available over the next week or so.
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 10:34:20AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 04:19:37PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
Are you speaking about the current 4.3.0 or the stuff you are working on ?
What I was working on.
Ok, ...
I take it, there will be a 4.4.0 before 5.0 ?
Most likely
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 10:52:08AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 04:19:37PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 09:04:06PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Are you speaking about the current 4.3.0 or the stuff you are working on ?
What I was working on.
BTW
be there regardless of whether you force
HAS_GLIBC_SIGSETJMP or not.
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo
to be done with the imake LinuxCLib*Version parameters instead.
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
|| HasShadowPasswd
PWD_DEFINES = -DUSESHADOW
#endif
While that's strictly speaking OK (it should function correctly), it
should really have a default provided in X11.tmpl.
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 08:48:12AM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, David Dawes wrote:
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 08:27:49PM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
setjmp is a *macro* (for __sigsetjmp) defined in /usr/include
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 10:31:56AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 11:28:24PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 10:34:20AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 04:19:37PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
Are you speaking about the current 4.3.0
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 07:01:35PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 12:27:41PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 10:41:50AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
I strongly advocate that you take in account such separation of the
outgoing resolution and the framebuffer
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 08:55:45PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
Around 23 o'clock on Mar 6, David Dawes wrote:
I'm looking for as many rows as I can get in a given xterm size with a
readable font, so I'd like to get rid of that unused white space. I tried
a few things, and found that setting
An XFree86 bugzilla is now available at http://bugs.xfree86.org/.
Many thanks to Hewlett-Packard for supplying the hardware, netSweng for
hosting, and the many developers who helped configure and test it.
Enjoy.
David
--
David Dawes
Release Engineer/President The XFree86
, it has been removed.
David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
be
surprised if one of the usual mailing list archives sites doesn't
carry it.
David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman
to. It follows from this that a good default file is
an empty one, hence the empty collection of sample host.def files :-).
If the build fails without one, it's usually a bug.
David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
configuration changes, it is recommended
that you start by going to ...
David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 05:11:36PM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote:
David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The general rule is don't create a host.def file unless you find
you need to. It follows from this that a good default file is
an empty one, hence the empty collection of sample host.def
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 07:41:18PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
David Dawes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 08:50:32PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
DD That is correct. Since this is a resource that contained
DD information that cannot be made publicly available, it has been
DD removed
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 04:29:04PM +0200, Egbert Eich wrote:
David Dawes writes:
On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 03:49:46PM -0600, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2003, Mike A. Harris wrote:
The [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail address still works?
Yes.
It works in the sense
{ [ KP_Equal] };
key KP0 { [ KP_Insert, KP_0] };
key KPDL { [ KP_Delete, KP_Decimal ]};
David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 03:31:01PM -0400, David Dawes wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 07:51:04PM +0700, Ivan Pascal wrote:
Hi,
The linux-ppc kernel has an option (CONFIG_MAC_ADBKEYCODES) to use the old
ADB-style keycodes. I imagine setting this option to no uses the conversion
you're
out for that case (I'll fix that), but the
i386/SVR4-specific case is for a platform where 0x5C (and some
other codes) is generated for other, Japanese-specific, keys.
Have you tested whether it fixes the KP_Equal problem you reported?
David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer
over with this, we'd handle the mappings more cleanly.
We should probably do that for 5.0.
David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
Index: programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common/atKeynames.h
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 10:08:11AM +0200, Robert Woerle wrote:
David Dawes schrieb:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 01:49:56PM +0200, Robert wrote:
Matthieu Herrb schrieb:
Robert wrote (in a message from Sunday 15)
Brad Hards schrieb:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 02:50:28PM +0200, Robert Woerle wrote:
David Dawes schrieb:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 01:49:56PM +0200, Robert wrote:
Matthieu Herrb schrieb:
Robert wrote (in a message from Sunday 15)
Brad Hards schrieb:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash
these things?
David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 06:46:15PM +0200, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
David Dawes wrote:
The sis driver goes one better and allows you to tell it which file to
to overwrite :-(
This has no real function other than debugging. It's to make it easy for
people to send me their video BIOS images
BuildFreetype !HasFreetype2?
The two are independent, so the difference is by design.
David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org
that it be implemented via a server extension. That
recommendation was obviously ignored. What Matrox puts in their own
driver is their business, but it definitely doesn't belong in XFree86
in its current state.
David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project
the VBIOS that allows the Xserver to
report memory it allocated to the VBIOS and the modes
could be adjusted.
Another problem I get a lot of reports about is that the VBIOS doesn't
support video modes like 1400x1050, the panel resolution used by a number
of laptops.
David
--
David Dawes
Founder
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 07:14:03PM -0700, Kean Johnston wrote:
David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 03:29:45PM -0700, Kean Johnston wrote:
All,
fonts/FreeType is built even if HasFreetype2 is set to YES.
lib/freetype2 correctly doesn't build if HasFreetype2 is set to YES
. Such fonts
are used by Apple (who do not use file extensions), but not by
Microsoft (who do); hence, I believe I need to pick a new one.
I suggest they should have the extension ``.sfnt'', with ``.sfn''
being recognised for compatibility with 8+3 systems.
Opinions collected so far:
- David Dawes
to be the current
release version according to the freetype web site.
David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
This would benefit would yield much higher benefit, I think
What caveats would that bring about? What about the development
been suggested several times over the last couple
of years. I haven't seen anything to say that it wouldn't be a
feasible solution (looks like the obvious approach to me). I think
it's just one of those things where nobody has needed it enough to
actually implement it.
David
--
David Dawes
hostile and intimidating
behaviour from several quarters, and it deserves the negative results
it will surely achieve.
David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
connections
-nolisten inet6 don't listen for TCP/IPv6 connections
-nolisten tcp don't listen for any TCP connections
Yes, the generic option should disable all TCP transport types.
David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer The XFree86
anoncvs.xfree86.org is
the preferred host to use (allows more connections, faster machine, etc).
David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
to see if I can change our 'cvs' so that it won't
allow the changed-case solution.
David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org
of putting them in separate files in
a subdirectory? XKB should allow multiple descriptions per file.
David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 07:15:43AM +0200, Alexander Pohoyda wrote:
David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
going back to 3.3. Unless someone comes up with a better solution,
that's what I'm planning to do.
OK, it seems to be the best solution in this situation.
I dare to propose another
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 08:21:39PM +0200, Alexander Pohoyda wrote:
David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 07:15:43AM +0200, Alexander Pohoyda wrote:
I believe that this is a correct way to develop geometries for
related keyboards and I think that it is logical to combine
by removing the offending reference.
David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
behaviour across a range of X platforms, including when XKB isn't
enabled.
David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman
and these
files where removed because xc is in flux for a little bit... right?
No, that doesn't happen.
David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 10:14:58AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:21:28AM -0400, David Dawes wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 06:41:58AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 04:52:02PM -0400, David Dawes wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 06:50:28PM -0400, George
be static. Others should be renamed (or possibly be struct members).
David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 08:43:55PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 02:36:01PM -0400, David Dawes wrote:
Alternatively, we could use the almost same effect by somehow having the
XFree86.0.log include the latest CHANGELOG entry number. This could be
done by some preprocessing
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 06:50:28PM -0400, George Georgalis wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 11:59:06PM -0400, David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 09:37:06PM -0400, George Georgalis wrote:
I heard (second hand from via) that xfree86 2.3.99 has drivers
for the CLE266 ( http://www.via.com.tw/en
if (pagesize == -1)
FatalError(xf86getpagesize: Cannot determine page size\n);
return pagesize;
}
David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
missed something rather fundamental about this code because
I feel like I am going nowhere.
What specifically are you looking for?
David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel
input from you.
David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
providing detail on what would
be done, and an assessment of its impact. Final upstream acceptance
would of course depend on the implementation meeting agreed on
requirements.
David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
(), should reliably find the page size on all
architectures, so this comment is redundant.
DRM_PAGE_SIZE should simply be defined to getpagesize(), providing that is
consistent with what the kernel interfaces expect.
David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project
://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-versions.html
and I hope it will not break the compilation on other operating
systems than FreeBSD.
I'll commit the patch.
Thanks.
David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org
1 - 100 of 481 matches
Mail list logo
