On 11/5/07, Heiko Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Though I can't help you, it sounds for me like a very
good feature for FlightGear! Real weather - real
traffic - would be great!
Yeah! How about setting up an mp-server feeding in real traffic? Or
even just AI? So that every client would
affected and that the AI program isn't starved at
the same
time.
My impression is that the traffic manager is quite CPU intensive; perhaps
that's skewed
by initialization costs.
It's still a good idea to have a separate program as an option, and
many people have several computers
Csaba Halász wrote:
On 11/5/07, Heiko Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Though I can't help you, it sounds for me like a very
good feature for FlightGear! Real weather - real
traffic - would be great!
Yeah! How about setting up an mp-server feeding in real traffic? Or
even just AI? So
possibility is allowing for a mechanism in future
feeding external live AI sources, for instance I have an adsb receiver and
would like to fit in real world air traffic from the receiver data stream,
supported with the local off air comms.
As mentioned above, feeding aircraft, ships, railways
On Monday 05 November 2007 16:50, Csaba Halász wrote:
On 11/5/07, Heiko Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Though I can't help you, it sounds for me like a very
good feature for FlightGear! Real weather - real
traffic - would be great!
Yeah! How about setting up an mp-server feeding
be great!
Yeah! How about setting up an mp-server feeding in real traffic? Or
even just AI? So that every client would see the same traffic.
Note: This is moving into a slightly different topic, but still
interesting enough to mention, I hope.
I've been thinking about this idea for some
The other day I was browsing through AI flight plans trying to get my
head around how they are setup.
I want to setup a scenario where I have a lead plane that I am trying to
follow. It will climb/decend and/or turn left/right. Usually the lead
and chase planes will want to maintain some
Hi,
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 07:56:22 Durk Talsma wrote:
On Monday 05 November 2007 16:50, Csaba Halász wrote:
Yeah! How about setting up an mp-server feeding in real traffic? Or
even just AI? So that every client would see the same traffic.
Note: This is moving into a slightly
Hi Durk,
I also have a sim built of multiple machines and would add support to Johns
comments about a socket to feed or maybe even just sync AI to other
machines.
The other consideration possibility is allowing for a mechanism in future
feeding external live AI sources, for instance I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oliver Schroeder wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 07:56:22 Durk Talsma wrote:
On Monday 05 November 2007 16:50, Csaba Halász wrote:
Yeah! How about setting up an mp-server feeding in real traffic? Or
even just AI? So that every client
machines and would add support to
Johns
comments about a socket to feed or maybe even just sync AI to other
machines.
The other consideration possibility is allowing for a mechanism in
future
feeding external live AI sources, for instance I have an adsb receiver
and
would like to fit
- would be great!
Yeah! How about setting up an mp-server feeding
in real traffic? Or
even just AI? So that every client would see the
same traffic.
Note: This is moving into a slightly different
topic, but still
interesting enough to mention, I hope.
I've been thinking about
traffic - would be great!
Yeah! How about setting up an mp-server feeding
in real traffic? Or
even just AI? So that every client would see the
same traffic.
Note: This is moving into a slightly different
topic, but still
interesting enough to mention, I hope
Harry Campigli wrote:
I also have a sim built of multiple machines and would add support to
Johns
comments about a socket to feed or maybe even just sync AI to other
machines.
The other consideration possibility is allowing for a mechanism in future
feeding external live AI sources
their windows app to view it back from
a port on their server. Thus to do much with it outside of that, you are
back to rolling your own code.
I did play around with the AI a while ago, but my butchered code would be
way behind the development now. Firstly i was trying to get the AI and MP in
sync over
=C:\Program
Files\FlightGear\data\Scenery;C:\Program
Files\FlightGear\scenery --airport-id=02Q --aircraft=f16 --control=joystick
--d
isable-random-objects --disable-ai-models --jpg_httpd=5502
I tried with --jpg-httpd=5502, and I get the same error: Unknown option
'--jpg-httpd=5502'
I'm running
PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Though I can't help you, it sounds for me
like
a very
good feature for FlightGear! Real weather
-
real
traffic - would be great!
Yeah! How about setting up an mp-server
feeding
in real traffic
PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Though I can't help you, it sounds for me
like
a very
good feature for FlightGear! Real weather
-
real
traffic - would be great!
Yeah! How about setting up an mp-server
feeding
in real traffic
-id=02Q --aircraft=f16
--control=joystick
--d
isable-random-objects --disable-ai-models --jpg_httpd=5502
I tried with --jpg-httpd=5502, and I get the same error: Unknown option
'--jpg-httpd=5502'
I'm running v0.9.10, could that be the problem?
Antonio
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
--aircraft=f16 --control=joystick
--d
isable-random-objects --disable-ai-models --jpg_httpd=5502
I tried with --jpg-httpd=5502, and I get the same error: Unknown option
'--jpg-httpd=5502'
I'm running v0.9.10, could that be the problem?
Antonio
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
much execution time has passed
between the two commands.
we are currently already feeding delta t into each subsystem, so we have some
redundant timing information available. I don't know yet how easy it would be
to implement a profiling like functionality into the current architecture,
but I
21 matches
Mail list logo
