Re: FLUXLIST: eight dots meaning nothing

2006-06-22 Thread Björn Eriksson 



I think eight double 
ellipsis equals double
nothing plus something
but I might be wrong. Ma-
thematics always fascinat-
ed me even if I never did any 
good calculations. Yours, Björn


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  clifford 
  To: FLUXLIST@scribble.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 11:33 
  PM
  Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: eight dots meaning 
  nothing
  that makes for one ellipsis and an almost half of another... or 
  is dot dot dot or dot dot dot dot, double ellipsis and double yer nothing 
  dots
  On 21/06/06, Björn 
  Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  


n o t h i n g =. . . . . . . 
.

RE: FLUXLIST: eight dots meaning nothing

2006-06-22 Thread Allan Revich 
Title: Message



Alan Bowman Does Dots

http://freeweb.supereva.com/alanfffo.superdada/dots.html?p

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf 
  Of Björn ErikssonSent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 12:18 
  PMTo: FLUXLIST@scribble.comSubject: Re: FLUXLIST: eight 
  dots meaning nothing
  I think eight double 
  ellipsis equals double
  nothing plus something
  but I might be wrong. Ma-
  thematics always fascinat-
  ed me even if I never did any 
  good calculations. Yours, Björn
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
clifford 
To: FLUXLIST@scribble.com 
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 11:33 
PM
Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: eight dots 
meaning nothing
that makes for one ellipsis and an almost half of another... 
or is dot dot dot or dot dot dot dot, double ellipsis and double yer nothing 
dots
On 21/06/06, Björn 
Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

  
  
  n o t h i n g =. . . . . . . 
  .

FLUXLIST: eight dots meaning nothing

2006-06-21 Thread Björn Eriksson 



n o t h i n g =. . . . . . . .

Re: FLUXLIST: eight dots meaning nothing

2006-06-21 Thread clifford 
that makes for one ellipsis and an almost half of another... or is dot dot dot or dot dot dot dot, double ellipsis and double yer nothing dotsOn 21/06/06, 
Björn Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:







n o t h i n g =. . . . . . . .