Re: [fossil-users] Test From masquerading

On Sat 11 Aug 2018 11:47 AM, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said "Andy Bradford" on 11 Aug 2018 11:41:01 -0600: > > > This is just a test. > > Only now at the end do I realize that Fossil Users allowed subscribers > to hide their subscriber email address... pity. > Just curious, how did you

Re: [fossil-users] About to merge the forum-v2 branch

On Thu 02 Aug 2018 6:03 PM, joerg van den hoff wrote: > > the specific _concern_ here is the contemplated shutdown of this mailing > list and mandatory(!) migration of all questions/discussions to the > planned/upcoming fossil-scm forum. if that's what going to happen: so be it. > but I would

Re: [fossil-users] About to merge the forum-v2 branch

On Thu 02 Aug 2018 11:02 AM, joerg van den hoff wrote: > On 02.08.18 10:38, Steve Landers wrote:> On 31 Jul 2018, 9:47 PM +0800, > Richard Hipp , wrote: > >> I am about ready to merge the forum-v2 branch into trunk. If there > >> are any objections, voice them quickly. > > > > I could easily

[fossil-users] Re-sync skins of remote repo

Hi All, I'd like to know if there's a way to re-sync to the skin of a remote repo, but I don't know of an option to do so. If I cloned the sqlite3 repo from long ago, when I run fossil server, I'll see the former skin. `fossil sync` doesn't seem to care about changes to the skin. Is the skin

Re: [fossil-users] OT: security/entropy (was Re: New Fossil user experiences)

On Fri 13 Jul 2018 4:22 PM, David Mason wrote: > So I guess this is what Warren had in mind. Posting this in case it helps > somebody on the list. > Taking this offtopic a little bit more...let's talk about VPNs. Don't use PPTP and don't get tangled up in ipsec configuration hell. Be happy

Re: [fossil-users] /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ldl

On Fri 13 Jul 2018 5:08 AM, Artur Shepilko wrote: > > openBSD -current x64 > > $ cc -v > > OpenBSD clang version 6.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_600/final) (based on LLVM 6.0.0) > > Target: amd64-unknown-openbsd6.3 > > Thread model: posix > > InstalledDir: /usr/bin > > > > Ok, I think I found the problem.

[fossil-users] /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ldl

Hi All, Since commit 9c38803597 I can't build fossil successfully: .obld/linenoise.o bld/shell.o bld/th.o bld/th_lang.o bld/th_tcl.o bld/cson_amalgamation.o -lfuse -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lz -ldl /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ldl cc: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see

Re: [fossil-users] Feature slideshow on fossil homepage

On Thu 12 Jul 2018 1:40 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said mario on Mon, 09 Jul 2018 18:06:52 +0200: > > > Our current homepage is a bit wall of textish / too bland I'd think. > > While it already gets all interesting features across, it's not likely > > enticing to new users. > > Here's a

Re: [fossil-users] Feature slideshow on fossil homepage

HI Mario, On 9 July 2018 at 09:06, mario wrote: > As followup to last month` Show time.. discussion: > > → http://fossilslideshow.tmp.include-once.org/ > > (Take in mind this ain't a mockup yet; just as example.) > I think it's a good first step. Thanks for your efforts! The carousal might be a

Re: [fossil-users] branch assistance needed

On 12:42AM, Wed, Jul 4, 2018 Nicola wrote: > > On 04/07/2018 00:18, Warren Young wrote:> On Jul 3, 2018, at 3:09 PM, > Dewey Hylton wrote: > > >> I then attempted to change that latest commit by adding a 'trunk' > tag and cancelling the new branch tag. > > > > Ow! > As a newbie Fossil user,

Re: [fossil-users] Cannot clone sqlite docs repository

On 2 July 2018 at 09:05, Brian Nguyen wrote: >> $ fossil clone https://www2.sqlite.org/docsrc doc.sqlite >> Round-trips: 2 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 >> Error: not authorized to clone >> Round-trips: 2 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 >> Clone done, sent: 537 received: 582 ip: 2.0.1.187

[fossil-users] fossil crash with http command

Hi All, I don't know if this has been reported already, but I'm getting a core dump when running `fossil http` anywhere but within the fossil repo. #0 sqlite3FindFunction (db=0x0, zName=0x6364d2e0220 "constant_time_cmp", nArg=2, enc=1 '\001', createFlag=0 '\0') at ./src/sqlite3.c:31156 #1

[fossil-users] minor grammar suggestions

Hi All, Please see attached patch for your consideration. I found some text for the various settings that could be updated. Thanks! Index: src/db.c == --- src/db.c +++ src/db.c @@ -15,11 +15,11 @@ **

Re: [fossil-users] smtp.c build failures

On 28 June 2018 at 12:07, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 6/28/18, jungle Boogie wrote: >> >> Does this help? >> http://man.openbsd.org/man3/getrrsetbyname.3 >> > > That seems to be an OpenBSD-only library function. So, no, it doesn't > really help. > >

Re: [fossil-users] smtp.c build failures

On 28 June 2018 at 11:42, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 6/28/18, jungle Boogie wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I know it's still very early on to make use of the new smtp logic, but >> I thought I'd report these issues. Is anyone else experiencing issues >> with compili

[fossil-users] smtp.c build failures

Hi All, I know it's still very early on to make use of the new smtp logic, but I thought I'd report these issues. Is anyone else experiencing issues with compiling? FIG_H -D_HAVE_SQLITE_CONFIG_H -g -O2 -o bld/smtp.o -c bld/smtp_.c ./src/smtp.c:54:3: error: use of undeclared identifier 'ns_msg'

[fossil-users] email.c typo

Hi All, I spotted one small type in the email.c file: Index: src/email.c == --- src/email.c +++ src/email.c @@ -2028,11 +2028,11 @@ /* ** WEBPAGE: announce ** ** A web-form, available to users with the "Send-Announcement" or

Re: [fossil-users] email testing - no subscriber table?

On 25 June 2018 at 14:51, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 6/25/18, jungle Boogie wrote: >> If I inadvertently forward my email along >> to someone/group without modifying the footer, the person/group would >> be able to alter my subscription. > > How can I fix that? > I d

Re: [fossil-users] email testing - no subscriber table?

On 23 June 2018 at 13:07, Richard Hipp wrote: > Just FYI: > > I have opened up email notifications on the canonical Fossil > repository. To subscribe, visit: > > https://fossil-scm.org/fossil/subscribe > > Your help in finding creative ways of breaking the new system is appreciated. > This

Re: [fossil-users] email testing - no subscriber table?

On Sat 23 Jun 2018 4:07 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > Just FYI: > > I have opened up email notifications on the canonical Fossil > repository. To subscribe, visit: > > https://fossil-scm.org/fossil/subscribe > > Your help in finding creative ways of breaking the new system is appreciated.

Re: [fossil-users] email testing - no subscriber table?

On Sat 23 Jun 2018 11:26 PM, Svyatoslav Mishyn wrote: > (Sat, 23 Jun 23:03) Svyatoslav Mishyn: > > quick typos: > > another one (+ previous one): > > -generated once the email notification systems stablizes. > +generated once the email notification systems stabilizes. > > and > > - of the

Re: [fossil-users] email testing - no subscriber table?

On Sat 23 Jun 2018 4:07 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > Just FYI: > > I have opened up email notifications on the canonical Fossil > repository. To subscribe, visit: > > https://fossil-scm.org/fossil/subscribe > > Your help in finding creative ways of breaking the new system is appreciated. >

[fossil-users] email testing - no subscriber table?

Hi All, I think I've brought my repo up to trunk, did a little configuring of the email page and attempted to add a subscriber, but I have a database error: SQLITE_ERROR: no such table: subscriber Database Error no such table: subscriber SELECT 1 FROM subscriber WHERE suname='jungle'

Re: [fossil-users] What should email notifications look like?

On 22 June 2018 at 11:18, Richard Hipp wrote: > Shown below is what I have at the moment. It is more succinct than > other examples I've seen, but you can easily follow the link for > details. Very nice! I think you're on the right track! ___

Re: [fossil-users] What should email notifications look like?

On 22 June 2018 at 07:09, jungle Boogie wrote: > On 22 June 2018 at 06:09, Richard Hipp wrote: >> You may have noticed that I've been working on adding support for >> email notifications or alerts to events on a Fossil repository. But I >> need your help. >&

Re: [fossil-users] What should email notifications look like?

On 22 June 2018 at 06:09, Richard Hipp wrote: > You may have noticed that I've been working on adding support for > email notifications or alerts to events on a Fossil repository. But I > need your help. > > When an event occurs (such as a check-in, or wiki-page edit) and a > user wants a

Re: [fossil-users] Cloning repository with large files very slow

On Thu 21 Jun 2018 7:47 PM, E Cruz wrote: > On 06/21/2018 05:06 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > As mentioned in the original post, the majority of the time taken by the > clone operation seems to be spent re-calculating the delta encoding of the > large table definition files.   I do not mind much

Re: [fossil-users] Perception of Fossil

All very, very lovely thinking! I just have one comment/question... On 15 June 2018 at 10:35, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 6/15/18, David Mason wrote: >> I heartily agree with this... A flag to allow a person (including >> Anonymous) to make a commit that would automatically go into a new branch >>

Re: [fossil-users] [sqlite] Mailing list shutting down...

On 14 June 2018 at 13:30, Thomas wrote: > Web forums are much more superior than mailing lists, in any possible > direction. > Ah, yes, superior. https://xkcd.com/979/ At this rate, I suggest we start using reddit more, it's at least more diverse than a single stand alone forum.

Re: [fossil-users] [sqlite] Back on-line. Was: Mailing list shutting down...

On 14 June 2018 at 08:58, Richard Hipp wrote: > > So there you have it: If you want to harass someone by sending them > thousands of subscription confirmations, there is now a website to > assist you. Do we need any further evidence that the heart of man is > deceitful above all things, and

Re: [fossil-users] Mailing list shutting down...

On 13 June 2018 at 08:11, Warren Young wrote: > On Jun 13, 2018, at 8:05 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: >> >> My current tthinking is to use a hybrid approach where subscribers get >> emails just like ordinary mailing lists, but posting and replying is >> via web-form only. > > If you do this atop

Re: [fossil-users] Attachment policy

Hi Andy, Seeing that you have a Gmail account, you could upload to Google drive and make public. Then provide the link via email to that file. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] Show time...

On Sun 03 Jun 2018 9:28 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > There is suddenly a big uptick in traffic to fossil-scm.org, > apparently due to the recent GitHub rumor. Unlike that traditional > "slashdot effect", though, the referrals seem to be coming for a large > variety of sources. > > So, if anybody

Re: [fossil-users] Show time...

On Sun 03 Jun 2018 11:06 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 6/3/18, Jungle Boogie wrote: > > On Sun 03 Jun 2018 10:47 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > >> On 6/3/18, jungle Boogie wrote: > >> > > >> > Since it's linked from the homepage, maybe this can be updated to

Re: [fossil-users] Show time...

On Sun 03 Jun 2018 10:47 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 6/3/18, jungle Boogie wrote: > > > > Since it's linked from the homepage, maybe this can be updated to show that > > a) project website is still updated and b) to show fossil is still > > efficient. > > > &g

Re: [fossil-users] Show time...

On Sun 03 Jun 2018 9:28 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > There is suddenly a big uptick in traffic to fossil-scm.org, > apparently due to the recent GitHub rumor. Unlike that traditional > "slashdot effect", though, the referrals seem to be coming for a large > variety of sources. > > So, if anybody

Re: [fossil-users] Show time...

On 6:28PM, Sun, Jun 3, 2018 Richard Hipp wrote: > > There is suddenly a big uptick in traffic to fossil-scm.org, > apparently due to the recent GitHub rumor. Unlike that traditional > "slashdot effect", though, the referrals seem to be coming for a large > variety of sources. > > So, if anybody

Re: [fossil-users] Recently added or enhanced /timeline query parameters

Thus said Warren Young on Sat, 28 Apr 2018 20:24:16 -0600 On Apr 28, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: (1) The new days=N query parameter shows all activity within the previous N days. Nice! I think this will end up being more useful than “max N any type,” as I

Re: [fossil-users] Why SQLite Does Not Use Git

On Sat 14 Apr 2018 6:22 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > Article: https://sqlite.org/whynotgit.html > > HN discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16806114 > > Reddit discussion: > https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/8c2niw/why_sqlite_does_not_use_git/ > Really good article with

Re: [fossil-users] Commit 3e94c7ed7

Thus said Richard Hipp on Sat, 7 Apr 2018 16:12:43 -0400 To get the latest trunk check-in, do this: https://whatever.dom/fossil/tarball/trunk/download.tar.gz That's awesome! Thanks for pointing this out and the link to the document! ___

[fossil-users] Commit 3e94c7ed7

Hi DRH, I think this commit is real useful: https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/3e94c7ed74a07741 Thanks! To enhance it a little more, what do you think about having the latest commit on trunk having a generic filename such as trunk.zip/.tar.gz/.sqlar? In this event, you wouldn't need

Re: [fossil-users] Error on commit

On 26 March 2018 at 12:27, Scott Doctor wrote: > > A while back I created a new repository for a project I ressurected. Checked > it after creating with the fossil ui that all files included and such. > Everything OK. > > My project contains many folders and a couple

Re: [fossil-users] Strange IP address on repository sync report.

On 2 February 2018 at 07:08, Warren Young wrote: > On Sep 16, 2017, at 12:57 PM, John Found wrote: >> >> On Sat, 16 Sep 2017 13:44:51 -0500 >> Andy Goth wrote: >> >>> Please type "openssl version" and let us know what it prints.

Re: [fossil-users] Cross-link tech notes to commits

On 21 December 2017 at 07:34, jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 20 December 2017 at 13:13, jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I know a tech note entry in the timeline can be linked to a specific commit. >>

Re: [fossil-users] Strange IP address on repository sync report.

On 24 January 2018 at 13:45, Warren Young wrote: > On Jan 24, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Warren Young wrote: >> >> On Sep 16, 2017, at 1:27 PM, Andy Goth wrote: >>> >>> Indeed, 1.1.0f is a version which includes the BIO_ADDR type, which is

[fossil-users] Sort skins alphabetically patch

Hi All, For your consideration... Index: src/skins.c == --- src/skins.c +++ src/skins.c @@ -39,23 +39,23 @@ static struct BuiltinSkin { const char *zDesc;/* Description of this skin */ const char *zLabel; /* The

Re: [fossil-users] New "Ardoise" skin

On 8 January 2018 at 04:27, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 1/8/18, Antoine Chavasse wrote: >> I'm not sure I can fix this from the skin, since the background color for >> ticket reports are configured by the user in the settings. >> > > I might need to enhance

Re: [fossil-users] Errors in current trunk (24c2b99d) related to TIMESPEC

On 9 January 2018 at 06:32, Richard Hipp wrote: > A new version of Fossil is now on trunk. > (https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/info/9a33a240a2101ede) Please try > again to build on every platform you have at hand, but especially all > variations of MSVC and MinGW, and let me

Re: [fossil-users] HTML instead of fossil sync protocol

On 28 December 2017 at 12:02, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > On 12/28/17, jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I cannot clone a fossil repo running on a reaspberry pi. >> --fossil-debug was originally used but since then

Re: [fossil-users] HTML instead of fossil sync protocol

> > Any pointers are appreciated. > > I created a brand new repo with zero commits and I was able to clone it with fossil server running. So it looks like an issue with the repo itself, perhaps enabling fossil debug on the binary caused an issue? > > -- > --- > inum: 883510009027723 > sip:

[fossil-users] HTML instead of fossil sync protocol

Hi All, I cannot clone a fossil repo running on a reaspberry pi. --fossil-debug was originally used but since then, multiple fossil binaries have been built with it disabled. >fossil clone http://10.7.0.82:8080 cpp_projects.f Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 server replies with

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil hack: quickly finding the first checkin via the web UI

On Thu 21 Dec 2017 11:46 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote: > > Nice tip. > > Since I've seen DRH ask about available features on GitHub since I started > lurking on this list recently, > I'd mention the graphs the latter provide which I find useful, in the > Insights tab of a project. > The Code

Re: [fossil-users] Digital signatures on check-ins. Was: tangent vs. wyoung on recent commti

On Fri 22 Dec 2017 6:13 AM, Warren Young wrote: > On Dec 21, 2017, at 4:57 PM, jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 21 December 2017 at 15:03, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > >> On Dec 21, 2017, at 2:58 PM, jungle Bo

Re: [fossil-users] Digital signatures on check-ins. Was: tangent vs. wyoung on recent commti

On 21 December 2017 at 15:03, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > On Dec 21, 2017, at 2:58 PM, jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> 3) Small green lock, like you see in your browser for https >> 2) Unlocked & red >> 1) Locked, but

Re: [fossil-users] Digital signatures on check-ins. Was: tangent vs. wyoung on recent commti

On 21 December 2017 at 14:16, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > On 12/21/17, jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> How are the signatures verified? > > Signatures are not verified, at the moment. > > Probably each repository

Re: [fossil-users] Digital signatures on check-ins. Was: tangent vs. wyoung on recent commti

On 21 December 2017 at 13:46, Richard Hipp wrote: > Suppose Fossil were enhanced to show an icon beside each check-in that > indicated whether or not the check-in had been signed and whether the > signature had been verified. Thus, there are three states: (1) > unsigned, (2)

Re: [fossil-users] Cross-link tech notes to commits

On 20 December 2017 at 13:13, jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I know a tech note entry in the timeline can be linked to a specific commit. > For example: > http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?ss=m=200=e=0 > > See the top commit by A

[fossil-users] Cross-link tech notes to commits

Hi All, I know a tech note entry in the timeline can be linked to a specific commit. For example: http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?ss=m=200=e=0 See the top commit by AG. Can a commit message contain the [ID] of a tech note and have it linked to it? Otherwise, how do you list all tech

Re: [fossil-users] Automatic update when changing type on timeline?

On 19 December 2017 at 13:59, Florian Balmer wrote: > No, my patches were about intercepting the enter key from text input > elements to submit the form and update the view. > > In my tests, I found that the "onchange" handler worked fine for > drop-down lists, so you

Re: [fossil-users] Automatic update when changing type on timeline?

On 19 December 2017 at 13:16, Florian Balmer wrote: > As the form has no "submit" element, it works differently in different > web browsers. I've sent a set of patches directly to Richard Hipp to > make use of the "onkeydown" ("onkeyup" in the initial version) instead >

[fossil-users] Automatic update when changing type on timeline?

Hi All, When I change from Check-ins to tech notes on my personal repo, there's not an automatic display of the results. I have to enter into something like the "max" box and press enter to change the tech notes. I noticed on the fossil-scm repo, there's some update to the page and it displays

Re: [fossil-users] Please suggest built-in skin fixes and improvements

Thus said Richard Kipp on Sun, 17 Dec 2017 21:11:30 -0500 You can now see the canonical Fossil self-hosting repository using any of the built-in skins by visiting links from this page: https://www.fossil-scm.org/skins/ Thanks for the link, this is a very handy way to see all the skins. This

Re: [fossil-users] tangent vs. wyoung on recent commti

Thus said Warren Young on Mon, 18 Dec 2017 17:55:16 -0700 I want to restrict this thread to the technical issues: preventing wyoung/tangent confusions, or helping Donny trust Alice, or or giving Donny the tools to *not* trust Alice just because Bob trusts Alice. I can't remember the repo drh

Re: [fossil-users] tangent vs. wyoung on recent commti

On 14 December 2017 at 10:07, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > On 12/14/17, jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> This commit caught my eye: >> http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/ec059849f5c73a43 >> >> User &a

[fossil-users] tangent vs. wyoung on recent commti

Hi All, This commit caught my eye: http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/ec059849f5c73a43 User & Date:wyoung on 2017-12-13 21:37:20 Original User & Date:tangent on 2017-12-13 21:37:20 So Warren edited a file at the same exact time as tangent? Clicking on tangent, I see this:

Re: [fossil-users] fossil rm --hard dir1

On 13 December 2017 at 07:58, Warren Young wrote: > I’d feel differently if Fossil owned the directories, but it doesn’t. > They’re mine; leave them alone! Yes, I agree. I think this topic has been raised here in the past, although that was about removing files. Still, If

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. GitHub

On 13 December 2017 at 09:07, Warren Young wrote: > On Dec 13, 2017, at 9:55 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: >> >> Would Git or GitHub have told me about those prior tickets? > > GitHub is pretty good about surfacing such information, as long as the ticket >

Re: [fossil-users] Lots of web interface changes

On 6 December 2017 at 11:22, Richard Hipp wrote: > There have been lots of changes (hopefully, "improvements") to the web > interface of Fossil over the past few days. If you have not be > following the developments, I encourage you to visit a few of the main > sites running the

Re: [fossil-users] Windows make fail: mkcss.c

On 30 November 2017 at 10:55, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > On Nov 30, 2017, at 8:16 AM, jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>mkcss.exe ..\src\default_css.txt default_css.h >> ..\src\default_css.txt:1: syntax error > >

Re: [fossil-users] diff coloring missing?

On 30 November 2017 at 08:07, Marc Simpson wrote: > Re: CSS issues: I think the default skin would be a bit more readable > with 1 or 2 pixels of space between these newly added commit > bubbles/boxes. > > (Adjacency currently yields a doubly thick shared line.) Comparing to

Re: [fossil-users] Windows make fail: mkcss.c

On 30 November 2017 at 08:43, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > On 11/30/17, jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 30 November 2017 at 07:46, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: >>> On 11/30/17, jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gm

Re: [fossil-users] Windows make fail: mkcss.c

On 30 November 2017 at 07:46, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > On 11/30/17, jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Still failing with latest changes and nmake /f Makefile.msc and with >> buildmsvc.bat: >> > > Sorry you are havi

Re: [fossil-users] diff coloring missing?

On 30 November 2017 at 06:36, Martin Gagnon wrote: > Do ctrl-f5 to force a full refresh. CSS is cached. > Yes, now it back! ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] Windows make fail: mkcss.c

On 29 November 2017 at 15:35, jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 29 November 2017 at 15:06, jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> First time to compile Fossil on Windows in awhile, so this might me a >> fault

Re: [fossil-users] diff coloring missing?

On Nov 30, 2017 3:35 AM, "Richard Hipp" <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > > On 11/30/17, jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> In previous builds, this commit would certainly have a number of green > >> lines, but that's no

Re: [fossil-users] diff coloring missing?

On Nov 29, 2017 9:29 PM, "Jungle Boogie" <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I don't think this is just an issue with my browser... > > https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/c94f6085489effe6 > > In previous builds, this commit would

[fossil-users] diff coloring missing?

Hi All, I don't think this is just an issue with my browser... https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/c94f6085489effe6 In previous builds, this commit would certainly have a number of green lines, but that's not the case anymore. Same with the unified diff version, too:

Re: [fossil-users] Trolling GitHub for ideas

On Sat 25 Nov 2017 9:17 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > The SQLite project is mirrored on GitHub (not by me). This mirror > provides a good opportunity to compare the interfaces of GitHub and > Fossil using the same underlying data. > > https://sqlite.org/srcx/timeline?basic >

Re: [fossil-users] Windows make fail: mkcss.c

On 29 November 2017 at 15:06, jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > First time to compile Fossil on Windows in awhile, so this might me a > fault of my own doing. > > ..\src\../skins/original/header.txt > ..\src\../skins/plain_gray/css.tx

Re: [fossil-users] Windows make fail: mkcss.c

On 29 November 2017 at 15:06, jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > First time to compile Fossil on Windows in awhile, so this might me a > fault of my own doing. I'm using Microsoft Visual Studio 2017, by the way.

[fossil-users] Windows make fail: mkcss.c

Hi All, First time to compile Fossil on Windows in awhile, so this might me a fault of my own doing. ..\src\../skins/original/header.txt ..\src\../skins/plain_gray/css.txt ..\src\../skins/plain_gr ../skins/plain_gray/header.txt ..\src\../skins/rounded1/css.txt ..\src\../skins/rounded1/details

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Tue 28 Nov 2017 10:36 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 27 Nov 2017 17:41:55 -0500: > > > I have installed the new look (temporarily at least) on > > https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil so that we can live with it for a > > while to see how we like it. >

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Tue 28 Nov 2017 10:40 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 27 Nov 2017 17:41:55 -0500: > > > The big down-side is that less information is visible on a single > > screen now, so you have to scroll more. But that seems to be the trend > > with websites these days >

Re: [fossil-users] Trolling GitHub for ideas

On Sat 25 Nov 2017 9:17 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > The SQLite project is mirrored on GitHub (not by me). This mirror > provides a good opportunity to compare the interfaces of GitHub and > Fossil using the same underlying data. > > https://sqlite.org/srcx/timeline?basic >

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On 27 November 2017 at 14:13, Warren Young wrote: > On Nov 24, 2017, at 7:35 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: >> >> Which is better? >> >> A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/timeline >> B: https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/timeline > > I prefer A because I don’t like

Re: [fossil-users] More timeline changes

On Sat 25 Nov 2017 6:46 PM, Zakero wrote: > To help make the ellipses more visible, you could put them in their own > and let the skin figure out what looks best. Also, instead of > using "...", what about "[+]"? > Yes, I support this suggestion. Most sites I've seen that can expand/shrink

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Fri 24 Nov 2017 7:25 PM, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: > Wow, #5 is super clean and easy on the eyes! > And #12 is interesting if I can see it with Per-Item Time Format = (off)? > > Thanks for the changes! #5 is nice, and especially with the easy option to switch back to advanced. Perhaps the

[fossil-users] Version bump post 2.4 release

Hello All, I think I've noticed this 'problem' before but I don't know what I did about it. It's really just a minor annoyance and not a bug. $ fossil version This is fossil version 2.4 [bf69c6enc9] 2017-11-04 14:56:23 UTC But that hash is from this commit, which is post 2.4 release:

Re: [fossil-users] CI thinks check-in is empty

On 31 October 2017 at 17:18, Jacob MacDonald wrote: > That is indeed the issue. There are command line flags to get Code to behave > the way you want, but I don't recall them off the top of my head. Try > searching for how to use Code as Git's editor, and use the same command

Re: [fossil-users] CI thinks check-in is empty

Good call, Stephan. Thanks for the input, Jacob. I'll take a look for the arguments to use. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

[fossil-users] CI thinks check-in is empty

Hi All, I would like this to be my editor on Windows: "C:\Program Files\Microsoft VS Code\Code.exe" I was able to set it up as my editor: >fossil set editor editor (local) "C:\Program Files\Microsoft VS Code\Code.exe" I wanted to commit a change: >fossil ci This opened VS Code

Re: [fossil-users] Shameless self-promotion

On 14 September 2017 at 09:12, Johan Kuuse wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: >> If you'd like to help promote Fossil to unwashed masses who are still >> using Git, perhaps like or retweet >>

Re: [fossil-users] toc.tcl

On 20 August 2017 at 10:24, Andy Goth wrote: > On 08/18/17 07:38, Dewey Hylton wrote: >> >> I predict this to be the best email I receive today. >> >> My first thought was "This is like paid support!" >> My second thought was "Wait ... paid support has *never* been this

Re: [fossil-users] Help messages in add.c

On 15 July 2017 at 03:58, Johan Kuuse wrote: > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 9:23 PM, Venkat Iyer wrote: >> Consider me old fashioned, but the current behavior seems more in line with >> traditional unix (read sysv) commands. > > I don't want to make this a big deal,

Re: [fossil-users] How to move a check-in from a branch to another one?

On 14 July 2017 at 08:21, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > On 7/14/17, jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> The command to edit commits after they've been commited is amend: >> https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/help?cmd=amend >> &

Re: [fossil-users] How to move a check-in from a branch to another one?

On 14 July 2017 at 03:21, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 7/14/17, Olivier R. wrote: >> So what is the recipe to move a check-in to another branch? > > I (the original author of Fossil) always use web-based UI for this. > First run "fossil ui" to get the web

Re: [fossil-users] Help messages in add.c

On 6 June 2017 at 06:50, Johan Kuuse wrote: > Hi, > > The following commands, executed without any arguments, are mute: > > f add > f rm > f delete > f forget > > IMHO, they should show a help message instead. > Is it desired to not do anything with the command isn't followed by a

Re: [fossil-users] diff for browse.c

On 10 July 2017 at 16:56, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > On 7/10/17, jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> One very minor update to browse.c to add a comma: > > I don't think that comma is correct. The most important

Re: [fossil-users] fossil info on tag & directory: SQLITE_CANTOPEN

On 07/11/2017 06:30 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: On 7/11/17, jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote: I don't think the -v works: https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/help?cmd=info What were you expecting it to do? Your commit is welcomed! Just one minor nitpick here:

Re: [fossil-users] fossil info on tag & directory: SQLITE_CANTOPEN

On 07/11/2017 06:30 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: On 7/11/17, jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote: I don't think the -v works: https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/help?cmd=info What were you expecting it to do? Well that's a good question. With and without the -v seem to p

  1   2   3   4   >