[fossil-users] persisting uv-files sync confusion

still struggling with this: short version: `fossil clone' seems not to honour the `uv-sync' setting. long version: * server repo created while global `uv-sync' setting was still "off" (if this matters) * server repo is not "open", i.e. no associated checkout (if this matters) *

[fossil-users] Fwd: [fossil-src] activity alert

--- Forwarded message --- From: fossil-...@fossil-scm.org To: veedeeh...@gmail.com Cc: Subject: [fossil-src] activity alert Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 13:40:12 +0200 This is an automated email sent by the Fossil repository at https://fossil-scm.org/fossil to report changes. == 2018-06-29

Re: [fossil-users] typos in `fossil help uv'

ot; to give a file a different name in the repository than on disk. Changes are not pushed to other repositories until the next sync. On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 14:57:43 +0200, j. van den hoff wrote: patch for `fossil help uv'

[fossil-users] fossil set uv-sync question

I am still struggling with unversioned files: after "discovering" the uv-sync setting I tried it out: * on the server I did `fossil set --global uv-sync on'. * doing, then, a file system based clone on the server `fossil clone {path_to_server_repo} {path_to_clone_in_server_file_system}

Re: [fossil-users] `unversioned' questions

On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 17:48:43 +0200, Andy Goth wrote: On 06/27/18 03:50, j. van den hoff wrote: but doing it via shell commands remains a hack/workaround. fossil providing functionality to treat uv-files and tracked files mostly on equal footing during ci/co/up/push/pull/sync (considering

[fossil-users] typos in `fossil help uv'

patch for `fossil help uv' output: 11,12c11,12

Re: [fossil-users] `unversioned' questions

On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 18:58:42 +0200, Andy Goth wrote: I think the next project that needs this feature should write a utility script for themselves that uses the uv commands to extract files however makes sense for them. well, AFAIAC, I would be happy if fossil would support the

Re: [fossil-users] `unversioned' questions

On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 18:58:42 +0200, Andy Goth wrote: I think the next project that needs this feature should write a utility script for themselves that uses the uv commands to extract files however makes sense for them. This live experimentation is necessary to figure what is needed in

Re: [fossil-users] `unversioned' questions

On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 18:33:22 +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 5:45 PM wrote: ​Can unversioned files respect their original paths when added? I have several locations for bitmaps, icons, pdf's, etc. They do not necessarily reside in an isolated folder.​ yes, same here,

Re: [fossil-users] `unversioned' questions

On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 18:12:54 +0200, Richard Hipp wrote: On 6/26/18, j. van den hoff wrote: turning this setting on by default might also offer the "least surprise" for the user It isn't an on/off setting. I was not clear. The setting is the name of the directory that i

Re: [fossil-users] `unversioned' questions

On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 17:31:32 +0200, Richard Hipp wrote: My thought was to provide a new setting (perhaps versionable) that specified a directory relative to the root of the check-out into which unversioned files are written whenever one does "fossil update" or "fossil checkout". If the

Re: [fossil-users] `unversioned' questions

ue we were not able to find an example were providing `up -u' or `uv up' could cause a problem. could it? On 6/26/18, j. van den hoff wrote: today I convinced a colleague to give fossil a try. so we set up a project (two checkouts/clones, one central server/repo), using a planned journ

[fossil-users] `unversioned' questions

today I convinced a colleague to give fossil a try. so we set up a project (two checkouts/clones, one central server/repo), using a planned journal article (to be written in latex) as the test case. now, while I never have used 'unversioned files' so far, he immediately wanted to try this

Re: [fossil-users] mv-rm-files setting

perfect, thanks a lot! On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 13:22:40 +0200, Richard Hipp wrote: The mv-rm-files setting used to require a compile-time option in order to function. I have removed that requirement. mv-rm-files now works without special compile-time options. On 6/26/18, j. van den hoff wrote

[fossil-users] mv-rm-files setting

I have not fiddled with this for some time and now I do no longer recall how exactly this setting is managed. it is mentioned in several of the help pages and I do have an entry in my global `.fossil' database INSERT INTO global_config VALUES('mv-rm-files','on'); (I do no longer recall when

Re: [fossil-users] email testing - no subscriber table?

On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 23:57:35 +0200, jungle Boogie wrote: On 25 June 2018 at 14:51, Richard Hipp wrote: On 6/25/18, jungle Boogie wrote: If I inadvertently forward my email along to someone/group without modifying the footer, the person/group would be able to alter my subscription. How

Re: [fossil-users] email testing - no subscriber table?

On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 05:08:53 +0200, Andy Goth wrote: On 06/24/18 05:27, j. van den hoff wrote: additionally, mabye shorten the footer separation line to exactly two `--', treating the footer as the sender's "affiliation/identity" (which usually leads to a less promine

Re: [fossil-users] email testing - no subscriber table?

On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 12:22:07 +0200, Richard Hipp wrote: On 6/24/18, j. van den hoff wrote: On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 12:08:30 +0200, Richard Hipp wrote: The UPDATE syntax error should be fixed now. Please try it again. yes, it works now. thank you. NB: I received the notification email

Re: [fossil-users] email testing - no subscriber table?

through despite the SQL error? or is this indication of some flaw in the subscription logic? On 6/24/18, j. van den hoff wrote: I get an sqlite error when following the verification link and hitting the `submit' button there: SQLITE_ERROR: near "WHERE": syntax error Database

Re: [fossil-users] email testing - no subscriber table?

I get an sqlite error when following the verification link and hitting the `submit' button there: SQLITE_ERROR: near "WHERE": syntax error Database Error near "WHERE": syntax error: {UPDATE subscriber SET sdonotcall=0, sdigest=0, ssub='c', smtime=julianday('now'), smip='*', WHERE

Re: [fossil-users] What should email notifications look like?

On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 16:46:07 +0200, Marcelo wrote: El vie., 22 jun. 2018 a las 11:09, jungle Boogie () escribió: I'd rather have emails delivered in plain text, bypassing html/markdown but that's just my preference. ​+1 for plain text notifications. +1 -- Using Opera's

Re: [fossil-users] How to fix an SQLite warning on the /tagtimeline page?

I see it on some repos, but not on others... On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:43:12 +0100, Martin Gagnon wrote: On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 01:02:47PM +0200, Svyatoslav Mishyn wrote: Hi, how to fix an SQLite warning on the /tagtimeline page? On all my publicly available repositories I

Re: [fossil-users] Compilation failure on osx 10.10 for fossil and sqlite shell

On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 15:37:41 +0100, Richard Hipp wrote: On 1/12/18, Marcel Graf wrote: I tried to compile actual tip of trunk (c409f828) on OS X 10.10.5 It fails when on the linking stage: Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 120, Issue 2

On Tue, 02 Jan 2018 04:33:56 +0100, Stephan Beal wrote: (this time back to the list) On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 3:43 AM, Andy Bradford wrote: Thus said Stephan Beal on Tue, 02 Jan 2018 03:07:20 +0100: > That will still strip any newlines

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Tue, 05 Dec 2017 16:27:28 +0100, Richard Hipp wrote: Please keep a close eye on the Fossil website and report any usability issues. just a thought: could/should the boxes+checkin messages be indented, reflecting the horizontal position of the respective branch in the

Re: [fossil-users] More timeline changes

On Sat, 25 Nov 2017 23:51:23 +0100, Marc Simpson wrote: One other (potential) problem: without the hash prefix, descriptions run together. Example: http://www.sqlite.org/src/timeline, 2017-11-24. The graph nodes are flushed to the left, so descriptions appear as: Add the "^"

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG Bloat?

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 15:25:25 +0100, Richard Hipp wrote: On 11/24/17, Johan Kuuse wrote: I think 'push' and 'pull' seems fair enough. But what about 'rebase' and 'submodule'? To what level should the Fossil-NG client support Git features not present in Fossil?

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 15:35:55 +0100, Richard Hipp wrote: Which is better? A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/timeline B: https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/timeline Also: A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/finfo?name=src/search.c B:

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG Bloat?

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 01:09:21 +0100, Richard Hipp wrote: On 11/22/17, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote: I'm dubious over making Fossil a client for any other main DVCS out there. But making Fossil work as a client for Git is the cornerstone of my plan

Re: [fossil-users] feature request: diff -tk: 'q' to quit

On Sun, 12 Nov 2017 01:08:32 +0100, Stephan Beal wrote: Lol - i never even noticed that there was a search box in the diff view. i'd be just as happy with ctrl-q - anything which is left-hand friendly. but `q' alone is better ;-). and the mentioned patch works

Re: [fossil-users] strange problem with graphical diff

On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 22:28:03 +0200, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: On 8/23/17, j. van den hoff <veedeeh...@gmail.com> wrote: On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 19:54:52 +0200, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: unable to create directory /var What happens when you try ru

Re: [fossil-users] strange problem with graphical diff

On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 19:54:52 +0200, Richard Hipp wrote: unable to create directory /var What happens when you try running this command on the latest trunk check-in? works again. no more hiccups. problem solved it seems. thanks a lot for looking into this. --

Re: [fossil-users] strange problem with graphical diff

On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 18:09:56 +0200, Richard Hipp wrote: more important: is a fix/work-around possible (apart from telling me to do it myself which I would have a hard time with ...) Hold on there, honcho. We are not your employees. This is a community effort. Expressing

Re: [fossil-users] strange problem with graphical diff

On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 17:14:05 +0200, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: On Aug 23, 2017, at 7:21 AM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: On 8/23/17, j. van den hoff <veedeeh...@gmail.com> wrote: unable to create directory /var It is trying to create a tempo

Re: [fossil-users] strange problem with graphical diff

On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 15:21:46 +0200, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: On 8/23/17, j. van den hoff <veedeeh...@gmail.com> wrote: unable to create directory /var It is trying to create a temporary file in which to store the one of the two sides of the diff. Can you trace

[fossil-users] strange problem with graphical diff

today I have stumbled over this problem: issuing something like fossil gdiff --from 823c95ff8a --to eac7dff4fe yields the terminal output (in this example): 8<- Index: Makefile == unable to create directory /var 8<- and that's

Re: [fossil-users] Two easy questions

On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:57:34 +0200, Steve Schow wrote: Related to this question, anyone have any workflow suggestions for accomplishing this aside from remembering to bump the number manually in the file before every important checkin or commit? my workaround is roughly

Re: [fossil-users] Command-line output format

On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:16:33 +0200, Florian Balmer wrote: Citation from: http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg24841.html ... What can we do to help you move away from scripts that depend on the details of command-line output and toward

Re: [fossil-users] [PROPOSED FEATURE] Fossil commands output sent through a pager

On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 16:00:11 +0200, Scott Robison wrote: On Mar 26, 2017 7:13 AM, "Christophe Gouiran" wrote: Hi all, First of all many thanks for all your feedback. I come back to you with an implemented solution. After many thinking,

Re: [fossil-users] No progress on "fossil cp"

On Mon, 16 May 2016 19:02:17 +0200, Warren Young wrote: 1. f finfo can’t trace file history back through a rename. The web version of this (f ui > Files > Ancestry) does manage to report the rename, but it doesn’t trace history back through that link to the old name.

Re: [fossil-users] Colored output on console

On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 18:03:27 +0200, Stephan Beal wrote: On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Steve Schow wrote: On Apr 25, 2016, at 9:22 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Michael Richter

Re: [fossil-users] Colored output on console

On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 16:48:43 +0200, Michael Richter wrote: @michael: I have been using `fsl' myself happily for several years now. I also have tried a couple of times to draw attention to its existence on this list (getting the same feedback -- i.e.: none -- as you).

Re: [fossil-users] opening more than one ui on localhost

On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 13:10:49 +0100, Scott Robison <sc...@casaderobison.com> wrote: On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 4:22 AM, j. van den hoff <veedeeh...@gmail.com> wrote: On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 02:12:01 +0100, Boruch Baum <boruch_b...@gmx.com> wrote: After Warren Young commente

Re: [fossil-users] opening more than one ui on localhost

On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 02:12:01 +0100, Boruch Baum wrote: After Warren Young commented on the "flatness" of forum-style discussions instead of the "threaded" viewing option in email-list-style discussions, I realized that Wikipedia has had a solution that could be easily

Re: [fossil-users] fossil sync doesn't sync

On Wed, 02 Dec 2015 16:56:35 +0100, Andy Gibbs wrote: I upgraded after the problem occurred. I was running 1.32 on the server and 1.32 or 1.33 on the clients. All are running 1.34 now. which at least means they were all post 1.30 (in which version the sync bug

Re: [fossil-users] fossil sync doesn't sync

On Wed, 02 Dec 2015 08:44:42 +0100, Andy Gibbs wrote: Next time this happens, try running: fossil sync --verily question: as per changelog of version 1.30 the sync protocol bug causing the hiccup was fixed for that release? does this mean the `--verily'

[fossil-users] missing quotes around wiki page name on the 'whistory?name=' page

contrary to the `/info/artifact_id' page, where the headline reads project name / Update of "name_of_wiki_page" including explicit double quoting of the name of the wiki page, on the `/whistory/?name=' page it instead reads project name / History of name_of_wiki_page which, depending on

Re: [fossil-users] fossil sync doesn't sync

On Wed, 02 Dec 2015 13:01:42 +0100, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: On 12/2/15, j. van den hoff <veedeeh...@gmail.com> wrote: what harm (in times of sync time/network traffic) would it do to make `--verily' the default action of sync? On the Fossil self-hosting reposit

Re: [fossil-users] fossil sync doesn't sync

On Wed, 02 Dec 2015 11:54:06 +0100, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: On 12/2/15, j. van den hoff <veedeeh...@gmail.com> wrote: thank you. sorry if this has been discussed/explained before: this means, there still is demand for that option? why? is there still a bug out th

Re: [fossil-users] problems with links in embedded documents

On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:19:28 +0100, Richard Hipp wrote: That's all well and good, but Joerg is right - it would be convenient to be able to specify the root of the repository in a hyperlink. I've pondered making that possible with some bit of magic like "[$ROOT/wcontent]" or

Re: [fossil-users] problems with links in embedded documents

On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:13:40 +0100, Warren Young <w...@etr-usa.com> wrote: On Nov 23, 2015, at 9:42 AM, j. van den hoff <veedeeh...@gmail.com> wrote: You could still serve multiple Fossil repositories via your web server’s name-based virtual hosting feature I will

Re: [fossil-users] problems with links in embedded documents

On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 16:10:02 +0100, Warren Young <w...@etr-usa.com> wrote: On Nov 22, 2015, at 6:47 AM, j. van den hoff <veedeeh...@gmail.com> wrote: my (obviously wrong/incomplete understanding so far is that `/wcontent' is an absolute path relative to the repository roo

[fossil-users] typo in admin_sql wiki page

someone with write access to the fossil repo might do a minor good deed ;-): In the sentence "Only *a* the first statement in the entry box will be run." the `a' enclosed in the asterisks should go away (Fossil version [63256980ee]) -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client:

Re: [fossil-users] problems with links in embedded documents

On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:04:07 +0100, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: On 11/23/15, j. van den hoff <veedeeh...@gmail.com> wrote: On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:19:28 +0100, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: That's all well and good, but Joerg is right - it would be con

[fossil-users] problems with links in embedded documents

I am currently giving embedded docs and the wiki another try (never had much need for it till now) and am having some difficulties regarding cross-linking between an embedded doc and any of the default wiki pages, e.g. `wcontent' in a way that it works on a cgi-served repo and its local clone.

Re: [fossil-users] diff after update

On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 01:45:28 +0200, Johan Kuuse wrote: fossil diff -before or fossil diff -before-commit typo... I just wanted to propose another name for the requested option, and actually I meant "call it `diff --before' or `diff --before-update' which I for one would

Re: [fossil-users] diff after update

diff --before(-update) On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 20:20:53 +0200, Warren Young wrote: On Sep 11, 2015, at 11:41 AM, Ron W wrote: On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Warren Young wrote: Though --from-undo is better in that it tells you what

Re: [fossil-users] Why Hash

On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 08:05:09 +0200, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote: On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Baruch Burstein <bmburst...@gmail.com> wrote: On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:12 PM, j. van den hoff < veedeeh...@googlemail.com> wrote: in a breach of promise

Re: [fossil-users] Why Hash

On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 16:54:30 +0200, Martin Gagnon <eme...@gmail.com> wrote: On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 03:29:24PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: On 10 September 2015 at 15:17, j. van den hoff <veedeeh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 08:05:09 +0200, Step

Re: [fossil-users] Why Hash

On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 20:16:52 +0200, Martin Gagnon <eme...@gmail.com> wrote: On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 08:39:49PM +0300, Baruch Burstein wrote: On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:03 PM, j. van den hoff <[1]veedeeh...@googlemail.com> wrote: and it really is just irrelevant fo

Re: [fossil-users] Why Hash

On Wed, 09 Sep 2015 20:19:04 +0200, Ron W wrote: On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Luca Ferrari wrote: Some DVCS, like hg, use both an hash and a sequential number. As I recall (been a few years since I last used hg), the numbers were "relative"

Re: [fossil-users] Search feature

On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 18:04:37 +0200, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: ​I read the search feature is in a trial stage. Can it be expanded to search in actual source files? Now using the browser and only per file. Or of course in an external tool in my checkout folder. Thanks for Fossil. until the

Re: [fossil-users] Automatically put version / checkout infomation into source code on commit

On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 07:05:05 +0200, Christopher M. Fuhrman cfuhr...@pobox.com wrote: On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 at 9:50pm, Christopher M. Fuhrman wrote: Although now that I think about it, using info here is slower than using status, so I may change that. Ah, I stand corrected: [

Re: [fossil-users] Automatically put version / checkout infomation into source code on commit

On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 06:50:57 +0200, Christopher M. Fuhrman cfuhr...@pobox.com wrote: On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 at 4:17am, Michael Weise wrote: Thanks for all the answers, I wrote my own little script that extracts the output of 'fossil status' with the help of sed and writes it to a file. It's

Re: [fossil-users] Code beauty

On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 16:40:51 +0200, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Andy Gibbs andyg1...@hotmail.co.uk wrote: I expect it was simply over-looked during import from a 3rd-party. Yes: https://github.com/antirez/linenoise/blob/master/linenoise.c

Re: [fossil-users] `fossil set mv-rm-files' throws error no such setting: mv-rm-files in 1.33 [18fc492a95]

On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 13:43:30 +0200, Martin Gagnon eme...@gmail.com wrote: ./configure --with-legacy-mv-rm indeed, that works, thanks a lot! I still have some difficulties in understanding the why (if not how, anymore ...) of this: * so, without that configure flag, `fossil set' does not

[fossil-users] `fossil set mv-rm-files' throws error no such setting: mv-rm-files in 1.33 [18fc492a95]

the new `mv-rm-files' setting is not working for me as per subject of this mail. what am I missing? do I need to use some compile time flag (wouldn't think so ...)? thx/j ps: if it matters, I see this on a macosx machine. -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client:

Re: [fossil-users] trunk closed??

On Fri, 29 May 2015 17:38:39 +0200, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On 5/29/15, Matt Welland mattrwell...@gmail.com wrote: This is an exceedingly confusing behavior from fossil but the fix is easy. Just do fossil up trunk. Indeed - Fossil is doing exactly the right thing here. If you

Re: [fossil-users] how to move commits to a different branch

On Thu, 28 May 2015 23:29:14 +0200, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, 28 May 2015 23:14:30 +0200, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 5:09 PM, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, 28 May 2015 22:47:32 +0200, Ron W ronw.m

Re: [fossil-users] how to move commits to a different branch

On Thu, 28 May 2015 22:21:19 +0200, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: So perhaps something similar like: fossil branch mv BRANCH-NAME BASIS I think fossil branch mv BASIS BRANCH-NAME is more intuitive (also

[fossil-users] workflow question

a colleague is considering to use fossil in a setup where he (the group leader) supervises several students having dedicated tasks within a larger project. what he would like to do is * set up master repo * give student(s) clone/pull/push permisisons for the repo * require student(s) to

Re: [fossil-users] workflow question

On Wed, 27 May 2015 18:05:15 +0200, Andy Bradford amb-sendok-1435334716.iohaonjclphfcadgm...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said j. van den hoff on Wed, 27 May 2015 12:10:57 +0200: the request to work on branch is the catch: he wants to ensure that students can never mess up trunk, i.e. must

Re: [fossil-users] workflow question

On Wed, 27 May 2015 18:49:46 +0200, David Mason dma...@ryerson.ca wrote: I use Fossil in 2 ways with students. 1) for each research project I have a Fossil, and all Grad students working on that project (and I) have commit access. There are few enough people that it works out. I think

Re: [fossil-users] workflow question

On Wed, 27 May 2015 19:24:38 +0200, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: (Sorry, accidently clicked the Send button when trying to click the unfold icon in the editor.) On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 6:10 AM, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote: the request to work on branch is the catch

Re: [fossil-users] workflow question

On Wed, 27 May 2015 13:25:43 +0200, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On 5/27/15, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote: he wants to ensure that students can never mess up trunk, i.e. must technically not be able to merge anything into trunk. When the students have a copy

[fossil-users] bug in `fossil finfo' output?

hi list, I've reported this a week ago or so and presume it failed to draw any attention. therefore, with apologies of reporting the same thing twice I'd like to repeat the observed problem here: `fossil finfo' output quite frequently does contain pairs of duplicate timeline entries at

Re: [fossil-users] About the help command

On Fri, 08 May 2015 21:14:07 +0200, Abilio Marques abili...@gmail.com wrote: Ohhh, I did use dbstat the other day (several times actually) while working with some binary files. But yeah, I know there is the -a list, plus the hidden list. But I'm still happy to know that almost everything I

[fossil-users] bug in CLI `fossil finfo' output?

I encounter dublicate entries in the output from `fossil finfo someFile' (`fossil timeline' is not affected) when forks are merged. e.g.: 2013-06-20 [e183f11d6a] intermediate stage of `churn' overhaul. (user: vdh, artifact: [4705fc57d1], branch: trunk) 2013-06-20 [70509c0933] just to make

[fossil-users] bug in CLI `fossil finfo' output?

I have checked the problem of duplicate entries reported by `fossil finfo' a bit further: fossil's own repository demonstrates the problem as well. e.g., I see the following duplicate entries in `fossil finfo src/sha1.c' (src/main.c yields *lots* more ...): * 2011-09-01 [02ee688a4d] Merge

[fossil-users] CLI timeline formatting issue

a minor thing but it causes me a bit of grief right now: currently, the timeline output is using whitespace as well as `-' as word boundaries when performing line wrapping/breaking. line wrapping can also happen, therefore, in the middle of branch names containing a minus, such as

Re: [fossil-users] status of sha1 reporting in timeline?

I think I found the answer myself: the relevant checkin seems to be [1fee0377e4] (feb. 11, 2015). sorry for the noise. On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 15:43:43 +0200, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote: I lost track of what exactly has happened w.r.t. to the previously variable-length

Re: [fossil-users] Testing. Was: Two trunks?

On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 19:51:44 +0200, Matt Welland mattrwell...@gmail.com wrote: I like this idea. I will test this branch Monday. +1 On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-04-26 12:54 GMT+02:00 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: Yes, but it is not a

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 03:03:50 +0200, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said Richard Hipp on Sat, 18 Apr 2015 09:53:53 -0400: Proposed solutions include denying the ability to commit or push a fork. But doesn't that just make the problem worse? Yes, I think it does make

Re: [fossil-users] Bug? FOSSIL MV does not work as expected (Win7 machine)

On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 11:09:05 +0200, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-04-21 10:24 GMT+02:00 Michael Richter ttmrich...@gmail.com: The key wording there is within the repository tree. It doesn't change the file system, only the naming of the files, etc. in the repository.

Re: [fossil-users] auto-adjust of CLI timeline to terminal width?

On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 23:00:57 +0200, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote: On Apr 20, 2015, at 1:43 PM, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote: why does it fail for me on one machine (linux) but not on the other (macos)? It’s a bug in the #includes at the top of src/comformat.c

Re: [fossil-users] auto-adjust of CLI timeline to terminal width?

On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 22:10:31 +0200, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, On 20 April 2015 at 12:43, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote: hi, just curious: today I accidentally noted -- accidentally, since I usually use it only through a wrapper reformatting

[fossil-users] auto-adjust of CLI timeline to terminal width?

hi, just curious: today I accidentally noted -- accidentally, since I usually use it only through a wrapper reformatting the timeline -- that `fossil timeline' now seems to auto-adjust to the terminal width (i.e. only does wrap around of the commit message at the given right margin of the

Re: [fossil-users] Two trunks?

On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 15:53:53 +0200, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Fossil has, for many years, detected potential forks prior to commit and warned about them, or within the past few years has disallowed the commit completely without the --allow-fork option. If two users are committing

Re: [fossil-users] Merge - including files from other branches - best practice?

On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 06:56:13 +0200, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said Scott Robison on Thu, 16 Apr 2015 21:00:50 -0600: Partly I think it is because your test case consists of a single file of a single line, which means probably (I would think) every merge

Re: [fossil-users] terminology confusion

On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 22:58:55 +0200, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com wrote: Some thoughts: More seriously, the Wikipedia article on forking is probably worth a read:

Re: [fossil-users] Introducing Lagerstatte, an open-source hosting service for Fossil repositories

a marginal point, but in case you care: the german word for repository/deposit actually is Lagerstätte where the diacritical mark over the `a' really matters. but Lagerstatte sounds really awful (since the a is pronounced like the u in the English word `up', while the ä is similarly

[fossil-users] strangeness

hi list, I have encountered a strange behaviour (of course right now no longer reproducible ...). setup: -- ssh-transport, all permissions fine -- local clone configured to use 'autosync' -- locally running some variant of 1.32, remotely of 1.31 (so updated recently) -- two year old repos

Re: [fossil-users] strangeness

fossil could accept the checkin locally without propagating the checkin to the remote url despite 'autosync on' and without throwing an error... joerg -bch On 3/27/15, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote: hi list, I have encountered a strange behaviour (of course right now

Re: [fossil-users] strangeness

On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 21:13:47 +0100, Andy Bradford amb-sendok-1430079228.ndeleinmkbfcohhpc...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said j. van den hoff on Fri, 27 Mar 2015 14:37:32 +0100: In a couple of years using fossil I have never encountered something like this. any ideas what might be going

Re: [fossil-users] strangeness

On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 21:15:58 +0100, Andy Bradford amb-sendok-1430079359.djinpnjliidbjojff...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said j. van den hoff on Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:37:37 +0100: in any case problem no. 2 is more irritating. I have no idea how fossil could accept the checkin locally

Re: [fossil-users] possible error

On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:06:33 +0100, Ramon Ribó ram...@compassis.com wrote: fossil version This is fossil version 1.32 [302052d30b] 2015-02-20 08:30:51 UTC fossil sync Usage: c:\other\binutils\fossil.exe sync URL is it not possible to use sync without URL? yes, if you have defined a remote

Re: [fossil-users] GitHub question. Was: Git-v-Fossil.

On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 10:18:35 +0100, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: I tried going to the network graph (https://github.com/mackyle/sqlite/network) which seems similar to the Fossil timeline graph, only sideways.

Re: [fossil-users] Justification for two-step mv and rm

if that is achieved by `rename/forget' in the future. -Tontyna BTW: As soon as I started exploring Fossil I startet developing a GUI application to comfortably operate Fossil. My GUI is much alike Paul's `fcommit`. Am 04.03.2015 um 18:24 schrieb paul: On 03/03/15 22:27, j. van den hoff wrote

Re: [fossil-users] Justification for two-step mv and rm

On Tue, 03 Mar 2015 22:22:40 +0100, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On 3/3/15, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote: Is there a good reason that “fossil mv” and “fossil rm” must be followed by OS-level mv and rm commands? I miss the behavior of Subversion which made these into a single

Re: [fossil-users] SQLITE_ERROR: no such function: score

On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 22:16:40 +0100, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Hi j. van den hoff, On 2 March 2015 at 12:54, j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote: something seems broken, currently (or what am I missing?): issuing `fossil search something' yields SQLITE_ERROR

  1   2   3   4   >