Re: [fpc-devel] Portability Standards

2005-01-03 Thread Florian Klaempfl
peter green wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Marco van de erstanding of include files. Codetools don't work at all if you use include files. That said: $ifdefs confuse it as well... That is one, the another is that they simply have suppo

RE: [fpc-devel] Portability Standards

2005-01-03 Thread Tomas Hajny
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 14:56:07 -, peter green wrote > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Marco van de > erstanding of include files. Codetools don't work at > > all if you use > > > include files. That said: $ifdefs confuse it as well..

Re: [fpc-devel] Optimization error causes pyacc and plex to fail

2005-01-03 Thread DSTRODT
In a message dated 1/3/2005 9:02:50 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I downloaded the new binary release Michael posted this morning. The > versions in that exhibit the same behavior  > I re-ran all my tests with the same results. plex quits > way too early an

Re: [fpc-devel] Small issue in win32 package of fpc 1.9.6

2005-01-03 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, pascalive wrote: > > I installed fpc-1.9.6.i386-win32.zip just fine. The only problem is that the > pdf docs were put in base directory instead of doc dir. Thank you for reporting ! We have noticed it ourselves meantime (gdbpas also is put there). We're still deciding on t

[fpc-devel] Small issue in win32 package of fpc 1.9.6

2005-01-03 Thread pascalive
I installed fpc-1.9.6.i386-win32.zip just fine. The only problem is that the pdf docs were put in base directory instead of doc dir. Using windows XP sp2 Luiz __ Acabe com aquelas janelinhas que pulam na sua tela. AntiPo

RE: [fpc-devel] Portability Standards

2005-01-03 Thread peter green
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Marco van de erstanding of include files. Codetools don't work at > all if you use > > include files. That said: $ifdefs confuse it as well... > > That is one, the another is that they simply have support

Re: [fpc-devel] Portability Standards

2005-01-03 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:40:10 +0100 (Romance Standard Time) Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Marco van de Voort wrote: > > > > > > 2) File Restructuring > > > I've separated the spaghetti code in AbUtils.pas into distinct MSWINDOWS > > > and UNIX sections,

Re: [fpc-devel] Portability Standards

2005-01-03 Thread Marco van de Voort
> On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Marco van de Voort wrote: > > > > 2) File Restructuring > > > I've separated the spaghetti code in AbUtils.pas into distinct MSWINDOWS > > > and UNIX sections, each containing complete procedures. These sections > > > could be moved into dedicated OS specific include files -

Re: [fpc-devel] Portability Standards

2005-01-03 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Marco van de Voort wrote: > > > 2) File Restructuring > > I've separated the spaghetti code in AbUtils.pas into distinct MSWINDOWS > > and UNIX sections, each containing complete procedures. These sections > > could be moved into dedicated OS specific include files - what's t

Re: [fpc-devel] Portability Standards

2005-01-03 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Tomas Hajny wrote: > On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 23:35:10 +0100 (Romance Standard Time), Michael Van Canneyt > wrote > > On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, DrDiettrich wrote: > > > > > Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > . > . > > > 2) File Restructuring > > > I've separated the spaghetti code in AbUtils

Re: [fpc-devel] Portability Standards

2005-01-03 Thread Marco van de Voort
> Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > > > I'm willing to demonstrate my ideas in a redesign and extension of > > > Abbrevia, so that we have a concreter base for further discussions. But > > > before starting with that work I would like to hear some encouraging > > > opinions or suggestions. > > > >