Hello!
I need a raid controller for FBSD 6.2 which has the following options
1) Full SATA-II support
2) Good rperfomance (over 50MB read, over 30 write) in mirror mode
3) No weird problems with freebSD (like with SRCS16)
4) Utility to monitor status of raids (command line or web)
5) Utility to
Hello,
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Hello!
I need a raid controller for FBSD 6.2 which has the following options
1) Full SATA-II support
2) Good rperfomance (over 50MB read, over 30 write) in mirror mode
3) No weird problems with freebSD (like with SRCS16)
4) Utility to monitor status of raids
Hello,
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Hello!
I need a raid controller for FBSD 6.2 which has the following options
1) Full SATA-II support
2) Good rperfomance (over 50MB read, over 30 write) in mirror mode
3) No weird problems with freebSD (like with SRCS16)
4) Utility to monitor status of raids
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:42:39PM +0300, Artem Kuchin wrote:
I need a raid controller for FBSD 6.2 which has the following options
I can highly recommend the Areca family of SATA-II controllers. I have a
ARC-1110 (4 poort RAID controller) with 4x 320GB Western Digital
SATA-II drives
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:42:39PM +0300, Artem Kuchin wrote:
I need a raid controller for FBSD 6.2 which has the following options
I can highly recommend the Areca family of SATA-II controllers. I have a
ARC-1110 (4 poort RAID controller) with 4x 320GB Western Digital
SATA-II drives
LI Xin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that threaded perl is broken on 6.2-RELEASE and 7-CURRENT. I
have tried some option combinations with no luck, if WITH_THREADED=yes
is specified then the build would fail with a coredump.
Any hints?
I ran into the same miniperl core dumps a few days
LI Xin wrote:
LI Xin wrote:
Hi,
It seems that threaded perl is broken on 6.2-RELEASE and 7-CURRENT. I
have tried some option combinations with no luck, if WITH_THREADED=yes
is specified then the build would fail with a coredump.
Another observation is that this happens with 6.2-RELEASE
http://www.3ware.com/
2007/2/8, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:47:10PM +0200, Clayton Milos wrote:
I can highly recommend the Areca family of SATA-II controllers. I have a
ARC-1110 (4 poort RAID controller) with 4x 320GB Western Digital
SATA-II drives
On Thursday 08 February 2007 08:52 am, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:47:10PM +0200, Clayton Milos wrote:
I can highly recommend the Areca family of SATA-II controllers. I
have a ARC-1110 (4 poort RAID controller) with 4x 320GB Western
Digital SATA-II drives attached to
On 27. nov. 2006, at 10.21, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:30:39AM +0100, V??clav Haisman wrote:
Hi,
the attached lor.txt contains LOR I got this yesterday. It is
FreeBSD 6.1
with relatively recent kernel, from last week or so.
--
VH
+lock order reversal:
+ 1st
They kick ass is what they are like. :)
I had a 3U box with a 12 port controller sitting next to my desk for a
few weeks and my only goal was to confuse/break the 3Ware controller.
No amount of power plug pulling, pulling multiple drives, quickly
re-arranging drives could confuse the
I want to second the recommendation for Areca controllers. We have two
systems - The first is using an 1160 (16-port PCI-x) with 16 400GB
drives, the 2nd is using the newer 1261ML card (16 port PCI Express,
mini SAS connectors) with 16 500GB drives. Comments below:
1) Do these controllers, from
Jaime Bozza wrote:
Everyone has their reasons - I liked the RAID 6 feature, plus the OOB
management of Areca, plus my history with 3ware wasn't good. :(
For what it's worth, 3Ware's latest PCI-E cards (9650 series) now
support RAID 6. The updated twa driver that supports them hasn't yet
Ok, now an editorial:
Kernel PPP is certified crap and should be phased out.
In my personal opinion the reason that it is unmaintained and slowly
dissolving into a nonfunctional pool of electrolytes, is that it is
functionally obsolete. User PPP provides better service, and several
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 02:51:58PM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Thursday 08 February 2007 02:17 pm, Mike Andrews wrote:
Jaime Bozza wrote:
Everyone has their reasons - I liked the RAID 6 feature, plus the OOB
management of Areca, plus my history with 3ware wasn't good. :(
For what
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 04:34:57PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote:
-They added a moving part (2-wire fan, no tach) to a mission-critical
part. That seems real stupid. After the bearings die in 2-3 years, what
happens to your card? Does it melt or just start acting weird? If the
For what it's worth, 3Ware's latest PCI-E cards (9650 series) now
support RAID 6. The updated twa driver that supports them hasn't yet
been merged into FreeBSD (see kern/106488 which I filed 2 months ago)
but you can download either the source or the binary for it from 3Ware
that works just
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Geoffrey Giesemann wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 04:34:57PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote:
-They added a moving part (2-wire fan, no tach) to a mission-critical
part. That seems real stupid. After the bearings die in 2-3 years, what
happens to your card? Does it melt
On Thursday, 8. February 2007 23:16, John Walthall wrote:
Ok, now an editorial:
I should not really dignify this rant by replying to it, but:
We have a fundamental design difference from Linux here. We chose this
difference because we believed that it was better. Why would we go back
now
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:49:23PM +0100, Frode Nordahl wrote:
On 27. nov. 2006, at 10.21, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:30:39AM +0100, V??clav Haisman wrote:
Hi,
the attached lor.txt contains LOR I got this yesterday. It is
FreeBSD 6.1
with relatively recent kernel,
If memory serves me right, Dimitry Andric wrote:
Bruce A. Mah wrote:
I mean that it may be that between -RELEASE and -STABLE, other things
have changed, e.g. network rc scripts, /sbin/route itself, etc, which
may also influence this behaviour. I'm sure more than only nd6.c
changed. :)
The
21 matches
Mail list logo
