Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FXS bridged on FXO ports and DTMF - Deja Vu

2010-07-04 Thread Moises Silva
The tone on/off conditions should be, minimum on 40ms and 50ms off.

I recommend you to record a call with those double digit detections. If you
can reproduce them yourself by dialing quickly it'd be even better. Once you
have the recording you can run libteletone on the recorded audio (see
libs/freetdm/src/detect_dtmf.c) and may be start tweaking it. You could also
run spandsp dtmf detector over the recorded audio to see if does a better
job (I'd think so).

Another way to test if spandsp does better is to disable dtmf detection
completely from freetdm (the disable_dtmf dial plan app does that) and then
use spandsp_start_dtmf application on the dialplan (see mod_spandsp).

I'd be interested in looking at the recording too, you can send it to my
email if you want me to take a look. You can record all the read/write audio
using:

ftmod trace /path/prefix  []

That starts recording all incoming and outgoing data on the channel (if no
channel is specified all channels on the span are recorded), the specified
prefix will be used for each of the files. The recording starts immediately
(although if there is no call then most likely no one is reading/writing to
the channel), you must stop the recording when done with:

ftmod notrace  []

Moises Silva
Senior Software Engineer
Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh Drive, Suite 120, Markham ON L3R 9T3
Canada
t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e. [email protected]


On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Jeroen C. van Gelderen  wrote:

>
> > If however you have this issue even with HW EC,
> >call Sangoma tech support and we will be happy to look at the issue.
>
> I wish this was Sangoma hardware esp. with hardware ec :)
>
> My DTMF "bouncing" issues were indeed caused by echo but now that I've got
> OSLEC running (thanks for patching that) calls are echo-free and crystal
> clear.
>
> The issue now is that my users dial their transfers (-say- #44) reasonably
> fast and that often causes two successive DTMF digits to be detected as one
> (#4).
>
> In order to reliably reach the extension the clerk cannot dial more than
> one
> digit per second. That seems excessively slow. I suspect there must be a
> knob somewhere to tune that (in libteletone)? Other causes to look for?
>
> Cheers,
> -Slim
>
>
> ___
> FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
___
FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FXS bridged on FXO ports and DTMF - Deja Vu

2010-07-03 Thread Jeroen C. van Gelderen

> If however you have this issue even with HW EC, 
>call Sangoma tech support and we will be happy to look at the issue.

I wish this was Sangoma hardware esp. with hardware ec :)

My DTMF "bouncing" issues were indeed caused by echo but now that I've got
OSLEC running (thanks for patching that) calls are echo-free and crystal
clear.

The issue now is that my users dial their transfers (-say- #44) reasonably
fast and that often causes two successive DTMF digits to be detected as one
(#4).

In order to reliably reach the extension the clerk cannot dial more than one
digit per second. That seems excessively slow. I suspect there must be a
knob somewhere to tune that (in libteletone)? Other causes to look for?

Cheers,
-Slim


___
FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FXS bridged on FXO ports and DTMF - Deja Vu

2010-07-01 Thread Moises Silva
Hi,

You can try the EC in speech recognition mode.

By default, the ec is in normal mode. But you can set it to speech
recognition mode with this:

# wan_ec_client wanpipe1 msr 

msr = mode speech recognition

Then verify the channel has the required mode:

# wan_ec_client wanpipe1 stats 

You can take it back to normal mode (IIRC) with:

# wan_ec_client wanpipe1 mn 

In any case I am interested in your problem with the ec in normal mode. I
need to check with the driver developer to see if something changed in the
ec settings.

Please let me know if speech recognition mode helps.

Moises Silva
Senior Software Engineer
Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh Drive, Suite 120, Markham ON L3R 9T3
Canada
t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e. [email protected]


On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:46 PM, François Legal  wrote:

> Yes, CID works back again with HWEC disabled. However, I get echo  without
> HWEC ;-)
>
>
>
> François
>
>
>
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:48:40 -0400, Moises Silva 
> wrote:
>
> Just fyi, you can disable hw ec from the CLI so you don't have to
> start/stop the port for your tests. Start the card with HWEC enabled, then
> you can use wan_ec_client.
>  # wan_ec_client wanpipe1 disable
>  Then enable again:
>  # wan_ec_client wanpipe1 enable
>  You can verify it's enabled/disabled with
>  # wan_ec_client wanpipe stats
>
> Moises Silva
> Senior Software Engineer
> Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh Drive, Suite 120, Markham ON L3R
> 9T3 Canada
> t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e. [email protected]
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 6:29 PM,  wrote:
>
>>  I’ll give a try tomorrow with HWEC disabled.
>>
>>
>>
>> *De :* [email protected] [mailto:
>> [email protected]] *De la part de* Moises Silva
>> *Envoyé :* mercredi 30 juin 2010 23:15
>> *À :* [email protected]
>> *Objet :* Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FXS bridged on FXO ports and DTMF - Deja
>> Vu
>>
>>
>>
>> Can you try 3.5.12 with and without hw ec enabled and check if cid is
>> there?
>>
>>
>> Moises Silva
>> Senior Software Engineer
>> Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh Drive, Suite 120, Markham ON L3R
>> 9T3 Canada
>> t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e. [email protected]
>>
>>  On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 2:58 PM, François Legal 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> did try to upgrade to wanpipe 3.5.12 (from 3.5.11) and thought the DTMF
>> problem seems to be fixed (did not had the opportunity to really test it
>> thourougthly), I seem to have lost the CID feature in the upgrade.
>>
>> Roll back to 3.5.11 and CID is back there.
>>
>>
>>
>> François
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:54:19 -0400, Moises Silva wrote:
>>
>>  Hello,
>>
>> I spent a few hours playing with DTMF stuff and analog cards and it seems
>> there is 2 issues at hand.
>>
>> 1. Bleeding DTMF.
>> 2. Echo DTMF.
>>
>> The first issue, for software DTMF, can be solved with Anthony's pre
>> buffer size feature. However that introduces delay by design, and it will
>> not work for large DTMFs (if the dtmf is larger than the buffer).
>>
>> For hardware DTMF a new driver was just released that includes a
>> configuration to allow the EC chip to perform the dtmf tone removal which
>> cuts down the bleeding to only 20ms (in my testing) there is no way a DTMF
>> detector will consider that a valid DTMF and therefore the bleeding should
>> be solved with no delay introduced. The option is HWEC_DTMF_REMOVAL = YES,
>> must be added along with the usual TDMV_HW_DTMF = YES in wanpipex.conf
>>
>> Ideally the software DTMF detector (in this case teletone) should cut it
>> at the same time that it detects it. I thought may be spandsp would help,
>> but it seems spandsp does not have an option to squelch the dtmf tone. May
>> be Steve can help with that. I pinged him on IRC and he said he may get some
>> code working, but there is no date for that and also that would involve
>> integrating spandsp into FreeTDM, any reason to not do this now that spandsp
>> is LGPL?
>>
>> As for the echo dtmf. It seems sometimes an outgoing DTMF may be detected
>> as incoming DTMF due to echo. There is not much we can do there if you don't
>> have echo cancellation. If however you have this issue even with HW EC, call
>> Sangoma tech support and we will be happy to look at the issue.
>>
>> In another note, I added a variable and application to disable DTMF.
>>
>>
>>  That will disa

Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FXS bridged on FXO ports and DTMF - Deja Vu

2010-07-01 Thread François Legal


Yes, CID works back again with HWEC disabled. However, I get echo
without HWEC ;-) 

François 

On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:48:40 -0400, Moises
Silva  wrote:  

Just fyi, you can disable hw ec from the CLI so you don't
have to start/stop the port for your tests. Start the card with HWEC
enabled, then you can use wan_ec_client.  # wan_ec_client wanpipe1 disable 
Then enable again:  # wan_ec_client wanpipe1 enable  You can verify it's
enabled/disabled with   # wan_ec_client wanpipe stats 

Moises Silva
Senior
Software Engineer
Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh Drive, Suite 120,
Markham ON L3R 9T3 Canada
t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e. [email protected]
[1]

 On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 6:29 PM,  wrote:

I'll give a try tomorrow
with HWEC disabled. 

DE : [email protected] [3]
[mailto:[email protected] [4]] DE LA PART DE
Moises Silva
ENVOYÉ : mercredi 30 juin 2010 23:15
À :
[email protected] [5]
OBJET : Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FXS
bridged on FXO ports and DTMF - Deja Vu

Can you try 3.5.12 with and
without hw ec enabled and check if cid is there?  

 Moises Silva
 Senior
Software Engineer
 Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh Drive, Suite
120, Markham ON L3R 9T3 Canada
 t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e.
[email protected] [6]

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 2:58 PM, François Legal 
wrote: 

Hello, 

did try to upgrade to wanpipe 3.5.12 (from 3.5.11) and
thought the DTMF problem seems to be fixed (did not had the opportunity to
really test it thourougthly), I seem to have lost the CID feature in the
upgrade. 

Roll back to 3.5.11 and CID is back there. 

François  

On Mon,
28 Jun 2010 18:54:19 -0400, Moises Silva wrote:

Hello,

 I spent a few
hours playing with DTMF stuff and analog cards and it seems there is 2
issues at hand.

 1. Bleeding DTMF.
 2. Echo DTMF.

 The first issue, for
software DTMF, can be solved with Anthony's pre buffer size feature.
However that introduces delay by design, and it will not work for large
DTMFs (if the dtmf is larger than the buffer).

 For hardware DTMF a new
driver was just released that includes a configuration to allow the EC chip
to perform the dtmf tone removal which cuts down the bleeding to only 20ms
(in my testing) there is no way a DTMF detector will consider that a valid
DTMF and therefore the bleeding should be solved with no delay introduced.
The option is HWEC_DTMF_REMOVAL = YES, must be added along with the usual
TDMV_HW_DTMF = YES in wanpipex.conf

 Ideally the software DTMF detector
(in this case teletone) should cut it at the same time that it detects it.
I thought may be spandsp would help, but it seems spandsp does not have an
option to squelch the dtmf tone. May be Steve can help with that. I pinged
him on IRC and he said he may get some code working, but there is no date
for that and also that would involve integrating spandsp into FreeTDM, any
reason to not do this now that spandsp is LGPL?

 As for the echo dtmf. It
seems sometimes an outgoing DTMF may be detected as incoming DTMF due to
echo. There is not much we can do there if you don't have echo
cancellation. If however you have this issue even with HW EC, call Sangoma
tech support and we will be happy to look at the issue.

 In another note,
I added a variable and application to disable DTMF. 

That will disable
DTMF (either software or hardware) in the leg executing that app. If you
want to disable in the outgoing leg (before a bridge), you must export a
special variable:

The DTMF is enabled automatically on each call, so there
is no need to enable it for each call. But in case you need to enable
it:

Moises Silva
 Senior Software Engineer
 Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50
McIntosh Drive, Suite 120, Markham ON L3R 9T3 Canada
 t. 1 905 474 1990 x
128 | e. [email protected] [8]

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Anthony
Minessale  wrote: 

openzap_pre_buffer_size is a variable you can set to
specific number of MS 60 for example.  

it will pre_buffer the audio on
the channel so when you detect dtmf it will completely drop the buffer so
all of the original   

dtmf should be dropped as well. probably if the
dtmf is too long then it will cause problems anyway.   

if that pre buffer
does not fix anything it would point to echo or bleeding.   

We could make
a variable to disable dtmf detection completely on a per-call basis
possibly but you will still probably hear it bleeding.   

This type of
problem was reported fixed with sangoma because of the echo canceler.   

I
don't use dahdi or digium stuff much so I can't comment on what happens
when you use it.   

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:41 AM, François Legal 
wrote: 

Does this really fix it ?
 I wonder because the problem I see here
is also that the FXS side detects
 the DTMF and then queues it on the FXO
side for generation. That leads to
 the called party receiving twice the
DTMF, the first one is the inband
 DTMF, the second is the one
queued/generate

Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FXS bridged on FXO ports and DTMF - Deja Vu

2010-06-30 Thread Moises Silva
Just fyi, you can disable hw ec from the CLI so you don't have to start/stop
the port for your tests. Start the card with HWEC enabled, then you can use
wan_ec_client.

# wan_ec_client wanpipe1 disable 

Then enable again:

# wan_ec_client wanpipe1 enable 

You can verify it's enabled/disabled with

# wan_ec_client wanpipe stats 


Moises Silva
Senior Software Engineer
Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh Drive, Suite 120, Markham ON L3R 9T3
Canada
t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e. [email protected]


On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 6:29 PM,  wrote:

>  I’ll give a try tomorrow with HWEC disabled.
>
>
>
> *De :* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *De la part de* Moises Silva
> *Envoyé :* mercredi 30 juin 2010 23:15
> *À :* [email protected]
> *Objet :* Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FXS bridged on FXO ports and DTMF - Deja Vu
>
>
>
> Can you try 3.5.12 with and without hw ec enabled and check if cid is
> there?
>
>
> Moises Silva
> Senior Software Engineer
> Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh Drive, Suite 120, Markham ON L3R
> 9T3 Canada
> t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e. [email protected]
>
>  On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 2:58 PM, François Legal 
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> did try to upgrade to wanpipe 3.5.12 (from 3.5.11) and thought the DTMF
> problem seems to be fixed (did not had the opportunity to really test it
> thourougthly), I seem to have lost the CID feature in the upgrade.
>
> Roll back to 3.5.11 and CID is back there.
>
>
>
> François
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:54:19 -0400, Moises Silva wrote:
>
>  Hello,
>
> I spent a few hours playing with DTMF stuff and analog cards and it seems
> there is 2 issues at hand.
>
> 1. Bleeding DTMF.
> 2. Echo DTMF.
>
> The first issue, for software DTMF, can be solved with Anthony's pre buffer
> size feature. However that introduces delay by design, and it will not work
> for large DTMFs (if the dtmf is larger than the buffer).
>
> For hardware DTMF a new driver was just released that includes a
> configuration to allow the EC chip to perform the dtmf tone removal which
> cuts down the bleeding to only 20ms (in my testing) there is no way a DTMF
> detector will consider that a valid DTMF and therefore the bleeding should
> be solved with no delay introduced. The option is HWEC_DTMF_REMOVAL = YES,
> must be added along with the usual TDMV_HW_DTMF = YES in wanpipex.conf
>
> Ideally the software DTMF detector (in this case teletone) should cut it at
> the same time that it detects it. I thought may be spandsp would help, but
> it seems spandsp does not have an option to squelch the dtmf tone. May be
> Steve can help with that. I pinged him on IRC and he said he may get some
> code working, but there is no date for that and also that would involve
> integrating spandsp into FreeTDM, any reason to not do this now that spandsp
> is LGPL?
>
> As for the echo dtmf. It seems sometimes an outgoing DTMF may be detected
> as incoming DTMF due to echo. There is not much we can do there if you don't
> have echo cancellation. If however you have this issue even with HW EC, call
> Sangoma tech support and we will be happy to look at the issue.
>
> In another note, I added a variable and application to disable DTMF.
>
>
>   That will disable DTMF (either software or hardware) in the leg
> executing that app. If you want to disable in the outgoing leg (before a
> bridge), you must export a special variable:
>
>
>   The DTMF is enabled automatically on each call, so there is no need to
> enable it for each call. But in case you need to enable it:
>
>
>   Moises Silva
> Senior Software Engineer
> Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh Drive, Suite 120, Markham ON L3R
> 9T3 Canada
> t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e. [email protected]
>
>On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Anthony Minessale <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> openzap_pre_buffer_size is a variable you can set to specific number of MS
> 60 for example.
>
> it will pre_buffer the audio on the channel so when you detect dtmf it will
> completely drop the buffer so all of the original
>
> dtmf should be dropped as well.  probably if the dtmf is too long then it
> will cause problems anyway.
>
> if that pre buffer does not fix anything it would point to echo or
> bleeding.
>
> We could make a variable to disable dtmf detection completely on a per-call
> basis possibly but you will still probably hear it bleeding.
>
> This type of problem was reported fixed with sangoma because of the
> echo canceler.
>
> I don't use dahdi or digium stuff much so I can't comment on what h

Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FXS bridged on FXO ports and DTMF - Deja Vu

2010-06-30 Thread devel
I’ll give a try tomorrow with HWEC disabled.

 

De : [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Moises Silva
Envoyé : mercredi 30 juin 2010 23:15
À : [email protected]
Objet : Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FXS bridged on FXO ports and DTMF - Deja Vu

 

Can you try 3.5.12 with and without hw ec enabled and check if cid is there?


Moises Silva
Senior Software Engineer
Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh Drive, Suite 120, Markham ON L3R 9T3 
Canada
t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e. [email protected]



On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 2:58 PM, François Legal  wrote:

Hello,

 

did try to upgrade to wanpipe 3.5.12 (from 3.5.11) and thought the DTMF problem 
seems to be fixed (did not had the opportunity to really test it thourougthly), 
I seem to have lost the CID feature in the upgrade.

Roll back to 3.5.11 and CID is back there.

 

François

 

 

On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:54:19 -0400, Moises Silva wrote:

Hello,

I spent a few hours playing with DTMF stuff and analog cards and it seems there 
is 2 issues at hand.

1. Bleeding DTMF.
2. Echo DTMF.

The first issue, for software DTMF, can be solved with Anthony's pre buffer 
size feature. However that introduces delay by design, and it will not work for 
large DTMFs (if the dtmf is larger than the buffer).

For hardware DTMF a new driver was just released that includes a configuration 
to allow the EC chip to perform the dtmf tone removal which cuts down the 
bleeding to only 20ms (in my testing) there is no way a DTMF detector will 
consider that a valid DTMF and therefore the bleeding should be solved with no 
delay introduced. The option is HWEC_DTMF_REMOVAL = YES, must be added along 
with the usual TDMV_HW_DTMF = YES in wanpipex.conf

Ideally the software DTMF detector (in this case teletone) should cut it at the 
same time that it detects it. I thought may be spandsp would help, but it seems 
spandsp does not have an option to squelch the dtmf tone. May be Steve can help 
with that. I pinged him on IRC and he said he may get some code working, but 
there is no date for that and also that would involve integrating spandsp into 
FreeTDM, any reason to not do this now that spandsp is LGPL?

As for the echo dtmf. It seems sometimes an outgoing DTMF may be detected as 
incoming DTMF due to echo. There is not much we can do there if you don't have 
echo cancellation. If however you have this issue even with HW EC, call Sangoma 
tech support and we will be happy to look at the issue.

In another note, I added a variable and application to disable DTMF. 




That will disable DTMF (either software or hardware) in the leg executing that 
app. If you want to disable in the outgoing leg (before a bridge), you must 
export a special variable:




The DTMF is enabled automatically on each call, so there is no need to enable 
it for each call. But in case you need to enable it:




Moises Silva
Senior Software Engineer
Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh Drive, Suite 120, Markham ON L3R 9T3 
Canada
t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e. [email protected]



On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Anthony Minessale 
 wrote:

openzap_pre_buffer_size is a variable you can set to specific number of MS 60 
for example. 

it will pre_buffer the audio on the channel so when you detect dtmf it will 
completely drop the buffer so all of the original

dtmf should be dropped as well.  probably if the dtmf is too long then it will 
cause problems anyway.

if that pre buffer does not fix anything it would point to echo or bleeding.

We could make a variable to disable dtmf detection completely on a per-call 
basis possibly but you will still probably hear it bleeding.

This type of problem was reported fixed with sangoma because of the echo 
canceler.

I don't use dahdi or digium stuff much so I can't comment on what happens when 
you use it.

 

 

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:41 AM, François Legal  wrote:

Does this really fix it ?
I wonder because the problem I see here is also that the FXS side detects
the DTMF and then queues it on the FXO side for generation. That leads to
the called party receiving twice the DTMF, the first one is the inband
DTMF, the second is the one queued/generated by the FXO channel.

For a clean fix, I guess some kind of application should be created, that
would prevent DTMF to be queued on the other channel. Such application
would then be called before the bridge. Maybe there is a cleaner way to do
this.

François


On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:23:13 -0500, "Jeroen C. van Gelderen"
 wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have a problem that is very similar to a problem
> reported by François [1] except for the fact that
> my FXS and FXO ports are on a Xorcom Astribank
> device instead of a Sangoma.
>
> To quote François: "The problem is that each leg of
> the bridge is detecting the inband DTMF, and so
> [F]reeswitch sends each detected DTMF

Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FXS bridged on FXO ports and DTMF - Deja Vu

2010-06-30 Thread Moises Silva
Can you try 3.5.12 with and without hw ec enabled and check if cid is there?

Moises Silva
Senior Software Engineer
Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh Drive, Suite 120, Markham ON L3R 9T3
Canada
t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e. [email protected]


On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 2:58 PM, François Legal wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
>
> did try to upgrade to wanpipe 3.5.12 (from 3.5.11) and thought the DTMF
> problem seems to be fixed (did not had the opportunity to really test it
> thourougthly), I seem to have lost the CID feature in the upgrade.
>
> Roll back to 3.5.11 and CID is back there.
>
>
>
> François
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:54:19 -0400, Moises Silva wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I spent a few hours playing with DTMF stuff and analog cards and it seems
> there is 2 issues at hand.
>
> 1. Bleeding DTMF.
> 2. Echo DTMF.
>
> The first issue, for software DTMF, can be solved with Anthony's pre buffer
> size feature. However that introduces delay by design, and it will not work
> for large DTMFs (if the dtmf is larger than the buffer).
>
> For hardware DTMF a new driver was just released that includes a
> configuration to allow the EC chip to perform the dtmf tone removal which
> cuts down the bleeding to only 20ms (in my testing) there is no way a DTMF
> detector will consider that a valid DTMF and therefore the bleeding should
> be solved with no delay introduced. The option is HWEC_DTMF_REMOVAL = YES,
> must be added along with the usual TDMV_HW_DTMF = YES in wanpipex.conf
>
> Ideally the software DTMF detector (in this case teletone) should cut it at
> the same time that it detects it. I thought may be spandsp would help, but
> it seems spandsp does not have an option to squelch the dtmf tone. May be
> Steve can help with that. I pinged him on IRC and he said he may get some
> code working, but there is no date for that and also that would involve
> integrating spandsp into FreeTDM, any reason to not do this now that spandsp
> is LGPL?
>
> As for the echo dtmf. It seems sometimes an outgoing DTMF may be detected
> as incoming DTMF due to echo. There is not much we can do there if you don't
> have echo cancellation. If however you have this issue even with HW EC, call
> Sangoma tech support and we will be happy to look at the issue.
>
> In another note, I added a variable and application to disable DTMF.
>
>
>
> That will disable DTMF (either software or hardware) in the leg executing
> that app. If you want to disable in the outgoing leg (before a bridge), you
> must export a special variable:
>
>
>
> The DTMF is enabled automatically on each call, so there is no need to
> enable it for each call. But in case you need to enable it:
>
>
>
> Moises Silva
> Senior Software Engineer
> Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh Drive, Suite 120, Markham ON L3R
> 9T3 Canada
> t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e. [email protected]
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Anthony Minessale <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> openzap_pre_buffer_size is a variable you can set to specific number of MS
>> 60 for example.
>> it will pre_buffer the audio on the channel so when you detect dtmf it
>> will completely drop the buffer so all of the original
>> dtmf should be dropped as well.  probably if the dtmf is too long then it
>> will cause problems anyway.
>> if that pre buffer does not fix anything it would point to echo or
>> bleeding.
>> We could make a variable to disable dtmf detection completely on a
>> per-call basis possibly but you will still probably hear it bleeding.
>> This type of problem was reported fixed with sangoma because of the
>> echo canceler.
>> I don't use dahdi or digium stuff much so I can't comment on what happens
>> when you use it.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:41 AM, François Legal wrote:
>>
>>> Does this really fix it ?
>>> I wonder because the problem I see here is also that the FXS side detects
>>> the DTMF and then queues it on the FXO side for generation. That leads to
>>> the called party receiving twice the DTMF, the first one is the inband
>>> DTMF, the second is the one queued/generated by the FXO channel.
>>>
>>> For a clean fix, I guess some kind of application should be created, that
>>> would prevent DTMF to be queued on the other channel. Such application
>>> would then be called before the bridge. Maybe there is a cleaner way to
>>> do
>>> this.
>>>
>>> François
>>>
>>> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:23:13 -0500, "Jeroen C. van Gelderen"
>>>  wrote:
>>> > Hi everybody,
>>> >
>>> > I have a problem that is very similar to a problem
>>> > reported by François [1] except for the fact that
>>> > my FXS and FXO ports are on a Xorcom Astribank
>>> > device instead of a Sangoma.
>>> >
>>> > To quote François: "The problem is that each leg of
>>> > the bridge is detecting the inband DTMF, and so
>>> > [F]reeswitch sends each detected DTMF from one leg
>>> > to the other, and so on and so forth (as each leg
>>> > detects the DTMF again and again)"
>>> >
>>> > HIS words but evidenced by the MY

Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FXS bridged on FXO ports and DTMF - Deja Vu

2010-06-30 Thread François Legal


Hello, 

did try to upgrade to wanpipe 3.5.12 (from 3.5.11) and thought
the DTMF problem seems to be fixed (did not had the opportunity to really
test it thourougthly), I seem to have lost the CID feature in the upgrade.


Roll back to 3.5.11 and CID is back there. 

François 

On Mon, 28 Jun
2010 18:54:19 -0400, Moises Silva wrote:  

Hello,

I spent a few hours
playing with DTMF stuff and analog cards and it seems there is 2 issues at
hand.

1. Bleeding DTMF.
2. Echo DTMF.

The first issue, for software DTMF,
can be solved with Anthony's pre buffer size feature. However that
introduces delay by design, and it will not work for large DTMFs (if the
dtmf is larger than the buffer).

For hardware DTMF a new driver was just
released that includes a configuration to allow the EC chip to perform the
dtmf tone removal which cuts down the bleeding to only 20ms (in my testing)
there is no way a DTMF detector will consider that a valid DTMF and
therefore the bleeding should be solved with no delay introduced. The
option is HWEC_DTMF_REMOVAL = YES, must be added along with the usual
TDMV_HW_DTMF = YES in wanpipex.conf

Ideally the software DTMF detector (in
this case teletone) should cut it at the same time that it detects it. I
thought may be spandsp would help, but it seems spandsp does not have an
option to squelch the dtmf tone. May be Steve can help with that. I pinged
him on IRC and he said he may get some code working, but there is no date
for that and also that would involve integrating spandsp into FreeTDM, any
reason to not do this now that spandsp is LGPL?

As for the echo dtmf. It
seems sometimes an outgoing DTMF may be detected as incoming DTMF due to
echo. There is not much we can do there if you don't have echo
cancellation. If however you have this issue even with HW EC, call Sangoma
tech support and we will be happy to look at the issue.

In another note, I
added a variable and application to disable DTMF. 

That will disable DTMF
(either software or hardware) in the leg executing that app. If you want to
disable in the outgoing leg (before a bridge), you must export a special
variable:

The DTMF is enabled automatically on each call, so there is no
need to enable it for each call. But in case you need to enable it:

Moises
Silva
Senior Software Engineer
Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh
Drive, Suite 120, Markham ON L3R 9T3 Canada
t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e.
[email protected] [1]

 On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Anthony Minessale 
wrote:
 openzap_pre_buffer_size is a variable you can set to specific
number of MS 60 for example. it will pre_buffer the audio on the channel so
when you detect dtmf it will completely drop the buffer so all of the
original dtmf should be dropped as well. probably if the dtmf is too long
then it will cause problems anyway. if that pre buffer does not fix
anything it would point to echo or bleeding. We could make a variable to
disable dtmf detection completely on a per-call basis possibly but you will
still probably hear it bleeding. This type of problem was reported fixed
with sangoma because of the echo canceler. I don't use dahdi or digium
stuff much so I can't comment on what happens when you use it.  

 On
Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:41 AM, François Legal  wrote:
 Does this really fix
it ?
 I wonder because the problem I see here is also that the FXS side
detects
 the DTMF and then queues it on the FXO side for generation. That
leads to
 the called party receiving twice the DTMF, the first one is the
inband
 DTMF, the second is the one queued/generated by the FXO channel.


For a clean fix, I guess some kind of application should be created, that

would prevent DTMF to be queued on the other channel. Such application

would then be called before the bridge. Maybe there is a cleaner way to do

this.

 François

 On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:23:13 -0500, "Jeroen C. van
Gelderen"
  wrote:
 > Hi everybody,
 >
 > I have a problem that is very
similar to a problem
 > reported by François [1] except for the fact that

> my FXS and FXO ports are on a Xorcom Astribank
 > device instead of a
Sangoma.
 >
 > To quote François: "The problem is that each leg of
 > the
bridge is detecting the inband DTMF, and so
 > [F]reeswitch sends each
detected DTMF from one leg
 > to the other, and so on and so forth (as each
leg
 > detects the DTMF again and again)"
 >
 > HIS words but evidenced by
the MY log :)
 >
 > The snippet below has DTMF coming in on the FXS port
 >
(1:1) and bouncing between it and the FXO port (3:1).
 > The ports are
simply bridged together with
 >
 > "bridge(OpenZap/3/1/F)" or
"bridge(OpenZap/3/1/w)"
 >
 > I'm running:
 >
 > FreeSWITCH version:
1.0.head (git-01c0c69 2010-06-08 16-22-21 -0500)
 > dahdi: Version:
SVN-trunk-r8762
 >
 > Output of lsdahdi at end of message.
 >
 > 8
2010-06-13 04:18:39.439252 [DEBUG] zap_io.c:2062 1:1 GENERATE DTMF [4]
 >
2010-06-13 04:18:39.637249 [DEBUG] mod_openzap.c:721 queue DTMF [4]
 >
2010-06-13 04:18:39.676248 [DEBUG] zap_io

Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FXS bridged on FXO ports and DTMF - Deja Vu

2010-06-28 Thread Moises Silva
Hello,

I spent a few hours playing with DTMF stuff and analog cards and it seems
there is 2 issues at hand.

1. Bleeding DTMF.
2. Echo DTMF.

The first issue, for software DTMF, can be solved with Anthony's pre buffer
size feature. However that introduces delay by design, and it will not work
for large DTMFs (if the dtmf is larger than the buffer).

For hardware DTMF a new driver was just released that includes a
configuration to allow the EC chip to perform the dtmf tone removal which
cuts down the bleeding to only 20ms (in my testing) there is no way a DTMF
detector will consider that a valid DTMF and therefore the bleeding should
be solved with no delay introduced. The option is HWEC_DTMF_REMOVAL = YES,
must be added along with the usual TDMV_HW_DTMF = YES in wanpipex.conf

Ideally the software DTMF detector (in this case teletone) should cut it at
the same time that it detects it. I thought may be spandsp would help, but
it seems spandsp does not have an option to squelch the dtmf tone. May be
Steve can help with that. I pinged him on IRC and he said he may get some
code working, but there is no date for that and also that would involve
integrating spandsp into FreeTDM, any reason to not do this now that spandsp
is LGPL?

As for the echo dtmf. It seems sometimes an outgoing DTMF may be detected as
incoming DTMF due to echo. There is not much we can do there if you don't
have echo cancellation. If however you have this issue even with HW EC, call
Sangoma tech support and we will be happy to look at the issue.

In another note, I added a variable and application to disable DTMF.



That will disable DTMF (either software or hardware) in the leg executing
that app. If you want to disable in the outgoing leg (before a bridge), you
must export a special variable:



The DTMF is enabled automatically on each call, so there is no need to
enable it for each call. But in case you need to enable it:



Moises Silva
Senior Software Engineer
Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh Drive, Suite 120, Markham ON L3R 9T3
Canada
t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e. [email protected]


On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Anthony Minessale <
[email protected]> wrote:

> openzap_pre_buffer_size is a variable you can set to specific number of MS
> 60 for example.
> it will pre_buffer the audio on the channel so when you detect dtmf it will
> completely drop the buffer so all of the original
> dtmf should be dropped as well.  probably if the dtmf is too long then it
> will cause problems anyway.
>
> if that pre buffer does not fix anything it would point to echo or
> bleeding.
>
> We could make a variable to disable dtmf detection completely on a per-call
> basis possibly but you will still probably hear it bleeding.
>
> This type of problem was reported fixed with sangoma because of the
> echo canceler.
> I don't use dahdi or digium stuff much so I can't comment on what happens
> when you use it.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:41 AM, François Legal wrote:
>
>> Does this really fix it ?
>> I wonder because the problem I see here is also that the FXS side detects
>> the DTMF and then queues it on the FXO side for generation. That leads to
>> the called party receiving twice the DTMF, the first one is the inband
>> DTMF, the second is the one queued/generated by the FXO channel.
>>
>> For a clean fix, I guess some kind of application should be created, that
>> would prevent DTMF to be queued on the other channel. Such application
>> would then be called before the bridge. Maybe there is a cleaner way to do
>> this.
>>
>> François
>>
>> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:23:13 -0500, "Jeroen C. van Gelderen"
>>  wrote:
>> > Hi everybody,
>> >
>> > I have a problem that is very similar to a problem
>> > reported by François [1] except for the fact that
>> > my FXS and FXO ports are on a Xorcom Astribank
>> > device instead of a Sangoma.
>> >
>> > To quote François: "The problem is that each leg of
>> > the bridge is detecting the inband DTMF, and so
>> > [F]reeswitch sends each detected DTMF from one leg
>> > to the other, and so on and so forth (as each leg
>> > detects the DTMF again and again)"
>> >
>> > HIS words but evidenced by the MY log :)
>> >
>> > The snippet below has DTMF coming in on the FXS port
>> > (1:1) and bouncing between it and the FXO port (3:1).
>> > The ports are simply bridged together with
>> >
>> >   "bridge(OpenZap/3/1/F)" or "bridge(OpenZap/3/1/w)"
>> >
>> > I'm running:
>> >
>> > FreeSWITCH version: 1.0.head (git-01c0c69 2010-06-08 16-22-21 -0500)
>> > dahdi: Version: SVN-trunk-r8762
>> >
>> > Output of lsdahdi at end of message.
>> >
>> > 8<8<8<8<8<8<8<
>> > [...]
>> > 2010-06-13 04:18:39.217256 [DEBUG] mod_openzap.c:721 queue DTMF [4]
>> > 2010-06-13 04:18:39.256255 [DEBUG] zap_io.c:2062 3:1 GENERATE DTMF [4]
>> > 2010-06-13 04:18:39.397253 [DEBUG] mod_openzap.c:721 queue DTMF [4]
>> > 2010-06-13 04:18:39.439252 [DEBUG] mod_openzap.c:780 Dropping frame!
>> (write
>> > not re

Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FXS bridged on FXO ports and DTMF - Deja Vu

2010-06-16 Thread Anthony Minessale
openzap_pre_buffer_size is a variable you can set to specific number of MS
60 for example.
it will pre_buffer the audio on the channel so when you detect dtmf it will
completely drop the buffer so all of the original
dtmf should be dropped as well.  probably if the dtmf is too long then it
will cause problems anyway.

if that pre buffer does not fix anything it would point to echo or bleeding.

We could make a variable to disable dtmf detection completely on a per-call
basis possibly but you will still probably hear it bleeding.

This type of problem was reported fixed with sangoma because of the
echo canceler.
I don't use dahdi or digium stuff much so I can't comment on what happens
when you use it.



On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:41 AM, François Legal wrote:

> Does this really fix it ?
> I wonder because the problem I see here is also that the FXS side detects
> the DTMF and then queues it on the FXO side for generation. That leads to
> the called party receiving twice the DTMF, the first one is the inband
> DTMF, the second is the one queued/generated by the FXO channel.
>
> For a clean fix, I guess some kind of application should be created, that
> would prevent DTMF to be queued on the other channel. Such application
> would then be called before the bridge. Maybe there is a cleaner way to do
> this.
>
> François
>
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:23:13 -0500, "Jeroen C. van Gelderen"
>  wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I have a problem that is very similar to a problem
> > reported by François [1] except for the fact that
> > my FXS and FXO ports are on a Xorcom Astribank
> > device instead of a Sangoma.
> >
> > To quote François: "The problem is that each leg of
> > the bridge is detecting the inband DTMF, and so
> > [F]reeswitch sends each detected DTMF from one leg
> > to the other, and so on and so forth (as each leg
> > detects the DTMF again and again)"
> >
> > HIS words but evidenced by the MY log :)
> >
> > The snippet below has DTMF coming in on the FXS port
> > (1:1) and bouncing between it and the FXO port (3:1).
> > The ports are simply bridged together with
> >
> >   "bridge(OpenZap/3/1/F)" or "bridge(OpenZap/3/1/w)"
> >
> > I'm running:
> >
> > FreeSWITCH version: 1.0.head (git-01c0c69 2010-06-08 16-22-21 -0500)
> > dahdi: Version: SVN-trunk-r8762
> >
> > Output of lsdahdi at end of message.
> >
> > 8<8<8<8<8<8<8<
> > [...]
> > 2010-06-13 04:18:39.217256 [DEBUG] mod_openzap.c:721 queue DTMF [4]
> > 2010-06-13 04:18:39.256255 [DEBUG] zap_io.c:2062 3:1 GENERATE DTMF [4]
> > 2010-06-13 04:18:39.397253 [DEBUG] mod_openzap.c:721 queue DTMF [4]
> > 2010-06-13 04:18:39.439252 [DEBUG] mod_openzap.c:780 Dropping frame!
> (write
> > not ready)
> > 2010-06-13 04:18:39.439252 [DEBUG] zap_io.c:2062 1:1 GENERATE DTMF [4]
> > 2010-06-13 04:18:39.637249 [DEBUG] mod_openzap.c:721 queue DTMF [4]
> > 2010-06-13 04:18:39.676248 [DEBUG] zap_io.c:2062 3:1 GENERATE DTMF [4]
> > 2010-06-13 04:18:39.859244 [DEBUG] mod_openzap.c:780 Dropping frame!
> (write
> > not ready)
> > [...ad infinitum...]
> > 8<8<8<8<8<8<8<
> >
> > Because I needed DTMF pass-through working "now"
> > I applied an ugly HACK. This drops DTMF tones
> > detected on spans 3 and 4 (which are my FXO
> > spans). This is very WRONG but it does solve
> > my immediate problem:
> >
> > 8<8<8<8<8<8<8<
> > diff --git a/libs/openzap/mod_openzap/mod_openzap.c
> > b/libs/openzap/mod_openzap/mod_openzap.c
> > index 5aebfea..ff3b081 100644
> > --- a/libs/openzap/mod_openzap/mod_openzap.c
> > +++ b/libs/openzap/mod_openzap/mod_openzap.c
> > @@ -718,8 +718,12 @@ static switch_status_t
> > channel_read_frame(switch_core_session_t *session, switch
> > for (p = dtmf; p && *p; p++) {
> > if (is_dtmf(*p)) {
> > _dtmf.digit = *p;
> > -   zap_log(ZAP_LOG_DEBUG, "queue DTMF
> [%c]\n",
> > *p);
> > -   switch_channel_queue_dtmf(channel,
> &_dtmf);
> > +   if (tech_pvt->zchan->span_id == 3 ||
> > tech_pvt->zchan->span_id == 4) {
> > +   zap_log(ZAP_LOG_DEBUG, "Ignoring
> > DTMF [%c] on FXO port %d:%d\n", *p, tech_pvt->zchan->span_id,
> > tech_pvt->zchan->chan_id)
> > ;
> > +   } else {
> > +   zap_log(ZAP_LOG_DEBUG, "queue
> DTMF
> > [%c]\n", *p);
> > +
> switch_channel_queue_dtmf(channel,
> > &_dtmf);
> > +   }
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > 8<8<8<8<8<8<8<
> >
> > Can someone point me in the "right" direction
> > instead? Do I need to do this at the OpenZAP/DAHDI
> > level by disabling some kind of DTMF detection
> > like was done for the Sangoma driver?
> >
> > Any and all pointers appreciated.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > -Slim
> >
> > [1] [

Re: [Freeswitch-dev] FXS bridged on FXO ports and DTMF - Deja Vu

2010-06-16 Thread François Legal
Does this really fix it ?
I wonder because the problem I see here is also that the FXS side detects
the DTMF and then queues it on the FXO side for generation. That leads to
the called party receiving twice the DTMF, the first one is the inband
DTMF, the second is the one queued/generated by the FXO channel.

For a clean fix, I guess some kind of application should be created, that
would prevent DTMF to be queued on the other channel. Such application
would then be called before the bridge. Maybe there is a cleaner way to do
this.

François

On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:23:13 -0500, "Jeroen C. van Gelderen"
 wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> 
> I have a problem that is very similar to a problem 
> reported by François [1] except for the fact that 
> my FXS and FXO ports are on a Xorcom Astribank 
> device instead of a Sangoma.
> 
> To quote François: "The problem is that each leg of 
> the bridge is detecting the inband DTMF, and so 
> [F]reeswitch sends each detected DTMF from one leg 
> to the other, and so on and so forth (as each leg 
> detects the DTMF again and again)"
> 
> HIS words but evidenced by the MY log :)
> 
> The snippet below has DTMF coming in on the FXS port 
> (1:1) and bouncing between it and the FXO port (3:1). 
> The ports are simply bridged together with
> 
>   "bridge(OpenZap/3/1/F)" or "bridge(OpenZap/3/1/w)"
> 
> I'm running:
> 
> FreeSWITCH version: 1.0.head (git-01c0c69 2010-06-08 16-22-21 -0500)
> dahdi: Version: SVN-trunk-r8762
> 
> Output of lsdahdi at end of message.
> 
> 8<8<8<8<8<8<8<
> [...]
> 2010-06-13 04:18:39.217256 [DEBUG] mod_openzap.c:721 queue DTMF [4]
> 2010-06-13 04:18:39.256255 [DEBUG] zap_io.c:2062 3:1 GENERATE DTMF [4]
> 2010-06-13 04:18:39.397253 [DEBUG] mod_openzap.c:721 queue DTMF [4]
> 2010-06-13 04:18:39.439252 [DEBUG] mod_openzap.c:780 Dropping frame!
(write
> not ready)
> 2010-06-13 04:18:39.439252 [DEBUG] zap_io.c:2062 1:1 GENERATE DTMF [4]
> 2010-06-13 04:18:39.637249 [DEBUG] mod_openzap.c:721 queue DTMF [4]
> 2010-06-13 04:18:39.676248 [DEBUG] zap_io.c:2062 3:1 GENERATE DTMF [4]
> 2010-06-13 04:18:39.859244 [DEBUG] mod_openzap.c:780 Dropping frame!
(write
> not ready)
> [...ad infinitum...]
> 8<8<8<8<8<8<8<
> 
> Because I needed DTMF pass-through working "now" 
> I applied an ugly HACK. This drops DTMF tones 
> detected on spans 3 and 4 (which are my FXO 
> spans). This is very WRONG but it does solve 
> my immediate problem:
> 
> 8<8<8<8<8<8<8<
> diff --git a/libs/openzap/mod_openzap/mod_openzap.c
> b/libs/openzap/mod_openzap/mod_openzap.c
> index 5aebfea..ff3b081 100644
> --- a/libs/openzap/mod_openzap/mod_openzap.c
> +++ b/libs/openzap/mod_openzap/mod_openzap.c
> @@ -718,8 +718,12 @@ static switch_status_t
> channel_read_frame(switch_core_session_t *session, switch
> for (p = dtmf; p && *p; p++) {
> if (is_dtmf(*p)) {
> _dtmf.digit = *p;
> -   zap_log(ZAP_LOG_DEBUG, "queue DTMF
[%c]\n",
> *p);
> -   switch_channel_queue_dtmf(channel,
&_dtmf);
> +   if (tech_pvt->zchan->span_id == 3 ||
> tech_pvt->zchan->span_id == 4) {
> +   zap_log(ZAP_LOG_DEBUG, "Ignoring
> DTMF [%c] on FXO port %d:%d\n", *p, tech_pvt->zchan->span_id,
> tech_pvt->zchan->chan_id)
> ;
> +   } else {
> +   zap_log(ZAP_LOG_DEBUG, "queue
DTMF
> [%c]\n", *p);
> +  
switch_channel_queue_dtmf(channel,
> &_dtmf);
> +   }
> }
> }
> }
> 8<8<8<8<8<8<8<
> 
> Can someone point me in the "right" direction 
> instead? Do I need to do this at the OpenZAP/DAHDI 
> level by disabling some kind of DTMF detection 
> like was done for the Sangoma driver?
> 
> Any and all pointers appreciated.
> 
> Cheers,
> -Slim
> 
> [1] [Freeswitch-dev] FXS bridged on FXO ports and DTMF
>
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02830.htm
> l
> 
> [Freeswitch-dev] Problem with sending 
> DTMF on FXS port bridged to   an FXO port
>
http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-dev/2010-April/003607.html
> 
> 
> 8<8<8<8<8<8<8<
> [r...@localhost freeswitch]# lsdahdi
> ### Span  1: XBUS-00/XPD-00 "Xorcom XPD #00/00: FXS" (MASTER)
>   1 FXSFXOKS
>   2 FXSFXOKS
>   3 FXSFXOKS
>   4 FXSFXOKS
>   5 FXSFXOKS
>   6 FXSFXOKS
>   7 FXSFXOKS
>   8 FXSFXOKS
>   9 Output FXOKS
>  10 Output FXOKS
>  11 Input  FXOKS
>  12 Input  FXOKS
>  13 Input  FXOKS
>  14 Input  FXOKS
> ### Span  2: XBUS-00/XPD-10 "Xorcom XPD #00/10: FXS"
>  15 FXSFXOKS
>  16 FXSFXOKS
>  17 FXSFXOKS
>  18 FXSF