Fwd: Re: Some advices about the new static website

2016-04-08 Thread Thomas Funk
On 04/08/2016 10:47 PM, Jaimos Skriletz wrote: On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Thomas Funk >wrote: ​The "logo" is now the menu entry, so instead of just saying "FVWM" I put the logo in its place. The logo except for looks works just as any other entry in the

Re: Some advices about the new static website

2016-04-08 Thread Thomas Funk
On 04/08/2016 11:41 PM, Thomas Adam wrote: Maybe, but again, there'll only ever be one set of man pages to reflect when releases happen. Since I've put in place a means of generating them from markdown (and have yet to receive offers on help with that), I'll see what happens when I have time to

Re: Some advices about the new static website

2016-04-08 Thread Jaimos Skriletz
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Thomas Funk wrote: > I'm not clear what you're referring to with "linking" either. >> > > I meant the links in > http://fvwm.org/doc/unstable/fvwm/fvwm.man.html > > And again the html docs under http://fvwm.org/doc/unstable are/were the > same as

Re: Some advices about the new static website

2016-04-08 Thread Dan Espen
Thomas Funk writes: > On 04/08/2016 11:08 PM, Thomas Adam wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 09:44:48PM +0200, Thomas Funk wrote: >>> What about the perlib pages and the ... uhm ... 'unstable' documentation >>> pages (http://fvwm.org/doc/unstable/index.html)? Will they appear again

Re: Some advices about the new static website

2016-04-08 Thread Thomas Adam
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 11:33:05PM +0200, Thomas Funk wrote: > I could help you if you like as I did much inside Fvwm-Nightshade with > perllib. I'll let you know when I've put this together. > > As for unstable man pages, no. There's no such thing any more, and > >hasn't been for a long time

Re: Some advices about the new static website

2016-04-08 Thread Thomas Funk
On 04/09/2016 12:53 AM, Jaimos Skriletz wrote: ​I believe I know which ones you were talking about.​ ​Was this the alphabetical ​list of terms that linked to their location inside the man pages. It was a nice set of links as it made looking for some things easier. Yes and the links inside fvwm

Re: Some advices about the new static website

2016-04-08 Thread Thomas Funk
On 04/09/2016 01:31 AM, Dan Espen wrote: We don't have stable and unstable anymore so references to stable and unstable should be removed. Yes you're right and I know this but since the update to static these html docs with linked keywords are available from unstable only [1]. Therefore I said

Re: Some advices about the new static website

2016-04-08 Thread Thomas Adam
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 12:40:54AM +0200, Thomas Funk wrote: > I meant the links in > http://fvwm.org/doc/unstable/fvwm/fvwm.man.html > > And again the html docs under http://fvwm.org/doc/unstable are/were the > same as under http://fvwm.org/doc/stable since ages. Yes, since I disabled snapshot

Re: Some advices about the new static website

2016-04-08 Thread Thomas Adam
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 09:44:48PM +0200, Thomas Funk wrote: > What about the perlib pages and the ... uhm ... 'unstable' documentation > pages (http://fvwm.org/doc/unstable/index.html)? Will they appear again > in the future? perllib maybe (althought woefully out of date, and it's on my TODO

Re: Some advices about the new static website

2016-04-08 Thread Thomas Funk
On 04/08/2016 11:08 PM, Thomas Adam wrote: On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 09:44:48PM +0200, Thomas Funk wrote: What about the perlib pages and the ... uhm ... 'unstable' documentation pages (http://fvwm.org/doc/unstable/index.html)? Will they appear again in the future? perllib maybe (althought

Some advices about the new static website

2016-04-08 Thread Thomas Funk
Hi Jaimos, until your last commit I took a look over the new static pages on fvwm.org and want to tell you what I've noticed: Cool feature with the window buttons (maximize, shade/unshade) and the logo behind B) :) But the small logo (left upper corner) overlaps the main menu 'FVWM' :( Used