| On 30 January 2012 21:28, Chris Siebenmann c...@cs.toronto.edu wrote:
| ÂDoes anyone know if there exists a good command line tool for
| listing either the window IDs or the window names of all windows
| of a specific class (or better yet, set of classes)? Or is this
| something that's
2) I want to keep the current date on the screen (and time as well, but
time is no problem)
In my old configuration I do this already, I stick in a corner of the
screen, one above the other, two applications.
- one is a xdaliclock with the (hh:mm:ss) time (no title, etc.)
> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 9:43 PM Ronald F. Guilmette
> wrote:
>
> > Greetings,
> >
> > First, the icon used to repreesent minimuzed Firefox windows is
> > substantially larger than t was for the prior version(s) of fvwm
> > that I had been accustomed to using. Since I tend to have a LOT
> > of
> I've search the website, archives, wiki, and a number of configuration
> websites, and have been unable to find a way to cause an action to
> happen when a modifier key is held down and/or released. I'm running
> fvwm 2.6.8 on CentOS 7.
It's possible that you'll be able to build an interface
I did some more digging on my problem of Lower not lowering windows
below iconified windows.
It first appears in fvwm 2.4.10; it is not present in 2.4.9.
Reproduction steps with the fvwm2rc at the end of this message:
- start your favorite Xnest environment (or a real X server) and
fvwm as
An additional two notes:
I localized the problem to fvwm 2.4.10's fvwm/stack.c changes; the 2.4.9
stack.c (hacked to change '-pstack' to '-stack.p') doesn't exhibit the
problem when compiled into 2.4.10.
The problem appears to go away if I force the do_lower parameter to
fvwm/stack.c's
In testing so far, a CVS version from branch-2_4 pulled on Tuesday
night or so seems to be working fine. (Sorry for the delay in reply,
but I wanted to give it some time to make sure.) Certainly the stacking
issue I saw is gone and I haven't observed any other ones.
- cks
--
Visit the
| On 24 January 2012 14:54, Dan Espen des...@verizon.net wrote:
| I think any platform that supports XDG is going to have python.
|
| It will; but I think it's best described the other way round -- that
| is, any platform that has python installed can use XDG -- and I say
| that only because of
