limitations.
Use of this template requires the rbd kernel driver and rbd tool
on all VM-capable nodes, as well as an operational RADOS cluster,
accessible by them.
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
Hello,
please find attached our patch for Ganeti's master.
We have tested
limitations.
Use of this template requires the rbd kernel driver and rbd tool
on all VM-capable nodes, as well as an operational RADOS cluster,
accessible by them.
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
Hello,
please find attached our patch for Ganeti's master.
We have tested
Ensure node level locks are recalculated properly
in LUInstanceGrowDisk.
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
Hello,
LUInstanceGrowDisk seems to not recalculate locks properly,
leading to this (testing with -t plain):
# gnt-instance grow-disk testgrow 0 1g
Failure
On 01/10/2012 06:17 PM, Andrea Spadaccini wrote:
Hello,
Introduce the rbd disk template, which handles provisioning and
management of instance disks as block devices mapped to rbd volumes
on a RADOS cluster.
Thanks for sending the patch.
After fighting with a couple of ceph/rbd bugs, today I
limitations.
Use of this template requires the rbd kernel driver and rbd tool
on all VM-capable nodes, as well as an operational RADOS cluster,
accessible by them.
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
Hello Andrea,
I'm resending the rbd patch, after fixing all `make lint' errors
is: 4b97458c42ee27c12def1b162437b583389711ae
Hope this helps,
Thanks,
Constantinos
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 05:35:45PM +0200, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 01/10/2012 06:17 PM, Andrea Spadaccini wrote:
Hello,
Introduce the rbd disk template, which handles provisioning and
management of instance disks as block
Hello Andrea,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 01:25:54PM +, Andrea Spadaccini wrote:
Hello Constantinos,
Thanks for resending and fixing the make lint errors.
I tried your patch and it works fine on my test cluster.
The functionality implemented in the patch looks good. I think that
for
limitations.
Use of this template requires the rbd kernel driver and rbd tool
on all VM-capable nodes, as well as an operational RADOS cluster,
accessible by them.
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
Hello team,
I'm resending the patch, hopefully addressing all issues
Andrea
limitations.
Use of this template requires the rbd kernel driver and rbd tool
on all VM-capable nodes, as well as an operational RADOS cluster,
accessible by them.
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
Hello team,
Thanks for the many review rounds.
I refactored the mapping/unmapping
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 02:07:14PM -0200, Michael Hanselmann wrote:
Hi Constantinos
Thanks for the removal of grep. Some style comments:
Am 19. Januar 2012 14:01 schrieb Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr:
--- a/lib/bdev.py
+++ b/lib/bdev.py
+ def _MapVolumeToBlockdev(self
limitations.
Use of this template requires the rbd kernel driver and rbd tool
on all VM-capable nodes, as well as an operational RADOS cluster,
accessible by them.
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
Hello,
I'm resending the patch.
I applied all
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 03:51:26PM -0200, Michael Hanselmann wrote:
Am 23. Januar 2012 15:20 schrieb Michael Hanselmann han...@google.com:
Am 23. Januar 2012 10:27 schrieb Constantinos Venetsanopoulos
c...@grnet.gr:
+ matched_lines = \
+ filter(lambda l: len(l) == allfields and l
On 02/10/2012 05:13 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 12:29:13PM +0200, Stratos Psomadakis wrote:
Add documentation and modify manpages for the RBD disk template.
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulosc...@grnet.gr
Signed-off-by: Stratos Psomadakispso...@grnet.gr
---
Hi,
Hello team,
I was trying to compile the current master branch today and got:
htools/Ganeti/Logging.hs:49:7:
Could not find module `System.Log.Formatter':
Use -v to see a list of the files searched for.
make[2]: *** [htools/hconfd] Error 1
After a bit of searching, I found that the
On 03/21/2012 01:31 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:21:46PM +0200, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Hello team,
I was trying to compile the current master branch today and got:
htools/Ganeti/Logging.hs:49:7:
Could not find module `System.Log.Formatter':
Use -v
On 03/29/2012 05:07 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:21:46PM +0200, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Hello team,
I was trying to compile the current master branch today and got:
htools/Ganeti/Logging.hs:49:7:
Could not find module `System.Log.Formatter':
Use -v
Update the shared storage design document to reflect the current
changes, after the implementation of the ExtStorage interface.
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
doc/design-shared-storage.rst | 204 ++--
1 files changed, 112
pool management and also diagnose other types of
templates too.
I'm looking forward to your comments,
Constantinos
Constantinos Venetsanopoulos (5):
Implement the External Storage Interface
Multiple ExtStorage Providers and ext-params
Add the gnt-storage client
Add
* ganeti-extstorage-interface man page
* gnt-storage man page
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
.gitignore |1 +
Makefile.am |2 +
man/footer.rst | 11 +-
man/ganeti-extstorage
logical id is the tuple ('ext', UUID.ext.diskX), where UUID
is generated as in disk template `plain' and X is the disk's index.
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
Makefile.am |1 +
configure.ac | 12 ++
lib/bdev.py | 304
Providers for each disk and
passing different ext-params to them:
-t ext --disk=0:size=2G,provider=sample_provider1,param1=value1
--disk=1:size=3G,provider=sample_provider2,param2=value2
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
lib/bdev.py | 68
be extended to diagnose other storage types supported by
Ganeti, such as lvm, drbd (INT_MIRROR) or rbd (EXT_MIRROR).
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
Makefile.am |6 +-
autotools/build-bash-completion |4 +
lib/backend.py | 45
On 04/04/2012 07:39 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 07:28:25PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Hello team,
Until now, Ganeti can handle shared storage in two ways:
- with the `drbd' disk template (internally)
- with the `blockdev' and `sharedfile' template
Hello team,
Should the release date of 2.6.0beta1 be: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 ?
Shouldn't it be Wed, 23 May 2012 in the NEWS file?
Am I missing something here? :)
Constantinos
On 06/12/2012 01:21 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 01:13:11PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Hello team,
I've bumped into something which I'm not sure is a bug or expected
behaviour. However, it seems a bit strange and was first introduced
after the implementation
Hello team,
I'm testing Ganeti 2.6.0beta2 and seem to have hit a problem:
Disk parameters are not getting annotated before several rpc calls
inside cmdlib, which causes Ganeti to break in templates that need
to find disk parameters during their Attach or Remove methods.
This does not cause
Hello René,
comments inline:
On 06/26/2012 12:22 PM, René Nussbaumer wrote:
Hello Constantinos,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos
c...@grnet.gr wrote:
Hello team,
I'm testing Ganeti 2.6.0beta2 and seem to have hit a problem:
Disk parameters are not getting
On 06/26/2012 03:21 PM, René Nussbaumer wrote:
Hi Constantinos,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos
c...@grnet.gr wrote:
On 06/26/2012 12:22 PM, René Nussbaumer wrote:
Hello Constantinos,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos
c...@grnet.gr
On 06/26/2012 04:27 PM, René Nussbaumer wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos
c...@grnet.gr wrote:
On 06/26/2012 03:21 PM, René Nussbaumer wrote:
Hi Constantinos,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos
c...@grnet.gr wrote:
On 06/26/2012
instance2
This patch fixes the bug, by allowing `modify' to be passed as a
parameter (as happens with `add' and `remove'), as long as it is
not done alongside `add' or `remove'. If so, it is treated in the
same way as if none of modify/add/remove is passed -- modify.
Signed-off-by: Constantinos
LGTM
Thanks,
Constantinos
On 6/28/2012 2:09 PM, René Nussbaumer wrote:
Hi Constantinos,
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos
c...@grnet.gr wrote:
With the new gnt-instance modify syntax for addition and removal of
disks/NICs on arbitrary indexes, we hit an assertion
On 8/14/2012 4:53 PM, Damien Churchill wrote:
On 13 August 2012 13:39, Ansgar Jazdzewski a.jazdzew...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
I like to build an instance on a RBD Storage with Kernel inside the VM
So i did,
root@node01# gnt-instance add -t rbd -s 30G --net 0:link=br-untagged
-B
when using adoption with 'plain'
and 'blockdev' template and will be addressed in another commit.
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
lib/cmdlib.py |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/cmdlib.py b/lib/cmdlib.py
index 1f80c6c
hail to fail
with FailDisk.
Thoughts on this one? How do you think we could fix that?
Regards,
cven
On 08/21/2012 06:06 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 02:15:53PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Hello team,
just stumbled upon the following bug, due to the new IPolicy
On 08/22/2012 02:24 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:16:48PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Currently, hail fails with FailDisk when trying to add an instance
of type: 'file', 'sharedfile' and 'rbd'.
This is due to a 0 or None value in the corresponding dict inside
On 08/22/2012 02:46 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:30:00PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 08/22/2012 02:24 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:16:48PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Currently, hail fails with FailDisk when trying
On 08/22/2012 03:03 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:25:42PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Hello iustin,
I just sent a patch that fixes the problem with FailDisk for
'sharedfile' and 'rbd'.
Plus, I discovered that also 'file' made hail fail differently,
because
On 08/16/2012 01:22 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:07:53AM +0100, Damien Churchill wrote:
On 16 August 2012 10:56, Iustin Pop iu...@k1024.org wrote:
Thanks! This will help fixing, for sure.
From what I've gathered, there's an instance of the RADOSBlockDevice
class being
On 08/23/2012 01:07 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:34:12PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 08/16/2012 01:22 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:07:53AM +0100, Damien Churchill wrote:
On 16 August 2012 10:56, Iustin Pop iu...@k1024.org wrote
Hello team,
I seem to not have actually understood how hail's algorithm works,
and I would like some insight if possible.
I have a Ganeti cluster with 13 VM-capable nodes running the latest
Ganeti 2.6.0 stable.
I see that when adding instances of type 'plain' or 'rbd' all instances
go to the
On 08/24/2012 05:39 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 04:33:21PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Hello team,
I seem to not have actually understood how hail's algorithm works,
and I would like some insight if possible.
I have a Ganeti cluster with 13 VM-capable nodes
On 08/24/2012 06:18 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 06:06:42PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 08/24/2012 05:39 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 04:33:21PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Hello team,
I seem to not have actually understood
Hello iustin,
any news on that? I assume you are quite busy these days..
thanks,
Constantinos
On 08/24/2012 06:26 PM, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 08/24/2012 06:18 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 06:06:42PM +0300, Constantinos
Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 08/24/2012 05
On 09/05/2012 06:09 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 12:54:30PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Hello iustin,
any news on that? I assume you are quite busy these days..
Not so much busy as overloaded with many small things, so I forgot about
this.
Looking now
On 09/07/2012 04:02 AM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:07:50PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 09/05/2012 06:09 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 12:54:30PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Hello iustin,
any news on that? I assume you
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
Hello team,
This is a design doc I wrote a few months ago and was hoping to submit
after the merge of the ExtStorage patch set.
However, given the recent discussions on:
* Reporting of free storage disk space
* Node slicing
On 08/23/2012 02:07 PM, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 08/23/2012 01:07 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:34:12PM +0300, Constantinos
Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 08/16/2012 01:22 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:07:53AM +0100, Damien Churchill wrote
We call _GatherAndLinkBlockDevs during the process, which in turn
calls _RecursiveFindBD. This needs disk parameters to work.
Probably, this is not the cleanest way to solve the problem.
See also commit b8291e0.
This was reported by Ansgar and Damien.
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos
Hello team,
running the latest stable-2.6 branch, I get the following error when trying
to failover an RBD instance:
# gnt-instance failover 3
Failover will happen to image 3. This requires a shutdown of the
instance. Continue?
y/[n]/?: y
Failure: command execution error:
'NoneType' object is
We call _GatherAndLinkBlockDevs during the process, which in turn
calls _RecursiveFindBD. This needs disk parameters to work.
See also commit b8291e0.
This was reported by Ansgar and Damien.
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
Hi Michael,
Is this what you meant
Rollback _InstDictOspDp, since the inst dict is built in one
place; inside _InstDict. There, the disks are getting
correctly annotated.
Relative commits: 5fce6a8, b8291e0
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
lib/rpc.py |4 +---
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3
On 09/12/2012 03:25 PM, Michael Hanselmann wrote:
2012/9/12 Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr:
Rollback _InstDictOspDp, since the inst dict is built in one
place; inside _InstDict. There, the disks are getting
correctly annotated.
Relative commits: 5fce6a8, b8291e0
Not only
On 09/12/2012 03:42 PM, Michael Hanselmann wrote:
Commit 5fce6a89 changed RpcRunner._InstDict to add the disk parameters
on all encoded instances. It didn't remove a special case in
“_InstDictOspDp”. Update and fix unittests as well.
---
lib/rpc.py |4 +---
at least for stable is just annotating
correctly. Is that the patch you just sent, right?
Yes
Thanks,
Constantinos
Thanks,
Guido
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos
c...@grnet.gr wrote:
On 08/23/2012 02:07 PM, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 08/23/2012 01:07
On 09/11/2012 07:05 PM, Guido Trotter wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:47:41PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Hi Costantinos,
Thanks for sharing this design.
Hello team,
This is a design doc I wrote a few months ago and was hoping to submit
after the merge of the ExtStorage
you can test
migrations too). Would one of these options suffice?
Thanks,
Constantinos
P.S: I hadn't had the chance to read all your comments on the design
doc yet; I'll reply there, as soon as possible.
Thanks,
Guido
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos
c
Update the shared storage design document to reflect the current
changes, after the implementation of the ExtStorage interface.
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
doc/design-shared-storage.rst | 204 ++--
1 files changed, 112
Hello team,
This is the ExtStorage Interface patch series rebased on top of
master branch's commit 0e1e0b6. It passes all current lint/unit
tests.
The first commit (design doc) has been already reviewed by Iustin
and the only question was about separate providers between disks,
which I think has
be extended to diagnose other storage types supported by
Ganeti, such as lvm, drbd (INT_MIRROR) or rbd (EXT_MIRROR).
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
Makefile.am |6 +-
autotools/build-bash-completion |4 +
lib/backend.py | 45
in
this commit. It serves as a general introduction of the 'ext'
template in gnt-instance modify.
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
Conflicts:
lib/cmdlib.py
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
lib/cli.py |8 +
lib
logical id is the tuple ('ext', UUID.ext.diskX), where UUID
is generated as in disk template `plain' and X is the disk's index.
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
Makefile.am |1 +
configure.ac | 12 ++
lib/bdev.py | 318
Hello team,
I'm attaching an ExtStorage provider called shared-filer which can be used
with the ExtStorage interface. It's purpose is to provide a way to test the
ExtStorage interface, without having to write custom scripts for a specific
NAS. It can also act as a template for those wanting to
, and if so can
you document it? It would be great if we could run a buildbot or test
it with just a normal linux machine even in emulation mode. :)
Thanks,
Guido
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos
c...@grnet.gr wrote:
Hello Guido,
Great to know it actually helped.
I just
On 09/18/2012 03:14 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 02:01:50PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Hi Guido,
Make sure please that it passes all unit tests, qa (adding unit tests
and qa for changed code), and check how it works with the haskell
query system in master
On 09/26/2012 07:21 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 05:38:17PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Update the shared storage design document to reflect the current
changes, after the implementation of the ExtStorage interface.
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c
On 09/27/2012 02:02 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:37:41PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 09/26/2012 07:21 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 05:38:17PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Update the shared storage design document to reflect
On 09/27/2012 04:17 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 05:38:18PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
With this commit we introduce the External Storage Interface
to Ganeti, abbreviated: ExtStorage Interface.
The ExtStorage Interface provides Ganeti with the ability
On 09/27/2012 04:26 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 05:38:20PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
The option is added to allow us the passing of arbitrary ext-params
during disk addition (gnt-instance modify --disk add: ...), same as
we do during instance add.
The option
On 10/08/2012 04:55 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 05:43:56PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 09/27/2012 04:17 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 05:38:18PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
With this commit we introduce the External Storage
On 10/09/2012 07:10 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 06:59:55PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 10/08/2012 04:55 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 05:43:56PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 09/27/2012 04:17 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed
diff --git a/lib/bdev.py b/lib/bdev.py
index b0ed7c0..7a27b7b 100644
--- a/lib/bdev.py
+++ b/lib/bdev.py
@@ -2797,8 +2797,24 @@ class ExtStorageDevice(BlockDev):
_ExtStorageAction(constants.ES_ACTION_GROW, self.unique_id,
str(self.size), grow=str(new_size))
+ def
/2012 12:15 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:07:31PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 10/09/2012 07:10 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 06:59:55PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 10/08/2012 04:55 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012
On 10/15/2012 6:58 PM, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Hi iustin,
I just sent you the interdiff. After rebasing, there is a trivial
conflict
when applying the next commit (2/7). I can resend it too, if you want.
I meant '3/7' here: Multiple ExtStorage providers
cven
Finally, I'll
On 10/16/2012 03:45 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 08:18:33PM +0300, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 10/15/2012 6:58 PM, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Hi iustin,
I just sent you the interdiff. After rebasing, there is a trivial
conflict
when applying the next
On 11/15/2012 06:52 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 06:49:34PM +0200, Christos Stavrakakis wrote:
Hi,
I tried to migrate an instance and I got the following error:
# gnt-job info 504936
...
Opcodes:
OP_INSTANCE_MIGRATE
Status: error
Processing start:
, 19 Nov 2012 12:20:01 +0200
From: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
Organization: Greek Research and Technology Network
To: Josh Durgin josh.dur...@inktank.com
CC: ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org, synnefo-de...@googlegroups.com
On 11/16/2012 07:14 PM, Josh Durgin wrote:
On 11/16
CheckArguments).
Currently, the check wrt to IDISK_PARAMS already happens in all
related LUs (InstanceSetParams, InstanceCreate, InstanceRecreateDisks),
with the use of ForceDictType(), so there is no need for additional
checking code.
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
Hello team
Hello team,
any comments on this one?
Thanks,
Constantinos
On 12/04/2012 01:50 PM, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Change the --disks option validation, to just check the format
of the dict and do not check whether the keys are included in the
IDISK_PARAMS constant at OpCode level
On 12/12/2012 01:00 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 01:50:16PM +0200, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Change the --disks option validation, to just check the format
of the dict and do not check whether the keys are included in the
IDISK_PARAMS constant at OpCode level
On 12/12/2012 01:01 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:50:35PM +0200, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Hello team,
any comments on this one?
Hah, just replied *now* to it. Talk about coincidences… :)
iustin
:) great!
Constantinos
On 12/12/2012 01:37 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 01:26:00PM +0200, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 12/12/2012 01:00 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 01:50:16PM +0200, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Change the --disks option validation, to just check
On 12/12/2012 01:58 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 01:54:13PM +0200, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 12/12/2012 01:37 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 01:26:00PM +0200, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 12/12/2012 01:00 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Tue
On 12/12/2012 03:24 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 02:06:42PM +0200, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 12/12/2012 01:58 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 01:54:13PM +0200, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 12/12/2012 01:37 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed
On 12/12/2012 05:21 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 05:01:36PM +0200, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 12/12/2012 03:24 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 02:06:42PM +0200, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 12/12/2012 01:58 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Wed
Hello team,
while testing the current master branch I stumbled upon this,
which seems like a bug:
when creating a new instance with --no-name-check --no-ip-check
I get the following error:
Failure: command execution error:
'LUInstanceCreate' object has no attribute 'hostname1'
I see that in
On 12/13/2012 05:25 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 05:04:11PM +0200, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Hello team,
while testing the current master branch I stumbled upon this,
which seems like a bug:
when creating a new instance with --no-name-check --no-ip-check
I get
This should be done because in the case of --no-name-check there
is no 'hostname.ip' attribute, causing an execution error.
'check_ip' is always set (in CheckArguments) even if --no-name-check
is passed in the command line.
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
lib
Hello team,
I'm testing the rebased ExtStorage patchset before re-sending and
when I tried to migrate an instance I get the following error:
# gnt-instance migrate ext1
Instance ext1 will be migrated. Note that migration might impact the
instance if anything goes wrong (e.g. due to bugs in the
Update the shared storage design document to reflect the current
changes, after the implementation of the ExtStorage interface.
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
doc/design-shared-storage.rst | 204 ++---
1 file changed, 112
logical id is the tuple ('ext', UUID.ext.diskX), where UUID
is generated as in disk template `plain' and X is the disk's index.
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
Makefile.am |1 +
configure.ac | 12 ++
lib/bdev.py | 351
an existing disk's ExtStorage Provider,
neither can change an existing disk's ext-params. Only an existing
disk's `mode' can be modified.
Removal is transparent of the disk template and is also supported.
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
lib/cmdlib.py | 60
the previous time.
Kind Regards,
Constantinos
Constantinos Venetsanopoulos (7):
Update the shared storage design document
Implement the External Storage Interface
Multiple ExtStorage Providers and ext-params
Adjust LUInstanceSetParams wrt the `ext' template
Add the gnt
Providers for each disk and
passing different ext-params to them:
-t ext --disk=0:size=2G,provider=sample_provider1,param1=value1
--disk=1:size=3G,provider=sample_provider2,param2=value2
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
lib/bdev.py | 52
On 12/20/2012 03:58 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 03:50:07PM +0200, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Add support for passing parameters to the ext template (ext-params).
Take advantage of disk-params, that don't seem to make much sense in
this template (ExtStorage Providers
On 12/20/2012 05:52 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 05:48:40PM +0200, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 12/20/2012 03:58 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 03:50:07PM +0200, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Add support for passing parameters to the ext
On 12/20/2012 06:03 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 06:00:55PM +0200, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 12/20/2012 04:02 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 03:50:08PM +0200, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Initial support for the `ext' template in gnt
On 12/20/2012 7:28 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 07:18:39PM +0200, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 12/20/2012 04:13 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 03:50:09PM +0200, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
Add a new client called 'gnt-storage'.
The client
On 12/22/2012 12:24 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 04:34:57PM +0200, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 12/20/2012 11:52 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 09:55:10PM +0200, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
On 12/20/2012 7:28 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Thu, Dec
On 12/22/2012 12:24 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 03:26:57PM +0100, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 03:50:11PM +0200, Constantinos Venetsanopoulos wrote:
* ganeti-extstorage-interface man page
* gnt-storage man page
+gnt-storage(8) Ganeti | Version @GANETI_VERSION
Signed-off-by: Constantinos Venetsanopoulos c...@grnet.gr
---
Hello team,
During the review of the ExtStorage patch series Iustin commented that
the model for gnt-* man pages proposes commands to appear as
sub-sections rather than just bold-ed.
However, I see that the gnt-os man page doesn't
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo
