It appears that each time I come back to working on Geeqie, I send one
of these emails ;o)
Here are threads #1 and #2:
#1: https://sourceforge.net/p/geeqie/mailman/message/22531197/
#2: https://sourceforge.net/p/geeqie/mailman/message/27441283/
In #2, I had created a one-liner to compute a
Omari> It appears that each time I come back to working on Geeqie, I send one
Omari> of these emails ;o)
LOL!
Omari> Here are threads #1 and #2:
Omari> #1: https://sourceforge.net/p/geeqie/mailman/message/22531197/
Omari> #2: https://sourceforge.net/p/geeqie/mailman/message/27441283/
Omari>
It is at least hypothetically possible to port Geeqie to C++11 / GtkMM.
Ignoring the inevitable ridiculous mountain of work that it would take,
does the end state seem like a good idea?
Personally, I only knew C89 and small quantities of C++98 until I
started using C++11 for work earlier this
On 2016-12-23 20:42, Omari Stephens wrote:
> It is at least hypothetically possible to port Geeqie to C++11 / GtkMM.
[...snip...]
> Thoughts?
libstdc++ ABI compatibility problems?
--
Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups
Personal signed mail: please _encrypt_ and sign
Don't
