Re: [gentoo-user] telephony

2009-04-27 Thread Yahya Mohammad
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:30:52PM -0400, Simon wrote: hi there, i'm looking for suggestions and guidance. I have a vps host with gentoo on it, i dont think the vps is stable enough to ensure a good quality of service, but it could just need an upgrade, no big deal. I need a phone and the

Re: [gentoo-user] ebuild description

2009-04-27 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:59:42 -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote: eix dev-lang/python I see that it's highlighting version ~2.5.4-r2, which is what I have installed. If the 2.5.4-r2 version is masked by keyword, why's it installed on my system? :) It's not keyword-masked according to eix here

Re: [gentoo-user] Failed to start /etc/init.d/checkroot

2009-04-27 Thread Chuanwen Wu
Hi, thanks! It seems a bit strange that checkroot gave no output, just failure - as if it's execution didn't even started, and, since it's one of the first initscripts to start, prehaps there's a problem with bash interpreter or access to init.d path. Since you've mounted filesystem and it

[gentoo-user] Software RAID vs Fake RAID

2009-04-27 Thread Yahya Mohammad
Hi list, I'm setting up a new desktop machine with RAID 0. The motherboard I bought supports the so-called Fake RAID, which offloads most of the processing to the system CPU. What are the pros and cons of using this as opposed to pure software RAID?

Re: [gentoo-user] Software RAID vs Fake RAID

2009-04-27 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:18:39 +0400, Yahya Mohammad wrote: I'm setting up a new desktop machine with RAID 0. The motherboard I bought supports the so-called Fake RAID, which offloads most of the processing to the system CPU. What are the pros and cons of using this as opposed to pure software

Re: [gentoo-user] Software RAID vs Fake RAID

2009-04-27 Thread Andrei Susnea
Neil Bothwick wrote: On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:18:39 +0400, Yahya Mohammad wrote: I'm setting up a new desktop machine with RAID 0. The motherboard I bought supports the so-called Fake RAID, which offloads most of the processing to the system CPU. What are the pros and cons of using this as

Re: [gentoo-user] Software RAID vs Fake RAID

2009-04-27 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Montag 27 April 2009, Andrei Susnea wrote: Neil Bothwick wrote: On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:18:39 +0400, Yahya Mohammad wrote: I'm setting up a new desktop machine with RAID 0. The motherboard I bought supports the so-called Fake RAID, which offloads most of the processing to the system

Re: [gentoo-user] Software RAID vs Fake RAID

2009-04-27 Thread Simon
I would recommend software raid. Because it's made by some great folks in the linux community and it is a project in development (so you can get lots of support and updates, though it is very stable and is used in many prod systems). Also the tool 'mdadm' combined with the output of /proc/mdstat

Re: [gentoo-user] conflict in update

2009-04-27 Thread Mike Kazantsev
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:39:55 +0100 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote: Incidentally, I almost always install software with --oneshot. That way the programs I install to try out show up on --depclean's output until I decide I want to keep them. It prevents accumulating cruft from various

Re: [gentoo-user] Software RAID vs Fake RAID

2009-04-27 Thread Paul Hartman
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Simon turne...@gmail.com wrote: I would recommend software raid. Because it's made by some great folks in the linux community and it is a project in development (so you can get lots of support and updates, though it is very stable and is used in many prod

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Domain name registration

2009-04-27 Thread Paul Hartman
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:47 PM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote: Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gentoo at gmail.com writes: On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gentoo at gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 3:41 PM, James wireless at tampabay.rr.com wrote:

Re: [gentoo-user] Software RAID vs Fake RAID

2009-04-27 Thread Simon
It has survived several crashes/power outages. For my RAID5 (four 500gb drives) it took about 90 minutes for the raid to verify after such incidents. I know there are benefits to hardware RAID but for low cost/low importance (it's my home PC) the software RAID is good enough for me. Software

Re: [gentoo-user] Software RAID vs Fake RAID

2009-04-27 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Monday 27 April 2009 14:18:39 Yahya Mohammad wrote: Hi list, I'm setting up a new desktop machine with RAID 0. The motherboard I bought supports the so-called Fake RAID, which offloads most of the processing to the system CPU. What are the pros and cons of using this as opposed to pure

Re: [gentoo-user] Software RAID vs Fake RAID

2009-04-27 Thread Hazen Valliant-Saunders
Ok, 1. Motherboard Raid is often Fake Raid 2. In Gentoo the Software Raid fucntions for Linux are probably faster than your motherboard's 3. Having had and seen issues with mother board raid I'd suggest using the mdtools. Since there is a FAR LARGER support base; that way if somthing goes awry

[gentoo-user] udev problem assigning persistent names

2009-04-27 Thread maxim wexler
Hi group, Having upgraded from the 2.6.23 kernel to the 2.6.28 and enabling the rt2x00 driver I get the following message at boot ... * UDEV: Your system has a problem assigning persistent * names to these network interfaces: wlan0-rename * Checking persistent rules: * Found no duplicate

[gentoo-user] Compiz broke on latest portage update?

2009-04-27 Thread Alex Bennee
I updated compiz today which required me to unmask: dev-libs/iniparser ~amd64 And it promptly broke with: 18:44 a...@danny/x86_64 [~] ~/bin/start-compiz.sh compiz: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0: undefined symbol: iniparser_new However revdep-rebuild

[gentoo-user] Re: X-forwarding fails with Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 key

2009-04-27 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
Grant wrote: X-forwarding used to work for me but I haven't used it in a while and now I get: Warning: untrusted X11 forwarding setup failed: xauth key data not generated Warning: No xauth data; using fake authentication data for X11 forwarding. Xlib: connection to localhost:10.0 refused by

Re: [gentoo-user] voice or touch data entry apps

2009-04-27 Thread Valmor de Almeida
James wrote: Hello, I'm looking for special types of applications that allow for data entry, via voice commands or using the touch screen on a touch screen enabled laptop. KDE4 is my preferred desktop, but any application that will run on kde4 and gentoo is of interest. Is there anything

[gentoo-user] Re: Domain name registration

2009-04-27 Thread James
Anthony Metcalf nevyn at anferny.me.uk writes: I use http://freedns.afraid.org/ . Doesn't meet your not-free stipulation, but I think just about encompasses everything else Thanks Everyone for the suggestions and information. I've got to build up several machines and get the DNS

Re: [gentoo-user] voice or touch data entry apps

2009-04-27 Thread Paul Hartman
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 1:55 PM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote: Hello, I'm looking for special types of applications that allow for data entry, via voice commands or using the touch screen on a touch screen enabled laptop. Don't know how accurate it is, but I found this article:

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this firewall safe?

2009-04-27 Thread Daniel Troeder
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 16:28 -0500, Chris Frederick wrote: Now I'm also keeping in mind that you are on a laptop with no remote services. If you start allowing services, then that will change things. If clients are going to be connection to you for certain services, you should be more

[gentoo-user] Re: Compiz broke on latest portage update?

2009-04-27 Thread Alex Bennee
2009/4/27 Alex Bennee kernel-hac...@bennee.com: I updated compiz today which required me to unmask: dev-libs/iniparser                     ~amd64 And it promptly broke with: 18:44 a...@danny/x86_64 [~] ~/bin/start-compiz.sh compiz: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libcompizconfig.so.0:

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this firewall safe?

2009-04-27 Thread Eric Martin
Marco wrote: On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Eric Martin freak4u...@gmail.com wrote: Marco wrote: Hi all, I set up my first firewall on my notebook (not running any services reachable from outside) using iptables. Since I am new to the topic, could you please verify if the output

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this firewall safe?

2009-04-27 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Monday 27 April 2009 20:56:07 Daniel Troeder wrote: segway I would recommend running nmap in crontab if you want to scan your network (look up ndiff on nmap's website). /segway Oh cool - I didn't know about ndiff. Fetching nmap from SVN now... :) What does segway mean? I just found

Re: [gentoo-user] Backup and Restore

2009-04-27 Thread Mick
On Thursday 23 April 2009, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Donnerstag 23 April 2009, Joerg Schilling wrote: Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote: as I wrote above, you got me thinking. If I can extract a multivolume archive created with star with gnutar I am sold and will

Re: [gentoo-user] Backup and Restore

2009-04-27 Thread Joerg Schilling
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: This has puzzled me too. Is there a way of passing the equivalent of tar's --exclude file_pattern at star, rather than a file containing a list of files to be excluded? I have been reading the -F,-FF ... but have failed to understand it so far :(

Re: [gentoo-user] conflict in update

2009-04-27 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:29:01 +0600, Mike Kazantsev wrote: Incidentally, I almost always install software with --oneshot. That way the programs I install to try out show up on --depclean's output until I decide I want to keep them. It prevents accumulating cruft from various experiments,

Re: [gentoo-user] Backup and Restore

2009-04-27 Thread Mick
On Monday 27 April 2009, Joerg Schilling wrote: Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: This has puzzled me too. Is there a way of passing the equivalent of tar's --exclude file_pattern at star, rather than a file containing a list of files to be excluded? I have been reading the -F,-FF ...

[gentoo-user] Re: conflict in update

2009-04-27 Thread Francesco Talamona
On Sunday 26 April 2009, Mark Knecht wrote: On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Alan McKinnon wrote: It should be easy enough to write a program that examines world and displays all packages it finds that are dependencies of something else in world, but I

[gentoo-user] ebuild log for net-print/cups-1.3.10-r1

2009-04-27 Thread Michael Higgins
I _remember_ doing this just a few days ago, so I'm not doing it again... but why is it still throwing a warning? Is this a limitation of portage or the ebuild? -- WARN: postinst /usr/lib/cups exists - You need to remerge every ebuild that installed into /usr/lib/cups and

[gentoo-user] really old box for a firewall

2009-04-27 Thread alex stone
Hello all, my first post here. Since installing Gentoo on my working audio box, i've had a good run, with no problems. (I'm a full time classical composer) The audio packages are stable and i get to work all day every day without having to spend time tweaking anything in the OS. (At last) So

Re: [gentoo-user] really old box for a firewall

2009-04-27 Thread Daniel de Oliveira
Do i need to install an older version of Gentoo in order for this to work? No, never. You can use the last portage. Do i need to flag the boot in some way with options in order to get this to install? I can be wrong, but I believe the livecd is i686, so will not run in your box (pentium-mmx

RE: [gentoo-user] really old box for a firewall

2009-04-27 Thread Adam Carter
have here (pentium-mmx) into a firewall/router. I tried a live cd, with the intent of building up a 32bit chroot in my big box, and syncing it into the old one. (All 64bit native in the studio boxes) when i inserted the live cd to begin the process, i got an error message at boot which said

Re: [gentoo-user] really old box for a firewall

2009-04-27 Thread alex stone
Thank you gentlemen. That gives me something to chase. The help is appreciated. Alex. On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Adam Carter adam.car...@optus.com.au wrote: have here (pentium-mmx) into a firewall/router. I tried a live cd, with the intent of building up a 32bit chroot in my big box,

Re: [gentoo-user] conflict in update

2009-04-27 Thread Mike Kazantsev
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:28:26 +0100 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote: Nothing as clever as that. I simply echo cat/pkg /etc/portage/sets/temp and have @temp in /var/lib/portage/world_sets Each week I look at the set and decide what should be removed or transferred to world. That

[gentoo-user] Re: really old box for a firewall

2009-04-27 Thread James
alex stone compose59 at gmail.com writes: So with that in mind, i have an interest in turning a very old box i have here (pentium-mmx) into a firewall/router. Ah, I do this all the time. Use knoppix to boot your target mmx system into a viable linux. Follow the handbook and get the system