On Sunday 02 August 2009 01:31:14 Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Alan McKinnonalan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Saturday 01 August 2009 23:19:52 Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I've been trying to get a few recalcitrant packages to build
(evolution-data-server, openoffice) but
On Sunday 02 August 2009 00:59:22 John covici wrote:
Hi. On my latest update attempt, I get the following message: !!! All
ebuilds that could satisfy =sys-fs/udev-145[extras] have been
masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
request:
- sys-fs/udev-
on Sunday 08/02/2009 Alan McKinnon(alan.mckin...@gmail.com) wrote
On Sunday 02 August 2009 00:59:22 John covici wrote:
Hi. On my latest update attempt, I get the following message: !!! All
ebuilds that could satisfy =sys-fs/udev-145[extras] have been
masked.
!!! One of the
On Sunday 02 August 2009 10:45:46 John covici wrote:
on Sunday 08/02/2009 Alan McKinnon(alan.mckin...@gmail.com) wrote
On Sunday 02 August 2009 00:59:22 John covici wrote:
Hi. On my latest update attempt, I get the following message: !!! All
ebuilds that could satisfy
Howdy,
While attempting to try the latest version of ruby-gnome2 (0.19.1), I
copied the 0.19.0 ebuilds to my local overlay then renamed them to the
new version. I then downloaded the ruby-gnome2-all-0.19.1.tar.gz,
placed it in /usr/portage/distfiles, then used ebuild ruby-...
digest for
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 04:45:46 -0400, John covici wrote:
run the emerge with the -t option to see what is pulling in
udev-
I get the same thing if I emerge udev145, so its not unique to 999.
That's because both are masked, it doesn't have any bearing on the reason
for udev- being
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roy Wright wrote:
Howdy,
While attempting to try the latest version of ruby-gnome2 (0.19.1), I
copied the 0.19.0 ebuilds to my local overlay then renamed them to the
new version. I then downloaded the ruby-gnome2-all-0.19.1.tar.gz,
placed it
on Sunday 08/02/2009 Neil Bothwick(n...@digimed.co.uk) wrote
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 04:45:46 -0400, John covici wrote:
run the emerge with the -t option to see what is pulling in
udev-
I get the same thing if I emerge udev145, so its not unique to 999.
That's because
I've had trouble building dev-util/duma and discovered this morning that
-j2 was the culprit. duma's build compiles and runs createconf.c in
order to create duma_config.h which is needed by dumapp.cpp. With -j2,
the cpp compilation is starting before createconf finishes running and
this causes
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Alan McKinnonalan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 02 August 2009 01:31:14 Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Alan McKinnonalan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Saturday 01 August 2009 23:19:52 Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I've been trying to get a
This must be a known issue, but I don't see recent messages that
appear to be about this problem with firefox.
Over the last few updates I'm unable to run firefox at all.
If called from cmdline I see:
firefox
Couldn't load XPCOM.
I read somewhere it might have something to do with Xulrunner.
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes:
This must be a known issue, but I don't see recent messages that
appear to be about this problem with firefox.
Over the last few updates I'm unable to run firefox at all.
If called from cmdline I see:
firefox
Couldn't load XPCOM.
I read somewhere
On 8/2/09, Kevin O'Gorman kogor...@gmail.com wrote:
checking for GL/glu.h... yes
checking for glVertex3d in -lGLcore... no
Starting from here, libGLcore.so on my current desktop system belongs
to nvidia-drivers:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 30 2.8. 17:13 /usr/lib64/libGLcore.so -
On Sunday 02 August 2009 13:31:41 John covici wrote:
on Sunday 08/02/2009 Neil Bothwick(n...@digimed.co.uk) wrote
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 04:45:46 -0400, John covici wrote:
run the emerge with the -t option to see what is pulling in
udev-
I get the same thing if I emerge
I noticed that my 'emerge world' wants to replace python 2.6.2 with
python 3.1 (I run ~x86). Is it safe to do so or will portage (and
everything else) freak out? If it is, in fact, safe are there any
extra (special) steps needed to ensure continued operation of things?
Thanks.
--
Douglas J
On 08/02/2009 04:20 PM, David Relson wrote:
I've had trouble building dev-util/duma and discovered this morning that
-j2 was the culprit. duma's build compiles and runs createconf.c in
order to create duma_config.h which is needed by dumapp.cpp. With -j2,
the cpp compilation is starting before
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 07:31:41 -0400, John covici wrote:
(dependency required by sys-apps/devicekit-power-010 [ebuild])
(dependency required by
gnome-extra/gnome-power-manager-2.26.3 [ebuild])
Neither of these are in portage. Which overlay are you using for them?
--
Neil Bothwick
PC DOS
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 09:20:37 -0400, David Relson wrote:
I've had trouble building dev-util/duma and discovered this morning that
-j2 was the culprit. duma's build compiles and runs createconf.c in
order to create duma_config.h which is needed by dumapp.cpp. With -j2,
the cpp compilation is
On 08/02/2009 06:17 PM, Doug Hunley wrote:
I noticed that my 'emerge world' wants to replace python 2.6.2 with
python 3.1 (I run ~x86).
Nope, it does not :) It only wants to install it alongside 2.6.x, not
replace it.
Is it safe to do so or will portage (and
everything else) freak out?
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 11:17:22 -0400, Doug Hunley wrote:
I noticed that my 'emerge world' wants to replace python 2.6.2 with
python 3.1 (I run ~x86). Is it safe to do so or will portage (and
everything else) freak out? If it is, in fact, safe are there any
extra (special) steps needed to ensure
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 11:17 -0400, Doug Hunley wrote:
I noticed that my 'emerge world' wants to replace python 2.6.2 with
python 3.1 (I run ~x86).
It doesn't replace 2.6.2. It's slotted.
Is it safe to do so or will portage (and
everything else) freak out?
I would think (hope) that the
Albert Hopkins mar...@letterboxes.org writes:
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 11:17 -0400, Doug Hunley wrote:
I would think (hope) that the python maintainers were smart enough to
know whether installing Python 3 would break portage. Then again, this
is Gentoo ;-)
Just installing it doesn't break
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Dan Farrell wrote:
hmm... network booting? network mounting? install packages once on
one system, share them with everyone. Share passwd/shadow files and
the like manually, or symlink them to skeletal versions symlinked to
somewhere that can be obscured and replaced by a
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 17:23:40 +0100
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 09:20:37 -0400, David Relson wrote:
I've had trouble building dev-util/duma and discovered this morning
that -j2 was the culprit. duma's build compiles and runs
createconf.c in order to create duma_config.h which
On 08/02/2009 08:37 PM, David Relson wrote:
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 17:23:40 +0100
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 09:20:37 -0400, David Relson wrote:
I've had trouble building dev-util/duma and discovered this morning
that -j2 was the culprit. duma's build compiles and runs
createconf.c
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 08/02/2009 08:37 PM, David Relson wrote:
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 17:23:40 +0100
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 09:20:37 -0400, David Relson wrote:
I've had trouble building dev-util/duma and discovered this morning
that -j2 was the culprit. duma's build
on Sunday 08/02/2009 Neil Bothwick(n...@digimed.co.uk) wrote
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 07:31:41 -0400, John covici wrote:
(dependency required by sys-apps/devicekit-power-010 [ebuild])
(dependency required by
gnome-extra/gnome-power-manager-2.26.3 [ebuild])
Neither of these are in
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 21:10:49 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
echo 'MAKEOPTS=-j1'/etc/portage/env/dev-util/duma
Exactly what I was looking for!
Note that by doing so you will be using -j1 for every future version of
duma. That means, if the problem gets fixed, you'll still be using
Hello,
So following this doc:
2009-04-18-java-config-wrapper-0.16
I ran: java-check-environment
then: rm /etc/env.d/20java ; env-update source /etc/profile
and finally: emerge -av --depclean dev-java/java-config:0
Calculating dependencies... done!
virtual/jdk-1.4.2 pulled in by:
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 14:53:48 -0400, John covici wrote:
I am using the gnome overlay from layman.
It might have been helpful to menyion that :(
If I comment out the source line for layman in /etc/make.conf I get
the following:
[nomerge ] gnome-base/gnome-2.26.3 [2.26.2]
[nomerge
On 08/02/2009 12:42 PM, James wrote:
Calculating dependencies... done!
virtual/jdk-1.4.2 pulled in by:
dev-db/hsqldb-1.8.0.10
dev-java/jdbc-mysql-5.0.8
dev-java/jdbc-postgresql-8.3_p603-r1
dev-util/eclipse-sdk-3.2.1-r3
So it looks like I need this virtual/jdk-1.4.2 ???
walt w41ter at gmail.com writes:
IMO unless you're doing some really unusual/obscure java thing,
you don't want or need the blacktown-jdk. I'm guessing that if
you delete that and run revdep-rebuild you'll probably see those
other packages get rebuilt against the sun-jdk-1.6 and that will
James wrote:
walt w41ter at gmail.com writes:
IMO unless you're doing some really unusual/obscure java thing,
you don't want or need the blacktown-jdk. I'm guessing that if
you delete that and run revdep-rebuild you'll probably see those
other packages get rebuilt against the
=== On Sun, 08/02, Christer Ekholm wrote: ===
Just installing it doesn't break portage. But using it does! :)
===
That's probably why it's there now. ;-)
Thanks for the clarification everyone. I was wondering the same thing.
-- Keith Dart
--
--
Keith Dart
On 08/02/2009 01:42 PM, James wrote:
But look here:
eix virtual/jdk
[I] virtual/jdk
Available versions:
(1.4) 1.4.1 1.4.2
(1.5) 1.5.0
(1.6) 1.6.0
Installed versions: 1.4.2(1.4)(14:13:11 07/07/09) 1.6.0(1.6)(14:10:01
Ah, that was the jog my memory
on Sunday 08/02/2009 Neil Bothwick(n...@digimed.co.uk) wrote
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 14:53:48 -0400, John covici wrote:
I am using the gnome overlay from layman.
It might have been helpful to menyion that :(
If I comment out the source line for layman in /etc/make.conf I get
the
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 17:07, Keith Dartke...@dartworks.biz wrote:
Just installing it doesn't break portage. But using it does! :)
Exactly. When I ran this (and then went for breakfast and coffee):
/usr/bin/eix-sync
/usr/bin/emerge --update --newuse --deep --keep-going --with-bdeps
Dale rdalek1967 at gmail.com writes:
Usually if something runs as root but not a user, it's a permissions
issue. You running something special on your system? Hardened or
something more secure?
Nope,
It's been a normal (stable) gentoo workstation
with OO for a couple of years. KDE4 and
Doug Hunley wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 17:07, Keith Dartke...@dartworks.biz wrote:
Just installing it doesn't break portage. But using it does! :)
Exactly. When I ran this (and then went for breakfast and coffee):
/usr/bin/eix-sync
/usr/bin/emerge --update --newuse --deep
walt w41ter at gmail.com writes:
Ah, that was the jog my memory needed. For reasons I don't know,
there was some old cruft remaining in either /etc/env.d or /etc/conf.d
or /etc/java-config-2, or maybe all three, that confused java-config.
OK
I had to hand-edit files in one/all of those
Just installing it doesn't break portage. But using it does! :)
19:14:44 poke:~ $ eselect python list
Available python interpreters:
[1] python2.6
[2] python3.1
19:17:24 poke:~ $ sudo eselect python set 2
19:17:31 poke:~ $ emerge --info
File /usr/bin/emerge, line
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 19:01:20 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Most likely the --depclean removed it. As someone else found out the
hard way, not all Gentoo package managers need python. Therefore python
can be unmerged which causes a mess. This is a good reason to NEVER
trust
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 23:45:16 + (UTC)
James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
Dale rdalek1967 at gmail.com writes:
Usually if something runs as root but not a user, it's a permissions
issue. You running something special on your system? Hardened or
something more secure?
Nope,
Adam Carter adam.car...@optus.com.au writes:
Just installing it doesn't break portage. But using it does! :)
19:14:44 poke:~ $ eselect python list
Available python interpreters:
[1] python2.6
[2] python3.1
19:17:24 poke:~ $ sudo eselect python set 2
19:17:31 poke:~ $
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:15:19 +1000
Adam Carter adam.car...@optus.com.au wrote:
Just installing it doesn't break portage. But using it does! :)
19:14:44 poke:~ $ eselect python list
Available python interpreters:
[1] python2.6
[2] python3.1
19:17:24 poke:~ $ sudo
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 18:18:59 -0400, John covici wrote:
Incidentally, unless you are a developer, you don't normally need
the doc use flag.
OK, thanks for the advise -- I wish there were a devel-doc flag to
distinguish between use and development docs, but I guess you can't
have
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 19:35:52 -0400, Doug Hunley wrote:
Please enlighten me where I went
wrong as I'd rather not have such surprises in the morn. :)
Updating world without first checking to see what will happen is asking
for trouble, running emerge --depclean without checking is sending it a
Mike Kazantsev mk.fraggod at gmail.com writes:
emerge -1 dev-util/strace strace -f ooffice 2strace.log
grep -2 -e EACCES -e EPERM strace.log
tail -500 strace.log | less (to see what happened last)
OK, Here are the bottom lines:
[pid 28034]
James wrote:
Dale rdalek1967 at gmail.com writes:
Usually if something runs as root but not a user, it's a permissions
issue. You running something special on your system? Hardened or
something more secure?
Nope,
It's been a normal (stable) gentoo workstation
with OO for a
On 08/02/2009 01:42 PM, James wrote:
waltw41terat gmail.com writes:
java-check-environment
snip
Java environment is sane. Congratulations!
eselect java-vm list
Available Java Virtual Machines:
[1] sun-jdk-1.6 system-vm
But look here:
eix virtual/jdk
[I] virtual/jdk
Available
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Arttu V.arttu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/2/09, Kevin O'Gorman kogor...@gmail.com wrote:
checking for GL/glu.h... yes
checking for glVertex3d in -lGLcore... no
Starting from here, libGLcore.so on my current desktop system belongs
to nvidia-drivers:
lrwxrwxrwx 1
On Aug 2, 2009, at 5:49 AM, ABCD wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roy Wright wrote:
Howdy,
While attempting to try the latest version of ruby-gnome2 (0.19.1), I
copied the 0.19.0 ebuilds to my local overlay then renamed them to
the
new version. I then downloaded the
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Kevin O'Gormankogor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Arttu V.arttu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/2/09, Kevin O'Gorman kogor...@gmail.com wrote:
checking for GL/glu.h... yes
checking for glVertex3d in -lGLcore... no
Starting from here,
=== On Mon, 08/03, Christer Ekholm wrote: ===
I think that the comma on line 41 in /usr/bin/emerge is simply not
valid in python-3
===
Right.
http://docs.python.org/3.1/whatsnew/3.0.html
-- Keith Dart
--
--
Keith Dart
ke...@dartworks.biz
===
54 matches
Mail list logo
