[gentoo-user] Help with blocking, please: vte is blocking gnome-pty-helper

2011-07-01 Thread Alan Mackenzie
Hi, Gentoo! After emerge-synching, an emerge -puND gives, in part: [ebuild N] x11-libs/gnome-pty-helper-0.28.1 [ebuild U ] x11-libs/vte-0.28.1-r200 [0.26.2] USE=introspection* [blocks b ] x11-libs/vte-0.27.90 (x11-libs/vte-0.27.90 is blocking

Re: [gentoo-user] Help with blocking, please: vte is blocking gnome-pty-helper

2011-07-01 Thread Sebastian Beßler
Am 01.07.2011 12:39, schrieb Alan Mackenzie: Hi, Gentoo! After emerge-synching, an emerge -puND gives, in part: [ebuild N] x11-libs/gnome-pty-helper-0.28.1 [ebuild U ] x11-libs/vte-0.28.1-r200 [0.26.2] USE=introspection* [blocks b ] x11-libs/vte-0.27.90

Re: [gentoo-user] Help with blocking, please: vte is blocking gnome-pty-helper

2011-07-01 Thread Alex Schuster
Sebastian Beßler writes: Am 01.07.2011 12:39, schrieb Alan Mackenzie: Hi, Gentoo! After emerge-synching, an emerge -puND gives, in part: [ebuild N] x11-libs/gnome-pty-helper-0.28.1 [ebuild U ] x11-libs/vte-0.28.1-r200 [0.26.2] USE=introspection* [blocks b ]

Re: [gentoo-user] Help with blocking, please: vte is blocking gnome-pty-helper

2011-07-01 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Friday 01 July 2011 10:39:18 Alan Mackenzie did opine thusly: Hi, Gentoo! After emerge-synching, an emerge -puND gives, in part: [ebuild N] x11-libs/gnome-pty-helper-0.28.1 [ebuild U ] x11-libs/vte-0.28.1-r200 [0.26.2] USE=introspection* [blocks b ]

Re: [gentoo-user] Help with blocking, please: vte is blocking gnome-pty-helper

2011-07-01 Thread Sebastian Beßler
Am 01.07.2011 13:54, schrieb Alex Schuster: Isn't that a thing that only the masked portage 2.2 does? I guess Alan stll runs stable portage. That may be possible, I run unstable portage 2.2 without any problem (a few surprises from time to time, but no problems) for so long that I have totaly

Re: [gentoo-user] Help with blocking, please: vte is blocking gnome-pty-helper

2011-07-01 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 10:39:18 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote: After emerge-synching, an emerge -puND gives, in part: [ebuild N] x11-libs/gnome-pty-helper-0.28.1 [ebuild U ] x11-libs/vte-0.28.1-r200 [0.26.2] USE=introspection* [blocks b ] x11-libs/vte-0.27.90

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT virtual stuff] gentoo vm appliance

2011-07-01 Thread Harry Putnam
Albert Hopkins mar...@letterboxes.org writes: On Tuesday, June 28 at 10:57 (-0400), Albert Hopkins said: Anyway, I will rebuild an image with AHCI support and upload it shortly. Done, uploaded to the same place: http://starship.python.net/crew/marduk/base-dist.vmdk.bz2 I also made the

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT virtual stuff] gentoo vm appliance

2011-07-01 Thread Harry Putnam
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes: resolved I kept getting really strange output from emerge. It appeared to be the output of something like vmstat or maybe the upper portion of `top'. Stuff about user loads and such... right after the first few lines of emerge output, and nothing was

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT virtual stuff] gentoo vm appliance

2011-07-01 Thread Albert Hopkins
On Friday, July 1 at 10:36 (-0500), Harry Putnam said: Albert Hopkins mar...@letterboxes.org writes: On Tuesday, June 28 at 10:57 (-0400), Albert Hopkins said: Anyway, I will rebuild an image with AHCI support and upload it shortly. Done, uploaded to the same place:

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT virtual stuff] gentoo vm appliance

2011-07-01 Thread Albert Hopkins
On Friday, July 1 at 11:55 (-0400), Albert Hopkins said: Oh, I'm referring to the 4GB version. The 10GB version demands a password so couldn't even start on it. That should not be the case with it requiring a password, or else I uploaded the wrong image. Nevertheless, I'll upload

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT virtual stuff] gentoo vm appliance

2011-07-01 Thread Harry Putnam
Albert Hopkins mar...@letterboxes.org writes: [...] Yeah, sorry if I didn't mention before. In the interest of size, I remove the portage tree (and also kernel sources) before creating the image. So in order to do portage-related stuff one must first: # emerge --sync [...] Should

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT virtual stuff] gentoo vm appliance

2011-07-01 Thread Albert Hopkins
On Friday, July 1 at 11:42 (-0500), Harry Putnam said: Albert Hopkins mar...@letterboxes.org writes: [...] Yeah, sorry if I didn't mention before. In the interest of size, I remove the portage tree (and also kernel sources) before creating the image. So in order to do

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT virtual stuff] gentoo vm appliance

2011-07-01 Thread Albert Hopkins
On Friday, July 1 at 11:42 (-0500), Harry Putnam said: In the shell where the initial login came up I keep seeing this every 5 minutes: INIT: ld so respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes Oh, you can also do this manually by commenting out the s0 entry in /etc/inittab. -a

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-lang/R installation : a hard nut

2011-07-01 Thread pk
On 2011-06-30 11:31, Helmut Jarausch wrote: Many thanks for your suggestions. Bitte schön! :-) Finally it turned that some old files (lzma) in /usr/local/include were in the way and caused those problem. It's always the little things... :-/ MfG / Best regards Peter K

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT virtual stuff] gentoo vm appliance

2011-07-01 Thread Harry Putnam
Albert Hopkins mar...@letterboxes.org writes: [...] You've never heard of FEATURES (or --jobs)? May want to peruse the man pages a bit. FEATURES is a very fundamental part of portage (man make.conf). Sorry for being a lazy slug... I've used the same /etc/make.conf for several yrs with no

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT virtual stuff] gentoo vm appliance

2011-07-01 Thread Alex Schuster
Harry Putnam writes: Albert Hopkins mar...@letterboxes.org writes: You've never heard of FEATURES (or --jobs)? May want to peruse the man pages a bit. FEATURES is a very fundamental part of portage (man make.conf). Sorry for being a lazy slug... I've used the same /etc/make.conf for

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT virtual stuff] gentoo vm appliance

2011-07-01 Thread Albert Hopkins
On Friday, July 1 at 14:10 (-0500), Harry Putnam said: Sorry for being a lazy slug... I've used the same /etc/make.conf for several yrs with no problems... so didn't really think to look there. That's why I asked... didn't know where to look... dumb perhaps but just didn't cross my mind.

[gentoo-user] LVM filter question

2011-07-01 Thread Alex Schuster
Hi there! I am using LVM heavily, but I decided to not use it for some additional, smaller hard drives I use for backups and that I do not want to spin up every time I do LVM stuff, like pvscan, lvscan, vgchange. As all devices are scanned in this case, I edited the filter in

Re: [gentoo-user] LVM filter question

2011-07-01 Thread David W Noon
On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 22:05:12 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote about [gentoo-user] LVM filter question: [snip] filter = [ r|/dev/nbd.*|, r|/dev/sdd|, a/.*/ ] This should reject /dev/sdd from scanning. But it doesn't, pvscan spins it up. Any idea why it is not being ignored? The regular

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT virtual stuff] gentoo vm appliance

2011-07-01 Thread James Wall
Thanks for the appliance image. it has come in handy for trying out multiple ideas and setups at once on my machine. Keep up the great work Albert! :) -- No trees were harmed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT virtual stuff] gentoo vm appliance

2011-07-01 Thread Albert Hopkins
On Friday, July 1 at 17:44 (-0500), James Wall said: Thanks for the appliance image. it has come in handy for trying out multiple ideas and setups at once on my machine. Keep up the great work Albert! :) You're welcome. I do have other appliances other than the base appliance. For

[gentoo-user] How do I turn off glibc's runtime error checks?

2011-07-01 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
This is driving me nuts. Since a few days ago, glibc will abort programs with a: *** glibc detected *** program: free(): invalid pointer: ... *** or similar error message. I have no idea which package was updated that triggered this. I did *not* emerge glibc (qlop confirms that I emerged

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT virtual stuff] gentoo vm appliance

2011-07-01 Thread Harry Putnam
Albert Hopkins mar...@letterboxes.org writes: Well, thanks for pointing out the error in my appliance creation script that mistakenly sets up the serial console on non-headless VMs. I've fixed the bug and created and uploaded a new image. My tiny input isn't much... the big thanks goes to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT virtual stuff] gentoo vm appliance

2011-07-01 Thread Albert Hopkins
On Friday, July 1 at 19:22 (-0500), Harry Putnam said: Albert Hopkins mar...@letterboxes.org writes: [...] At the risk of exposing further ignorance on my part, I'm curious what it means in fstab where you have: /.swap none swap sw0 0 At the swap line.

[gentoo-user] Re: How do I turn off glibc's runtime error checks?

2011-07-01 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 07/02/2011 03:05 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: This is driving me nuts. Since a few days ago, glibc will abort programs with a: *** glibc detected *** program: free(): invalid pointer: ... *** or similar error message. I have no idea which package was updated that triggered this. I did *not*

[gentoo-user] RE: [OT virtual stuff] gentoo vm appliance

2011-07-01 Thread Pandu Poluan
-original message- Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT virtual stuff] gentoo vm appliance From: Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com Date: 2011-07-02 07:22 Albert Hopkins mar...@letterboxes.org writes: Well, thanks for pointing out the error in my appliance creation script that mistakenly sets up the

[gentoo-user] [OT]: Detecting frames at aspect-ratio-changes in a video file?

2011-07-01 Thread meino . cramer
Hi, is there a software, a tool, a something which with it is possible to print the frame numbers of those frames in a video file, which are at positions, where the aspect-ratio changes? Best regards, mcc

[gentoo-user] Feeding /etc/cron.dail and such into ?

2011-07-01 Thread meino . cramer
Hi, what mechanism is responsible for feeding the contents of /etc/cron.* into the fcron which is installed on this system instead of cron? Best regards, mcc

[gentoo-user] md device hda - sda

2011-07-01 Thread Adam Carter
I havent touched the md setup on this box since it was built ~6years ago, but for the latest kernel/udev i've finally disabled the old IDE stuff, so the disks will now appear as sda/sdc instead of hda/hdc at next boot. Will the change be autodetected, or will I need to update a configuration file?

Re: [gentoo-user] md device hda - sda

2011-07-01 Thread JD
On 07/01/2011 08:49 PM, Adam Carter wrote: I havent touched the md setup on this box since it was built ~6years ago, but for the latest kernel/udev i've finally disabled the old IDE stuff, so the disks will now appear as sda/sdc instead of hda/hdc at next boot. Will the

Re: [gentoo-user] md device hda - sda

2011-07-01 Thread Adam Carter
What about your grub.conf (or /boot/grub/menu.lst) ? Its still running lilo, which references the meta devices; and the raid-extra-boot is just a fallback if the metadevice is down IIRC (its a mirror obviously) boot = /dev/md0 raid-extra-boot=/dev/hda,/dev/hdc image = /boot/kernel-2.6.38-r6ata