Re: [gentoo-user] OT: SeAndroid build on a Gentoo System?

2012-02-07 Thread Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06.02.2012 17:25, James wrote: Hello, Has anyone built or installed SE-android onto a Sumsung Nexus (or similar) cell phone, using a Gentoo development environment?

Re: [gentoo-user] firefox-9.0 won't compile

2012-02-07 Thread Corentin RIVOT
I'using CFLAGS=-march=core2 -O2 -pipe -msse4.1 Firefox builds with success for me. gcc is 4.5.3 for me. It's strange. I had a similar problem but it had a bad kernel configuration. When I have this problem it's gcc receive SIGSEV signal. I don't think that you have the same problem like me. I

Re: [gentoo-user] hwclock -- sysclock and the ntp-client

2012-02-07 Thread Andrea Conti
Is your RTC driver compiled into the kernel? CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS=y CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS_DEVICE=rtc0 Those have nothing to do with the RTC *driver*. AFAIK on a PC the relevant option is CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS andrea

[gentoo-user] Re: Quick and dirty install of google chrome binary package

2012-02-07 Thread walt
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 21:59 -0500, Jeff Horelick wrote: On 6 February 2012 21:42, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote: I tried and liked google chrome for a few months until I got tired of the multi-hour compile every week or so. The chrome-binary ebuild was removed a while ago, I'm guessing

Re: [gentoo-user] HEADS UP - postfix-2.9.0 is broken

2012-02-07 Thread Pandu Poluan
On Feb 7, 2012 2:39 PM, Eray Aslan e...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 01:58:33PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote: S... I'm still on 2.8.7. Is it safe to upgrade to 2.9.0-r1 ? Yes, it should be OK as long as you run etc-update/dispatch-conf/similar after the upgrade. Postfix

[gentoo-user] Re: Quick and dirty install of google chrome binary package

2012-02-07 Thread walt
On 02/07/2012 08:57 AM, walt wrote: However, the newer google-chrome package forces the downgrade of libpng to libpng12 for the entire machine Damn, fooled again by the ebuild message after installing libpng12 :( The post-install message announces that I now need to run revdep-rebuild to fix

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Quick and dirty install of google chrome binary package

2012-02-07 Thread Pandu Poluan
On Feb 8, 2012 12:03 AM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 21:59 -0500, Jeff Horelick wrote: On 6 February 2012 21:42, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote: I tried and liked google chrome for a few months until I got tired of the multi-hour compile every week or so. The

Re: [gentoo-user] HEADS UP - postfix-2.9.0 is broken

2012-02-07 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2012-02-07 2:36 AM, Eray Aslan e...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 01:58:33PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote: S... I'm still on 2.8.7. Is it safe to upgrade to 2.9.0-r1 ? Yes, it should be OK as long as you run etc-update/dispatch-conf/similar after the upgrade. I was

Re: [gentoo-user] HEADS UP - postfix-2.9.0 is broken

2012-02-07 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2012-02-07 2:36 AM, Eray Aslan e...@gentoo.org wrote: Postfix daemons now live under /usr/libexec/postfix (not under /usr/lib{,64)/postfix). I'm curious - is there a good reason for this change?

[gentoo-user] Re: Quick and dirty install of google chrome binary package

2012-02-07 Thread walt
On 02/07/2012 09:16 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote: On Feb 8, 2012 12:03 AM, walt w41...@gmail.com mailto:w41...@gmail.com wrote: Now that Pandu has mentioned it, I can edit the google-chrome ebuild to do what I want :) The part where I install the obsolete libpng12 in the /opt/google/chrome

[gentoo-user] Syntax for set files

2012-02-07 Thread Alan McKinnon
Anyone know a link to documentation on what the syntax is in portage's set files? I once had a skimpy doc (since lost) that described operators like + - / that let you add, remove and replace named atoms in a set file. I use the enlightenment-niifaq overlay which ships with some awesome predfined

Re: [gentoo-user] HEADS UP - postfix-2.9.0 is broken

2012-02-07 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 00:11:26 +0700 Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote: On Feb 7, 2012 2:39 PM, Eray Aslan e...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 01:58:33PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote: S... I'm still on 2.8.7. Is it safe to upgrade to 2.9.0-r1 ? Yes, it should be OK as long

Re: [gentoo-user] Syntax for set files

2012-02-07 Thread Paul Hartman
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone know a link to documentation on what the syntax is in portage's set files? I once had a skimpy doc (since lost) that described operators like + - / that let you add, remove and replace named atoms in a set

Re: [gentoo-user] Out of memory during GCC compile

2012-02-07 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 06.02.2012 22:33, schrieb Grant: I'm trying to compile GCC on a remote system with 192MB RAM. It's completed successfully before but now it uses up all RAM. The compile doesn't stop but it must be thrashing. I have MAKEOPTS=-j1 in /etc/make.conf. Am I jeopardizing my HD by letting it

Re: [gentoo-user] Syntax for set files

2012-02-07 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 13:46:04 -0600 Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone know a link to documentation on what the syntax is in portage's set files? I once had a skimpy doc (since lost) that

Re: [gentoo-user] Syntax for set files

2012-02-07 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 02/07/12 15:08, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 13:46:04 -0600 Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone know a link to documentation on what the syntax is in portage's set files? I once

[gentoo-user] Recovering MySQL Database from EXT4 Formatted Hard Disk ...

2012-02-07 Thread Christopher Kurtis Koeber
Hello, I am trying to recover MySQL databases (which were properly shut down) from an EXT4 formatted hard disk. I loaded the SystemRescueCD distro that you can get online and when running TestDisk I can see the partitions but I cannot recover said partitions because it tells me the structure

Re: [gentoo-user] HEADS UP - postfix-2.9.0 is broken

2012-02-07 Thread Pandu Poluan
On Feb 8, 2012 2:38 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 00:11:26 +0700 Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote: On Feb 7, 2012 2:39 PM, Eray Aslan e...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 01:58:33PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote: S... I'm still on

Re: [gentoo-user] firefox-9.0 won't compile

2012-02-07 Thread Grant
I'using CFLAGS=-march=core2 -O2 -pipe -msse4.1 Firefox builds with success for me. gcc is 4.5.3 for me. It's strange. I had a similar problem but it had a bad kernel configuration. When I have this problem it's gcc receive SIGSEV signal. I don't think that you have the same problem like me.