I recently switched from Thunderbird to Roundcube (highly
recommended), switched to the non-SSL courier daemon, and plugged the
firewall hole since courier resides on the same system as my web
server. Do I still need cyrus-sasl or will a webmail client
authenticate directly with courier?
I have
On 11/03/2013 06:00, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 05:07:25PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote
NAT behind a home router is bad, too. For IPv4, it's only necessary
because there aren't enough IPv4 addresses to let everyone have a unique
one.
The best real reason for moving to IPV6
Hello!
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:09:00 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
walt wrote:
No, my 4.0.1.2 doesn't play your presentation. It displays a light
brown rectangle and nothing else. I uploaded your odp to google
docs and tried to play it but I've never tried that before so I'm
Hello,
I'm having a problem with blank spaces between buttons and their size
(too big) in notification bar (gnome 3.6.2 fallback mode). In dconf
their size is 'small' . I've already tried to modify the:
.config/gtk-3.0/settings.ini
and added:
[Settings]
gtk-fallback-icon-theme = gnome
Am 11.03.2013 00:07, schrieb Alecks Gates:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Michael Hampicke gentoo-u...@hadt.biz
wrote:
Am 10.03.2013 21:48, schrieb Alecks Gates:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Michael Hampicke gentoo-u...@hadt.biz
wrote:
[...]
I use the ati-drivers package, and I'd
130309 Philip Webb wrote:
130309 »Q« wrote:
130309 Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
Doing my usual Saturday system update, I saw a prominent msg
telling me that 'module-init-tools' has been masked
to use 'kmod' or 'modutils' -- the msgs vary -- to replace it.
When I did so (both),
On 11.03.2013 03:05, Daniel Wagener wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 21:53:42 +0100
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 10.03.2013 19:28, schrieb Daniel Wagener:
Hello,
I ran into some trouble about an hour ago…
My workstation has an onboard Realtek Ethernet which only works
maybe it will be fixed in kernel 3.9
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTMxNzA
2013/3/11 Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net
Am 10.03.2013 13:48, schrieb Florian Philipp:
Am 10.03.2013 00:53, schrieb cosmoslx lin:
2013/3/10 Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com
Am 11.03.2013 14:00, schrieb Yuri K. Shatroff:
On 11.03.2013 03:05, Daniel Wagener wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 21:53:42 +0100
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 10.03.2013 19:28, schrieb Daniel Wagener:
Hello,
I ran into some trouble about an hour ago…
My
Am 11.03.2013 00:05, schrieb Daniel Wagener:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 21:53:42 +0100
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 10.03.2013 19:28, schrieb Daniel Wagener:
Hello,
I ran into some trouble about an hour ago…
My workstation has an onboard Realtek Ethernet which only
On 03/11/13 01:34, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
[snip]
config R8169
tristate Realtek 8169 gigabit ethernet support
Say Y here if you have a Realtek 8169 PCI Gigabit
Ethernet adapter.
To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
module will be called r8169.
Hi,
I'm trying to tether 3G from my Xperia S and Nexus 4 via USB, but the
interface doesn't show up (earlier I used to get usb0 after enabling
tethering).
I have compiled all related drivers : cdc_acm, cdc_ether, cdc_ncm as
modules.
I tried inserting modules manually and then plugging the
My wife and I have identical Dell XPS 13 laptops. I have the config
on both as close as possible. We use identical kernel config files,
but I can compile git-sources-3.9-rc1 without installing sys-devel/bc
and it looks like she can not. Does anyone know why this would
happen?
BC
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:22:39AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
You are being over-simplistic.
Lack of IPv4 address space *caused* NAT to happen, the two are
inextricably intertwined.
Agreed. But we shouldn't be pointing out that NAT has partially solved
the problem, and giving people
Don't waste time and effort on it. Put your
effort into pounding away on a simple issue that people do understand...
we're running out of IP addresses.
We have run out of unallocated ones, there are still loads of unused
ones and even more due to global NAT, and even some being released.
It
On 03/09/2013 07:53 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
There is no reason to believe that IPv6 will result in an
increased use of IPsec.
Bull. The biggest barrier to IPsec use has been NAT! If an
intermediate router has to rewrite the packet to change the
apparent source and/or destination
No, there was simply no useful result that came up. Incidentally, both
links you provide *did* come up...but I dismissed them because I
couldn't imagine anyone using them as a reference except in trying to
deride Henning Brauer.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=129666298029771w=2
NAT behind a home router is bad, too. For IPv4, it's only necessary
because there aren't enough IPv4 addresses to let everyone have a unique
one.
The best real reason for moving to IPV6 is address space (or lack
thereof, in the case of IPV4). The people who are truly interested
On 12/03/2013 00:45, Walter Dnes wrote:
NAT is the context of an IPv6 discussion is *very* relevant, it's
one of the points you have to raise to illustrate what bits inside
people's heads needs to be identified and changed.
Until you change the content of people's heads, IPv6 is just not
On 12/03/2013 01:31, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
NAT behind a home router is bad, too. For IPv4, it's only necessary
because there aren't enough IPv4 addresses to let everyone have a unique
one.
The best real reason for moving to IPV6 is address space (or lack
thereof, in the case of IPV4).
On 03/11/2013 06:45 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:22:39AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
You are being over-simplistic.
Lack of IPv4 address space *caused* NAT to happen, the two are
inextricably intertwined.
Agreed. But we shouldn't be pointing out that NAT has
On 03/11/2013 06:34 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
On 03/09/2013 07:53 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
There is no reason to believe that IPv6 will result in an
increased use of IPsec.
Bull. The biggest barrier to IPsec use has been NAT! If an
intermediate router has to rewrite the packet to change
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:39:35PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote
Don't waste time and effort on it. Put your
effort into pounding away on a simple issue that people do understand...
we're running out of IP addresses.
We have run out of unallocated ones, there are still loads of unused
On 03/11/2013 07:09 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
No, there was simply no useful result that came up. Incidentally,
both links you provide *did* come up...but I dismissed them
because I couldn't imagine anyone using them as a reference except
in trying to deride Henning Brauer.
24 matches
Mail list logo
