Is this in any way significant? Anything I should do about it?
* Messages for package dev-python/pygobject-2.28.6-r52:
* Unable to establish /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pygtk.py symlink
* Unable to establish
On Tuesday 26 Mar 2013 18:57:18 Michael Mol wrote:
On 03/26/2013 01:54 PM, Stroller wrote:
Searching portage, I find there are quite a number of alternative whois
clients.
I think I have always used net-misc/whois in the past I now notice that a
BSD whois is available, a generic and an
sys-kernel/dracut
still requires udev, please update it.
And what to do with udev USE flag?
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.atwrote:
Am 26.03.2013 15:57, schrieb Mike Gilbert:
apcupsd-3.14.10-r1 still installs its rules into /lib/udev/rules.d
...
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 08:34:29AM +, Neil Bothwick wrote
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 23:01:30 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
Running MAKEOPTS=-j1 as default on a multi-core processor seems an
awful waste of resources, unless it is needed for something else, in
which case I don't run emerge at
On Tue, Mar 26 2013, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 20:43:25 +0530, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
It's better to limit the number of jobs to 2*CPUs (or cores) with a
load control like --load-average=N where N is number of CPUs.
I have two i7-3520Ms. Each has hyperthreading so counts
Ok...
So, what is this all about?
Does all of this mean that udev is now going *completely* away,
*totally* replaced by systemd?
If so, has there been any kind of formal announcement about this
*anywhere*??
On 2013-03-27 6:32 AM, fantasticfears fantasticfe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/27/2013 10:25 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Ok...
So, what is this all about?
Does all of this mean that udev is now going *completely* away,
*totally* replaced by systemd?
If so, has there been any kind of formal announcement about this
*anywhere*??
Hold your horses.
The devs will work
On 03/27/2013 10:33 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
On 03/27/2013 10:25 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Ok...
So, what is this all about?
Does all of this mean that udev is now going *completely* away,
*totally* replaced by systemd?
If so, has there been any kind of formal announcement about this
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:50 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26 2013, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 20:43:25 +0530, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
It's better to limit the number of jobs to 2*CPUs (or cores) with a
load control like --load-average=N where N is number of CPUs.
Am 27.03.2013 15:34, schrieb Michael Mol:
On 03/27/2013 10:33 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
On 03/27/2013 10:25 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Ok...
So, what is this all about?
Does all of this mean that udev is now going *completely*
away, *totally* replaced by systemd?
If so, has there been any kind
I ran away from Arch last year to get away from all this systemd stuff. I
hope that you guys will continue to support openrc for as long as possible.
One question though. why does everyone seem to be migrating towards
systemd? How is it superior? is openrc just a dead project is that why?
On
On 2013-03-27 10:33 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/27/2013 10:25 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Ok...
So, what is this all about?
Does all of this mean that udev is now going*completely* away,
*totally* replaced by systemd?
If so, has there been any kind of formal announcement about
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 11:46:01 -0400
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2013-03-27 10:33 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/27/2013 10:25 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Ok...
So, what is this all about?
Does all of this mean that udev is now going*completely* away,
On 27/03/13 at 11:27am, »Q« wrote:
Eventually, as I understand it, GNOME and KDE will require systemd
because they want full control of they system. For people not using
GNOME or KDE, other init systems will still be possible, with either
udev or a udev alternative. I have no idea how far
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Jake Margason jmargason...@gmail.com wrote:
I ran away from Arch last year to get away from all this systemd stuff. I
hope that you guys will continue to support openrc for as long as possible.
Don't do top posting, please.
One question though. why does
Hi all,
Just a question...
Can I replace module-init-tools with kmod and stay with udev-171-r10 for
the time being?
Asked another way - is kmod fully supported by older releases of udev
like 171-r10?
Thanks
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Hi all,
Just a question...
Can I replace module-init-tools with kmod and stay with udev-171-r10 for the
time being?
Asked another way - is kmod fully supported by older releases of udev like
171-r10?
If you
On 03/27/2013 01:08 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Jake Margason jmargason...@gmail.com wrote:
I ran away from Arch last year to get away from all this systemd stuff. I
hope that you guys will continue to support openrc for as long as possible.
Don't do top
Hi, Gentoo!
Has anybody else seen this? I did a sync, then emerge -puND world and
got a list of ~100 packages to merge. About a third of them seem to be
new perl stuff, 13 packages with gnome, and a lot of this and that.
Most worrying is sys-fs/udisks-2.1.0. Should I be worried about this
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 08:07:06PM +0530, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote
@Walter, I'm also on a dual core machine, and as per my observation
over long emerges, load doesn't cross 2.2.
I have also observed that if it is limited to 2, system seems to be
under utilized, because make checks the 1
Is there a way I can get git to only show commits for lines that are
evaluated after #ifdef, #ifndef, etc? Maybe I can preparse (strip out
code) with gcc and then have some git magic to show me what I want?
If I do:
git log v3.8..v3.8.4
I get about a fourth of the stuff that I don't care about.
On 2013-03-27, Alan Mackenzie a...@muc.de wrote:
Has anybody else seen this? I did a sync, then emerge -puND world and
got a list of ~100 packages to merge. About a third of them seem to be
new perl stuff, 13 packages with gnome, and a lot of this and that.
When that happened to me, it was
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Alan Mackenzie a...@muc.de wrote:
Hi, Gentoo!
Has anybody else seen this? I did a sync, then emerge -puND world and
got a list of ~100 packages to merge. About a third of them seem to be
new perl stuff, 13 packages with gnome, and a lot of this and that.
Am 26.03.2013 22:40, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:58:29 +0100, Michael Hampicke wrote:
I havent't had any failed builds that were related to the --jobs
option. The only exception is when rebuilding my kernel modules. I
have to build spl first, then zfs-kmod. But that's
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:33:05 +0530
Yohan Pereira yohan.pere...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27/03/13 at 11:27am, »Q« wrote:
Eventually, as I understand it, GNOME and KDE will require systemd
because they want full control of they system. For people not using
GNOME or KDE, other init systems will
From a technical point of view (the quality of the code and the time
it takes to fix bugs), I believe everyone (even Lennart's most fervent
detractors) will agree that systemd is a superb piece of software. The
problem is the philosophy behind it; if you agree with said
philosophy, systemd is
On 27/03/13 at 11:27am, »Q« wrote:
Eventually, as I understand it, GNOME and KDE will require systemd
because they want full control of they system. For people not using
GNOME or KDE, other init systems will still be possible, with either
udev or a udev alternative. I have no idea how
On 2013-03-27, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
The real drive behind systemd is enterprise cloud type computing for
Red Hat. The rest is snake oil and much of the features already exist
without systemd. With more snake oil of promises of faster boot up on a
portion of the code
On 2013-03-27 3:43 PM, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
The real drive behind systemd is enterprise cloud type computing for
Red Hat.
I'd be interested in hearing more on this...
Link(s) to online articles is fine...
On 03/27/2013 04:00 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2013-03-27, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
The real drive behind systemd is enterprise cloud type computing for
Red Hat. The rest is snake oil and much of the features already exist
without systemd. With more snake oil of promises
On 2013-03-27 4:41 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/27/2013 04:00 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2013-03-27, Kevin Chadwickma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
The real drive behind systemd is enterprise cloud type computing for
Red Hat. The rest is snake oil and much of the features
On 27/03/2013 22:41, Michael Mol wrote:
The case for systemd is twofold:
...
2) Reduce the amount of CPU and RAM consumed when you're talking about
booting tens of thousands of instances simultaneously across your entire
infrastructure, or when your server instance might be spun up and down
I've been mounting my external HD in thunar. When I clicked the
device icon, the HD was mounted to /media/VOLUME_LABEL/. Now I see
the path has changed to /run/media/grant/VOLUME_LABEL/ and the grant
folder is:
drwxr-x---+ 3 root root
which I think is preventing my automated remote backups
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/27/2013 06:08 AM, Mick wrote:
Like Stroller I've been using net-misc/whois for ever and it does
what I want, but don't know what the other packages may be able to
do/do better. I would also be interested to find out why people
prefer
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 19:54:39 +0100, Michael Hampicke wrote:
emerge @module-rebuild seems to work just fine on my machine. Thx for
the tip, I did not know of this @set
@x11-module-rebuild is worth knowing about too :)
--
Neil Bothwick
Fine day for a good workout. Steal something heavy.
On 03/27/2013 05:51 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 27/03/2013 22:41, Michael Mol wrote:
The case for systemd is twofold:
...
2) Reduce the amount of CPU and RAM consumed when you're talking about
booting tens of thousands of instances simultaneously across your entire
infrastructure, or
from eix, it says that jwhois can do recursive queries
whatever that means.
-Kevin
On 03/27/2013 06:37 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 03/27/2013 06:08 AM, Mick wrote:
Like Stroller I've been using net-misc/whois for ever and it does
what I want, but don't know what the other packages may
On 2013-03-27, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
The case for systemd is twofold:
1) Boot-to-desktop session management by one tool.
Ah, the old universal generic tool approach. I've seen a lot of
money and time poured into black-hole projects with names containing
words like universal
38 matches
Mail list logo
