On Tue, July 30, 2013 23:34, Randy Westlund wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 07:52:11AM +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Will the server be internet-facing?
I would make sure you have a firewall and only open the port needed for
the front-end.
Don't update the kernel too often, keep an eye out for
On 07/30/2013 05:40 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
There is going to be resistance. Two months ago there was a huge
thread in gentoo-dev, because a package maintaner complained that his
co-maintainer added a systemd unit to the package:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/85792
On 31/07/2013 07:32, Daniel Campbell wrote:
I was interested in becoming a dev for a little while, but the testing
and what looks to be prolonged process kinda put me off of the idea. It
just seems like a lot of bureaucratic work. Perhaps my impression is
wrong, though...
You are right that the
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Daniel Campbell li...@sporkbox.us wrote:
On 07/30/2013 05:40 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
There is going to be resistance. Two months ago there was a huge
thread in gentoo-dev, because a package maintaner complained that his
co-maintainer added a systemd unit
On 30 July 2013 23:32, Daniel Campbell li...@sporkbox.us wrote:
I was interested in becoming a dev for a little while, but the testing
and what looks to be prolonged process kinda put me off of the idea. It
just seems like a lot of bureaucratic work. Perhaps my impression is
wrong, though...
On 31/07/2013 09:48, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
I want to become a dev, what's my next step? There is none. Help out,
and maybe someone will notice you? Ok, I'm on it. Been doing it for
years, and I know several other people in the same situation. It doesn't
work, and recruitment numbers are
Am 30.07.2013 23:34, schrieb Randy Westlund:
How often should a small database like this be backed up? Once a day? Twice
a day? I'm thinking that I should backup to another machine on the network,
then copy that to at least one off-side machine.
Depends on your needs. Can you afford
On Tue, July 30, 2013 18:29, Michael Hampicke wrote:
Am 30.07.2013 07:35, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
⢠Can you add a new wireless or wired networks with NetworkManager?
Never tried NM or wifi on my workstation, but my guess would be that it
will not work.
I don't see why it wouldn't
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com writes:
The wiki is wrong. The script /etc/init.d/udev is part of sys-fs/udev,
which you need to uninstall before installing systemd. Perhaps it's
CONFIG_PROTECT'd, but anyway sys-fs/udev and sys-apps/systemd install
the udev binary in different
I'm looking at setting up 32-bit WINE to run a 32-bit Windows app.
Since I'm on a pure 64-bit (no multi-lib) machine, that doesn't exactly
work, which is why I'm looking at QEMU. I need to run WINE in 32 bit
mode, on a 32-bit install in a VM. Is a 64-bit virtual cpu type
recommended anyways?
- Mail original -
--[ 16%] Building CXX object
kdeui/CMakeFiles/kdeui.dir/widgets/kmenubar.o
Neil Bothwick
OK. Here's the full output. It happens on a amd64 / 8 cores (AMD
8120) machine. Output is slightly different if I set MAKEOPTs to
-j1 or -j8. Here's what I get
On 31/07/2013 11:11, Walter Dnes wrote:
I'm looking at setting up 32-bit WINE to run a 32-bit Windows app.
Since I'm on a pure 64-bit (no multi-lib) machine, that doesn't exactly
work, which is why I'm looking at QEMU. I need to run WINE in 32 bit
mode, on a 32-bit install in a VM. Is a
On 2013-07-30 5:32 PM, Daniel Campbell li...@sporkbox.us wrote:
Which projects are most in need of developers or maintainers? I wouldn't
mind learning a bit more about package maintenance, portage, and ebuilds...
One that I would *love* to see updated is sogo, which is in the gnustep
On 07/30/2013 11:32 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 07/30/2013 01:16 PM, hasufell wrote:
And we need MOAR devs
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=1chap=2
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Gentoo/Staffing_Needs
so awesome! srsly!
What many people don't seem to
Am Wed, 31 Jul 2013 06:11:24 -0400
schrieb Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org:
I'm looking at setting up 32-bit WINE to run a 32-bit Windows app.
Since I'm on a pure 64-bit (no multi-lib) machine, that doesn't exactly
work, which is why I'm looking at QEMU. I need to run WINE in 32 bit
Top-posting because my question is about something in the linked threads...
In one comment was said the following:
Can I ask the systemd people to design a working solution for opting out? I
can't support this initiative without such a solution and I would be happy
to work with the systemd
On 2013-07-30 8:30 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 06:36:57AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote
Side question...
I want to run the vmware tools on my gentoo VM (so the host can safely
power it down), but it also requires modules.
Why do you need vmware tools?
On 31/07/2013 12:31, Marc Joliet wrote:
[snip]
There's also -cpu host, which simply passes your CPU through to the guest.
That's what I use for my 32 bit WinXP VM. You can use it if you don't mind not
being able to migrate your guest, but it sounds to me like you're doing this on
a desktop
On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 07:34:22 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
Where is this 'INSTALL_MASK' option for opting out of systemd
completely documented?
man make.conf
--
Neil Bothwick
If at first you don't succeed, redefine success.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 2013-07-31 8:22 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 07:34:22 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
Where is this 'INSTALL_MASK' option for opting out of systemd
completely documented?
man make.conf
Thanks but... I didn't see one word mention of systemd.
So, how should
On 31/07/13 19:40, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-07-30 8:30 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 06:36:57AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote
Side question...
I want to run the vmware tools on my gentoo VM (so the host can safely
power it down), but it also requires modules.
On 31/07/13 at 08:30am, Tanstaafl wrote:
So, how should this be used to 'opt out of systemd completely'?
from main make.conf
Use this variable if you want to selectively prevent certain
files from being copied into your file system tree. ..
You can use it to prevent ebuilds from
On 07/31/2013 03:25 AM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
On 31/07/2013 09:48, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
I want to become a dev, what's my next step? There is none. Help out,
and maybe someone will notice you? Ok, I'm on it. Been doing it for
years, and I know several other people in the same situation.
On Wed, Jul 31 2013, Graham Murray wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com writes:
The wiki is wrong. The script /etc/init.d/udev is part of sys-fs/udev,
which you need to uninstall before installing systemd. Perhaps it's
CONFIG_PROTECT'd, but anyway sys-fs/udev and sys-apps/systemd
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2013-07-31 8:22 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 07:34:22 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
Where is this 'INSTALL_MASK' option for opting out of systemd
completely documented?
man
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Graham Murray gra...@gmurray.org.uk wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com writes:
The wiki is wrong. The script /etc/init.d/udev is part of sys-fs/udev,
which you need to uninstall before installing systemd. Perhaps it's
CONFIG_PROTECT'd, but anyway
On 2013-07-31 8:41 AM, Yohan Pereira yohan.pere...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31/07/13 at 08:30am, Tanstaafl wrote:
So, how should this be used to 'opt out of systemd completely'?
from main make.conf
Use this variable if you want to selectively prevent certain
files from being copied into
On 2013-07-31 11:20 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
If you don't use the systemd USE flag (and never install anything that
depends on systemd), you will not get systemd installed, but many
packages will install systemd unit files in /urs/lib/systemd/system.
This unit files are
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:28 AM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31 2013, Graham Murray wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com writes:
The wiki is wrong. The script /etc/init.d/udev is part of sys-fs/udev,
which you need to uninstall before installing systemd. Perhaps it's
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2013-07-31 11:20 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
If you don't use the systemd USE flag (and never install anything that
depends on systemd), you will not get systemd installed, but many
packages
On 31/07/13 18:26, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-07-31 11:20 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
If you don't use the systemd USE flag (and never install anything that
depends on systemd), you will not get systemd installed, but many
packages will install systemd unit files in
On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 11:24:09 -0400
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2013-07-31 8:41 AM, Yohan Pereira yohan.pere...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31/07/13 at 08:30am, Tanstaafl wrote:
So, how should this be used to 'opt out of systemd completely'?
from main make.conf
Use this
On 31/07/13 at 11:26am, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-07-31 11:20 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
If you don't use the systemd USE flag (and never install anything that
depends on systemd), you will not get systemd installed, but many
packages will install systemd unit files in
On 07/31/2013 11:20 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
For the record, I now think it's a waste of time trying to stop the
installation of tiny files that basically do nothing, either in
/usr/lib/systemd/system or in /etc/init.d, but you have the option if
you so desire.
The nice thing about
On 2013-07-31 11:45 AM, Yohan Pereira yohan.pere...@gmail.com wrote:
The one true way is to set -systemd in your useflags. However anything
that hard depends on systemd will pull it in like AFAIR gnome. Trying to
opt-out of systemd in these cases is not supported and probably not
trivial.
Ok,
On 31/07/2013 17:36, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
No, because the *exact same* situation occurs for Bash completion
scripts... and logrotate scripts... and cron jobs... and...
The devs decided (and I agree with them) that the important thing is
to cover the necessities of the majority of users
On Mon, July 29, 2013 22:22, Randy Westlund wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm planning to set up an SQL server for my dad's small canvas awning
business, and I've never done this before. Most of my sysadmin-type
skills are self-taught. I could use some advice.
[snip]
Randy,
I've read your original post
Thank you Canek and Graham.
I apologize for all the questions, but one still remains.
The wiki says to
emerge --ask --changed-use --deep @world
One could make small additions/changes, but there is a large one that is
not clear. Should you have --update ?
allan
On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:36:31 -0500, »Q« wrote:
If this really is 'the one true way' to 'totally opt out of systemd',
then in my opinion there should be a very thorough example of *how*
to 'opt out of systemd' included in the man page.
I'd rather not see man make.conf cluttered with
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:43 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
Thank you Canek and Graham.
I apologize for all the questions, but one still remains.
The wiki says to
emerge --ask --changed-use --deep @world
One could make small additions/changes, but there is a large one that is
not clear.
On 31 July 2013, at 18:23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
Whinging about systemd binaries being installed is valid, but whinging
about some data files is not. Anyone who does is letting their OCD show
in ways they really should be keeping private.
Hmmmn, it's a bit freaking weird - if I'm
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Stroller
strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
On 31 July 2013, at 18:23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
Whinging about systemd binaries being installed is valid, but whinging
about some data files is not. Anyone who does is letting their OCD show
in ways they
Early during booting phase, dmesg shows:
[0.515651] ata6: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m8192@0xfdefe000 port
0xfdefe180 irq 17
[0.833387] ata6: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
But later, it reports lots like the following stanza:
[164362.715469] ata6: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0
On 31/07/2013 19:56, Stroller wrote:
On 31 July 2013, at 18:23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
Whinging about systemd binaries being installed is valid, but whinging
about some data files is not. Anyone who does is letting their OCD show
in ways they really should be keeping private.
Hmmmn,
On 31/07/13 at 06:56pm, Stroller wrote:
Hmmmn, it's a bit freaking weird - if I'm understanding correctly some of the
statements made here about systemd - that there will be files installed to
/etc/init.d/ that don't actually do anything.
If your refering to what I think your refering to
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 01:09:03PM -0500, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Hmmmn, it's a bit freaking weird - if I'm understanding correctly some of
the statements made here about systemd - that there will be files installed
to /etc/init.d/ that don't actually do anything.
If you use
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31/07/2013 19:56, Stroller wrote:
On 31 July 2013, at 18:23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
Whinging about systemd binaries being installed is valid, but whinging
about some data files is not. Anyone who does is
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Bruce Hill
da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 01:09:03PM -0500, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Hmmmn, it's a bit freaking weird - if I'm understanding correctly some of
the statements made here about systemd - that there will be
On 31/07/2013 22:56, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
Lately I've been submitting things to the gentoo-haskell overlay.
Have you asked any members of that project if they would be interested
in being your mentor? Even if they can't, they might know someone who can.
On 30/07/2013 17:04, Pavel Volkov wrote:
It is reliable, but for now I'll suggest adding -consolekit line into
/etc/portage/profile/use.force
(at least if you use default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/kde profile like me)
Good news, we will be making changes with KDE 4.11 so that we no longer
On 2013-07-31, Bruce Hill da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 01:09:03PM -0500, Canek Pel?ez Vald?s wrote:
Hmmmn, it's a bit freaking weird - if I'm understanding correctly
some of the statements made here about systemd - that there will be
files installed to
On 07/31/2013 02:25 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
On 31/07/2013 22:56, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
Lately I've been submitting things to the gentoo-haskell overlay.
Have you asked any members of that project if they would be interested
in being your mentor? Even if they can't, they might know
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 31/07/2013 19:56, Stroller wrote:
On 31 July 2013, at 18:23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
Whinging about systemd binaries being
On 31 July 2013, at 19:09, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Stroller
strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
On 31 July 2013, at 18:23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
Whinging about systemd binaries being installed is valid, but whinging
about some data files is not.
On 31 July 2013, at 19:09, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 31/07/2013 19:56, Stroller wrote:
On 31 July 2013, at 18:23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
Whinging about systemd binaries being installed is valid, but whinging
about some data files is not. Anyone who does is letting their OCD show
in ways
On 31 July 2013, at 19:24, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
...
If you use systemd, all the files installed in /etc/init.d (except
functions.sh) don't actually do nothing.
In English don't actually do nothing means do something; i.e. don't
actually do anything != don't actually do nothing.
I
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Stroller
strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
On 31 July 2013, at 19:24, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
...
If you use systemd, all the files installed in /etc/init.d (except
functions.sh) don't actually do nothing.
In English don't actually do nothing means do
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org wrote:
Early during booting phase, dmesg shows:
[0.515651] ata6: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m8192@0xfdefe000 port
0xfdefe180 irq 17
[0.833387] ata6: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
But later, it reports lots like
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Stroller
strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
On 31 July 2013, at 19:09, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Stroller
strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
On 31 July 2013, at 18:23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
Whinging about systemd
On 31 July 2013, at 20:03, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Stroller
strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
On 31 July 2013, at 19:24, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
...
If you use systemd, all the files installed in /etc/init.d (except
functions.sh) don't actually
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 09:11:22PM +0300, Thanasis wrote:
Early during booting phase, dmesg shows:
[0.515651] ata6: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m8192@0xfdefe000 port
0xfdefe180 irq 17
[0.833387] ata6: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
But later, it reports lots like the following
On 1/08/2013 04:34, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
It seems a little rude to pop in, address them personally, and ask them
each if they'd devote months of their time towards mentoring me. (Doing
so can pressure someone into agreeing to something he doesn't want to
do, or makes him reject you personally
On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 13:43:55 -0400, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
The wiki says to
emerge --ask --changed-use --deep @world
One could make small additions/changes, but there is a large one that is
not clear. Should you have --update ?
--changed-use will re-emerge any packages affected by the
On 31/07/2013 20:54, Stroller wrote:
On 31 July 2013, at 19:09, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Stroller
strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
On 31 July 2013, at 18:23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
Whinging about systemd binaries being installed is valid, but
On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 19:54:54 +0100, Stroller wrote:
If you use systemd, all the files installed in /etc/init.d (except
functions.sh) don't actually do nothing.
Right, which is a bit freakin' odd, because on most every previous
distro and other *nix system, that's where the system
On 31 July 2013, at 20:09, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
… if you used systemd, and tried to run /etc/init.d/whatever start,
…
Nowadays you get the following warning:
* You are attempting to run an openrc service on a
* system which openrc did not boot.
*...
So it's pretty harmless.
On 31/07/2013 20:54, Stroller wrote:
On 31 July 2013, at 19:09, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 31/07/2013 19:56, Stroller wrote:
On 31 July 2013, at 18:23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
Whinging about systemd binaries being installed is valid, but whinging
about some data files is not. Anyone who
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 01:24:29PM -0500, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Bruce Hill
da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 01:09:03PM -0500, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Hmmmn, it's a bit freaking weird - if I'm understanding correctly
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 06:31:36PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
In standard, formal English, that's correct.
However, in some English dialects, a double-negatve does not equate to
a positive. A double negative is simply a stronger negative. For
example, don't do nothing is a stronger,
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 01:22:21PM -0500, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
acero ~ # du -sh /usr/share/man
82M /usr/share/man
acero ~ # du -sh /usr/lib/systemd/
3.6M /usr/lib/systemd/
And /usr/share/doc is 2.5G in my laptop.
That's due to USE=doc rather than USE=-doc
--
Happy Penguin
on 07/31/2013 10:06 PM Paul Hartman wrote the following:
There are a few approaches to try figuring it out explained here:
http://serverfault.com/questions/244944/linux-ata-errors-translating-to-a-device-name
Looking into /sys/dev/block it seems like /dev/sda is on ata1 and
/dev/sdb is on
On 31 July 2013, at 20:38, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
Heck! Even according to yourself, in the same email, I'm not understanding
it wrong!
I've asked you this before - would you stop wrongly telling people they're
wrong, please?
Would you please just stop and think could it be me who
On 31/07/2013 23:22, Stroller wrote:
On 31 July 2013, at 20:38, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
Heck! Even according to yourself, in the same email, I'm not understanding
it wrong!
I've asked you this before - would you stop wrongly telling people they're
wrong, please?
Would you please
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org wrote:
Early during booting phase, dmesg shows:
[0.515651] ata6: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m8192@0xfdefe000 port
0xfdefe180 irq 17
[0.833387] ata6: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
But later, it reports lots like
On Wed, Jul 31 2013, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I apologize for all the questions, but one still remains.
The wiki says to
emerge --ask --changed-use --deep @world
One could make small additions/changes, but there is a large one that is
not clear. Should you have --update ?
Thank you
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:17:02PM +0300, Thanasis wrote:
on 07/31/2013 10:06 PM Paul Hartman wrote the following:
There are a few approaches to try figuring it out explained here:
http://serverfault.com/questions/244944/linux-ata-errors-translating-to-a-device-name
Looking into
On 31 July 2013, at 22:43, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
Are we OK on this for now, or is there more to discuss?
Yes, that's great. I'm glad we can be open and honest when we've got these
kinds of problems.
On other occasions I've worried that you might have driven away someone who was
seeking
On 31 July 2013, at 20:28, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Right, which is a bit freakin' odd, because on most every previous distro
and other *nix system, that's where the system administrator goes to start
and stop services.
If they're not used, in this case, I don't think they should be
On 07/31/2013 11:09 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
There's an idea floating around that openrc could use systemd unit files
but it's still just an idea.
I must have crossed the line into grumpy-old-man-hood. That idea is insane.
Someone is willing to re-write udev to use Lennart's config files but
On 07/29/2013 06:04 PM, walt wrote:
I'm going to test cinnamon next, and I'll post results in a day or
two.
Sad to report that gentoo's cinnamon-1.6.7-r2 is out of date :( Arch
linux installs gnome-3.8 and cinnamon-1.8.8-2, which work fairly well
together but not perfectly.
The reason
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:45:48AM +0100, Kerin Millar wrote
Please provide the content of /proc/cpuinfo on the host.
The first one is my shiney almost new desktop (Dell Inspiron 660) and
the second one is my hot backup (more like emergency backup, 6-year-old
Dell Dimension 530). I'll be on
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 07:40:36AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote
On 2013-07-30 8:30 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
Why do you need vmware tools? From the host, execute...
ssh root@guest /sbin/poweroff
Two reasons this isn't sufficient...
1. Extended power outage
If my
Can a shell script tell if systemd is the init? I have a couple of
places where it would be nice to know this.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
--
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is:
How do
you spend it?
John Covici
在 2013-8-1 上午10:26， cov...@ccs.covici.com写道：
Can a shell script tell if systemd is the init? I have a couple of
places where it would be nice to know this.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
Check /proc/1/comm or something like that, IIRC...
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Wang Xuerui idontknw.w...@gmail.com wrote:
在 2013-8-1 上午10:26， cov...@ccs.covici.com写道：
Can a shell script tell if systemd is the init? I have a couple of
places where it would be nice to know this.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
Check
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 09:40:04PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote
ssh -P 60022 root@localhost /sbin/poweroff
Oops... that should read...
ssh -p 60022 root@localhost /sbin/poweroff
scp uses uppercase P for port number. It goes without saying, but I
probably should say it; ssh needs to have
86 matches
Mail list logo
