On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 6:16 PM, thegee...@thegeezer.net wrote:
OK so because of how much time has been spent arguing about systemd with
little technical content, i've spent some time on the freedesktop site
reading Lennart's blog and also going through the source to find answers
to my
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 01:32:36AM +0100, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
Am Samstag, 22.02.2014 um 21:15
What do I have to do to get this thing emerged?
Thanks!
Sometimes it is helpful to increase the backtrack value. Some weeks ago
I had a similar problem and could I solve it with
emerge
Hi, Alan.
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:06:15AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 22/02/2014 23:15, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hi, Gentoo.
I've just tried an emerge -puND world, after a shockingly long interval.
I got the error message:
!!! Multiple package instances within a single package
Hi, Mick.
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 11:32:42PM +, Mick wrote:
On Saturday 22 Feb 2014 22:06:15 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 22/02/2014 23:15, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hi, Gentoo.
I've just tried an emerge -puND world, after a shockingly long interval.
I got the error message:
!!!
On Monday 17 Feb 2014 07:01:53 Yuri K. Shatroff wrote:
17.02.2014 00:19, Canek Peláez Valdés пишет:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Yuri K. Shatroff yks-...@yandex.ru
wrote: [ snip ]
Isn't there too many if you believe and if you agree? A church of
systemd? ;)
As I said to
Hey list,
I'm observing on this olde Centrino laptop that emerges take much, much longer
for certain packages than they did in the past. There was a bigger update on
25. Jan (the first since 20. Oct) and another one on 22. Feb. Examples
can be found at the bottom, they show increases from 15 to
On 23/02/2014 14:13, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
- are you sure that's an emerge failure and not just a convoluted info
message? Perhaps post the entire emerge output.
I tried it again without the -p, and got the same output.
I think this is a portage bug. At the very least, it's poor
Hello, Alan.
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 05:22:15PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 23/02/2014 14:13, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
- are you sure that's an emerge failure and not just a convoluted info
message? Perhaps post the entire emerge output.
I tried it again without the -p, and got the same
Hello,
I am trying to compile fltk-1.1.10 both using an ebuild from [1] and
with just the downloaded source. I think this version needs libpng 1.2
which is installed in one of the slots.
Using the source code and cmake with FLTK_USE_SYSTEM_PNG off it complies
fine. I can see that it
On 23/02/2014 18:13, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hello, Alan.
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 05:22:15PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 23/02/2014 14:13, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
- are you sure that's an emerge failure and not just a convoluted info
message? Perhaps post the entire emerge output.
I tried
Hello,
after reading the thread about systemd somebody mentioned sys-fs/eudev.
I decided used because I had systemd only to used udev and unmerge systemd.
Now I can't use Banshee which I use as my music player because of the
next dependency tree:
banshee
-
Mick,
You do realize that blind bottom posting is far WORSE than blind
top-posting (done here intentionally to make a point), don't you?
Please trim your posts.
On 2014-02-22 6:32 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday 22 Feb 2014 22:06:15 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 22/02/2014
On Sunday 23 Feb 2014 17:25:18 Tanstaafl wrote:
Mick,
You do realize that blind bottom posting is far WORSE than blind
top-posting (done here intentionally to make a point), don't you?
Please trim your posts.
Sorry for this, I wasn't being lazy. I usually do trim my posts, except for
On 2014-02-23 12:42 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 23 Feb 2014 17:25:18 Tanstaafl wrote:
You do realize that blind bottom posting is far WORSE than blind
top-posting (done here intentionally to make a point), don't you?
Please trim your posts.
Sorry for this, I wasn't
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 5:06 AM, thegee...@thegeezer.net wrote:
[ snip ]
Corrupt filesystems or logs?
logs. currently if fsck runs anywhere on boot i get zero log about what
was done, so i prefer to do this on a running system. / is obviously
special, so this is a pro that fsck is logged,
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
[ snip ]
I am not sure if people object to the Lennart-way of messing up Linux, under
the blessings of RHL, or if they just don't like the immediate outcome.
Actually, most people that actually *try* using systemd and reads
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Fox halfsocial...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
after reading the thread about systemd somebody mentioned sys-fs/eudev. I
decided used because I had systemd only to used udev and unmerge systemd.
Now I can't use Banshee which I use as my music player because of the
I remember having past a similar problem by this steps:
unmerge it.
try to update and write the offered package choices on corresponding files,
i.e: *.mask/use.
update it with --newuse option. Doesn't work, try first installing the
aforementioned package and then update.
It's actually not a bug,
Edward M edwardm.gentoo.java at live.com writes:
I'm looking for an application
to create flashcards for study.
Hello,
You may want to take a look at anki.
app-misc/anki
Thanks,
I'll give it a test drive
James
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Alan,
The easiest method may be to parse the error given:
On 02/23/2014 07:13 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
###
!!!
Multiple package instances within a single package slot
On 23/02/2014 20:18, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
I don't think forking would attract much developers. Writing something
new trying to follow the*nix design principles, but being modern and
with the same features (all of them optional, of course) of systemd
will have more chances; although I
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:59:14 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Personally, I think portage has gone too far and the complex solutions
are causing problems that are worse than what they attempt to solve.
Amzing solutions (like sub-slots) aren't really much use in the real
world if the package
On 02/23/2014 07:25 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Fox halfsocial...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
after reading the thread about systemd somebody mentioned sys-fs/eudev. I
decided used because I had systemd only to used udev and unmerge systemd.
Now I can't use
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/02/2014 20:18, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
I don't think forking would attract much developers. Writing something
new trying to follow the*nix design principles, but being modern and
with the same features (all
On Sunday 23 Feb 2014 22:32:32 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 23/02/2014 20:18, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
I don't think forking would attract much developers. Writing something
new trying to follow the*nix design principles, but being modern and
with the same features (all of them optional, of
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
[ snip ]
Well, I'm no authority on this since I can't code,
My point exactly.
but here's a starter for 10:
http://www.faqs.org/docs/artu/ch01s06.html
Funny you mention this; the second definition is by Robert Pike,
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 17:54:07 +0100, Fox halfsocial...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to compile fltk-1.1.10 both using an ebuild from [1] and
with just the downloaded source. I think this version needs libpng
1.2 which is installed in one of the slots.
Using the source code and cmake
On 24/02/2014 01:12, Mick wrote:
On Sunday 23 Feb 2014 22:32:32 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 23/02/2014 20:18, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
I don't think forking would attract much developers. Writing something
new trying to follow the*nix design principles, but being modern and
with the same
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:02:01 +0100, Fox halfsocial...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
after reading the thread about systemd somebody mentioned
sys-fs/eudev. I decided used because I had systemd only to used udev
and unmerge systemd.
Now I can't use Banshee which I use as my music player because of
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 7:31 PM, eroen er...@falcon.eroen.eu wrote:
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:02:01 +0100, Fox halfsocial...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
after reading the thread about systemd somebody mentioned
sys-fs/eudev. I decided used because I had systemd only to used udev
and unmerge systemd.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 03:07:09AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
We don't do error handling. We don't even try and deal with it at the
point it occurred, we just chuck it back up the stack, essentially
giving them message stuff it, I'm not dealing with this. You called me,
you fix it.
The
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:47:55 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés
can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 7:31 PM, eroen er...@falcon.eroen.eu wrote:
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:02:01 +0100, Fox halfsocial...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
after reading the thread about systemd somebody mentioned
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 03:07:09AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
We don't do error handling. We don't even try and deal with it at the
point it occurred, we just chuck it back up the stack, essentially
giving them message
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 8:11 PM, eroen er...@falcon.eroen.eu wrote:
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:47:55 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés
can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 7:31 PM, eroen er...@falcon.eroen.eu wrote:
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:02:01 +0100, Fox halfsocial...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24/02/2014 01:12, Mick wrote:
On Sunday 23 Feb 2014 22:32:32 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 23/02/2014 20:18, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
I don't think forking would attract much developers. Writing something
new trying
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 03:07:09AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
We don't do error handling. We don't even try and deal with it at the
point
Hi. I am again, with a similar question to previous.
I want to install RAID on SSD's.
Comparing THEORETICALLY, RAID0 (stripe) vs RAID1 (mirrior). The performance
would be something like this:
n= number of disks
reads:
raid1: n*2
raid0: n*2
writes:
raid1: n
raid0: n*2
But, in real
24.02.2014 05:07, Alan McKinnon wrote:
[ ...]
We don't do error handling. We don't even try and deal with it at the
point it occurred, we just chuck it back up the stack, essentially
giving them message stuff it, I'm not dealing with this. You called me,
you fix it.
Doesn't sound like good
24.02.2014 02:32, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 23/02/2014 20:18, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
I don't think forking would attract much developers. Writing something
new trying to follow the*nix design principles, but being modern and
with the same features (all of them optional, of course) of systemd
On 24/02/2014 06:27, Facundo Curti wrote:
Hi. I am again, with a similar question to previous.
I want to install RAID on SSD's.
Comparing THEORETICALLY, RAID0 (stripe) vs RAID1 (mirrior). The
performance would be something like this:
n= number of disks
reads:
raid1: n*2
raid0: n*2
40 matches
Mail list logo
