2014-07-27 2:10 GMT+03:00 walt w41...@gmail.com:
On 07/26/2014 02:00 PM, Grand Duet wrote:
After the last reboot I magically have got the right /etc/resolv.conf
with DNS servers IPs.
Even more strange is that it happened *without* my intervention:
just a few reboots (one was no enough!).
This is a continuation of the thread:
Something went wrong with DNS, plz help!
Now, the issue became clearer, so I decided to start
a new thread with more descriptive Subject.
In short: the contents of the file /etc/resolv.conf
is unpredictably different from one reboot to another.
It is either
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:21:23 +0300, Grand Duet wrote:
In short: the contents of the file /etc/resolv.conf
is unpredictably different from one reboot to another.
It is either
# Generated by net-scripts for interface lo
domain mynetwork
That's what you get when lo comes up.
or
#
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
alexander.kaps...@gmail.com wrote:
Forgot to mention.
equery -q b /usr/include/wx-2.8/wx/thread.h
x11-libs/wxGTK-2.8.12.1-r1
Ok so the file IS provided by the package itself, and therefore I see why
-l1 makes sense.
Hi,
after finding a bad sector on my hd (see previous thread) a read a lot
stuff about SMART, smartctl and such to determine wether and how
severe is a bad sector and how to cope with it.
There is (at least ;) one thing I dont understand:
On the one hand, the surface test (extended offline and
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
after finding a bad sector on my hd (see previous thread) a read a lot
stuff about SMART, smartctl and such to determine wether and how
severe is a bad sector and how to cope with it.
There is (at least ;) one thing I dont understand:
On the one hand, the
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:12:47 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
On the one hand, the surface test (extended offline and such) aborts
as soon the first read fgailure happens.
On the other hand it is said: If the count of bad sectors increases
over time it is time to change the hd.
How can
2014-07-27 12:29 GMT+03:00 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:21:23 +0300, Grand Duet wrote:
In short: the contents of the file /etc/resolv.conf
is unpredictably different from one reboot to another.
It is either
# Generated by net-scripts for interface lo
domain
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 12:21:23PM +0300, Grand Duet wrote
This is a continuation of the thread:
Something went wrong with DNS, plz help!
Now, the issue became clearer, so I decided to start
a new thread with more descriptive Subject.
In short: the contents of the file /etc/resolv.conf
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk [14-07-27 12:32]:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:12:47 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
On the one hand, the surface test (extended offline and such) aborts
as soon the first read fgailure happens.
On the other hand it is said: If the count of bad sectors
Am 26.07.2014 20:23, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
but you will care when your kernel writes the next file right over the
partition boundary.
That's why I do have backups of all my relevant data on an external
storage medium.
Marc Stürmer wrote:
Am 26.07.2014 20:23, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
but you will care when your kernel writes the next file right over the
partition boundary.
That's why I do have backups of all my relevant data on an external
storage medium.
Just watch that you don't backup bad data.
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk [14-07-27 12:32]:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:12:47 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
On the one hand, the surface test (extended offline and such) aborts
as soon the first read fgailure happens.
On the other hand it is said: If the
Grand Duet wrote:
2014-07-27 12:29 GMT+03:00 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk:
It sounds logical. But how can I fix it? Can carrier_timeout_eth0=
setting in /etc/conf.d/net file help? If so, how much seconds should I
use?
what do your logs say?
Could you, please, be more precise where to
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com [14-07-27 13:12]:
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk [14-07-27 12:32]:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:12:47 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
On the one hand, the surface test (extended offline and such) aborts
as soon the first read fgailure
2014-07-27 13:39 GMT+03:00 Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 12:21:23PM +0300, Grand Duet wrote
This is a continuation of the thread:
Something went wrong with DNS, plz help!
Now, the issue became clearer, so I decided to start
a new thread with more descriptive
On 07/27/2014 12:30 PM, Adam Carter wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
alexander.kaps...@gmail.com mailto:alexander.kaps...@gmail.com wrote:
Forgot to mention.
equery -q b /usr/include/wx-2.8/wx/thread.h
x11-libs/wxGTK-2.8.12.1-r1
Ok so the file IS
On 07/26/2014 11:25 PM, Dale wrote:
Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On 07/26/2014 03:31 PM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:05:23 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
Which NTPd package would the list recommend using, ntp, openntpd, or
some other package?
chrony - no competition, even
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Back to the initial problem: How can I offline test the rest of the
disk if the first bad sector (10%) of the surface breaks the test with
an error? Best regards, mcc
I never got mine to go past the first failure until I used dd to erase
the drive. As mentioned
Am 25.07.2014 06:32, schrieb Pavel Volkov:
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:40:36 AM MSK, James wrote:
Bloatware like gnome and KDE will be the last to get QT5, Wayland and a
myriad of new, super_fast, secure desktop toys, imho.
Well, KDE is already on Qt 5.
Strictly speaking, there's no KDE or
On Jul 27, 2014, at 13:33, Grand Duet grand.d...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-07-27 12:29 GMT+03:00 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:21:23 +0300, Grand Duet wrote:
In short: the contents of the file /etc/resolv.conf
is unpredictably different from one reboot to another.
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com [14-07-27 14:36]:
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Back to the initial problem: How can I offline test the rest of the
disk if the first bad sector (10%) of the surface breaks the test with
an error? Best regards, mcc
I never got mine to go past the first failure
2014-07-27 16:10 GMT+03:00 Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi:
On Jul 27, 2014, at 13:33, Grand Duet grand.d...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-07-27 12:29 GMT+03:00 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:21:23 +0300, Grand Duet wrote:
In short: the contents of the file
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com [14-07-27 14:36]:
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Back to the initial problem: How can I offline test the rest of the
disk if the first bad sector (10%) of the surface breaks the test with
an error? Best regards, mcc
I never got mine to go
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
NFS uses RPC to do some heavy lifting - I don't know how familiar you
are with this, so here's the quick version:
When you mount something locally, and need to use the mounted
filesystem, kernel calls are used to
On Sunday 27 Jul 2014 15:05:53 Dale wrote:
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com [14-07-27 14:36]:
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Back to the initial problem: How can I offline test the rest of the
disk if the first bad sector (10%) of the surface breaks the test with
an
On 07/27/2014 04:30 AM, Grand Duet wrote:
and also the output of the rc-update show command?
# rc-update show
alsasound | boot
bootmisc | boot
dbus | default
devfs | sysinit
2014-07-27 14:30 GMT+03:00 Grand Duet grand.d...@gmail.com:
2014-07-27 13:39 GMT+03:00 Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 12:21:23PM +0300, Grand Duet wrote
This is a continuation of the thread:
Something went wrong with DNS, plz help!
Now, the issue became clearer,
2014-07-27 17:50 GMT+03:00 Daniel Frey djqf...@gmail.com:
On 07/27/2014 04:30 AM, Grand Duet wrote:
and also the output of the rc-update show command?
# rc-update show
alsasound | boot
bootmisc | boot
dbus | default
On Jul 27, 2014, at 16:39, Grand Duet grand.d...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-07-27 16:10 GMT+03:00 Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi:
On Jul 27, 2014, at 13:33, Grand Duet grand.d...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-07-27 12:29 GMT+03:00 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:21:23 +0300,
Am 26.07.2014 04:47, schrieb walt:
So, why did the broken machine work normally for more than a year
without rpcbind until two days ago? (I suppose because nfs-utils was
updated to 1.3.0 ?)
The real problem here is that I have no idea how NFS works, and each
new version is more
Grand Duet grand.duet at gmail.com writes:
In short: the contents of the file /etc/resolv.conf
is unpredictably different from one reboot to another.
It is either
# Generated by net-scripts for interface lo
domain mynetwork or
# Generated by net-scripts for interface eth0
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com [14-07-27 16:36]:
On Sunday 27 Jul 2014 15:05:53 Dale wrote:
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com [14-07-27 14:36]:
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Back to the initial problem: How can I offline test the rest of the
disk if the first bad
On 27 July 2014 18:25:24 CEST, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 26.07.2014 04:47, schrieb walt:
So, why did the broken machine work normally for more than a year
without rpcbind until two days ago? (I suppose because nfs-utils was
updated to 1.3.0 ?)
The real problem here is
Am 27.07.2014 18:25, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Only last week I re-attacked this topic as I start using puppet here to
manage my systems ... and one part of this might be sharing /usr/portage
via NFSv4. One client host mounts it without a problem, the thinkpads
don't do so ... just
2014-07-27 19:33 GMT+03:00 James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com:
Grand Duet grand.duet at gmail.com writes:
In short: the contents of the file /etc/resolv.conf
is unpredictably different from one reboot to another.
It is either
# Generated by net-scripts for interface lo
domain
On 27/07/2014 12:30, Grand Duet wrote:
2014-07-27 13:39 GMT+03:00 Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 12:21:23PM +0300, Grand Duet wrote
This is a continuation of the thread:
Something went wrong with DNS, plz help!
Now, the issue became clearer, so I decided to start
a
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:41:15 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
My understanding is that the test only aborts if the error is severe
enough to force it to do so. A simple bad block can be skipped and the
rest of the drive tested.
But it is slightly off the point I tried to explain (I am no
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 13:33:47 +0300, Grand Duet wrote:
That's what replaces it when eth0 comes up.
It looks like eth0 is not being brought up fully
It sounds logical. But how can I fix it?
By identifying how far it is getting and why no further. But it appears
that eth0 is being brought
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:41:15 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
My understanding is that the test only aborts if the error is severe
enough to force it to do so. A simple bad block can be skipped and the
rest of the drive tested.
But it is slightly off the point I tried
On 27/07/2014 17:55, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On 27 July 2014 18:25:24 CEST, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 26.07.2014 04:47, schrieb walt:
So, why did the broken machine work normally for more than a year
without rpcbind until two days ago? (I suppose because nfs-utils was
updated
2014-07-27 21:14 GMT+03:00 Kerin Millar kerfra...@fastmail.co.uk:
On 27/07/2014 12:30, Grand Duet wrote:
2014-07-27 13:39 GMT+03:00 Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 12:21:23PM +0300, Grand Duet wrote
This is a continuation of the thread:
Something went wrong with
On 07/27/2014 08:08 AM, Grand Duet wrote:
If eth0 starts after lo, then I have the right /etc/resolv.conf
file, however if lo starts after eth0, then the DNS IPs in
resolv.conf file are overwritten with dummy instruction
for lo interface.
But, now, after your suggestion, I have looked
2014-07-27 22:13 GMT+03:00 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 13:33:47 +0300, Grand Duet wrote:
That's what replaces it when eth0 comes up.
It looks like eth0 is not being brought up fully
It sounds logical. But how can I fix it?
By identifying how far it is getting
2014-07-27 23:28 GMT+03:00 Daniel Frey djqf...@gmail.com:
On 07/27/2014 08:08 AM, Grand Duet wrote:
If eth0 starts after lo, then I have the right /etc/resolv.conf
file, however if lo starts after eth0, then the DNS IPs in
resolv.conf file are overwritten with dummy instruction
for lo
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 14:20:23 -0500, Dale wrote:
Question. Does that mean that the heads can't move past that point? If
yes, does that mean the OP can't get any data that is further out than
that point? I'm asking hoping I will learn something. I have taken
drives apart so I know how the
On 27/07/2014 21:38, Grand Duet wrote:
2014-07-27 22:13 GMT+03:00 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 13:33:47 +0300, Grand Duet wrote:
That's what replaces it when eth0 comes up.
It looks like eth0 is not being brought up fully
It sounds logical. But how can I fix it?
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 12:33 PM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
I set my nameservers all manually in this file and they do
not every change. I do not run systemd. I'm not sure
of your issue(s) but, historically, resolv.conf should not
be displaying this behavior.
FWIW, systemd
grep MAKEOPTS /etc/portage/make.conf
MAKEOPTS=-j3
What value is your MAKEOPTS set to?
I have tried -j1 to rule out parallel compilation issues, but it didn't
help.
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 14:20:23 -0500, Dale wrote:
Question. Does that mean that the heads can't move past that point? If
yes, does that mean the OP can't get any data that is further out than
that point? I'm asking hoping I will learn something. I have taken
drives
2014-07-27 5:29 GMT-06:00 meino.cra...@gmx.de:
Back to the initial problem:
How can I offline test the rest of the disk if
the first bad sector (10%) of the surface breaks
the test with an error?
Best regards,
mcc
I've only read this thread not the previous, and I can only give some
On 07/28/2014 04:33 AM, Adam Carter wrote:
grep MAKEOPTS /etc/portage/make.conf
MAKEOPTS=-j3
What value is your MAKEOPTS set to?
I have tried -j1 to rule out parallel compilation issues, but it
didn't help.
Here's all the 'thread.h' header files I seem to have on my system:
52 matches
Mail list logo
