Re: [gentoo-user] upgrade to perl 5.22.0 yields perl double free or corruption

2015-08-04 Thread covici
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/08/2015 12:14, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/08/2015 11:13, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: Hi. After upgrading to perl 5.22.0 which was a pain -- had to remove all those virtuals -- I

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrade to perl 5.22.0 yields perl double free or corruption

2015-08-04 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Dienstag, 4. August 2015, 11:13:56 schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com: *** Error in `perl': double free or corruption (!prev): 0x01ed8610 *** === Backtrace: = /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x71e4b)[0x7f59bc417e4b] /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x7730e)[0x7f59bc41d30e]

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrade to perl 5.22.0 yields perl double free or corruption

2015-08-04 Thread covici
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: Am Dienstag, 4. August 2015, 11:13:56 schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com: *** Error in `perl': double free or corruption (!prev): 0x01ed8610 *** === Backtrace: = /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x71e4b)[0x7f59bc417e4b]

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrade to perl 5.22.0 yields perl double free or corruption

2015-08-04 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 04/08/2015 13:15, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: Am Dienstag, 4. August 2015, 11:13:56 schrieb cov...@ccs.covici.com: *** Error in `perl': double free or corruption (!prev): 0x01ed8610 *** === Backtrace: =

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrade to perl 5.22.0 yields perl double free or corruption

2015-08-04 Thread wraeth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 04/08/15 21:19, Alan McKinnon wrote: Pick one: [] Cosmic Rays! [] Random quantum-level bit flipping! [] Slight imperfection in cannot-be-perfect disc surface! [] Random shit in the style of Discworld! [] Your $DEITY is messing with your

[ SOLVED ] Re: [gentoo-user] smartd and ssmtp not sending emails again.

2015-08-04 Thread Dale
John Campbell wrote: On 08/04/2015 01:35 AM, Dale wrote: Howdy, I went through this before and I haven't changed anything so not sure why it isn't working now. I decided to test smartd to make sure that it would send me a email if a drive developed a problem. I added -M test to the line,

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrade to perl 5.22.0 yields perl double free or corruption

2015-08-04 Thread covici
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/08/2015 11:13, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: Hi. After upgrading to perl 5.22.0 which was a pain -- had to remove all those virtuals -- I am now finding that a small perl program which connects to a mysql database yields the following

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: systemd-224 Look out for new networking behavior [FIXED]

2015-08-04 Thread Franz Fellner
Fernando Rodriguez wrote: On Monday, August 03, 2015 6:41:22 PM walt wrote: That line declares *hostname as a constant and then the statement below proceeds to assign a value to the 'constant'. I wonder how many hours of frustration have been suffered by student programmers while trying to

[gentoo-user] smartd and ssmtp not sending emails again.

2015-08-04 Thread Dale
Howdy, I went through this before and I haven't changed anything so not sure why it isn't working now. I decided to test smartd to make sure that it would send me a email if a drive developed a problem. I added -M test to the line, restarted smartd and got nothing. I mean nothing but crickets.

Re: [gentoo-user] smartd and ssmtp not sending emails again.

2015-08-04 Thread Raffaele BELARDI
Dale wrote: I went through this before and I haven't changed anything so not sure why it isn't working now. I decided to test smartd to make sure that it would send me a email if a drive developed a problem. I added -M test to the line, restarted smartd and got nothing. I mean nothing but

Re: [gentoo-user] smartd and ssmtp not sending emails again.

2015-08-04 Thread John Campbell
On 08/04/2015 01:35 AM, Dale wrote: Howdy, I went through this before and I haven't changed anything so not sure why it isn't working now. I decided to test smartd to make sure that it would send me a email if a drive developed a problem. I added -M test to the line, restarted smartd and got

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrade to perl 5.22.0 yields perl double free or corruption

2015-08-04 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 04/08/2015 11:13, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: Hi. After upgrading to perl 5.22.0 which was a pain -- had to remove all those virtuals -- I am now finding that a small perl program which connects to a mysql database yields the following when it exits: *** Error in `perl': double free or

Re: [gentoo-user] smartd and ssmtp not sending emails again.

2015-08-04 Thread Dale
Raffaele BELARDI wrote: Dale wrote: I went through this before and I haven't changed anything so not sure why it isn't working now. I decided to test smartd to make sure that it would send me a email if a drive developed a problem. I added -M test to the line, restarted smartd and got

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrade to perl 5.22.0 yields perl double free or corruption

2015-08-04 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 04/08/2015 12:14, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/08/2015 11:13, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: Hi. After upgrading to perl 5.22.0 which was a pain -- had to remove all those virtuals -- I am now finding that a small perl program which

[gentoo-user] upgrade to perl 5.22.0 yields perl double free or corruption

2015-08-04 Thread covici
Hi. After upgrading to perl 5.22.0 which was a pain -- had to remove all those virtuals -- I am now finding that a small perl program which connects to a mysql database yields the following when it exits: *** Error in `perl': double free or corruption (!prev): 0x01ed8610 *** ===

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: systemd-224 Look out for new networking behavior [FIXED]

2015-08-04 Thread Franz Fellner
walt wrote: On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 08:19:37 +0200 Franz Fellner alpine.art...@gmail.com wrote: Fernando Rodriguez wrote: On Monday, August 03, 2015 6:41:22 PM walt wrote: That line declares *hostname as a constant and then the statement below proceeds to assign a value to the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: crossdev runtime version

2015-08-04 Thread Fernando Rodriguez
On Tuesday, August 04, 2015 5:16:09 PM walt wrote: On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 18:40:49 +0200 Cor Legemaat c...@cor.za.net wrote: Hi: I want to install a mingw64 compiler with =dev-util/mingw64-runtime- 4.0.1, tried with the cmd: crossdev --lenv 'CFLAGS=-march=generic -mtune=generic -O2

Re: [gentoo-user] Configuring hostapd

2015-08-04 Thread Fernando Rodriguez
On Tuesday, August 04, 2015 8:18:43 PM Cor Legemaat wrote: On Sun, 2015-08-02 at 19:56 -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote: On Sunday, August 02, 2015 11:12:07 PM Mick wrote: On Sunday 02 Aug 2015 22:04:41 Fernando Rodriguez wrote: On Sunday, August 02, 2015 1:29:50 PM Mick wrote: On

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: crossdev runtime version

2015-08-04 Thread Cor Legemaat
On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 17:16 -0700, walt wrote: On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 18:40:49 +0200 Cor Legemaat c...@cor.za.net wrote: Hi: I want to install a mingw64 compiler with =dev-util/mingw64- runtime- 4.0.1, tried with the cmd: crossdev --lenv 'CFLAGS=-march=generic -mtune=generic -O2

Re: [gentoo-user] want to upgrade 50 month old installation

2015-08-04 Thread Felix Miata
Neil Bothwick composed on 2015-08-04 21:36 (UTC+0100): On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:32:51 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: I've yet to figure out how to get a list of all installed packages akin to 'rpm -qa | sort', so I really don't know what my starting configuration is. qlist -ICv -bash: qlist:

Re: [gentoo-user] want to upgrade 50 month old installation

2015-08-04 Thread Felix Miata
James composed on 2015-08-04 21:07 (UTC): Interesting choice:: how do you like your choices, Felix? Choices are a double edged sword. The more you have, the more power you have, but the harder to choose, especially while overwhelmed by the unfamiliar. Your later provided ungrading old

[gentoo-user] Re: want to upgrade 50 month old installation

2015-08-04 Thread James
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards at gmail.com writes: I've tried that pathway. Many times. The mostly unattended installers all install things I don't want, pick options I don't like, and end up configured to do things the way the authors of the installer wanted to do things rather than the

Re: [gentoo-user] want to upgrade 50 month old installation

2015-08-04 Thread Felix Miata
Neil Bothwick composed on 2015-08-04 18:44 (UTC+0100): On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 13:12:42 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: 6-# emerge portage This produced a longish warning: !!! /etc/make.profile is not a symlink and will probably prevent most merges. !!! It should point into a profile within

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: want to upgrade 50 month old installation

2015-08-04 Thread Dale
James wrote: Felix Miata mrmazda at earthlink.net writes: 1-I just find upgrade processes more enjoyable than inital installations and their follow-up tedium getting from defaults back to the way I like things to work. Now that I've seen several thread responses subsequent to this one,

[gentoo-user] Re: want to upgrade 50 month old installation

2015-08-04 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2015-08-04, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote: Felix Miata mrmazda at earthlink.net writes: 1-I just find upgrade processes more enjoyable than inital installations and their follow-up tedium getting from defaults back to the way I like things to work. Now that I've seen several

[gentoo-user] Re: systemd-224 Look out for new networking behavior [FIXED]

2015-08-04 Thread walt
On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 08:19:37 +0200 Franz Fellner alpine.art...@gmail.com wrote: Fernando Rodriguez wrote: On Monday, August 03, 2015 6:41:22 PM walt wrote: That line declares *hostname as a constant and then the statement below proceeds to assign a value to the 'constant'. I wonder how

Re: [gentoo-user] want to upgrade 50 month old installation

2015-08-04 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 23:48:16 +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: 2-clone the existing partition to a larger one to be the upgrade target 3-boot the target 4-note that there exists no /etc/portage/ How did you clone it? It appears parts are missing. In the old days make.conf and

[gentoo-user] Re: crossdev runtime version

2015-08-04 Thread walt
On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 18:40:49 +0200 Cor Legemaat c...@cor.za.net wrote: Hi: I want to install a mingw64 compiler with =dev-util/mingw64-runtime- 4.0.1, tried with the cmd: crossdev --lenv 'CFLAGS=-march=generic -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe CXXFLAGS=-march=generic -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe'

[gentoo-user] Re: want to upgrade 50 month old installation

2015-08-04 Thread James
Felix Miata mrmazda at earthlink.net writes: 1-I just find upgrade processes more enjoyable than inital installations and their follow-up tedium getting from defaults back to the way I like things to work. Now that I've seen several thread responses subsequent to this one, I'm leaning

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: want to upgrade 50 month old installation

2015-08-04 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 20:59:47 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote: No way on 32-bit Athlon. I have Athlon-XP. Even with distcc to Core2Duo it takes about 10 days of compilation time to build all stuff, I'm not counting time to fix all failures here. Well, I have 3000 packages installed...

[gentoo-user] crossdev runtime version

2015-08-04 Thread Cor Legemaat
Hi: I wand to install a mingw64 compiler with =dev-util/mingw64-runtime- 4.0.1, tried with the cmd: crossdev --lenv 'CFLAGS=-march=generic -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe CXXFLAGS=-march=generic -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe' --ex-gdb -t x86_64-w64-mingw32 --ov-output /usr/local/portage-crossdev --l

Re: [gentoo-user] Configuring hostapd

2015-08-04 Thread Cor Legemaat
On Sun, 2015-08-02 at 19:56 -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote: On Sunday, August 02, 2015 11:12:07 PM Mick wrote: On Sunday 02 Aug 2015 22:04:41 Fernando Rodriguez wrote: On Sunday, August 02, 2015 1:29:50 PM Mick wrote: On Sunday 02 Aug 2015 01:50:21 Fernando Rodriguez wrote: Hello,

[gentoo-user] Re: want to upgrade 50 month old installation

2015-08-04 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2015-08-04, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote: That's right, May 2011, my first and only Gentoo installation, 32 bit on an old Athlon, which means no sse2, and kernel 2.6.37. It coexists in multiboot on one HD with 12 installations of Fedora and openSUSE. I'd like to upgrade it

Re: [gentoo-user] want to upgrade 50 month old installation

2015-08-04 Thread Dale
Felix Miata wrote: That's right, May 2011, my first and only Gentoo installation, 32 bit on an old Athlon, which means no sse2, and kernel 2.6.37. It coexists in multiboot on one HD with 12 installations of Fedora and openSUSE. I'd like to upgrade it rather than installing fresh, if it's

Re: [gentoo-user] want to upgrade 50 month old installation

2015-08-04 Thread Felix Miata
Grant Edwards composed on 2015-08-04 17:20 (UTC): Felix Miata wrote: That's right, May 2011, my first and only Gentoo installation, 32 bit on an old Athlon, which means no sse2, and kernel 2.6.37. It coexists in multiboot on one HD with 12 installations of Fedora and openSUSE. I'd like to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: want to upgrade 50 month old installation

2015-08-04 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 04 Aug 2015 18:20:40 Grant Edwards wrote: On 2015-08-04, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote: That's right, May 2011, my first and only Gentoo installation, 32 bit on an old Athlon, which means no sse2, and kernel 2.6.37. It coexists in multiboot on one HD with 12

[gentoo-user] want to upgrade 50 month old installation

2015-08-04 Thread Felix Miata
That's right, May 2011, my first and only Gentoo installation, 32 bit on an old Athlon, which means no sse2, and kernel 2.6.37. It coexists in multiboot on one HD with 12 installations of Fedora and openSUSE. I'd like to upgrade it rather than installing fresh, if it's doable. My initial steps

Re: [gentoo-user] want to upgrade 50 month old installation

2015-08-04 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 13:12:42 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: 2-clone the existing partition to a larger one to be the upgrade target 3-boot the target 4-note that there exists no /etc/portage/ How did you clone it? It appears parts are missing. 5-# emerge --sync which warned I need to

Re: [gentoo-user] want to upgrade 50 month old installation

2015-08-04 Thread Alan Grimes
50 months?!?!??! that's like a fresh install Jeez, have you even finished the burn-in testing on that? My machine is more than 60 months old and I only recently completed the burn-in test, (the mobo failed, wasn't giving me the PCI-E channels I needed). My home directory is about eleven

Re: [gentoo-user] want to upgrade 50 month old installation

2015-08-04 Thread Daniel Frey
On 08/04/2015 11:30 AM, Felix Miata wrote: Grant Edwards composed on 2015-08-04 17:20 (UTC): and faster. A fresh install will take a couple hours. An upgrade will take somewhere between a couple days and a couple weeks. Seriously, more than a day? Oh sure, it's possible. In late 2013

[gentoo-user] Re: want to upgrade 50 month old installation

2015-08-04 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2015-08-04, Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 17:20:40 + (UTC) Grant Edwards wrote: On 2015-08-04, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote: That's right, May 2011, my first and only Gentoo installation, 32 bit on an old Athlon, which means no sse2, and

Re: [gentoo-user] want to upgrade 50 month old installation

2015-08-04 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 04.08.2015 um 20:30 schrieb Felix Miata: 1-I just find upgrade processes more enjoyable than inital installations and their follow-up tedium getting from defaults back to the way I like things to work. been there, done that ... several times. Loads of work but also a big chunk of learning

Re: [gentoo-user] want to upgrade 50 month old installation

2015-08-04 Thread Felix Miata
Dale composed on 2015-08-04 12:41 (UTC-0500): First, you are going to have a interesting few days, at least. It would be faster and easier to start fresh. Honestly. If you just have to or want to for a learning experience, cool. See if eselect exists. If it does, try this: eselect

Re: [gentoo-user] want to upgrade 50 month old installation

2015-08-04 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:32:51 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: I've yet to figure out how to get a list of all installed packages akin to 'rpm -qa | sort', so I really don't know what my starting configuration is. qlist -ICv -- Neil Bothwick Top Oxymorons Number 36: Alone together

[gentoo-user] Re: want to upgrade 50 month old installation

2015-08-04 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2015-08-04, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote: Grant Edwards composed on 2015-08-04 17:20 (UTC): My gut feeling is that a fresh install is going to be a _lot_ easier For some degenerate value of easier. :-) and faster. A fresh install will take a couple hours. An upgrade will

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: want to upgrade 50 month old installation

2015-08-04 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 17:20:40 + (UTC) Grant Edwards wrote: On 2015-08-04, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote: That's right, May 2011, my first and only Gentoo installation, 32 bit on an old Athlon, which means no sse2, and kernel 2.6.37. It coexists in multiboot on one HD with 12

Re: [gentoo-user] want to upgrade 50 month old installation

2015-08-04 Thread Jeremi Piotrowski
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015, Daniel Frey wrote: I found that I had to do it in little pieces at a time and portage got in my way constantly. I wish there was a setting to just forcibly compile a package and then manually deal with breakage afterward with something like revdep-rebuild, rather than

Re: [gentoo-user] want to upgrade 50 month old installation

2015-08-04 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 18:44:47 +0100 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 13:12:42 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: 2-clone the existing partition to a larger one to be the upgrade target 3-boot the target 4-note that there exists no /etc/portage/ How did you clone it? It appears parts are

[gentoo-user] Re: want to upgrade 50 month old installation

2015-08-04 Thread James
Felix Miata mrmazda at earthlink.net writes: That's right, May 2011, my first and only Gentoo installation, 32 bit on an old Athlon, which means no sse2, and kernel 2.6.37. It coexists in multiboot on one HD with 12 installations of Fedora and openSUSE. I'd like to upgrade it rather than

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: systemd-224 Look out for new networking behavior [FIXED]

2015-08-04 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 7:56 PM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote: Let me give you one more example of syntax that I find unreasonable, and then I'll ask my *real* question, about which I hope you will have opinions. Okay, the statement I referred to above uses this notation: if

[gentoo-user] ipset needs to patch the kernel?

2015-08-04 Thread Meino . Cramer
Hi, this morning I was trying to emerge ipset (in order to use with sidmat) and got this instead of the executable: Unpacking source... Unpacking ipset-6.20.1.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/net-firewall/ipset-6.20.1/work Source unpacked in /var/tmp/portage/net-firewall/ipset-6.20.1/work