Re: [gentoo-user] Missing digest for *** Tree looks messed up.

2015-08-10 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Monday 10 August 2015 09:13:01 Dale wrote: I might add, sync is taking a LONG time again. Of course, my DSL is a bit slower than some folks. At least the bumpy road got smoothed out tho. It seems to be working again. Maybe next sync will be back to normal. I do one sync a day, of my

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC-4.9?

2015-08-10 Thread Fernando Rodriguez
On Monday, August 10, 2015 2:02:20 PM Neil Bothwick wrote: On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:58:19 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: I've been using ~amd64 GCC on my MythTV boxes, which run mainly stable, for a long time. I would keep 4.8 installed too, just in case the odd package still doesn't like

Re: [gentoo-user] Missing digest for *** Tree looks messed up.

2015-08-10 Thread Dale
Peter Humphrey wrote: On Monday 10 August 2015 09:13:01 Dale wrote: I might add, sync is taking a LONG time again. Of course, my DSL is a bit slower than some folks. At least the bumpy road got smoothed out tho. It seems to be working again. Maybe next sync will be back to normal. I do

Re: [gentoo-user] Missing digest for *** Tree looks messed up.

2015-08-10 Thread Dale
Rich Freeman wrote: On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Peter Humphrey pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk wrote: On Monday 10 August 2015 09:13:01 Dale wrote: I might add, sync is taking a LONG time again. Of course, my DSL is a bit slower than some folks. At least the bumpy road got smoothed out tho.

Re: [gentoo-user] Missing digest for *** Tree looks messed up.

2015-08-10 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Peter Humphrey pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk wrote: On Monday 10 August 2015 09:13:01 Dale wrote: I might add, sync is taking a LONG time again. Of course, my DSL is a bit slower than some folks. At least the bumpy road got smoothed out tho. It seems to be working

Re: [gentoo-user] Missing digest for *** Tree looks messed up.

2015-08-10 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Peter Humphrey wrote: On Monday 10 August 2015 09:13:01 Dale wrote: I might add, sync is taking a LONG time again. Of course, my DSL is a bit slower than some folks. At least the bumpy road got smoothed out tho. It seems

[gentoo-user] testing system + gcc-5.2 anyone?

2015-08-10 Thread James
Hello, Just for grins, I'm thinking about installing a gentoo system that is (~) testing and newer codes and setting gcc-.5.2 as the default compiler. Anyone doing this yet? Will it mostly work or should I wait? Workstation with lxqt-0.9x. Hardened? What are the chances if it is set up (amd64)

Re: [gentoo-user] LVM not accessible after reboot

2015-08-10 Thread Paul Tobias
my ideas is that LVM2 is not ready at the time of mounting partitions. how can i do this? I had the same problem on a system where scsi initialization was very slow. Adding rootdelay=30 to the kernel command line fixed it. The 30 is how many seconds should the kernel wait before it starts

Re: [gentoo-user] Configuring hostapd

2015-08-10 Thread Fernando Rodriguez
On Monday, August 10, 2015 8:59:27 AM Cor Legemaat wrote: On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 23:41 -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote: On Thursday, August 06, 2015 7:04:27 AM Cor Legemaat wrote: On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 01:00 -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote: On Tuesday, August 04, 2015 8:18:43 PM Cor

[gentoo-user] Re: Hubris?

2015-08-10 Thread James
Jeremi Piotrowski jeremi.piotrowski at gmail.com writes: In general I have not had any problems setting up similar gentoo systems running pure btrfs in raid1/single mode. Those systems, however, all have initramfs' - not that that's a bad thing but see above. I too am also interested in

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Hubris?

2015-08-10 Thread Jeremi Piotrowski
Paul Tobias tobias.pal at gmail.com writes: It works, but a patched kernel is needed. Take a look at https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7275724.html The patch there was still working on the latest kernel a while ago. The patch from the forum thread does indeed work, and just reading it

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC-4.9?

2015-08-10 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Monday 10 August 2015 13:03:14 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 11:32:01 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: Has anyone any advice on whether it's a good idea to add a keyword to gcc-4.9.2 so that I can make progress here? This is a stable box and I'd like to know whether this one,

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC-4.9?

2015-08-10 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:58:19 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: I've been using ~amd64 GCC on my MythTV boxes, which run mainly stable, for a long time. I would keep 4.8 installed too, just in case the odd package still doesn't like 4.9. Ironically, on my MythTV boxes, the only package that

Re: [gentoo-user] Missing digest for *** Tree looks messed up.

2015-08-10 Thread Mickaël Bucas
2015-08-10 2:15 GMT+02:00 Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com: Howdy, I'm sure I'm not alone on monitoring -dev to see upcoming changes. I noticed they switched to git or something and it seems to have caused a bit of trouble. At least I think it may have. I did my usual 'eix-sync emerge -uvaDN

Re: [gentoo-user] Missing digest for *** Tree looks messed up.

2015-08-10 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Sunday 09 August 2015 21:05:07 Rich Freeman wrote: Whether you've already seen it or will see it in the future, I would expect the first rsync to be much longer. The git migration probably touched virtually every file in the tree in some way, which means that rsync is going to be

Re: [gentoo-user] Missing digest for *** Tree looks messed up.

2015-08-10 Thread Mickaël Bucas
2015-08-10 10:55 GMT+02:00 Mickaël Bucas mbu...@gmail.com: 2015-08-10 2:15 GMT+02:00 Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com: Howdy, I'm sure I'm not alone on monitoring -dev to see upcoming changes. I noticed they switched to git or something and it seems to have caused a bit of trouble. At

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: crossdev runtime version

2015-08-10 Thread Cor Legemaat
On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 00:45 -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote: On Tuesday, August 04, 2015 5:16:09 PM walt wrote: On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 18:40:49 +0200 Cor Legemaat c...@cor.za.net wrote: Hi: I want to install a mingw64 compiler with =dev-util/mingw64- runtime- 4.0.1, tried with

Re: [gentoo-user] Configuring hostapd

2015-08-10 Thread Cor Legemaat
On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 23:41 -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote: On Thursday, August 06, 2015 7:04:27 AM Cor Legemaat wrote: On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 01:00 -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote: On Tuesday, August 04, 2015 8:18:43 PM Cor Legemaat wrote: On Sun, 2015-08-02 at 19:56 -0400, Fernando

[gentoo-user] GCC-4.9?

2015-08-10 Thread Peter Humphrey
Hello list, I'm having trouble compiling xf86-video-virtualbox, and the bug report [1] says that gcc-4.9 is required to compile it. Has anyone any advice on whether it's a good idea to add a keyword to gcc-4.9.2 so that I can make progress here? This is a stable box and I'd like to know

[gentoo-user] LVM not accessible after reboot

2015-08-10 Thread Marko Weber | 8000
hello list, Using grub2 i have gentoo box where i did a raid5 on 4 disks. On the raid i created a lvm partition and created some logical volumes. All is going fine. But when rebooting the machine sometimes the lvm is not available and the logic volumes did not get mounted. I have to reboot the

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC-4.9?

2015-08-10 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 11:32:01 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: Has anyone any advice on whether it's a good idea to add a keyword to gcc-4.9.2 so that I can make progress here? This is a stable box and I'd like to know whether this one, rather central ~amd64 package would cause trouble. I've

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC-4.9?

2015-08-10 Thread Raffaele BELARDI
Neil Bothwick wrote: On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 11:32:01 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: I've been using ~amd64 GCC on my MythTV boxes, which run mainly stable, for a long time. I would keep 4.8 installed too, just in case the odd package still doesn't like 4.9. Ironically, on my MythTV boxes, the only

Re: [gentoo-user] Missing digest for *** Tree looks messed up.

2015-08-10 Thread Dale
Rich Freeman wrote: On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: I'm sure I'm not alone on monitoring -dev to see upcoming changes. I noticed they switched to git or something and it seems to have caused a bit of trouble. There are a few issues they're working through,