[gentoo-user] Re: Re: KDE 5: Broken file protocol for KDE 4 apps

Hi, P Levine wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Jörg Schaible > wrote: >> Anyone? After upgrading a second machine to KDE/Plasma 5, I have the same >> behavior there. All KDE-4-based apps fail to interact with the file >> system. Using KMail I can no longer add any

Re: [gentoo-user] Skype users

Just of note, the classic version seems to support cloud based chats now. There's been some conversions going on on the skype servers, and I reported a couple of bugs to microsoft which appear to have been recently fixed. On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Raymond Jennings

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: KDE 5: Broken file protocol for KDE 4 apps

Michael Mol wrote: > On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 11:54:48 PM Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Anyone? After upgrading a second machine to KDE/Plasma 5, I have the same >> behavior there. All KDE-4-based apps fail to interact with the file >> system. Using KMail I can no longer add any attachment to an

Re: [gentoo-user] GTK+ circular dependency

On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 18:17:18 +0100, Daniel Quinn wrote: > > Because the ebuild says so. The question you should be asking is > > "why", especially as none of the other gtk+ ebuilds contain this > > DEPEND. And that's a question that is probably best asked on b.g.o. > > Sorry, but what's

Re: [gentoo-user] GTK+ circular dependency

> Because the ebuild says so. The question you should be asking is "why", > especially as none of the other gtk+ ebuilds contain this DEPEND. And > that's a question that is probably best asked on b.g.o. Sorry, but what's "b.g.o."? Are you saying that this might be a bug?

Re: [gentoo-user] GTK+ circular dependency

On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 18:01:53 +0100, Daniel Quinn wrote: > Unfortunately yes. I took your advice just now and it's still > complaining about circular dependencies. Maybe I'm missing something, > but how can gtk+ *depend* on gtk-engines-adwaita? Because the ebuild says so. The question you

Re: [gentoo-user] GTK+ circular dependency

On 13/10/16 02:36, wabe wrote: > Since the update process is dead slow anyway and I really don't care about a few minutes less ore more, I always use --backtrack=999. Unfortunately yes. I took your advice just now and it's still complaining about circular dependencies. Maybe I'm missing

Re: [gentoo-user] Small computing recommendations?

On 2016-10-12 13:16, Alan McKinnon wrote: On 12/10/2016 13:56, Daniel Campbell wrote: My birthday's coming up in 10 days and my SO and others are wanting to know what to get me for my birthday. I'm slowly growing tired of trying to keep my desktop Gentoo machine lightweight and "clean", so

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: KDE 5: Broken file protocol for KDE 4 apps

On Thursday, October 13, 2016 10:48:08 AM you wrote: > On Thursday, October 13, 2016 09:07:46 PM Andrew Lowe wrote: > > On 13/10/16 20:39, Michael Mol wrote: > > > On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 11:54:48 PM Jörg Schaible wrote: > > >> Anyone? After upgrading a second machine to KDE/Plasma 5, I

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: KDE 5: Broken file protocol for KDE 4 apps

On Thursday, October 13, 2016 09:07:46 PM Andrew Lowe wrote: > On 13/10/16 20:39, Michael Mol wrote: > > On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 11:54:48 PM Jörg Schaible wrote: > >> Anyone? After upgrading a second machine to KDE/Plasma 5, I have the same > >> behavior there. All KDE-4-based apps fail to

Re: [gentoo-user] PPC64

On 2016-10-13 11:03, thegee...@thegeezer.net wrote: On 2016-10-13 10:46, Alarig Le Lay wrote: On Thu Oct 13 10:26:48 2016, thegee...@thegeezer.net wrote: can anyone point me in the direction of an "install-ppc64-minimal-20141204.iso" or hopefully something newer? my google-fu is letting me

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: KDE 5: Broken file protocol for KDE 4 apps

On 13/10/16 20:39, Michael Mol wrote: On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 11:54:48 PM Jörg Schaible wrote: Anyone? After upgrading a second machine to KDE/Plasma 5, I have the same behavior there. All KDE-4-based apps fail to interact with the file system. Using KMail I can no longer add any

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: KDE 5: Broken file protocol for KDE 4 apps

On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 11:54:48 PM Jörg Schaible wrote: > Anyone? After upgrading a second machine to KDE/Plasma 5, I have the same > behavior there. All KDE-4-based apps fail to interact with the file system. > Using KMail I can no longer add any attachment to an email nor save an >

Re: [gentoo-user] PPC64

On 2016-10-13 10:46, Alarig Le Lay wrote: On Thu Oct 13 10:26:48 2016, thegee...@thegeezer.net wrote: can anyone point me in the direction of an "install-ppc64-minimal-20141204.iso" or hopefully something newer? my google-fu is letting me down! thanks in advance! Hi, You have

Re: [gentoo-user] PPC64

On Thu Oct 13 10:26:48 2016, thegee...@thegeezer.net wrote: > can anyone point me in the direction of an > "install-ppc64-minimal-20141204.iso" or hopefully something newer? > my google-fu is letting me down! > > thanks in advance! Hi, You have install-powerpc-minimal-20140713.iso and the

[gentoo-user] PPC64

Howdy folks, I find myself in a position where I have some IBM pseries servers at hand, and of course my first instinct is to install Gentoo :) I've tried following the handbook[1] but I fail at the media step, as there is no ppc64 download, just /mirror/gentoo/releases/ppc inside there in