Farhan Ahmed wrote:
But here's the weird thing, I had compiled glibc-2.4-r1
with userlocales USE flag, in my /etc/locales.build
There *is* no file called /etc/locales.build. glibc-2.4-r2
uses /etc/locale.gen to determine, which locales are to be
generated.
But with 2.4-r2
Jerry McBride wrote:
Anyone here running a ~x86 box and have the latest glibc and a 4.0.3 gcc
running on it?
I used to run gcc-4.0.3 and latest glibc (don't remember the version
number) some time ago.. But now running gcc-4.1.0 and glibc-2.4-r2.. No
problems with both..
Any hurdles to leap
--- CJ Keist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes,
Running Matlab on current release will just core
dump. Also tried
the fix on Matlab site where you modify the .matlab7rc.sh
file. So I'm
thinking it has to be a problem with the new glibc on
current releases.
This is on Fedora 3 and 4
I've lost most of them locales after upgrade to glibc-2.3.6-r4.
You'll need to create a /etc/locale.gen file. After that, read
man 5 locale.gen
man 8 locale-gen
and run /usr/sbin/locale-gen
Yep. Thanks. Easy enough.
I've seen something of the sort in glibc-2.3.6-r4.log
Andrey Falko wrote:
Have you done an update to this system where glibc might have been upgraded
but not gcc or vice versa? Have you updated any system packages in general
on the system? As was mentioned earlier an emerge -e system might solve the
problem. If not, then we'll know that it's
in an explosive
memory leak (virtual memory hits 400G in 1 second, and continues to
climb).
I suspect the problem is that RHEL v4 uses =sys-libs/glibc-2.3.4,
whereas we have =sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2 installed.
I have three questions:
1. Am I posting to the right list?
You are just just
Yes, I have read this in
/var/portage/sys-libs/glibc/files/eblits/pkg_setup.eblit
and I understand the risks.
if has_version ''${CATEGORY}/${PF} ; then
eerror Sanity check to keep you from breaking your system:
eerror Downgrading glibc is not supported and a sure way to destruction
die
Hi all,
I'm trying to update my glibc for now 2 weeks or so and it doesn't
matter what I'm doing, I run into a strange error.
/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.12.1-r3/work/build-amd64-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/libc_pic.a(init-first.os):(.data+0x0):
multiple definition of `__libc_multiple_libcs
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 01:39:15 +0100, Holger Hoffstaette wrote:
That's odd, it broke local deliveries for me - and others.
Fortunately, nothing was lost, it just stayed in the queue while I
recompiled glibc.
Same here, but are you saying you fixed this by rebuilding 2.13? I ask
because
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 23:23:50 +0100, Nils Holland wrote:
Thanks a lot, I've read your mail just in time. Actually, glibc 2.13
krept onto my first machine Monday night - I generally test new
versions of such far reaching stuff as glibc on a single machine
first before letting to onto all of my
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:23 on Thursday 10 February 2011, Nils
Holland did opine thusly:
On 13:34 Mon 07 Feb , Neil Bothwick wrote:
Don't install glibc-2.13 if you either use prelinking or run postfix.
After testing it on my netbook, which uses neither, I installed it on my
Hi,
On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 04:18 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 07/02/2011 03:05 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
This is driving me nuts. Since a few days ago, glibc will abort programs
with a:
*** glibc detected *** program: free(): invalid pointer: ... ***
or similar error message
As the list knows, I been having random lock ups on my system. I'm in
the process of one last emerge -e world but I'm not holding my breath it
will change anything. So, I'm wanting to try a unstable version of both
gcc and glibc. This is the list available:
root@fireball / # equery list -p
On 22/04/12 20:52, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Just browsed the changelog of glibc-2.15:
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-03/msg00836.html
When I read the NEWS section there with all that optimized stuff I
wonder if it makes any sense to rebuild packages here after upgrading glibc
kwk...@hkbn.net writes:
Bless those who keeps on telling people there is no need to rebuild
packages after glibc upgrade, for they must have not used pam or any
other packages that uses dlopen().
So which packages need to be rebuilt? Owing to the initial
non-availability of the patch file
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 13:49:16 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
It still aborts with
* Sanity check to keep you from breaking your system:
* Downgrading glibc is not supported and a sure way to destruction
* ERROR: sys-libs/glibc-2.14.1-r3 failed (setup phase):
* aborting to save
On 06/06/12 14:08, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 13:49:16 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
It still aborts with
* Sanity check to keep you from breaking your system:
* Downgrading glibc is not supported and a sure way to destruction
* ERROR: sys-libs/glibc-2.14.1-r3 failed
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:58:57 -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
If you build glibc with CFLAGS=${CFLAGS} -g3, your glibc will be
very, very broken. Apparently, it's old, known and has been a problem
for about five years.[1]
Thisd sounds worthy of a bug report, an ebuild allowing you to break
something
an incompatibility between the Arch kernel and the
version of glibc in the chroot.
Well, the kernel in Arch is 3.4.4 and glibc is 2.15. In the chroot, the glibc
is 2.14. Maybe I should update system et al. But then emerge system
asks for m4 (but not for glibc, which I find surprising).
Thanks,
J.
and the
version of glibc in the chroot.
Well, the kernel in Arch is 3.4.4 and glibc is 2.15. In the chroot, the glibc
is 2.14. Maybe I should update system et al. But then emerge system
asks for m4 (but not for glibc, which I find surprising).
Well, I found the problem: ulimit problem. Not the first time
On 13 January 2013, at 06:53, Andrew Lowe wrote:
...
From all of the above, I think the important part is that I need to
install some glibc developement files. A google search doesn't point me in
the direction of what these might be. According to eix glibc, I have debug
turned OFF
I have updated the systems since then. Up to early
last year. Is it safe to update glibc?
;
>> I plan to sync again and if it persists, Raid comes out. :/
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Dale
>>
>> :-) :-)
>>
> I have a couple of background "things" happening at the moment:
>
> prelink and glibc: odd failures that make no sense - unp
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:56 AM, <tu...@posteo.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While updateing glibc-2.24-r2 failed to install.
>
> These are the last few lines of that process:
>
>
> al/execinfo.c.texi
> /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.24-r2/work/build-amd6
On 06/15 12:16, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:56 AM, <tu...@posteo.de> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > While updateing glibc-2.24-r2 failed to install.
> >
> > These are the last few lines of that process:
> >
> >
> > al/exe
On 06/15 08:18, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> On 06/15 12:16, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:56 AM, <tu...@posteo.de> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > While updateing glibc-2.24-r2 failed to install.
> > >
> > > These are t
On 06/15 05:56, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While updateing glibc-2.24-r2 failed to install.
>
> These are the last few lines of that process:
>
>
> al/execinfo.c.texi
> /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.24-r2/work/build-amd64-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/manua
On 12/09/2017 05:43, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> got a problem this morning:
>
>>>> Verifying ebuild manifests
>>>> Running pre-merge checks for sys-libs/glibc-2.24-r4
> * Sanity check to keep you from breaking your system:
> * Downgra
Am Freitag, 22. Juni 2018, 20:11:51 CEST schrieb wabe:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have a problem and didn't find a solution yet.
>
> Upgrading glibc from 2.25-r11 to 2.26-r7 doesn't work. It says
>
> /var/tmp/portage/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.26-r7/work/build-x86-x86_64-pc-lin
On 25/06/18 18:17, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
On 06/25 12:33, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Is the file there? It's "/usr/include/sys/ustat.h" and qfile says it's from
glibc:
$ qfile /usr/include/sys/ustat.h
sys-libs/glibc (/usr/include/sys/ustat.h)
I'm on glibc-2.27-r4.
If you can
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> Am Freitag, 22. Juni 2018, 20:11:51 CEST schrieb wabe:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I have a problem and didn't find a solution yet.
> >
> > Upgrading glibc from 2.25-r11 to 2.26-r7 doesn't work. It says
> >
> > /va
Corbin Bird wrote:
> Is anyone else having a sys-libs/glibc emerge compile failure?
>> *** LD_LIBRARY_PATH shouldn't contain the current directory when
>> *** building glibc. Please change the environment variable
>> *** and run configure again.
> Same error regardless o
On 2019-03-29, Philip Webb wrote:
> 190329 Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> gcc-7.3.9-r3 is marked stable, yet it fails to build if you have the
>> current stable version of glibc installed (2.28-r5).
>
> I've been using Gcc-8.2.0-r6 since 170302 with Glibc-2.27-r6 : no problems
> > That's what I did: I found a 2017 stage3 with a still older glibc and
> > managed to upgrade to a 2020 gentoo while masking the last glibc
> > versions. That was tricky because I had to git-checkout intermediate
> > versions of the portage tree in order to deal with th
Hello,
I need to distribute some linux binaries and the one built with my
up-to-date gentoo sytem won't run on distributions using older glibc.
My idea is too maintain a gentoo chroot dedicated for compiling my
binaries which would (package.)mask recent versions of glibc and gcc
ebuilds
On Sunday, 21 June 2020 20:43:59 BST Hervé Guillemet wrote:
> Le 21/06/2020 à 19:06, Michael a écrit :
> >> I need to distribute some linux binaries and the one built with my
> >> up-to-date gentoo sytem won't run on distributions using older glibc.
> >>
> &g
> > That's what I did: I found a 2017 stage3 with a still older glibc and
> > managed to upgrade to a 2020 gentoo while masking the last glibc
> > versions. That was tricky because I had to git-checkout intermediate
> > versions of the portage tree in order to deal with th
On Wednesday, 30 March 2022 09:38:41 BST Nikolay Kichukov (oldumnet) wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> On Wed, 2022-03-30 at 00:50 -0400, James Cloos wrote:
> > Anyone else seeing a multitude of segv in libc on a stable box with
> > =sys-libs/glibc-2.34-r10?
> >
> &g
a sane version and run
python
updater - this wasn't mentioned but may make sense nonetheless)
- emerge linux-headers
- emerge glibc (hopefully with success this time)
WKR
Hinnerk
I didn't have the audit stuff installed BUT it was turned on in the
kernel. I kicked
with a older version of the glibc. I run
the
2.11.1 now but for one tool I need a previous version (2.6.1).
How can I compile the glibc without changing my system glibc. I
would
like to set the previous glibc with the LD_PATH.
Can I run two different versions or is a better solution to
downgrade
Not sure what relevant information to provide. My system works and I can
compile other ebuilds normally, except, it seems, gcc and glibc. Searching
for the error in the tile doesn't give me much - what it does give me
doesn't seem to apply to my instance of the error, or at least what I know
about
EDT, Sid S wrote:
Not sure what relevant information to provide. My system works and I
can compile other ebuilds normally, except, it seems, gcc and glibc.
Searching for the error in the tile doesn't give me much - what it
does give me doesn't seem to apply to my instance of the error
wrote:
Not sure what relevant information to provide. My system works and I
can compile other ebuilds normally, except, it seems, gcc and glibc.
Searching for the error in the tile doesn't give me much - what it
does give me doesn't seem to apply to my instance of the error, or at
least
Am 08.01.2014 17:41, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
trying emerge -B glibc for now ... step by step.
emerge -B : success
emerge -K: same failure
The unpacking of glibc seems to somehow break python while emerge still
runs ... at least that is my impression.
Manually unpacking the 2.17-tarball
On Donnerstag, 8. November 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hello!
This morning, I upgraded to glibc 2.7 from whatever used to be current
in ~x86 before that (2.6.).
Do you guys do a emerge -e system, ie. recompile everything, after such
an upgrade?
Thanks,
Alexander Skwar
Hello!
This morning, I upgraded to glibc 2.7 from whatever used to be current
in ~x86 before that (2.6.).
Do you guys do a emerge -e system, ie. recompile everything, after such
an upgrade?
Thanks,
Alexander Skwar
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:30:17 +0900, William Kenworthy wrote:
Also, dont the current livecd's do a stage 3 install, which means there
should be a quickpkg'd glibc on them?
A stage 3 is one large tarball, not separate packages.
--
Neil Bothwick
All general statements are false
-u and there was only one file really
changed. sshd_config which I left alone.
However I did remember to make sure the package I had trouble with
`glibc' did get installed. It did not and will not.
Ending with this stuff below... I'm not at all sure what to make of
it.
Is it related to hal
/log/emerge.log.old1
Currently merging 1 out of 4
* sys-libs/glibc-2.8_p20080602-r1
current merge time: 3 hours, 18 minutes and 43 seconds.
ETA: any time now.
r...@smoker / #
One, that emerge started about 15 or 20 minutes ago. If I use this
command, it works pretty well.
r
. Xlib: connection to localhost:10.0 refused by server
Xlib: Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 key
Cannot open display:
Ah, I had this problem for months; it was driving me crazy!
I don't remember the specifics, but it had to to with some wankery of
glibc not working properly with xauth. I'm
Still can not compile opencv: 1. Tried with CFLAGS="-O2 -march=k8 -pipe" as recommended in "Gentoo Linux/AMD64 FAQ". The compilation fails at the same point. 2. (Richard Fish): The links to crti.o and crtbeginS.o are in the glibc, they are not in the opencv makefile. An
On 1 Oct 2008, at 20:44, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
So I tried more and once xpcom problem is resolved but UTF-16.so (it
belongs glibc package) is.
I have to re-emerge glibc?
You are throwing faeces at the wall and hoping that it sticks ...
Hey! It's ART, man!
Stroller.
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Nikos Chantziaras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Weird problem this one. I updated to sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201 (from
2.8_p20080602) and everything appears to be just fine. With one exception:
viewing files in Midnight Commander's built
However, did you notice that the parent poster mentioned glib and you have
attempted to downgrade glibc?
My fault missed the c.
@Jeff
Please provide a emerge --info so that we can comment on it. Perhaps
this will protect you from some more headache when reinstalling.
signature.asc
hello, i'm recompiling glibc to suport userlocales. do i nedd to
recompile my software?
begin:vcard
fn;quoted-printable:Jos=C3=A9 Moreira
n;quoted-printable:Moreira;Jos=C3=A9
adr:;;;Vila Nova de Gaia;;;Portugal
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard
* On Apr 29 13:06, Jose Moreira (gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org) wrote:
Is this normal?
It's normal for an emerge -e system, yes, but you don't need to do that
for simply recompiling glibc.
Tom
pgpaxZMuQVDUN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Today glibc blocks libiconv. libiconv and transcode are needeed by k3b?
Mike
--
Michael W. Holdeman
Powered by Gentoo Linux www.gentoo.org |
Kernel 2.6.11-ck8 |
Win4Lin 5-1-20 netraverse.com |
Win4LinPro 6.1.1-03
Alle 05:28, domenica 12 giugno 2005, Raphael Melo de Oliveira Bastos
Sales ha scritto:
Did you recently recompiled glibc? 2 of the files on the log are part
of glibc. Maybe it is that reason. If not, downgrading it may help.
I tried to reemerge ut2004...And now it works! Thanks a lot!
Luigi
Hi,
OK, so it's too late again but my current build reminded me to ask
about emerging glibc and the section where it does all these different
locales. Do I need this stuff? If not how would I tell the system to
do only my Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk locale?
Thanks,
Mark
--
gentoo-user
can you give me the mirrorsit where to download the latest glibc and xcompmgr
thx2005/10/10, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
When I try to emerge the latest glibc or xcompmgr I get a 404.Here's Change your GENTOO_MIRRORS in /etc/make.confThat was it, thanks!- Grant--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
can you give me the mirrorsit where to download the latest glibc and
xcompmgr
thx
I just commented out the GENTOO_MIRRORS entry.
- Grant
When I try to emerge the latest glibc or xcompmgr I get a 404. Here's
Change your GENTOO_MIRRORS in /etc/make.conf
That was it, thanks
Michael [Plouj] Ploujnikov ha scritto:
Hi,
What happens after this is pretty nasty. Any program that I run segfaults:
# ls
Segmentation fault
Try also using the emergency shell /bin/bb, it should be statically
linked and therefore independent from glibc.
m.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Michael [Plouj] Ploujnikov ha scritto:
Try also using the emergency shell /bin/bb, it should be statically
linked and therefore independent from glibc.
Thanks. I had no idea I had that thing.
Me too, but Google is always a bliss. :)
m.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 02:17:27 Alex Schuster wrote:
and what is the output of:
# cat /var/db/pkg/sys-libs/{glibc-2.2.5-r2,glibc-2.5}/SLOT
A blank line, and 2.2.
You should definitely fix that. glibc-2.2.5-r2 is supposed to be in SLOT 2.2
too which means it should have been cleaned when
Hello All,
What should I do after I do a emerge of gcc and glibc vers in subject line?
I have also when doing that emerged told it to do kde and gnome so
both of them will be at the latest versions in the tree that are
~amd64.
X 7 modular is already on the system and appears to be working
On 5/11/06, Christopher E [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
What should I do after I do a emerge of gcc and glibc vers in subject line?
What versions are you upgrading from?
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 03:57, Jerry McBride wrote:
Anyone here running a ~x86 box and have the latest glibc and a 4.0.3 gcc
running on it?
any good reasons not to use gcc 4.1?
gcc 4.0.X has a lot of annoying bugs - and several of them are fixed in
4.1 ...
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing
On 11/6/06, Sergio Polini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect that there is a glibc problem:
http://www.vmware.com/community/message.jspa?messageID=26228
Look at the posts by... Richard Fish ;-)
Nah, not the same problem. In my case it was a gentoo-specific glibc
patch that was messing up. I
Alexander Veit wrote:
Hi,
When I try to emerge -u world, the only package that's going to be updated
is glibc. However the build fails with the following error:
MAKEOPTS=-j3
-j3 causes many build problems for many packages that build internal
libraries and then try to link against them
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
but there is enough stuff out there, that does not work with ntpl.
So recommending ntplonly is irresponsible.
No problems here. I'd expect people to do their own research before making the
switch. Plus, you can swap in a linuxthreads glibc at any time if need
I've lost most of them locales after upgrade to glibc-2.3.6-r4.
I don't have userlocales flag set either.
And probably should consider selling sweatshirts to oil-exporting
countries instead of software engineering as I don't seem to be capable
of running STABLE system anymore.
--
gentoo-user
',
'emerge shadow pam openssh', 'emerge gcc glibc' which results in an
unusable system. Any consequent emerge I've tried crashes
upon the first gcc call with the same error:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.6/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
cannot find /usr/lib64/libc_nonshared.a
Hi,
William Kenworthy napisał(a):
so bash needs glibc!
Sure :)
Your best bet would be to locate a glibc bin package (from the
livecd?)and untar it in / of your system, then it should work enough to
rebuild properly. You could just copy in the missing libs as you
discover them, but thats
Hi,
I got some homebrewed problems :-/
This morning I tried to update to glibc-2.4-r3.
Checking dependencies breaks with:
--
checking glibc-2.4-patches-1.17.tar.bz2 ;-)
checking glibc-linuxthreads-20060605.tar.bz2
I went through the gcc upgrade and discovered that ssp no longer works
(suppose it was documented somewhere - but I missed it)
So I'm trying to reverse the upgrade process (this time using using a
hardened profile) and glibc won't allow me to downgrade.
How do I get around this, please
Has anybody tried updating glibc to the latest stable 2.4-r3, but
without also updating gcc to 4.1.1? Any problems?
From the ebuild, =sys-devel/gcc-3.4.4 should be supported.
I'd like to do the updates separately if possible.
Thanks.
-- Remy
Remove underscore and suffix in reply address
On Wednesday 08 July 2009 17:13:16 daid kahl wrote:
Hello,
I'm working on upgrading a very old Gentoo system for my work.
Some software is only running well in 2.4.x kernels, and when doing other
updates I inadvertently updated past glibc-2.3.5, and so now the 2.4 kernel
does not boot
Back on topic now :-) Apparently upstream is aware of this silly
behaviour/bug, maybe I should wait a bit and see if they provide a knob to go
back to the old behaviour
This sounds like a reasonable plan. glibc downgrades aren't supported
not only because they are a pain in the rear
* Alan McKinnon (Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:06:45 +0200)
A multitude of apps that used to run just fine now give free():
invalid pointer errors since I upgraded to glibc-2.11
Which ones are these? I installed glibs 2.11 on Monday and had exactly
zero problems afterwards...
Thorsten
I think --gen-suppressions may be a too complicated solution. valgrind
shouldn't find *any* warnings from the libraries of my system at all. either
valgrind is doing something wrong or there's really some errors on glibc. in
every other system I try, valgrind runs fine.
I rebuilt valgrind
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 03:31:19PM -0300, Crístian Viana wrote:
either valgrind is doing something wrong or there's really some errors on
glibc.
I wouldn't doubt it.
--
I am a man who does not exist for others.
pgpfRllZuHu01.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 01.05.2010 um 10:32 wrote Volker Armin Hemmann:
On Samstag 01 Mai 2010, Graham Murray wrote:
Kraus Philipp philipp.kr...@flashpixx.de writes:
Hello,
I must test a software with a older version of the glibc. I run the
2.11.1 now but for one tool I need a previous version (2.6.1).
How can
On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 10:57 +0200, Kraus Philipp wrote:
On 01.05.2010 um 10:32 wrote Volker Armin Hemmann:
On Samstag 01 Mai 2010, Graham Murray wrote:
Kraus Philipp philipp.kr...@flashpixx.de writes:
Hello,
I must test a software with a older version of the glibc. I run
Don't install glibc-2.13 if you either use prelinking or run postfix.
After testing it on my netbook, which uses neither, I installed it on my
desktop and home server and broke both.
--
Neil Bothwick
All mail what i send is thoughly proof-red, definately!
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Tue, Feb 08 2011, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 12:37:41 +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Don't install glibc-2.13 if you either use prelinking or run postfix.
After testing it on my netbook, which uses neither, I installed it on
my
desktop and home server and broke both
Carlos Sura schrieb am 14.04.2011 21:47:
Yes, I'm using ~amd64 version of glib, I tried to downgrade glib, but it
show me this error: *downgrading glibc is not supported and a sure way to
destruction.*
sys-libs/glibc != dev-libs/glib
It should be safe to downgrade dev-libs/glib.
--
Daniel
Anyone hitting the same issue?
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-6824432.html?sid=ff31450ec4a661979b3545e662bdfbb1
AFAI understand glibc-2.13-r4 (as in ~amd64 right now) is too new for
the vmware-binary?
Did I understand correctly?
Is there a workaround? Downgrading glibc is not the way
Am 14.10.2011 00:22, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Anyone hitting the same issue?
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-6824432.html?sid=ff31450ec4a661979b3545e662bdfbb1
AFAI understand glibc-2.13-r4 (as in ~amd64 right now) is too new
for the vmware-binary?
Did I understand correctly
:
Just browsed the changelog of glibc-2.15:
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-03/msg00836.html
When I read the NEWS section there with all that optimized
stuff I wonder if it makes any sense to rebuild packages here
after upgrading
glibc?
no, because
On 04/26/2012 05:09:58 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
I've had two segfaults I'd never seen before. One in sudo and one in
rdesktop. Updates later when I get things better tracked down.
I am at glibc-2.15-r1 on AMD64 with no problems so far,
Helmut.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 04:47, Helmut Jarausch
jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
I am at glibc-2.15-r1 on AMD64 with no problems so far,
ditto here
--
Douglas J Hunley (doug.hun...@gmail.com)
Twitter: @hunleyd Web:
douglasjhunley.com
G+: http
I wish to build a binary package of glibc-2.14.1-r3. I don't want to
actually install it on my system. Just build a tbz2 for it to use on
another system. Is there a way to do that? Portage aborts when
emerging an older glibc and won't let you proceed, so I can't just
install it normally
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de wrote:
VO: [gl] 320x240 = 320x240 Planar YV12
*** glibc detected *** mplayer: malloc(): memory corruption:
0x01957a60 ***
try with -vo xv to see if perhaps it is gl-related... Sometimes I
have videos crash mplayer using
Hi,
I am running squid on amd64. I tried 3.2.6 and 3.2.9 both repeatedly die
with glibc-errors in cache.log. Anybody else experiencing something similar?
Regards,
Konstantin
--
Dipl-Inf. Konstantin Agouros aka Elwood Blues. Internet: elw...@agouros.de
Altersheimerstr. 1, 81545 Muenchen
Am 08.01.2014 12:28, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
What can I do? quickpkg some python-version and copy over?
(sidenote: 32bit box ...)
I assume it should be glibc repaired, right?
Activated some 32bit-chroot here and building glibc-2.17-package now.
How to apply that without emerge? googling ...
I just updated glibc to 2.1.17, and got the following error at the very
end of the emerge:
/usr/bin/python2.7: relocation error: /lib64/libresolv.so.2: symbol __sendmmsg,
version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 with lin
k time
2014-03-21 23:44 GMT+08:00 Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 18:43:27 +0800
microcai micro...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I'm having trouble compiling glibc. No matter I tried with binutils
2.23 2.24. or - live version, I got ld internal error in
x86_64_relocation
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:33:57AM -0500, Dale wrote:
SNIP
make -j3 -s glibc-test
* Your old kernel is broken. You need to update it to
* a newer version as syscall(bignum) will break.
* http://bugs.gentoo.org/279260
* ERROR: sys-libs/glibc-2.17::gentoo failed (setup phase
On Wed, 06 Jul 2016 11:19:44 -0400, Michael Orlitzky <m...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 07/06/2016 03:17 AM, Franz Fellner wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I have issues with some prgrams eating too much memory. This seems to be
> > related to glibc not trimming as necess
> I masked =sys-libs/glibc-2.25-r4.
>
> And now I remember why I did this: It gave a compilation error:
> (As some other packages) it has problems with my texinfo installation
> as it seems.
>
bug number?
--
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfri...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux develo
201 - 300 of 3746 matches
Mail list logo
