My firewall is blocking periodic outbound connections to port 3680 on
a Rackspace IP. How can I find out more about what's going on? Maybe
which program is generating the connection requests?
- Grant
On 6/19/20 9:04 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
Inquiring minds want to know. What exactly do they accomplish,
besides cluttering up a database somewhere?
It's not the cluttering of databases that bother me, it's the creation
of many ambiguous requests now. I went to emerge mythtv (I think
A little more infromation would help. like what webserver, what kind of
requests, etc
-Kevin
It's apache and the requests/responses are XML. I know this is
pathetically little information with which to diagnose the problem.
I'm just wondering if there is a tool or method that's good
My network's firewall is rejecting a bunch of attempts by my laptop to
reach 192.168.x.x systems which don't exist. The requests are from
and to very high port numbers. This must have to do with the p2p
software I'm running (transmission), but I thought it was pretty
creepy. Is that sort
A little more infromation would help. like what webserver, what kind of
requests, etc
-Kevin
On 02/06/2013 07:13 PM, Grant wrote:
I have a script that makes 6 successive HTTP requests via
LWP::UserAgent. It runs fine and takes only about 3 seconds, but
whenever it is run I start receiving
Is anyone out there using Residential SBC/Yahoo DSL with dynamic DNS? I
want to know if the ISP blocks incoming requests to your servers if
you're not paying them the rate for a static IP...
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hello all,
The subject says it all: no more feature requests for portage (the package
manager) until further notice. This does not include submitting of patches
that add new features. Further notice will likely mean when the next major
version of portage becomes stable.
The reason behind
My web server's response time for http requests skyrockets every
weekday between about 9am and 5pm. I've gone over my munin graphs and
the only one that really correlates well with the slowdown is "TCP
Queuing". It looks like I normally have about 400 packets per second
graphed as &q
> My web server's response time for http requests skyrockets every
> weekday between about 9am and 5pm. I've gone over my munin graphs and
> the only one that really correlates well with the slowdown is "TCP
> Queuing". It looks like I normally have about 400 packet
Wolfram Schlich <li...@wolfram.schlich.org> wrote:
> So, you (also) are effectively the maintainer
There was some dispute. It seems that now my requests are ignored:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/628512
On Saturday 23 December 2006 4:08 pm, Michael Sullivan wrote:
Is anyone out there using Residential SBC/Yahoo DSL with dynamic DNS? I
want to know if the ISP blocks incoming requests to your servers if
you're not paying them the rate for a static IP...
Yes and yes. Unless you setup your
I have a remote system on which shorewall blocks all outgoing 80/443
traffic except for 1 destination IP. I noticed that whenever someone
logs in to an xfce4 session on that system, I see a bunch of rejected
80/443 requests from that system to various Google IPs from throughout
their session
On Thursday 24 September 2009 16:30:51 James wrote:
One last thing. I can get a small subnet of say 5 IP address from my
ISP for an additional 20/month. That that help me?
Possibly. If you manage to get two public IPs, each website using one, you can
then DNAT requests arriving at the first
On Sunday 22 Jan 2012 20:26:13 Grant wrote:
I just started running this on the router:
tcpdump -i eth1 -n | grep the.offending.ip.address
where eth1 is my LAN interface. I figure this will tell me if any
requests are being made to the offending IP, including any that aren't
being logged
I have a script that makes 6 successive HTTP requests via
LWP::UserAgent. It runs fine and takes only about 3 seconds, but
whenever it is run I start receiving alerts that my website is
responding slowly to requests. This lasts for up to around 10
minutes. I've tried turning the timeout down
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
A little more infromation would help. like what webserver, what kind of
requests, etc
-Kevin
It's apache and the requests/responses are XML. I know this is
pathetically little information with which to diagnose the problem
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 09:40, n952162 wrote:
> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
> !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
>
> dev-python/requests:0
>
>(dev-python/requests-2.24.0-r1:0/0::gentoo, ebuild schedule
My firewall is blocking periodic outbound connections to port 3680 on
a Rackspace IP. How can I find out more about what's going on? Maybe
which program is generating the connection requests?
Uh, a packet sniffer?
I have an old laptop here that I have a second (cardbus) network card
On 01/22/2012 02:29 PM, Grant wrote:
Since my local firewall is rejecting the outbound requests, the time
elapsed between the request and the block should be very short. Is it
possible the 'sleep 1' portion of the script is causing the failure to
log the connection request? The outbound
hit the serving application's
main code.
I was under the impression that Apache coded sensibly enough to handle
incoming requests as least as well as Squid would. Agree with everything
else tho.
OP should look into what's required on the back end to process those 6
requests, as it superficially
On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 at 18:51, n952162 wrote:
>
> On 8/1/21 6:19 PM, Arve Barsnes wrote:
> > Many of the conflicts seem related to an old version of
> > dev-python/requests. Could newer versions be masked, or could there be
> > older python targets set for it in
of the conflicts seem related to an old version of
dev-python/requests. Could newer versions be masked, or could there be
older python targets set for it in /etc/portage/package.use/ ?
Regards,
Arve
I have this:
02/etc/portage/package.use>grep -i request *
...
201213:>=dev-python/requests-2.2
Hello
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 12:13:40PM +0200, Ralf Stephan wrote:
I'm fed up with waiting for ever the same name requests from my
browser (and open servers don't cut it either): which DNS cache
or caching DNS for simple local installation would you recommend?
I use dnsmasq, can be used
=== On Wednesday 09 April 2008, Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote: ===
Hello
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 12:13:40PM +0200, Ralf Stephan wrote:
I'm fed up with waiting for ever the same name requests from my
browser (and open servers don't cut it either): which DNS cache
or caching DNS
2009/1/25 Grant emailgr...@gmail.com
My network's firewall is rejecting a bunch of attempts by my laptop to
reach 192.168.x.x systems which don't exist. The requests are from
and to very high port numbers. This must have to do with the p2p
software I'm running (transmission), but I thought
My network's firewall is rejecting a bunch of attempts by my laptop to
reach 192.168.x.x systems which don't exist. The requests are from
and to very high port numbers. This must have to do with the p2p
software I'm running (transmission), but I thought it was pretty
creepy. Is that sort
unless a device requests more. My drive requests it
and Windows seems to honour that by providing more power, but gentoo
doesnt. What can i do to get more power out of my port (i dont have
windows anymore).
Thanks for your help.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sat, 2006-12-23 at 16:37 -0600, Joe Menola wrote:
On Saturday 23 December 2006 4:08 pm, Michael Sullivan wrote:
Is anyone out there using Residential SBC/Yahoo DSL with dynamic DNS? I
want to know if the ISP blocks incoming requests to your servers if
you're not paying them the rate
it writes that 200MB to disk, there is no chance for
any other IO. I'm playing an mp3 from the very same fileserver. It stops
playing, because the machine does answer the read-requests.
So what's going on here?
Why does Linux write so huge amounts of data to the disk? Why does Linux
not stop
On Tuesday 22 September 2009, Grant wrote:
I have a remote system on which shorewall blocks all outgoing 80/443
traffic except for 1 destination IP. I noticed that whenever someone
logs in to an xfce4 session on that system, I see a bunch of rejected
80/443 requests from that system
a bit
From Google DNS FAQ:
Does Google Public DNS support IPv6?
Google Public DNS can respond to requests for IPv6 addresses (
requests), but it does not yet support native IPv6 transport and
cannot talk to IPv6-only authoritative nameservers. Clients should use
IPv4 network connections
the limit on the
number of simultaneous requests that will be served and i'd say when
they say requests, they're talking about TCP sessions. So in the old
days of HTTP/1.0 you'd be right, and if you'd turned off pipelining
(KeepAlives) you'd be right.
The default for MaxKeepAliveRequests is 100, so
A little more infromation would help. like what webserver, what kind of
requests, etc
-Kevin
It's apache and the requests/responses are XML. I know this is
pathetically little information with which to diagnose the problem.
I'm just wondering if there is a tool or method that's good
On 10 February 2013, at 05:05, Grant wrote:
...
Your server is just a single computer, running multiple processes.
Each request from a user (be it you or someone else) requires a
certain amount of resources while it's executing. If there aren't
enough resources, some of the requests
Hi,
I connected a Arietta.G25 via Ethernet over USB (using a simple USB
cable and hardware USB-Ethernet Adaptor to my Gentoo PC. I can ssh
on that little tiny board. Now I want to access the internat from
within the Arietta. Therefore all requests need to be transfered from
the Arietta board
""
> > ABI_X86="(64)" PYTHON_TARGETS="python3_8 -pypy3 (-python3_6) -python3_7
> > -python3_9" conflicts with>
> > > ypy3(-),-python_single_target_python3_6(-),-python_single_target_pytho
> > n3_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_8
) -python3_7
> -python3_9" conflicts with
>
> required by (dev-python/requests-2.25.1:0/0::gentoo, installed) USE="ssl
> -socks5 -test" ABI_X86="(64)" PYTHON_TARGETS="python3_8 -pypy3 (-python3_6)
> -python3_7 -python3_9"^
Upstream knows about it at least: https://github.com/psf/requests/issues/5710
Regards,
Arve
Hi,
I have just reinstalled my 32 bit Gentoo on a raspberry pi 3B with a
Gentoo aarch64 image also with boot on an sdcard and root on nfs (both
working fine with boot on an sdcard and root on an nfs share hosted on
an moosefs cluster). Both have a problem where the initial boot loader
requests
On 8/1/21 7:51 PM, Arve Barsnes wrote:
On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 at 19:18, n952162 wrote:
I removed all python_targets_python3_6 from my use flags, but I still
have a very similar looking situation, with python-requests still dominant.
It seems to be blender holding you back now. If you are running
Hello,
I'm fed up with waiting for ever the same name requests from my
browser (and open servers don't cut it either): which DNS cache
or caching DNS for simple local installation would you recommend?
Regards,
ralf
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
2008/9/17 Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is after many requests from others for you to calm down on the list
What exactly am I doing that isn't calm?
two private mails from myself asking the same, both of which you have not
answered.
I only received one, that didn't contain any
On 11/30/05, Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is what I get from host 2 (the server):
...
IfRequested - Use encryption if the server requests it
Shouldn't this line be commented out??
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hello, I'm at my parents' home for Thanksgiving and connected
wirelessly to the family Netgear router via WPA. Page requests
sometimes fail in Firefox immediately, without spending any time
trying to load the page. I suspect a problem connecting to the ISP's
DNS server. How would you
Does Firefox periodically make Google requests for
some reason? The person logging in says they aren't attempting to
access Google, and the home page is not set to go there. Does anyone
know why this might be happening?
If you haven’t disabled it, Firefox periodically downloads a current
On Thursday, January 20, 2011 04:14:28
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com
wrote:
please fix your stupid e-mail
There is a font for coders called Rail Model, please include it with Linux
distributions:
package requests go
requests and responses are logged, providing
the option xferlog_std_format is not enabled. Useful for debugging.
Default: NO
My firewall is blocking periodic outbound connections to port 3680 on
a Rackspace IP. How can I find out more about what's going on? Maybe
which program is generating the connection requests?
Uh, a packet sniffer?
I have an old laptop here that I have a second (cardbus) network
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
My firewall is blocking periodic outbound connections to port 3680 on
a Rackspace IP. How can I find out more about what's going on? Maybe
which program is generating the connection requests?
Uh, a packet sniffer?
I
My firewall is blocking periodic outbound connections to port 3680 on
a Rackspace IP. How can I find out more about what's going on? Maybe
which program is generating the connection requests?
Uh, a packet sniffer?
I have an old laptop here that I have a second (cardbus) network
want to change the port -- I tested to make sure that was really
logging my Thunderbird connections.
I'm still getting the blocked outbound requests to port 3680 on my
firewall and I'm running the above script (changed 993 to 3680) on the
local system indicated by SRC in the firewall log
>> The answer to this may be an obvious "yes" but I've never done it so I'm
>> not sure. Can I route requests from machine C through machine A only
>> for my domain name, and not involve A for C's other internet requests?
>> If so, where is that configured?
On Sunday, July 24, 2016 02:48:41 PM R0b0t1 wrote:
> I would strongly suggest softraid. And qemu.
Few requests here:
1) LEARN to quote properly
2) Learn to provide reasons why.
Neither suggestions make sense.
--
Joost
>>>> My web server's response time for http requests skyrockets every
>>>> weekday between about 9am and 5pm. I've gone over my munin graphs and
>>>> the only one that really correlates well with the slowdown is "TCP
>>>> Queuing".
On September 20, 2016 2:38:03 AM GMT+02:00, Grant <emailgr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> My web server's response time for http requests skyrockets every
>>>> weekday between about 9am and 5pm. I've gone over my munin graphs
>and
>>>> the only one that rea
>>>>> My web server's response time for http requests skyrockets every
>>>>> weekday between about 9am and 5pm. I've gone over my munin graphs
>>and
>>>>> the only one that really correlates well with the slowdown is "TCP
>>>
>> My web server's response time for http requests skyrockets every
>> weekday between about 9am and 5pm. I've gone over my munin graphs and
>> the only one that really correlates well with the slowdown is "TCP
>> Queuing". It looks like I normally have about
>>> My web server's response time for http requests skyrockets every
>>> weekday between about 9am and 5pm. I've gone over my munin graphs and
>>> the only one that really correlates well with the slowdown is "TCP
>>> Queuing". It looks lik
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Michael Orlitzky <m...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 11/21/2016 08:26 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>> What is the proper procedure to ask for some modification in a ebuild?
>> (Bugs as well as feature requests...)
>>
>
> File a bug at https://bugs.gentoo.org/
>
Thanks. Done.
On Monday 10 Jul 2017 12:43:58 Marc Joliet wrote:
> I don't think he wants help; at least, I don't *see* any explicit or
> implicit requests for help.
No, he's just winding you up - and anyone else who doesn't keep his/her eyes
open.
--
Regards
Peter
On 12/30/19 1:04 PM, Dale wrote:
Is there a way to find the IP for this thing?
Try running a network sniffer as you reboot it.
Most pieces of network equipment will send out some sort of broadcast
requests that will give some hint as to how they are configured. At
least what subnet
* Daniel Frey:
> I went to emerge mythtv (I think) and now it says it's an ambiguous
> requests with *both* the group and user of the same name.
You need to emerge "media-tv/mythtv", not just "mythtv". Nothing
ambiguous about it.
Further reading: https://www.gent
hey
since a while back the rss feed :
https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/updated.atom
is not working. today i looked into it, i get : 429 Too Many Requests
if i go to that page.
just fyi
br smurfd
Lets try this again, 1st mail did not seem to get through?!
On 2021-01-30 11:29, smurfd wrote:
hey
since a while back the rss feed :
https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/updated.atom
is not working. today i looked into it, i get : 429 Too Many
Requests if i go to that page.
just fyi
that it will also be
filtered on subsequent re-delivery requests.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
On 12/4/20 9:53 AM, Arve Barsnes wrote:
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 09:40, n952162 wrote:
!!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
!!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
dev-python/requests:0
(dev-python/requests-2.24.0-r1:0/0::gentoo
I'm still getting the blocked outbound requests to port 3680 on my
firewall and I'm running the above script (changed 993 to 3680) on the
local system indicated by SRC in the firewall log, but mystery.log
remains empty. I tested the script with other ports and it seems to
be working fine
multiple
processes. Each request from a user (be it you or someone else)
requires a certain amount of resources while it's executing. If
there aren't enough resources, some of the requests will have to
wait until enough others have finished in order for the resources
to be freed up.
Here's
Hello everyone,
Release Engineering is in the planning stages for 2008.0, so we're
asking for input from the community on things that they'd like to see
added/changed/removed from our release media. All requests should be
something Release Engineering actually can accomplish, like profile
Hello
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 02:45:18PM +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 12:13:40PM +0200, Ralf Stephan wrote:
I'm fed up with waiting for ever the same name requests from my
browser (and open servers don't cut it either): which DNS cache
or caching DNS for simple
current availiable unless a device requests more. My drive requests it
and Windows seems to honour that by providing more power, but gentoo
doesnt. What can i do to get more power out of my port (i dont have
windows anymore).
Thanks for your help.
There are probably better solutions which I do
This is for any newbies out there like me ... I spent days trying to figure
out how to get a Gentoo linux laptop to print to a Gentoo server through
Cups. I was consistently getting connection refused messages from the
print server.
In order for the Cups server to accept incoming requests
the /printers/ part of the address. Hmm, perhaps the Example given on the
gui needs improving?
Last question and then I'll be good to print until I run out of money to pay
for the *extremely expensive* HP ink ;-)
What rule should I add to the firewall on the server to allow it to accept
cups requests
if it a 10+MB file that is involved.
Can someone suggest to me what this suggests, in terms of firewall
activity? I have heard remarks about the quality of the firewall.
Could it be a router? I saw some mention of routers not allowing
certain kinds of requests or certain numbers of requests.
I
Hi there,
I have one machine (Machine 1) that I need backup its files
periodically. I also have another machine (Machine 2) that will hold
the backup. Machine 2 can see (make requests to) Machine 1, but the
opposite isn't true. The network is covered by a firewall, so I don
need a paranoid
. Machine 2 can see (make requests to) Machine 1, but the
opposite isn't true. The network is covered by a firewall, so I don
need a paranoid solution. I was thinking about doing the following:
On Machine 1, put it on the crontab to put netcat waiting for
requests, and when it did receive a request
writes the harddisk. But during that time
- during the time it writes that 200MB to disk, there is no chance for
any other IO. I'm playing an mp3 from the very same fileserver. It stops
playing, because the machine does answer the read-requests.
So what's going on here?
Why does Linux write so
the limit on the
number of simultaneous requests that will be served and i'd say when
they say requests, they're talking about TCP sessions. So in the old
days of HTTP/1.0 you'd be right, and if you'd turned off pipelining
(KeepAlives) you'd be right.
The default for MaxKeepAliveRequests
On 20 January 2012, at 18:34, Grant wrote:
My firewall is blocking periodic outbound connections to port 3680 on
a Rackspace IP. How can I find out more about what's going on? Maybe
which program is generating the connection requests?
Uh, a packet sniffer?
I have an old laptop here that I
want to change the port -- I tested to make sure that was really
logging my Thunderbird connections.
I'm still getting the blocked outbound requests to port 3680 on my
firewall and I'm running the above script (changed 993 to 3680) on the
local system indicated by SRC in the firewall log
active.
3. The DNS server doesn't serve or support records. Apparently it
drops all such requests. All other records for IP and reverse lookup are
correct.
Now I'm experiencing the classic, very long delay when connecting to the
server via SSH because it does DNS lookups. When I look at wireshark
machines just don't boot up often enough for a few seconds
or even tens of seconds to matter at all.
With cloud-based computing, you don't have a bunch of servers running,
waiting to received requests.
Instead, you have is a bunch of idle hardware, waiting to have pre-built
system images spun up
network or, at
most, those of the specific group of people you're seeking to help.
You *might* try restricting the resolver to only respond to TCP requests
rather than UDP requests, but if the resolver sends response data along
with that first SYN+ACK, then nothing is solved, and you've opened
yourself
your resolver to be accessible only to your network or, at
most, those of the specific group of people you're seeking to help.
You *might* try restricting the resolver to only respond to TCP requests
rather than UDP requests, but if the resolver sends response data along
with that first SYN+ACK
requests need to be transfered from
the Arietta board to my PC, which then plays the role of an ISP to
the Arietta board and itself places the requests to the internet
instead of the Arietta board itself.
But this is a too longish explanation to be put into a google request.
:)
Is there any
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Grant <emailgr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The answer to this may be an obvious "yes" but I've never done it so I'm not
> sure. Can I route requests from machine C through machine A only for my
> domain name, and not involve A for C's oth
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Grant <emailgr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So the user is safe if I send all internet requests from her remote
> laptop through the Zerotier connection (instead of only sending
> requests to my server through Zerotier)?
>
It depends on w
Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes:
> > The answer to this may be an obvious "yes" but I've never done it so I'm
> > not sure. Can I route requests from machine C through machine A only
> > for my domain name, and not involve A for C's other inte
fs share hosted on
> an moosefs cluster). Both have a problem where the initial boot loader
> requests an IP address using "IP=dhcp", then the main operating system
> requests it again on initialising the interface. Despite asking using
> the same MAC address, ISC dhcp
On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 at 20:02, n952162 wrote:
> Ok, I'm sure I can manage that, thank you...
>
> Can you clue me in, how you identified blender? I see it it forces
> dev-python/requests, but that target is just one of 10 apparently
> problem packages.
Your output was a little man
Ric de France wrote:
On 25/01/2008, Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replies sent to this list will *not* be seen by Release Engineering, so
make sure that you send your responses to the correct list. You'll have
to join the list first, if you're not a subscriber, already.
On Monday 3 March 2008, Jan Seeger wrote:
NOTE: I don't speak spanish. But somehow, I read it thusly:
On Mon, 03. Mar, [EMAIL PROTECTED] spammed my inbox with
todos los temas relacionados con soporte técnico
all technical support requests (relations?)
all technical support-related
On Wed, 09 Apr 2008, Ralf Stephan wrote:
I'm fed up with waiting for ever the same name requests from my
browser (and open servers don't cut it either): which DNS cache
or caching DNS for simple local installation would you recommend?
I'm using the DNS of my router (D-Link DSL-500G). Works
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 12:13:40 +0200, Ralf Stephan wrote:
I'm fed up with waiting for ever the same name requests from my
browser (and open servers don't cut it either): which DNS cache
or caching DNS for simple local installation would you recommend?
net-dns/dnsmasq
--
Neil Bothwick
Deja
vorner wrote
I use dnsmasq, can be used as a LAN cache too (by simply allowing
requests from a given interface). Took me about 30 minutes to configure.
I asked dhcp to save to resolv.conf.2 and made resolv.conf to request
from localhost.
OK this works fine, thanks. However, udhcpd cannt
fed up with waiting for ever the same name requests from my
browser (and open servers don't cut it either): which DNS cache
or caching DNS for simple local installation would you recommend?
Regards,
ralf
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
It's bugday today, guys and gals! Come along to #gentoo-bugs on
irc.freenode.org and help fix bugs!
As per usual, there is a list of suitable bug candidates for you guys to
help us devs out with at http://bugday.gentoo.org/.
If anyone has any requests with regards to adding bugs to that page
On Wed, 6 May 2009 06:24:08 +0600, Mike Kazantsev wrote:
But you don't have to!
Just setup first apache to forward requests to the second one in any
way you like using mod_rewrite:
If the second server is only serving HTTPS, you don't even need that.
Just have the router forward port 80
You could try findsmb, its part of samba. It will list all systems
which respond to netbios requests, on your network.
-dave
Mark Knecht wrote:
Is there a simple way for me to discover the IP address of any random
Windows machine that dropped by and hooked up to my network?
Extra points
for a documentation bugzilla entry. Unmerging gnuplot
and libkudzu got rid of the requests for additional stuff. Thanks for
the help.
It is http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74944 and is fixed in the
unstable version of gentoolkit.
Regards,
Paul
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
darren kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would like to do this thing right, so if you (anybody!) has ideas, advice,
requests etc please try it out and let's talk. Am I missing anything that
should be printed?
Thanks for the effort. It looks promising. I've downloaded but not
tried yet
1 - 100 of 1044 matches
Mail list logo
