Re: [gentoo-user] Dumb `lspci -F` question...

2005-10-29 Thread Stroller
On Oct 28, 2005, at 5:41 pm, Christoph Gysin wrote: Stroller wrote: Do you have any references on this, please? I'm obviously using different search terms from you, because I can't find anything about this bug on Google. search term: bug lspci -F : Thank you. I have now emerged

Re: [gentoo-user] Dumb `lspci -F` question...

2005-10-28 Thread Christoph Gysin
Stroller wrote: Can anyone explain to me how to use this, please? Try as I might I don't seem to be getting it right. Seems to be a bug in lspci. It works here like it should. I have tried this on a couple of machines. The output produced by `lspci -x` _looks_ reasonable - I've attached

Re: [gentoo-user] Dumb `lspci -F` question...

2005-10-28 Thread Christoph Gysin
Christoph Gysin wrote: Nonetheless this seems like a bug and should be fixed. Could you file a bug and reference it here? Searching google turns out that it has already been fixed. Update to the latest pciutils will fix the issue. Christoph -- echo mailto: NOSPAM !#$.'*'|sed 's. ..'|tr *

Re: [gentoo-user] Dumb `lspci -F` question...

2005-10-28 Thread Holly Bostick
Christoph Gysin schreef: Christoph Gysin wrote: Nonetheless this seems like a bug and should be fixed. Could you file a bug and reference it here? Searching google turns out that it has already been fixed. Update to the latest pciutils will fix the issue. Why search Google and not

Re: [gentoo-user] Dumb `lspci -F` question...

2005-10-28 Thread Christoph Gysin
Holly Bostick wrote: Why search Google and not b.g.o itself, or packages.gentoo.org? Either manually or-- if you use Firefox-- using the Firefox b.g.o search engine? Seems like a waste of effort to have to filter irrelevant hits from Google when one already knows that the status of the issue

Re: [gentoo-user] Dumb `lspci -F` question...

2005-10-28 Thread Stroller
On Oct 28, 2005, at 10:44 am, Christoph Gysin wrote: Christoph Gysin wrote: Nonetheless this seems like a bug and should be fixed. Could you file a bug and reference it here? Searching google turns out that it has already been fixed. Update to the latest pciutils will fix the issue. Hi,

Re: [gentoo-user] Dumb `lspci -F` question...

2005-10-28 Thread Christoph Gysin
Stroller wrote: Do you have any references on this, please? I'm obviously using different search terms from you, because I can't find anything about this bug on Google. search term: bug lspci -F : ... brings us to: http://www.google.ch/search?q=bug+%22lspci+-F%22+%22%3A%22+ ...

[gentoo-user] Dumb `lspci -F` question...

2005-10-27 Thread Stroller
Reading the lspci manpage I can across an interesting potentially useful flag: -F file Extract all information from given file containing output of lspci -x. This is very useful for analysis of user-supplied bug reports, because you can