Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:46:12 -0600, Marzan, Richard non Unisys wrote:
Portage can continue to build packages if one fails.
# emerge -options package/list_of_packages || until emerge
-same_options_as_before package/list_of_packages ; do : ;done
Yes
-Original Message-
From: Zsitvai János [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 3:47 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Excellent Paludis interview
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:46:12 -0600, Marzan
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 10:54:44 -0600, Marzan, Richard non Unisys wrote:
One option that I would like is for the build to be done completely in
ram until it's compiled and ready to be placed on disk. HDD I/O is the
slowest part of the system avoiding it as much as possible on systems
with plenty
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:08:13 +0200, Rumen Yotov wrote:
Regarding claws-mail there's a script to rebuild it's plugins - see
elogs. Since i first tried paludis-0.2.1, may still have some old use
info (laziness) about paludis USE-flag (IIRC revdep-rebuild
portage-utils, etc.had it).
flagedit
Here is an excellent interview with Ciaran McCreesh about Paludis:
http://lab.obsethryl.eu/content/paludis-gentoo-and-ciaran-mccreesh-uncensored
Has anyone here switched from Portage to Paludis?
Yes, and very satisfied. Even with the earlier versions.
ralf
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
On Thursday 20 December 2007 10:08:13 Rumen Yotov wrote:
Watch out for some scripts (perl-cleaner, claw-mail, etc.) in which the
use of portage/emerge is embedded. Put 'paludis' as USE-flag.
Unless you use a crappy, unsupported overlay no such use flag exists.
[...]
Regarding claws-mail
On Thursday 20 December 2007 09:43:20 Neil Bothwick wrote:
flagedit will warn you if you have any unsupported USE flags set. That
and eix-test-obsolete are useful for keeping make.conf and /etc/portage
clear of cruft.
And the config-decruft ruby script that can be used with Paludis can do the
-Original Message-
From: Iain Buchanan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 8:46 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Excellent Paludis interview
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 22:42 +0100, Zsitvai János wrote:
And the recent addition of the option
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:46:12 -0600, Marzan, Richard non Unisys wrote:
Portage can continue to build packages if one fails.
# emerge -options package/list_of_packages || until emerge
-same_options_as_before package/list_of_packages ; do : ;done
Yes it can, but not with this, which will
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 08:46 -0600, Marzan, Richard non Unisys wrote:
Portage can continue to build packages if one fails.
# emerge -options package/list_of_packages || until emerge
-same_options_as_before package/list_of_packages ; do : ;done
yes but wouldn't this continue regardless of
Here is an excellent interview with Ciaran McCreesh about Paludis:
http://lab.obsethryl.eu/content/paludis-gentoo-and-ciaran-mccreesh-uncensored
Has anyone here switched from Portage to Paludis?
- Grant
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Hi,
On (19/12/07 08:43) Grant wrote:
Here is an excellent interview with Ciaran McCreesh about Paludis:
http://lab.obsethryl.eu/content/paludis-gentoo-and-ciaran-mccreesh-uncensored
Thanks for the link.
Has anyone here switched from Portage to Paludis?
Yes, for some 4-5 months and plan to
On Wednesday 19 December 2007 17:43:41 Grant wrote:
Has anyone here switched from Portage to Paludis?
Yes, I did it long time ago :-)
Bye...
Dirk
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Dirk Heinrichs ha scritto:
On Wednesday 19 December 2007 17:43:41 Grant wrote:
Has anyone here switched from Portage to Paludis?
Yes, I did it long time ago :-)
I'd like to try Paludis, looks very promising.
I think I've read that Portage and Paludis can coexist happily. Can
someone
Here is an excellent interview with Ciaran McCreesh about Paludis:
http://lab.obsethryl.eu/content/paludis-gentoo-and-ciaran-mccreesh-uncensored
Thanks for the link.
It really got the meta-wheels turning for me. I found especially
interesting the fact that Paludis's use on Gentoo is
On Wednesday 19 December 2007 17.43.41 Grant wrote:
Here is an excellent interview with Ciaran McCreesh about Paludis:
http://lab.obsethryl.eu/content/paludis-gentoo-and-ciaran-mccreesh-uncensor
ed
excellent is a bit much... Seems like a propaganda pice to me.
That said I did find paludis a
On Dec 19, 2007 2:46 PM, Naga Toro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 19 December 2007 17.43.41 Grant wrote:
Here is an excellent interview with Ciaran McCreesh about Paludis:
http://lab.obsethryl.eu/content/paludis-gentoo-and-ciaran-mccreesh-uncensor
ed
excellent is a bit much...
On (19/12/07 20:05) b.n. wrote:
Dirk Heinrichs ha scritto:
On Wednesday 19 December 2007 17:43:41 Grant wrote:
Has anyone here switched from Portage to Paludis?
Yes, I did it long time ago :-)
I'd like to try Paludis, looks very promising.
I think I've read that Portage and
b.n. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd like to try Paludis, looks very promising.
I think I've read that Portage and Paludis can coexist happily. Can
someone confirm it? It would be useful for a transition.
It works just fine. :) Later versions have the ability to use portage
configuration files
Mark Shields ha scritto:
Portage has proved more than adequate for my needs. Paladis doesn't
seem like anything I need or want.
Well, Portage is adequate for my needs too, and I've never tried Paludis
but the very continue-on-failure and underlays things look like,
for example, two small but
On Wednesday 19 December 2007 21:37:38 Rumen Yotov wrote:
Watch out for some scripts (perl-cleaner, claw-mail, etc.) in which the
use of portage/emerge is embedded. Put 'paludis' as USE-flag.
Unless you use a crappy, unsupported overlay no such use flag exists. Kind of
curious how that relates
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 22:42 +0100, Zsitvai János wrote:
And the recent addition of the option '--continue-on-failure' won me
over all over again. :)
I've been wondering for a long time why portage doesn't continue with
building other packages when one fails - so long as deps are met why
stop?
On Thursday 20 December 2007 02:46:20 Iain Buchanan wrote:
And the recent addition of the option '--continue-on-failure' won me
over all over again. :)
I've been wondering for a long time why portage doesn't continue with
building other packages when one fails - so long as deps are met why
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 22:42 +0100, Zsitvai János wrote:
b.n. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd like to try Paludis, looks very promising.
I think I've read that Portage and Paludis can coexist happily. Can
someone confirm it? It would be useful for a transition.
It works just fine. :) Later
Richard Marzan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
May i have that script? I assume it's GPLed :-)
Honestly, calling it a script is an embellishment.
Perhaps phrasing it as 'something that keeps the faster moving parts of
configuration in sync' would have been better.
echo '*/* x86'
Grant wrote:
Here is an excellent interview with Ciaran McCreesh about Paludis:
http://lab.obsethryl.eu/content/paludis-gentoo-and-ciaran-mccreesh-uncensored
Has anyone here switched from Portage to Paludis?
- Grant
i'm completely delete portage and use paludis.
work's fine ;)
--
С
Bo Ørsted Andresen написа:
On Wednesday 19 December 2007 21:37:38 Rumen Yotov wrote:
Watch out for some scripts (perl-cleaner, claw-mail, etc.) in which the
use of portage/emerge is embedded. Put 'paludis' as USE-flag.
Unless you use a crappy, unsupported overlay no such use flag
27 matches
Mail list logo
