Could anyone tell me how to install firefox 3.5.x without changing the
entire installation to ~arch? I have been looking around on the web for
how to do this, but can't find anything that doesn't require being
(afaict) very invasive to the rest of the system. Thanks!
Marcus
P.S. Mozilla
Marcus Wanner writes:
Could anyone tell me how to install firefox 3.5.x without changing the
entire installation to ~arch? I have been looking around on the web for
how to do this, but can't find anything that doesn't require being
(afaict) very invasive to the rest of the system. Thanks!
On 11/2/2009 12:16 PM, Marcus Wanner wrote:
Could anyone tell me how to install firefox 3.5.x without changing the
entire installation to ~arch? I have been looking around on the web for
how to do this, but can't find anything that doesn't require being
(afaict) very invasive to the rest of the
On 11/2/2009 1:40 PM, Mike Edenfield wrote:
On 11/2/2009 12:16 PM, Marcus Wanner wrote:
Could anyone tell me how to install firefox 3.5.x without changing the
entire installation to ~arch? I have been looking around on the web for
how to do this, but can't find anything that doesn't require
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Marcus Wanner marc...@cox.net wrote:
SNIP
Thank you, I added firefox and xulrunner to package.keywords and that did
the trick.
Marcus
You might want to periodically run eix-test-obsolete -d to see if the
two packages get marked stable before some other new
On 11/2/2009 3:11 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Marcus Wanner marc...@cox.net wrote:
SNIP
Thank you, I added firefox and xulrunner to package.keywords and that did
the trick.
Marcus
You might want to periodically run eix-test-obsolete -d to see if the
two
Mark Knecht writes:
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Marcus Wanner marc...@cox.net wrote:
SNIP
Thank you, I added firefox and xulrunner to package.keywords and that
did the trick.
You might want to periodically run eix-test-obsolete -d to see if the
two packages get marked stable
7 matches
Mail list logo
