Re: [gentoo-user] OO fails with useless 65280 error on unoxml

2009-12-01 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Monday 30 November 2009 00:06:23 daid kahl wrote: I've been getting the same silly OpenOffice compile error for a couple weeks now. Nothing I can search up or think of seems to do the trick. Since it takes about 2 hours + to crash out (the *exact* same way), it's also not trivial to try

Re: [gentoo-user] OO fails with useless 65280 error on unoxml

2009-12-01 Thread daid kahl
Somewhere in this thread was a mention of a failed patch. Where version of patch are you using? If it's 2.6, downgrade it as 2.6 is horribly broken http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2009/12/01/gentoo-service-announcement-keep-clear-of- gnu-patch-2-6 There was some patching things that caught my

Re: [gentoo-user] OO fails with useless 65280 error on unoxml

2009-11-30 Thread daid kahl
I've been getting the same silly OpenOffice compile error for a couple weeks now.  Nothing I can search up or think of seems to do the trick. Here's the end of the output during compile: 1 module(s):       unoxml need(s) to be rebuilt I had hoped to never ever see this error again, looks

Re: [gentoo-user] OO fails with useless 65280 error on unoxml

2009-11-30 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Monday 30 November 2009 18:09:47 daid kahl wrote: I've been getting the same silly OpenOffice compile error for a couple weeks now. Nothing I can search up or think of seems to do the trick. Here's the end of the output during compile: 1 module(s): unoxml need(s) to be

Re: [gentoo-user] OO fails with useless 65280 error on unoxml

2009-11-30 Thread daid kahl
Success on compiling OOo! I'm quite certain it was the ebuild, and that making it use the internal redland and not the system redland was the issue in my case. However, I've undone my changes in the ebuild and began compiling again so that I can confirm it fails with only that change. I had

Re: [gentoo-user] OO fails with useless 65280 error on unoxml

2009-11-30 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Monday 30 November 2009 22:48:22 daid kahl wrote: Success on compiling OOo! I'm quite certain it was the ebuild, and that making it use the internal redland and not the system redland was the issue in my case. However, I've undone my changes in the ebuild and began compiling again so

Re: [gentoo-user] OO fails with useless 65280 error on unoxml

2009-11-30 Thread daid kahl
That's a known issue - it saw a reference to it on b.g.o. last night. That bug report declared it to be a kde integration error. Logic tells me any number of faulty things could do it too). Shouldn't be kde. Unmerged that last month... I'm sure the OOo maintainer will appreciate the

Re: [gentoo-user] OO fails with useless 65280 error on unoxml

2009-11-30 Thread daid kahl
Success on compiling OOo! I'm quite certain it was the ebuild, and that making it use the internal redland and not the system redland was the issue in my case. Bing! Now submitted a bug report: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=295268 Regards, daid

[gentoo-user] OO fails with useless 65280 error on unoxml

2009-11-29 Thread daid kahl
I've been getting the same silly OpenOffice compile error for a couple weeks now. Nothing I can search up or think of seems to do the trick. Since it takes about 2 hours + to crash out (the *exact* same way), it's also not trivial to try lots of different ideas. I'd read something that

Re: [gentoo-user] OO fails with useless 65280 error on unoxml

2009-11-29 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Monday 30 November 2009 00:06:23 daid kahl wrote: I've been getting the same silly OpenOffice compile error for a couple weeks now. Nothing I can search up or think of seems to do the trick. Since it takes about 2 hours + to crash out (the *exact* same way), it's also not trivial to try

Re: [gentoo-user] OO fails with useless 65280 error on unoxml

2009-11-29 Thread daid kahl
I had hoped to never ever see this error again, looks like my hopes were dashed. If my eyes needed a screen saver, this would be burned into my retinas. Long answer: The reason for the failure is in the build log, but it is never just above the error message. It is often many 1000s of lines