[gentoo-user] Overlays package.mask

2010-09-10 Thread Hilco Wijbenga
Hi all, This morning I got centaur ~ # emerge -vDuNp world These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! snip/ [ebuild UD] kde-base/pykde4-4.5.1 [4.5.1-r1] USE=semantic-desktop (-aqua) -debug -doc -examples (-kdeenablefinal) (-kdeprefix) 0 kB

Re: [gentoo-user] Overlays package.mask

2010-09-10 Thread J. Roeleveld
On Friday 10 September 2010 18:53:52 Hilco Wijbenga wrote: Hi all, This morning I got centaur ~ # emerge -vDuNp world These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! snip/ [ebuild UD] kde-base/pykde4-4.5.1 [4.5.1-r1] USE=semantic-desktop

Re: [gentoo-user] Overlays package.mask

2010-09-10 Thread Dale
Hilco Wijbenga wrote: Hi all, This morning I got centaur ~ # emerge -vDuNp world These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! snip/ [ebuild UD] kde-base/pykde4-4.5.1 [4.5.1-r1] USE=semantic-desktop (-aqua) -debug -doc -examples

Re: [gentoo-user] Overlays package.mask

2010-09-10 Thread Hilco Wijbenga
On 10 September 2010 10:25, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote: Strange, I don't have pykde4-4.5.1-r1 at all. What does eix pykde4 say on your system? On mine it says: *** $ eix pykde4 [I] kde-base/pykde4     Available versions:        (4.4)   ~4.4.1[3] 4.4.5 **4.4.!m!t[1]

Re: [gentoo-user] Overlays package.mask

2010-09-10 Thread Hilco Wijbenga
On 10 September 2010 10:25, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Do you have the package listed in the unmask or keyword file?  If so, it ignores the mask file.  Actually, I think it reads mask first then the others. Ah! Yes, I do. That explains why package.mask is being ignored, I guess, but I

Re: [gentoo-user] Overlays package.mask

2010-09-10 Thread Paul Hartman
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Hilco Wijbenga hilco.wijbe...@gmail.com wrote: So I'm confused. Why is package.mask not having any (apparent) effect for pykde4? How do I prevent the downgrade? It's probably unmasked as well. I think unmask overrides mask. As an alternative, you can try to

Re: [gentoo-user] Overlays package.mask

2010-09-10 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:53 on Friday 10 September 2010, Hilco Wijbenga did opine thusly: Hi all, This morning I got centaur ~ # emerge -vDuNp world These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! snip/ [ebuild UD]

Re: [gentoo-user] Overlays package.mask

2010-09-10 Thread Alex Schuster
J. Roeleveld writes: Strange, I don't have pykde4-4.5.1-r1 at all. I do. What does eix pykde4 say on your system? On mine it says: *** $ eix pykde4 [I] kde-base/pykde4 Available versions: (4.4) ~4.4.1[3] 4.4.5 **4.4.!m!t[1] **4.4.!m!t[2] (4.5) ~4.5.1

Re: [gentoo-user] Overlays package.mask

2010-09-10 Thread Dale
Hilco Wijbenga wrote: On 10 September 2010 10:25, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Do you have the package listed in the unmask or keyword file? If so, it ignores the mask file. Actually, I think it reads mask first then the others. Ah! Yes, I do. That explains why package.mask is

Re: [gentoo-user] Overlays package.mask

2010-09-10 Thread John Campbell
On 09/10/2010 09:53 AM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote: Hi all, So I'm confused. Why is package.mask not having any (apparent) effect for pykde4? How do I prevent the downgrade? pykde4-4.5.1-r1 was removed from the repository, not masked. In order to keep 4.5.1-r1 you need to obtain a copy of the

Re: [gentoo-user] Overlays package.mask

2010-09-10 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:53:52 -0700, Hilco Wijbenga wrote: I decided that I did not want to go back to 4.5.1 so I added =kde-base/pykde4-4.5.1 to /etc/portage/package.mask. To my utmost surprise, I got the exact same result as before when running the above emerge command again. I tried

Re: [gentoo-user] Overlays package.mask

2010-09-10 Thread Hilco Wijbenga
On 10 September 2010 11:40, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Hilco Wijbenga hilco.wijbe...@gmail.com wrote: So I'm confused. Why is package.mask not having any (apparent) effect for pykde4? How do I prevent the downgrade? It's probably