[gentoo-user] Re: Anyone compiled libreoffice-3.6.0.4 yet? [WORKAROUND]

2012-08-18 Thread walt
On 08/09/2012 01:19 PM, walt wrote: This has been slow and painful so far. First, the build stops repeatedly because of zero-length library files. The gentoo libreoffice package doesn't yet compile with the 'binfilter' useflag set, so I unset it and the install completed. Second, the

[gentoo-user] Re: Anyone compiled libreoffice-3.6.0.4 yet?

2012-08-12 Thread walt
On 08/12/2012 10:44 AM, Philip Webb wrote: 120812 Philip Webb wrote: 120812 v...@ukr.net wrote: Looks like developers have already caught this issue. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428328#c8 I'll try merging again with USE=xmlsec , as the bug fix recommends. Yes, it compiled

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone compiled libreoffice-3.6.0.4 yet?

2012-08-12 Thread Philip Webb
120812 walt wrote: On 08/12/2012 10:44 AM, Philip Webb wrote: Yes, it compiled with USE=xmlsec . While it used less memory than 2 emerges ago, it used more disk space ( 4 GB ) took much longer ( 3 h 2 m ). OTOH it also opens almost at once, so I'll take the trade-offs. I'm glad to hear

[gentoo-user] Re: Anyone compiled libreoffice-3.6.0.4 yet? [SOLVED, maybe]

2012-08-10 Thread walt
On 08/09/2012 01:19 PM, walt wrote: ...the ebuild is using only one CPU out of four, so this is taking much longer than before. Ugh. Well, since there are at least four of you who don't have any problem with libreoffice it must be something on my two machines with the same trouble. This