[gentoo-user] Re: How to easily find out what USE flags are redundant in make.conf and package.use?

2011-10-02 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 10/02/2011 11:44 AM, Dale wrote: Look into app-portage/ufed. Hey, cl. That is some cool stuff. Maybe I can use this to clean this up: USE=3dnow 3dnowext X a52 aac acpi alsa amd64 aml apng automount avahi [snip monstrosity] It seems you confused make.conf with package.use :-P

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to easily find out what USE flags are redundant in make.conf and package.use?

2011-10-02 Thread Dale
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 10/02/2011 11:44 AM, Dale wrote: Look into app-portage/ufed. Hey, cl. That is some cool stuff. Maybe I can use this to clean this up: USE=3dnow 3dnowext X a52 aac acpi alsa amd64 aml apng automount avahi [snip monstrosity] It seems you confused make.conf

[gentoo-user] Re: How to easily find out what USE flags are redundant in make.conf and package.use?

2011-10-02 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 10/02/2011 12:14 PM, Dale wrote: Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 10/02/2011 11:44 AM, Dale wrote: Look into app-portage/ufed. Hey, cl. That is some cool stuff. Maybe I can use this to clean this up: USE=3dnow 3dnowext X a52 aac acpi alsa amd64 aml apng automount avahi [snip monstrosity]

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to easily find out what USE flags are redundant in make.conf and package.use?

2011-10-02 Thread Dale
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 10/02/2011 12:14 PM, Dale wrote: Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 10/02/2011 11:44 AM, Dale wrote: Look into app-portage/ufed. Hey, cl. That is some cool stuff. Maybe I can use this to clean this up: USE=3dnow 3dnowext X a52 aac acpi alsa amd64 aml apng

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to easily find out what USE flags are redundant in make.conf and package.use?

2011-10-02 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 05:13:49 -0500 Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 10/02/2011 12:14 PM, Dale wrote: Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 10/02/2011 11:44 AM, Dale wrote: Look into app-portage/ufed. Hey, cl. That is some cool stuff. Maybe I can use this to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to easily find out what USE flags are redundant in make.conf and package.use?

2011-10-02 Thread Dale
Alan McKinnon wrote: On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 05:13:49 -0500 Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: In that case, I then use package.use. Like this in package.use: x11-base/xorg-server -hal net-misc/ntp caps -ipv6 media-gfx/gtkam debug sys-power/nut -usb I use package.use for those exceptions where I

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to easily find out what USE flags are redundant in make.conf and package.use?

2011-10-02 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 06:36:54 -0500 Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Alan McKinnon wrote: On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 05:13:49 -0500 Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: In that case, I then use package.use. Like this in package.use: x11-base/xorg-server -hal net-misc/ntp caps -ipv6

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to easily find out what USE flags are redundant in make.conf and package.use?

2011-10-02 Thread Dale
Alan McKinnon wrote: On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 06:36:54 -0500 Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Alan McKinnon wrote: On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 05:13:49 -0500 Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: In that case, I then use package.use. Like this in package.use: x11-base/xorg-server -hal net-misc/ntp caps

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to easily find out what USE flags are redundant in make.conf and package.use?

2011-10-02 Thread Michael Mol
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 06:36:54 -0500 Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Alan McKinnon wrote: On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 05:13:49 -0500 Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com  wrote: You often mention the attraction of Gentoo is you get

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to easily find out what USE flags are redundant in make.conf and package.use?

2011-10-02 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 08:50:41 -0500, Dale wrote: That said, I'm going to try USE=-perl -python emerge -Nav world and see what pukes on my keyboard. Also, I think a lot of things required python and/or perl back when I added the flag. If they require Perl or Python, you won't have the perl

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to easily find out what USE flags are redundant in make.conf and package.use?

2011-10-02 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 10:53:46 -0400 Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 06:36:54 -0500 Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Alan McKinnon wrote: On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 05:13:49 -0500

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to easily find out what USE flags are redundant in make.conf and package.use?

2011-10-02 Thread Dale
Alan McKinnon wrote: On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 10:53:46 -0400 Michael Molmike...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 06:36:54 -0500 Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Alan McKinnon wrote: On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 05:13:49

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to easily find out what USE flags are redundant in make.conf and package.use?

2011-10-02 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 14:26:27 -0500, Dale wrote: One thing I don't like about having all the separate file in package.* is trying to keep up with them. I have several files that are there that don't even have anything in them because either portages unmask feature or autounmask created

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to easily find out what USE flags are redundant in make.conf and package.use?

2011-10-02 Thread Dale
Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 14:26:27 -0500, Dale wrote: One thing I don't like about having all the separate file in package.* is trying to keep up with them. I have several files that are there that don't even have anything in them because either portages unmask feature or

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to easily find out what USE flags are redundant in make.conf and package.use?

2011-10-02 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 14:51:56 -0500, Dale wrote: I generally use autounmask or portages unmask feature and it gives them names. Thing is, just because is it named something doesn't mean that is what is in it. I had a KDE unmask file that had things that were not KDE but was needed by KDE.