On Thursday 11 November 2010, Dale wrote:
I just checked again, it is still working. I'm liking that I can watch
a video whenever I want instead of when it decides to work. ;-)
I also have good news to report. I upgraded to Qt 4.7.0 and my xserver is a
reformed character! It sits and chugs
Apparently, though unproven, at 14:39 on Thursday 11 November 2010, Robin
Atwood did opine thusly:
On Thursday 11 November 2010, Dale wrote:
I just checked again, it is still working. I'm liking that I can watch
a video whenever I want instead of when it decides to work. ;-)
I also
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 14:39 on Thursday 11 November 2010, Robin
Atwood did opine thusly:
On Thursday 11 November 2010, Dale wrote:
I just checked again, it is still working. I'm liking that I can watch
a video whenever I want instead of when it
Dale wrote:
I did a test just then and my video was slow again. This is what I
get now.
r...@smoker / # glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
677 frames in 5.6 seconds = 120.183 FPS
1 frames in 7.6
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:49 on Thursday 11 November 2010, Dale did
opine thusly:
Dale wrote:
I did a test just then and my video was slow again. This is what I
get now.
r...@smoker / # glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The framerate should be
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:49 on Thursday 11 November 2010, Dale did
opine thusly:
Dale wrote:
I did a test just then and my video was slow again. This is what I
get now.
r...@smoker / # glxgears
Running synchronized to the vertical refresh. The
Dale wrote:
According to top, gkrellm and cat /proc/meminfo there is no swap in
use. I have 2Gbs of ram and have swappiness set to 20 or 30. I
rarely use swap unless I am compiling something huge, OOo comes to
mind, or have a LOT of images open with GIMP.
I did check to make sure tho.
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:18 on Wednesday 10 November 2010, Dale did
opine thusly:
Dale wrote:
According to top, gkrellm and cat /proc/meminfo there is no swap in
use. I have 2Gbs of ram and have swappiness set to 20 or 30. I
rarely use swap unless I am compiling something
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:18 on Wednesday 10 November 2010, Dale did
opine thusly:
Dale wrote:
According to top, gkrellm and cat /proc/meminfo there is no swap in
use. I have 2Gbs of ram and have swappiness set to 20 or 30. I
rarely use swap unless I
On Monday 08 November 2010, Dale wrote:
Robin Atwood wrote:
On Saturday 06 November 2010, Dale wrote:
Dale wrote:
This is getting weird. I haven't rebooted in a few weeks now. I tried
to watch a video a bit ago and it was slow again. It was down to about
2 or 3 frames per
Robin Atwood wrote:
AFAIK, all eselect opengl does is set up some symlinks so you use NVidia
libraries and not Mesa ones. You might want to poke around and check last
access dates.
HTH
-Robin
I was thinking the same thing. I figure something worked for a while
and then had some sort of
Dale wrote:
I was thinking the same thing. I figure something worked for a while
and then had some sort of a error and then switched to something else
that was slow. I don't know the inner workings of opengl so I am just
guessing. I just know it worked for a while then didn't until I told
Dale writes:
Well, I worked on my air compressor and played in the dirt in my garden
for a while and now I get this again:
2 frames in 7.6 seconds = 0.263 FPS
2 frames in 7.7 seconds = 0.259 FPS
D'ouch!
I don't know what the issue is but it is getting on my nerves. I have
not even
Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
Well, I worked on my air compressor and played in the dirt in my garden
for a while and now I get this again:
2 frames in 7.6 seconds = 0.263 FPS
2 frames in 7.7 seconds = 0.259 FPS
D'ouch!
I don't know what the issue is but it is getting
walt wrote:
On 11/08/2010 01:20 PM, Dale wrote:
Dale wrote:
I was thinking the same thing. I figure something worked for a while
and then had some sort of a error and then switched to something
else that was slow. I don't know the inner workings of opengl so I
am just guessing.I just know
On 11/08/2010 01:20 PM, Dale wrote:
Dale wrote:
I was thinking the same thing. I figure something worked for a while and then
had some sort of a error and then switched to something else that was slow. I
don't know the inner workings of opengl so I am just guessing.I just know it
worked for
On 11/06/2010 01:06 PM, Robin Atwood wrote:
,,,I have a GeForce 9400 GT 512MB and the xserver will happily use
90% while nothing much is happening. Start a KDE4 app which constantly updates
(ktorrent, kps are good 3rd party examples) and the xserver goes crazy.
That sounds to me like a bug
On Monday 08 November 2010, walt wrote:
On 11/06/2010 01:06 PM, Robin Atwood wrote:
,,,I have a GeForce 9400 GT 512MB and the xserver will happily use
90% while nothing much is happening. Start a KDE4 app which constantly
updates (ktorrent, kps are good 3rd party examples) and the xserver
Robin Atwood wrote:
On Saturday 06 November 2010, Dale wrote:
Dale wrote:
This is getting weird. I haven't rebooted in a few weeks now. I tried
to watch a video a bit ago and it was slow again. It was down to about
2 or 3 frames per second. It is awful. If I go tell it to
Dale wrote:
I noticed something on mine when I did that. I was actually doing the
command in a Konsole. It seemed to mess up again later on. It got
REALLY slow. I decided to do things differently. I logged out of
KDE, went to single user mode, typed in the command to set opengl to
On Saturday 06 November 2010, Dale wrote:
Dale wrote:
This is getting weird. I haven't rebooted in a few weeks now. I tried
to watch a video a bit ago and it was slow again. It was down to about
2 or 3 frames per second. It is awful. If I go tell it to switch to
opengl, it gets fast
On 10/26/2010 07:30 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 14:01 on Tuesday 26 October 2010, Iain
Buchanan did opine thusly:
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 11:18 +0200, Marc Joliet wrote:
Am Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:34:58 +0930
schrieb Iain Buchananiai...@netspace.net.au:
[...]
Someone
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
My fast desktop with Core i7 920, Nvidia GX 240, has a
slower KDE UI than my 6-year-old laptop that has AMD Athlon 3200+ and
ATI Radeon Mobility 9700. Simply opening a konsole window on my
desktop with
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 10:24 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Iain Buchanan iai...@netspace.net.au wrote:
I'm having issues with the latest mix of nvidia-drivers, xorg, and
whatever else it might be!
I'm getting bad performance when switching virtual dekstops and
Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 22:55 -0500, Dale wrote:
I have a update. Check this out:
hey, don't get my hopes up like that. Still no improvement on my box.
But then, I am seeing nearly 6500 FPS :D
I noticed something on mine when I did that. I was
On Tuesday 26 October 2010 18:28:16 Arttu V. wrote:
~ $ equery belongs glxinfo
[ Searching for file(s) glxinfo in *... ]
x11-apps/mesa-progs-7.7 (/usr/bin/glxinfo)
~ $ equery belongs glxgears
[ Searching for file(s) glxgears in *... ]
x11-apps/mesa-progs-7.7 (/usr/bin/glxgears
Thank you,
Am Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:34:58 +0930
schrieb Iain Buchanan iai...@netspace.net.au:
[...]
Someone posted recently about an upgrade that affected him (looking...
can't find it). He downgraded to fix it, but it wasn't nvidia or x from
memory. Sorry for being vague, I'll keep looking.
Ah, I seem
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 11:18 +0200, Marc Joliet wrote:
Am Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:34:58 +0930
schrieb Iain Buchanan iai...@netspace.net.au:
[...]
Someone posted recently about an upgrade that affected him (looking...
can't find it). He downgraded to fix it, but it wasn't nvidia or x from
Apparently, though unproven, at 14:01 on Tuesday 26 October 2010, Iain
Buchanan did opine thusly:
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 11:18 +0200, Marc Joliet wrote:
Am Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:34:58 +0930
schrieb Iain Buchanan iai...@netspace.net.au:
[...]
Someone posted recently about an upgrade
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Iain Buchanan iai...@netspace.net.au wrote:
I'm having issues with the latest mix of nvidia-drivers, xorg, and
whatever else it might be!
I'm getting bad performance when switching virtual dekstops and moving
windows and such. GL screensavers seem to be ok
On Tuesday 26 October 2010 02:48:03 Dale wrote:
r...@smoker / # glxinfo
r...@smoker / # glxgears
Would someone tell me which package has these two programs? The bit of
poking about that I've done doesn't find them.
--
Rgds
Peter. Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23.
On 10/26/10, Peter Humphrey pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
On Tuesday 26 October 2010 02:48:03 Dale wrote:
r...@smoker / # glxinfo
r...@smoker / # glxgears
Would someone tell me which package has these two programs? The bit of
poking about that I've done doesn't find them.
~ $ equery
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:24 on Tuesday 26 October 2010, Paul Hartman
did opine thusly:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Iain Buchanan iai...@netspace.net.au
wrote:
I'm having issues with the latest mix of nvidia-drivers, xorg, and
whatever else it might be!
I'm getting bad
Dale wrote:
Hi,
I am thinking of upgrading from a FX-5200 with 128Mb video card to a
GeForce 6200 with 512MB. It will be AGP since this is a older rig.
My system is something like this:
Mobo: Abit NF7 2.0
CPU: AMD 2500+ No overclocking
Memory: 2Gbs of 333Mhz.
Monitor: Gateway 19
Dale writes:
So, same card as a year or so ago and same everything else but now I
get only about 1/10th the frame rate. What gives? Is this a driver
issue?
Is OpenGL working at all? Does glxinfo produce lots of output, with
'direct rendering: Yes' near the top? If not, your're using
Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
So, same card as a year or so ago and same everything else but now I
get only about 1/10th the frame rate. What gives? Is this a driver
issue?
Is OpenGL working at all? Does glxinfo produce lots of output, with
'direct rendering: Yes' near the
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 18:42 -0500, Dale wrote:
So, same card as a year or so ago and same everything else but now I get
only about 1/10th the frame rate. What gives? Is this a driver issue?
I'm going to take the side off and blow out the case in a bit and test
again. I'm open to ideas
Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 18:42 -0500, Dale wrote:
So, same card as a year or so ago and same everything else but now I get
only about 1/10th the frame rate. What gives? Is this a driver issue?
I'm going to take the side off and blow out the case in a bit and test
again.
Dale wrote:
Well, at least we know there is a problem and it isn't just us. If
you find something, let us know. I would hate to know I had to try
to watch a DVD right now. I doubt it would even start up. o_O
BTW, hal is disabled on xorg here. It's enabled on other things but
not
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Dale wrote:
Well, at least we know there is a problem and it isn't just us. If you
find something, let us know. I would hate to know I had to try to watch a
DVD right now. I doubt it would even start up. o_O
BTW, hal
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 22:55 -0500, Dale wrote:
I have a update. Check this out:
hey, don't get my hopes up like that. Still no improvement on my box.
But then, I am seeing nearly 6500 FPS :D
--
Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au
The chief enemy of creativity is good sense
41 matches
Mail list logo
