Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gnome intrusion?

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Kai Krakow wrote: > > >> All this would be easier if upstream package developers would explain >> what the different config options really entail. Most of the times, >> "./configure --help" is not that helpful. > > One could start a wiki

[gentoo-user] Re: gnome intrusion?

Am Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:25:02 + schrieb Jorge Almeida : > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Neil Bothwick > wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:23:02 +, Jorge Almeida wrote: > > > >> > > What you're asking is a bit like asking for a complete list

[gentoo-user] Re: gnome intrusion?

Am Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:38:44 + schrieb Andrew Tselischev : > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 09:32:59AM +, Jorge Almeida wrote: > > I noticed some obnoxious-looking processes in my system: > > > > $ ps axf > > (...) > > 367 ?S 0:00 dbus-launch --autolaunch

[gentoo-user] Re: gnome intrusion?

Am Mon, 14 Nov 2016 21:49:42 + schrieb Jorge Almeida : > I don't know what a11y is... accessibility +-+ = 11 chars, a+11+y ;-) It's like i18n, l10n... Developers love those it seems... -- Regards, Kai Replies to list-only preferred.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gnome intrusion?

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Kai Krakow wrote: > Am Mon, 14 Nov 2016 09:32:59 + >> --config-file=/usr/share/defaults/at-spi2/accessibility.conf --nofork >> --print-address 3 >> 417 ?Sl 0:00 /usr/libexec/at-spi2-registryd > > Try uninstalling a a11y

[gentoo-user] Re: gnome intrusion?

Am Mon, 14 Nov 2016 09:32:59 + schrieb Jorge Almeida : > I noticed some obnoxious-looking processes in my system: > > $ ps axf > (...) > 367 ?S 0:00 dbus-launch --autolaunch > 899f609d1c39e4d202c179a7580e4b49 --binary-syntax --close-stderr > 368 ?