[gentoo-user] Re: llvm clang ABI confusion

2016-02-10 Thread James
James tampabay.rr.com> writes: > > 1. Relax your stance and accept that some software out there that you > > might want is 32 bits > > 2. Refuse to have 32 bits, so give up on llvm and clang. Find something > > else and move on. > > You must pick one of those two. There is no magic hidden

[gentoo-user] Re: llvm clang ABI confusion

2016-02-10 Thread James
Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes: > 1. Relax your stance and accept that some software out there that you > might want is 32 bits > 2. Refuse to have 32 bits, so give up on llvm and clang. Find something > else and move on. > You must pick one of those two. There is no magic hidden solution

[gentoo-user] Re: llvm clang ABI confusion

2016-02-10 Thread James
Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes: > > I still want to ensure I have no 32 bit packages on this system. > Why? What is special about 32 bit libraries? They are dependencies like > any other, if a package needs them why try to stop portage installing > them? Experimentation. I trying to