Fernando Rodriguez outlook.com> writes:
> > albeit in it's infancy. Naturally it's going to take a while to
> > become mainstream useful; but that more like a year or 2, at most.
>
> The value I see on that technology for desktop computing is that we get the
> GPUs for what they're made
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:20 AM, james wrote:
> I think most folks when purchasing a workstation include a graphics
> card on the list of items to include. So my suggestions where geared
> towards informing folks about some of the new features of gcc that
> may intice
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:20:39 + (UTC) james wrote:
> Fernando Rodriguez outlook.com> writes:
>
> > > albeit in it's infancy. Naturally it's going to take a while to
> > > become mainstream useful; but that more like a year or 2, at most.
> >
> > The value I see
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 21:12:37 + (UTC) james wrote:
> Gevisz gmail.com> writes:
>
> > on-board video card. Just to avoid extra heating and aircraft noise
> > produced by R4770.
>
> Fanless video cards are wonderful. I have had many over the years but this
> one is
Gevisz gmail.com> writes:
> on-board video card. Just to avoid extra heating and aircraft noise
> produced by R4770.
Fanless video cards are wonderful. I have had many over the years but this
one is still my (silent) favorite::
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
On Wednesday, September 09, 2015 9:52:55 PM james wrote:
> Jeremi Piotrowski gmail.com> writes:
>
> > No, and yes. Compilation is not affected in any way and runtime
> > performance can only be improved _if_ this stuff is explicitly used within
> > the code.
>
> Yes this is all new and a work
Jeremi Piotrowski gmail.com> writes:
> > AFAI understand gcc-5 should compile faster?
> > And generate faster code in some cases?
> No, and yes. Compilation is not affected in any way and runtime
> performance can only be improved _if_ this stuff is explicitly used within
> the code.
On 09.09.2015 21:35, Jeremi Piotrowski wrote:
> tldr: don't buy a dedicated gpu just because you read something on a
> mailing list ;)
yep :-)
On 09.09.2015 20:01, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Digging up that thread now somewhere ...
Ah, I even participated then ;-)
AFAI understand gcc-5 should compile faster?
And generate faster code in some cases?
looking at genlop -t I can't really spot speedups in the last months.
With gcc-5.2.0
Am 2015-09-09 um 04:20 schrieb James:
I have posted several links on the subject previously [1]; here's one [2].
[..]
If you can afford it, get a mobo that supports DDR-4.
Right now the AMD-HBM Fury-X is the video card with the
highest bandwidth for a memory buss on a video card, if
you can
On Wednesday 09 Sep 2015 19:01:24 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 2015-09-09 um 04:20 schrieb James:
> > I have posted several links on the subject previously [1]; here's one
> > [2].
>
> [..]
>
> > If you can afford it, get a mobo that supports DDR-4.
> > Right now the AMD-HBM Fury-X is the
On Wed, 9 Sep 2015, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> On 09.09.2015 20:01, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> > Digging up that thread now somewhere ...
>
> Ah, I even participated then ;-)
>
> AFAI understand gcc-5 should compile faster?
> And generate faster code in some cases?
No, and yes. Compilation
On 09/09/2015 20:01, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 2015-09-09 um 04:20 schrieb James:
>
>> I have posted several links on the subject previously [1]; here's one
>> [2].
>
> [..]
>
>> If you can afford it, get a mobo that supports DDR-4.
>> Right now the AMD-HBM Fury-X is the video card with
Jeremi Piotrowski gmail.com> writes:
> No, and yes. Compilation is not affected in any way and runtime
> performance can only be improved _if_ this stuff is explicitly used within
> the code.
Yes this is all new and a work in progress. I do not think it will be
gcc-6 that makes the difference
Am 2015-09-08 um 17:32 schrieb James:
> So I'm not really pushing any sort of hardware. But things are changing
> with gcc-5.x
could you detail this a bit?
Does it need less RAM or what?
I also consider getting a new system later this year, maybe a
core-i7-6xxx or so ...
2015-09-08 12:51 GMT-03:00 Stefan G. Weichinger :
> Am 2015-09-08 um 17:32 schrieb James:
>
> > So I'm not really pushing any sort of hardware. But things are changing
> > with gcc-5.x
>
> could you detail this a bit?
> Does it need less RAM or what?
>
> I also consider getting a
Stefan G. Weichinger xunil.at> writes:
> > So I'm not really pushing any sort of hardware. But things are changing
> > with gcc-5.x
I have posted several links on the subject previously [1]; here's one [2].
Basically several projects and the codes got pulled into
GCC-5, where the GPU
Philip Webb ca.inter.net> writes:
> Since my AMD machines have been more successful than the Intels,
> I intend to use an AMD CPU again & anyway they seem to be
> cheaper & faster. Gigabyte mobos are cheaper & it has been good in ANB4.
I built some FX-8350 system on Gigabyte mobo (990-FXA)
18 matches
Mail list logo