-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 1/20/2012 02:57 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 01:22:50PM -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
On 1/19/2012 11:32 AM, Chris Walters wrote:
This is a test. Enigmail has been trying to use a revoked and expired key
to
sign my
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thursday, January 19, 2012, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com
mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't have mine set up to sign them all. I did a couple to see if it
worked or not. Whenever I sign a message, it asks for the password. It
is quite a long password and I don't
On 2012-01-19 5:42 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no known way to decrypt a mail like that without the single
private key needed (this works exactly like https traffic to your
bank). I feel very confident saying no known way as cracking that
puzzle has been the Holy
On 1/19/2012 01:44 AM, v...@ukr.net wrote:
Hello!
From what I know for sure, many people in different countries
supported the opposition to these bills because they understand that
this is not just a US problem. If it happens there, it can easily be
repeated anywhere. And the point of
On 1/19/2012 01:27 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Humanity starts things and continues things. This is good.
Governments stop things. This is only sometimes good.
Agreed.
Chris
---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 120118-1, 01/18/2012
Tested on: 1/19/2012 5:30:31
On Thursday 19 Jan 2012 08:27:20 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Humanity starts things and continues things. This is good.
Governments stop things. This is only sometimes good
im fairly certain it was humanity that started this whole goverment thing.
--
- Yohan Pereira
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:11:24 +0530
Yohan Pereira yohan.pere...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 19 Jan 2012 08:27:20 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Humanity starts things and continues things. This is good.
Governments stop things. This is only sometimes good
im fairly certain it was humanity that
On 1/19/2012 05:41 AM, Yohan Pereira wrote:
im fairly certain it was humanity that started this whole goverment thing.
True. Once started, though, governments tend to evolve on their own - I am
pretty certain that most government officials are from another planet.
Besides, isn't it up to
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 06:03:29 -0500
Chris Walters cjw20...@comcast.net wrote:
On 1/19/2012 05:41 AM, Yohan Pereira wrote:
im fairly certain it was humanity that started this whole goverment
thing.
True. Once started, though, governments tend to evolve on their own
- I am pretty certain
On 1/19/2012 06:58 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
If by fix you mean wage war on and shoot, then yes :-)
It seems like that is the only method humanity uses to fix it's
governments that go toxic - witness the last year's events in that part
of the world that has lots of desert
By fix I mean
On 1/19/2012 05:29 AM, Chris Walters wrote:
On 1/19/2012 01:44 AM, v...@ukr.net wrote:
Hello!
From what I know for sure, many people in different countries
supported the opposition to these bills because they understand that
this is not just a US problem. If it happens there, it can
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53:07AM -0600, Dale wrote:
While on this subject, sort of. Who on here as their email set up to
encrypt and decrypt emails? I want to test some things OFF LIST.
Well, if you had signed your mail, then I could write you encrypted. :)
--
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
I
On 1/19/2012 11:57 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53:07AM -0600, Dale wrote:
While on this subject, sort of. Who on here as their email set up to
encrypt and decrypt emails? I want to test some things OFF LIST.
Well, if you had signed your mail, then I could
On 1/19/2012 11:32 AM, Chris Walters wrote:
On 1/19/2012 11:57 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53:07AM -0600, Dale wrote:
While on this subject, sort of. Who on here as their email set up to
encrypt and decrypt emails? I want to test some things OFF LIST.
Well, if
Chris Walters wrote:
On 1/19/2012 11:57 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53:07AM -0600, Dale wrote:
While on this subject, sort of. Who on here as their email set up to
encrypt and decrypt emails? I want to test some things OFF LIST.
Well, if you had signed your
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Chris Walters wrote:
On 1/19/2012 11:57 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53:07AM -0600, Dale wrote:
While on this subject, sort of. Who on here as their email set up to
encrypt and decrypt emails? I
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:04:11 -0600
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Chris Walters wrote:
On 1/19/2012 11:57 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53:07AM -0600, Dale wrote:
While on this subject, sort of. Who on here as their email set
up to encrypt and decrypt
On 1/19/2012 05:04 PM, Dale wrote:
Chris Walters wrote:
This is a test. Enigmail has been trying to use a revoked and expired key to
sign my messages, lately.
Chris
I have a question now. I got a message from Paul Hartman and replied to
it, off list, and it was encrypted and I hope
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Chris Walters wrote:
This is a test. Enigmail has been trying to use a revoked and expired
key to
sign my messages, lately.
Chris
I have a question now. I got a message from Paul Hartman and replied to
it, off list,
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:42:16 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
There's no known way to decrypt a mail like that without the single
private key needed (this works exactly like https traffic to your
bank). I feel very confident saying no known way as cracking that
puzzle has been the Holy Grail of
Paul Hartman wrote:
There are basically 2 things PGP/GPG normally does for emails: signing
and encrypting. They are not mutually exclusive.
Signing (like you see on a lot of messages on this list, for example)
is about the person who SENT the message. It lets you verify that the
person
On Thursday 19 Jan 2012 22:44:12 Chris Walters wrote:
On 1/19/2012 05:04 PM, Dale wrote:
I have a question now. I got a message from Paul Hartman and replied to
it, off list, and it was encrypted and I hope my reply was too. My
question is this. How do you make a email that only the
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:04:11 -0600 Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com
wrote:
Chris Walters wrote:
On 1/19/2012 11:57 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53:07AM -0600, Dale wrote:
While on this subject, sort of. Who on here as their email
set up to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Walters wrote:
On 1/19/2012 05:04 PM, Dale wrote:
Chris Walters wrote:
This is a test. Enigmail has been trying to use a revoked and
expired key to sign my messages, lately.
Chris
I have a question now. I got a message from
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mud is clearing up a bit.
Excellent! Lookin good!
Dale
:-) :-)
- --
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood
or how you interpreted my
Matthew Finkel wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com
mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Mud is clearing up a bit.
Excellent! Lookin good!
Well, I get this on top of your message:
Error - No valid armored OpenPGP data block found
What's wrong with
On Thursday 19 Jan 2012 23:20:44 Dale wrote:
Chris Walters wrote:
I'm starting to see this now. When I sign a message, it is public but
people are assured that it came from me. Sort of like having a check
with a picture ID that matches. :/
Better than that.
Readers (all that have access
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Matthew Finkel wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com
mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Mud is clearing up a bit.
Excellent! Lookin good!
Well, I get this on top of your message:
Mick wrote:
On Thursday 19 Jan 2012 23:20:44 Dale wrote:
Chris Walters wrote:
I'm starting to see this now. When I sign a message, it is public but
people are assured that it came from me. Sort of like having a check
with a picture ID that matches. :/
Better than that.
Readers (all
On Thursday, January 19, 2012, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't have mine set up to sign them all. I did a couple to see if it
worked or not. Whenever I sign a message, it asks for the password. It
is quite a long password and I don't want to type it in every time I
send something.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 01:22:50PM -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
On 1/19/2012 11:32 AM, Chris Walters wrote:
On 1/19/2012 11:57 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53:07AM -0600, Dale wrote:
While on this subject, sort of. Who on here as their email set up to
encrypt
I am truly surprised that Gentoo, and more GNU/Linux and *BSD sites did not
join in the 'blackout'. The only one I saw that did was opensuse.org .
These laws, as I understand them, and I am no lawyer, could be used against
open source kernels, operating system tools, and other open source
Chris Walters wrote:
I am truly surprised that Gentoo, and more GNU/Linux and *BSD sites did not
join in the 'blackout'. The only one I saw that did was opensuse.org .
These laws, as I understand them, and I am no lawyer, could be used against
open source kernels, operating system tools, and
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 07:21:12PM -0600, Dale wrote:
I am truly surprised that Gentoo, and more GNU/Linux and *BSD sites did not
join in the 'blackout'. The only one I saw that did was opensuse.org .
[…]
I bypassed the wiki black out. I used adblock to disable the part that
blacks
Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 07:21:12PM -0600, Dale wrote:
I am truly surprised that Gentoo, and more GNU/Linux and *BSD sites did not
join in the 'blackout'. The only one I saw that did was opensuse.org .
[…]
I bypassed the wiki black out. I used adblock to disable the
On 1/18/2012 08:21 PM, Dale wrote:
I don't like the law and honestly I don't like 99% of the laws they even think
about much less pass. Trust me, I let my Rep know several times that I oppose
both of them and even got a phone call today from one of them. I also
pointed
out that no law we
El 19/01/12 00:55, Chris Walters escribió:
I am truly surprised that Gentoo, and more GNU/Linux and *BSD sites did not
join in the 'blackout'. The only one I saw that did was opensuse.org .
Some of us did support the movement on our ways, for example the Gentoo
Hardened team didn't twit the
Chris Walters wrote:
On 1/18/2012 08:21 PM, Dale wrote:
I don't like the law and honestly I don't like 99% of the laws they even think
about much less pass. Trust me, I let my Rep know several times that I oppose
both of them and even got a phone call today from one of them. I also pointed
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 20:08:42 -0600
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 07:21:12PM -0600, Dale wrote:
I am truly surprised that Gentoo, and more GNU/Linux and *BSD
sites did not join in the 'blackout'. The only one I saw that
did was
Hello!
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:21:12 -0600
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I also pointed out that no law we pass here affects the
people overseas. Last I heard, when you got a few miles off shore,
our laws pretty much end. The people in other countries are going to
hack and steal
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 20:08:42 -0600
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's to hoping Governments learn they can't regulate thought or
stupidity.
Humanity starts things and continues things. This is good.
Governments stop things. This is only sometimes good.
41 matches
Mail list logo